d not spawn process for application /var/railsapps/metasmoke/current: An error occurred while starting up the preloader.
Error ID: 2dcf236f
Error details saved to: /tmp/passenger-error-NzYbXE.html
Message from application: undefined method `generate_direct_associations' for #<Class:0x000000000725fce0>
Did you mean? generate_association_writer (NoMethodError)
/var/railsapps/metasmoke/shared/bundle/ruby/2.5.0/gems/activerecord-5.2.0/lib/active_record/dynamic_matchers.rb:22:in `method_missing'
The reason to use a virtualenv is mostly if you use your server/instance/internet gerbil to run more than one python application that relies on the same library but different versions of the library. As a contrived example, if Smokey needs tld 0.9.0 but your other application needs 0.6.0 and can't be upgraded, you'd have a conflict using the system installed tld because they are different versions. Virtual environments allow each application to set up it's own python environment
@ArtOfCode Why use sudo -H? Having read about it looks like we want to use the root's home environmental variable instead of whatever user is running that command?
@ArtOfCode Is this consistent with how I've installed the rest with the docs? For example, when I followed the instructions the first time I did sudo pip3 install -r requirements.txt --upgrade. I literally have no idea the difference between these which is why I'm asking :)
not so much that as just the pip3 shortcut isn't always there
if you run pip, that could be python 2 or 3; pip3 will always be python 3 but it isn't always available; python3 -m pip is always python 3 and always available as long as pip is installed
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, pattern-matching website in body, potentially bad ns for domain in body, +1 more (493): Best ever for Skin Care Luxuriance Cream by Paltacozz on graphicdesign.SE
@SmokeDetector This looks like it might be just NAA from a confused user. However, it feels more like spam to me. There's really no good reason for the person to be "working now with" the data in a paid-for essay that was posted 2 years ago. In addition, the user has been deleted, which implies that a moderator may have found more information to justify that it's spam.
@EriktheOutgolfer That pattern looks like it's already caught by Pattern-matching email in answer, Potentially bad keyword in body, Potentially bad keyword in answer, and Pattern-matching email in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
@EriktheOutgolfer That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@ArtOfCode sure, I meant, if something like this becomes too much of an obstacle for other discussions, we should be able to graveyard it (term borrowed from SOCVR)
