Yes, it is. With it can we approach the subject matter? I really am interested in study that for music trainers, I am one and we are very charged with the sound quality in service. — Thiago Felipe Navarro6 mins ago
Reminds me a little of our comment spammer
@SmokeDetector n
@SmokeDetector Answer is by the OP, probably has misunderstood the point of the answer field
I don't really see much reason to keep that one. All of the spam posts included a now blacklisted domain. It doesn't look like the watch for the username is providing much benefit. If it was still ongoing, it would be useful to find other patterns to get to 3 reasons, but with the username we're only at two reasons and there are no TP posts where this watch is the only detection reason.
@tripleee I unwatched the above username pattern. It didn't appear to be doing us much good at this time (see above). If that spammer starts up again, it might be useful to temporarily push up to 3 reasons (with something else added too), but for now it was almost all FP.
@Rob It would only match usernames, due to being that short and bounded by ^ and $.
@Rob Yes, but how many are only kelvin, not Kelvin (or something with more letters)? I see only 1 on Meta. I agree that it's a watch that was broad, which was a major factor in removing it. However, note that in the 2 months which it was in the watchlist, it detected only 5 FP posts (1 detected twice for 6 FP) and 1 NAA, so it really wasn't all that broad. If it was helping us detect otherwise undetected spam, then it would have been worth keeping, but it really wasn't benefiting us.
@TetsuyaYamamoto That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@TetsuyaYamamoto That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
Interesting question: Most Common Usernames: Alex 9572, John 7902, Chris 7234, David 6727, and surprisingly Mike 6163 is 5th place, but I always thought it was the most common. The name kelvin is 82 hits. Only 1 Makyen. With 2372 people named Rob.
@tripleee Yeah, it really wasn't that bad. It just got noticed. If it was providing some benefit (e.g. detecting some TP which were not otherwise caught, contributing to getting to 3 detections in order to autoflag some TP, etc.) then that small number of FP would definitely be worth keeping.
@EriktheOutgolfer FYI: Job offers being spam depends on the site. In a relatively brief search, I didn't find a Meta.SE post specific to stating if they are spam on the network in general. They definitely are considered spam on SO. However, some sites, at least Blender, consider them to be just off-topic and not spam. On that site, spam flags on job offers will be declined.
@TetsuyaYamamoto That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
@SmokeDetector This is undisclosed affiliation, based on the username matching the name of the blog author (full name available in comments on the blog) and the blog being created today.
@NisseEngström Thanks for the heads-up. I may have tried going to the site linked in that post, but I always keep JavaScript disabled when doing so and nothing shows on that site without JavaScript.
@SmokeDetector seems similar to past posts containing that domain, and it doesn't really answer the question. Looks like the spammer tried to post a spam seed and got more than they bargained for :)
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url-only title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, body starts with title and ends in url, link at end of body, +5 more (794): supplementeffects.com/ultrastrenx/ by hcouomjm on askubuntu.com
@TetsuyaYamamoto That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url-only title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, +4 more (790): pilpedia.com/male-liberator/ by bmujhha on askubuntu.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, body starts with title and ends in url, link at end of body, +5 more (791): supplementeffects.com/ultrastrenx/ by marilena on drupal.SE
Title - supplementeffects.com NS suspicious dns1.namecheaphosting.com.,dns2.namecheaphosting.com. Title - Position 8-29: supplementeffects.com Title - Position 8-29: supplementeffects.com Title - Position 0-29: https://supplementeffects.com Body - Link at end: https://supplementeffects.com/ultrastrenx/ Body - supplementeffects.com NS suspicious dns1.namecheaphosting.com.,dns2.namecheaphosting.com. Post - Body contains title and ends in URL: https://supplementeffects.com/ultrastrenx/ Body - Positions 197-218, 929-950, 999-1020: supplementeffects.com
@SmokeDetector this wasn't autoflagged, what's up with that?
maybe something with the MS connection again, I see incomplete AIM decorations (no weight, for example)
I see this in the JavaScript console, no idea whether this is a local problem:
Active resource loading counts reached a per-frame limit while the tab was in background. Network requests will be delayed until a previous loading finishes, or the tab is brought to the foreground. See chromestatus.com/feature/5527160148197376 for more details
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url in title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, +5 more (691): newsletterforhealth.com/trialix/ by dawugu on wordpress.SE
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url in title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, +7 more (791): 360nutra.org/keto-slim-7/ by baqedew on augur.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, body starts with title and ends in url, pattern-matching product name in body, pattern-matching website in body, +2 more (491): Keto Trim Canada by NancyWalker on wordpress.SE
@Ferrybig the Wunderbaum bar (or whatever it's called) above the keyboard where you'd expect function keys sort of offers an esc key some of the time, but I really don't trust that
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url-only title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, +2 more (690): pilpedia.com/proflexoral/ by budixahiz on askubuntu.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Blacklisted website in body, body starts with title and ends in url, link at end of body, potentially bad ns for domain in body, potentially bad keyword in body (298): Its fixings are from plants and herbs by modfhskd on superuser.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in answer, bad keyword in link text in answer, potentially bad keyword in answer, potentially problematic ns configuration in answer (168): Forensics on a single CD-Rom Disc by venets news on superuser.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword with email in body, blacklisted website in body, body starts with title and ends in url, potentially bad keyword in body, +1 more (360): Webtrackker Technology Reviews by aashutosh on mathoverflow.net
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, pattern-matching website in body, pattern-matching website in title, +1 more (493): topdiethub.com/ludicene-cream/ by user132252 on graphicdesign.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, pattern-matching website in body, potentially bad keyword in body, potentially bad keyword in title (196): IntenseX pills ingredients by nomylony on drupal.SE
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Pattern-matching website in answer and Pattern-matching website in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
@angussidney I'm more than 50% suspicious, because: the question is a couple of years old, Michiel registered today, there's nothing supporting that particular site being helpful to the OP - BUT, it's fixable by a comment and an edit removing the objectionable content leaving the rest as an upvotable answer. If it was irrelevant and had the link I'd say 100%.
The problem being is you flag spam, a 20+K edits it, then your flag is declined (or worse, not helpful) then you have to custom Mod flag and appeal the outcome. Probably best to wait 10 minutes.
Mr. Helpful usually shows up quickly to make the helpful edit that saves the answer, afterwards you can flag if it remains spam. I really wish that flags were always judged on the version of the post that was flagged but unfortunately you flag now, maybe someone (even the OP, within the grace period, really screwing you) and then some time later your flag is reviewed on the current version of the post, usually they check out the edits but sometimes not. --- It's the benefit of the doubt
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, blacklisted website in body, body starts with title and ends in url, link at end of body, pattern-matching product name in body, +2 more (494): Finally, the art of cooking burns by Olga RBuhl on drupal.SE
It's my first feedback on chat.SO domain. The message is generated by MS, and MS doesn't know which room the feedback is given in, so the notification just goes here.
