marked as WIP because I want to make sure things don't fail first before it's ready for review
... downside: we have to tell Flake which config file to use. Upside: we have two separate Flake8 runs with two separate configuration files to dictate what we ignore and what directory is explicitly being tested.
for future reference, this is the websocket payload:
{"commit_status"=>{"status"=>"success", "ci_url"=>"https://travis-ci.org/Charcoal-SE/SmokeDetector/builds/193142666", "commit_sha"=>"5f2a2455bc88f498bee5106f14a0b60fc60c9ca9", "commit_message"=>"Auto blacklist of this\\.is\\.a\\.test\\.website\\.com by Undo --autopull"}} (via streamed from smokedetector_messages)
@Undo do you mind if I put the fact I'm listed as a developer in the Charcoal/SmokeDetector project on my resume? Trying to keep it updated with all the skills and such I have and contributions I've made :P
1. [:34864523] <processed without return value> 2. [:34864518] <skipped> 3. [:34864513] Blacklisted user - blacklisted for http://stackoverflow.com/a/41574604 (https://m.erwaysoftware.com/posts/by-url?url=//stackoverflow.com/a/41574604) by http:metasmoke
Oh, by the way: this situation reminds me that I do want to increase my threshold on Ask Patents. However, I don't see the Sites anymore, so I can neither change them nor create a new condition.
@ArtOfCode Considering giving someone other than me SSH access to metasmoke's server. It's probably getting a dedicated server sometime in the near future anyway, and I'm leaving for a while and autoflagging is a thing now.
Main issue is your protection; having access to those tokens could open one up to nastiness. Current userbase is probably trusting.
@Undo even if I wasn't biased I'd tend to agree. Might wanna do a User.all.pluck(:email) and send a BCC notification around about it, though, even if they are trusting.
Life Pro Tip #22837a: Order useful-but-inconsequential items from people who take a while to deliver. Then, when it arrives two weeks later, you get a nice surprise and a useful new thing.
@Undo if you're considering giving me MS server access, probably a smart move to move everything else off it first. Which you've probably thought of already, but doesn't harm saying again.
