« first day (1419 days earlier)      last day (3496 days later) » 

12:04 AM
Well? Wie lang soll ich hier warten?
0
Q: How far out does "in-law" go?

Memor-Xthe sister to a husband becomes the wife's sister-in-law. if the sister in-law was to marry a woman would she also become the wife's sister-in-law? if so can you keep calling the family of your in-law's spouse in-laws aswell Example Chrono [M] marries Amy [F] Chrono's sister Fate marries Nanoh...

Close-worthy, to say the least. Not our job to answer questions about familial relationships.
 
 
1 hour later…
1:10 AM
@Robusto Hmm but it could depend on the language.
 
1:39 AM
@Cerberus That's not very entertaining.
 
You want entertainment? Try MNF.
 
1:59 AM
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 My New Fuzzball?
Many Nappy 'Fro's?
Must Not Frown?
 
@Mitch Yes. It's the whore's pores.
We are bending the Patriots over.
 
`Oh..uh.. Monday Night... Frogmarching?
Monday Never Forgets?
Monday Not ... struggles ... Friday?
Yes, I get it the Pats are doing terribly.
But... do prostitutes... do they really have such good skin?
 
Maybe. They have a lot of sex.
 
Yeah ... I heard about that... from Cosmo.
 
@Robusto Dogs are no fun. Get a cat.
> Questo è un piatto che tutti lo sanno fare
@tchrist I think this repeated object is common to Italian and Spanish, but not French?
@tchrist I also found out that both Italian and Portuguese have a way to say "a large x", such as spaghettoni v. spaghetti (and spaghettini).
I forgot how it works in Portuguese, but they, too, have some nasal suffix to do it.
I don't think Latin or French has such a thing.
 
2:19 AM
Belichick can't believe it.
 
Hiya!
A map or chart of many, many kind of pasta and their names: slate.com/articles/life/map_of_the_week/2013/08/…
 
@Cerberus houdoe!
I think.
@Cerberus nice!
 
Howdy!
I think that is spelled correctly!
 
Yes!
Son of a bitch!
The Pats scored.
 
2:38 AM
Oh, too bad! I think.
 
2:57 AM
When the wall comes crumbling, crumbling down.... @cornbreadninja
 
-_____-
Suck it, Tom Brady!
Yes, yes, I'm here.
 
Sack the Sucker!!!
 
We bitch slapped it out of his hand.
 
Get his skull for skullpatrol
:D
 
 
3 hours later…
6:09 AM
Nice job by your chiefs of running up the score on Beli-CHEATER @Cornbreadninja
 
 
2 hours later…
7:44 AM
@MattЭллен I changed my mind. I will see my psychologist and psychiatrist one last time and see what they have to say.
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 No wonder my skin is so good. I do it with myself all the time.
 
8:02 AM
@WillHunting good, good. I hope you find them helpful
 
Anonymous
8:47 AM
@Cerberus Tortelloni, tortellini! Oh, I want tortelloni!
 
would conchigle suit?
then you could stuff it yourself!
 
9:40 AM
Wow, I got 5 stars for such a stupid thing.
 
@WillHunting which thing?
 
@RutvikSutaria See the star wall to the right.
 
hey
One was mine, lol
 
People star the weirdest things
 
10:12 AM
It seems that the Oxford Dictionary of English is the biggest single volume English dictionary from Oxford.
It also seems that its American counterpart is the New Oxford American Dictionary.
I always get confused by the different dictionaries they produce.
 
11:11 AM
@snailboat For example!
@WillHunting They do that just to make more money. As does Cambridge.
 
12:03 PM
@Cerberus Reminds of how in French (and in northern Italian) a participle with avoir agrees with a preceding direct object if any. Spanish does repeat a direct object as a clitic if it comes before the verb in non clitic form, so OoV(S), where the o is the clitic matching the O object. Ese libro ya lo he leído = That book I have already read. It makes the book the focus, just as in English, to move it out front. But the DO clitic repetition is obligatory for that case in Spanish.
 
surprising it hasn't gone exctinct ;)
 
Clitics are unlikely to go extinct. :)
 
DODOs on the otherhand...
 
@tchrist Right! That's what I meant.
 
But Spanish did lose the DO agreement with haber+participle that French and some Italian still has. It used to have it. Of course ser/estar+participle agrees with the subject.
 
12:07 PM
I think it's lazy for French to have it only when it follows the object.
@MattЭллен Haha.
 
The obligatory clitic marking is because Spanish allows for SVO SOV VO OV OVS VS ordering. You have to be able to know which is S and which is O.
 
I love dodos. Especially with thyme and lemon.
But I have to run.
Bye gents!
 
