Your model suggests that on a 2d10 we have only a 5% chance of rolling 40 or below, but we have a 40% chance of rolling a 39 or below. How can that possibly be the case in reality? If I have a 40% chance of rolling a 39 or below, I can suggest I should have at least that 40% chance of rolling 40 or below, because I can also just roll 39 or below to get 40 or below. How do you account for this? — doppelgreener1 min ago
I know something's terribly wrong with the theory in that answer, but I just realised a feature I can point out that demonstrates there's an enormous problem.
@TheStumps You appear to have missed the point of my inquiry. When I have to roll X or below, I at least have a chance of rolling X-1 or below, because anything X-1 or below is rolling X or below. Your model presents multiple values that violate this. That is a problem. Either this reasoning is incorrect or your model is. — doppelgreener4 mins ago
