@ArtOfCode ah ok, is there any way for me to view this "aggregate accuracy" in metasmoke? Or do I just have to improve some conditions and hope it gets me over the line?
@River It's not in the UI, but there is a data query for it - if you enable your conditions and make some changes, you can run that query to see what the overall accuracy is.
@River To forestall some potential confusion: at least the last time I checked, there is a significant discrepancy between the numbers that the " Overall flag condition accuracy" query @ArtOfCode linked provides and the numbers which are shown on the "edit flag conditions" page. This is a result of the numbers being displayed between the two pages treating posts with conflicting feedback differently and the Overall flag condition accuracy showing "FP count" for what is really FP || NAA count.
@River In addition, the TP/FP counts can appear to not add up correctly, as a result of conflicting feedback. At the accuracy levels which are required, there can be significant numbers of posts which are any combination of TP, FP and NAA (i.e. a post may be counted as both TP and FP; new posts may be counted as neither until they receive feedback of at least one of the primary three types).
@ArtOfCode Thanks. I'm glad to hear the numbers are fixed.
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Pattern-matching email in answer and Pattern-matching email in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
@Makyen Added supernaturalspell@yahoo\.com to watchlist