by using one thread per network-based check, the total time for all CI items decreased from 12s to 11s on CircleCI (-0.9s), while increased from 22s to 23s on Travis CI (+0.5s)
In real cases, though, since posts contain a lot more links than test cases, I think we can expect a greater decrease in time spent on checking a specific post
I disabled autoflagging because there were enough other people and I felt it was more helpful to manually flag after the autoflags to help delete faster
So... I think I had around 2k autoflags when I disabled them?
> Potentially bad keyword in body, potentially bad keyword in title, potentially bad keyword in username ---------- Title - Position 0-13: iherdsman.com Username - Position 0-13: iherdsman.com Body - Position 0-13: iherdsman.com
In this answer on the merits of the -100 reputation penalty for spamming, Journeyman Geek ♦ comments,
Its worth remembering there's two (and half) types of spammers.
There's the big commercial operations....These are beyond redemption. We nuke em from orbit....100 rep penalty? Foo.
...
Matched by the following regexes: ^.{1,7}(?:dl?san|(?:dl|ld)l?son)$ on line 100 of blacklisted_usernames.txt ^\w{1,}(?:dl?san|(?:dl|ld)l?son)(?<!donaldson)$ on line 101 of blacklisted_usernames.txt
if you are a company with an open position, SO Jobs might suit you better... ;)
well, if by "job requests" you mean asking for help, well, format your question well, make sure you're not being a help vampire and that your question is on-topic, and your efforts will be rewarded :P
I mean for applicants who can't find one, who for some reason end up asking "I'm looking for a job" and posts a really off-topic post with an entire resume in it or something like that (idk, people are weird at times xd)
I have a mod question. How does a mod clear rude flags on a post? Do they need to undelete the post for that? Is the post undeletable by 20K-ers if the post can be left deleted ?
Suspicious of the post by "CAM" because it mentions ULTRAREV which received bad reviews at TrustPilot. The spam (if it is spam) is in a code block, see MS.
@rene Spam flags get diamond deleted (by community) which nobody can overturn but another diamond. Also, we have a menu option to just directly clear spam/abusive flags.
@CalvT @IsaacMoses @EriktheOutgolfer @ArtOfCode The original version of that username blacklist was added by @Mithrandir. I contributed some changes to reduce FP. The ^.{1,7}(?:dl?san|(?:dl|ld)l?son)$ version (was on line 100) should have been removed on 2018-09-07, but it appears the !!/unblacklist command failed. That version was running 153 TP and 5 FP.
The version that was on line 101 was running 153 TP and 3 TP.
I've tightened it up a bit more to get 153 TP and 0 FP. It's still a moderately loose regex and will probably encounter additional FP, which we should then exclude. The most recent TP was a day ago, so the spammer is still using the pattern.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Blacklisted website in body, body starts with title and ends in url, link at end of body, no whitespace in title, pattern-matching website in body, +1 more (457): Supplementsforfitness by fitnesspro87 on askubuntu.com
In this answer on the merits of the -100 reputation penalty for spamming, Journeyman Geek ♦ comments,
Its worth remembering there's two (and half) types of spammers.
There's the big commercial operations....These are beyond redemption. We nuke em from orbit....100 rep penalty? Foo.
...