It’s also why there is an accusative marker on persons used as direct objects: you use the particle a in front of their name.
No more "Man bites dog" stories.
 
I guess that would make you quite small
 
12:10 PM
El perro mordió al hombre.
The dog bit the man. The man is the DO.
So it gets an extra a particle.
 
DO = Direct Object?
 
Yes.
But if the man bites the dog, the dog is not a person, so merits no such thing.
El hombre mordió el perro.
Note that this allows for OSV without ambiguity.
Al hombre mordió el perro.
That’s OVS because the a particle reminds you which is the object.
 
interesting
 
And the dog is doing the biting.
As it when you write El perro mordió al hombre.
The a is a DO/accusative marker only when persons are involved.
But it is obligatory when not using clitics.
They call it, and I do not jest, the "a personal".
This does not happen in Portuguese, French, or Italian, only in Spanish.
Catalan I would have to look up.
But it might; it is a Castilian thing.
 
so, could you say "el hombre al hombre mordió"?
 
12:16 PM
Yes but you need a duplicate clitic now.
El hombre al hombre lo mordió.
 
Because you are using SOV instead of SVO, so it needs a still-extra marker.
I do not include clitics as O.
Just real ones.
Varying word order from whatever pattern is normal in Spanish has the same effect as setting something in italic for voice stress/emphasis in English.
So what you wrote is perfectly possible as a way of showing emphasis.
 
like "the man the man bit"?
 
Yes.
Exactly.
 
ok. I think I get it
 
12:21 PM
Although they do it a bit more often than we do.
You know how we do VS inversion with leading adverbials, right?
Only afterwards will I see you.
They tend to do VS inversion in more places, especially preterite intransitives or of motion.
 
is that inversion? seems normal to me
 
Entered the boy.
 
I suppose the will is inverted
 
It is (auxiliary) inversion, and it is indeed normal, even obligatory, in English.
Down the street came the little black buggy.
They do that a lot.
 
OK. seems quite old fashioned in English :)
 
12:24 PM
Well, if you start with the adverbial, you have no choice.
Otherwise you have to put it after the verb.
 
tomorrow comes the boy home?
tomorrow the boy comes home
 
Tomorrow isn’t a great adverbial.
 
Like Monday.
Well, Wednesday now.
 
Happily the boy comes home
 
12:26 PM
Wednesday my boy comes home.
It can serve if pressed into duty, but it is not especially comfortable there.
 
happily comes home the boy
 
Well, Wednesday is not.
Friday might be more pliable.
Happily comes the boy home to his mother.
 
hungrily eats the boy his food
 
Yes, that is very old-fashioned.
Damn it, use a preposition.
 
the boy hungrily eats his food to
I don't appear to be good at this
 
12:28 PM
In that bed sleeps only Matilda and no one else.
 
user116848
Which is correct: "I used to think that you drink a lot of coffee" or "I used to think that you drank a lot of coffee"?
 
user116848
hi!
 
Unknown to the happy couple, just around the next dark corner lurked a cutpurse.
 
user116848
Is it necessary to backshift after "I used to think"?
 
I guess.
Subject–verb inversion in English is a type of inversion where the subject and verb (or chain of verbs, verb catena) switch their canonical order of appearance, so that the subject follows the verb(s), e.g. A lamp stood beside the bed → Beside the bed stood a lamp. Subject-verb inversion is distinct from subject-auxiliary inversion because the verb involved is not an auxiliary verb. == Overview == The following sentences illustrate subject-verb inversion. They compare canonical order with the non-standard inversion order, and they also point to the fact that subject-verb inversion is impossible...
 
user116848
12:31 PM
@tchrist So, you'd say the second version?
 
@Arrowfar Yes.
 
user116848
okay, thanks!
 
But I don’t know it is a rule.
I just think that is what I would say.
I may not be a natural speaker.
 
user116848
Yes, it looks natural too.
 
I used to think it was better to arrive early to avoid being late, but now I don’t care so much and do what I please, when I please.
 
user116848
12:33 PM
good example!
 
I have to run these through my head like that to know what I would say.
 
user116848
I see :)
 
12:47 PM
> subject-verb inversion is impossible if the subject is a weak (non-stressed) definite pronoun:
Really?
Old King Cole was a merry old soul / A merry old soul was he
That wasn't even difficult, much less impossible.
 
unduly embarrassed was I
quickly runs he
eaten the food was
that seems wrong
 
Yoda.
 
I suppose Yoda speak isn't SV inversion, as such
at least that one wasn't
 
What do you expect from Wikipedia?
 
12:55 PM
absoulte perfection!
 
Must c'm't.
 
Swedish vodka. Is that as good as Finnish vodka?
tries to foment international unrest in Scandinavia
it would probably help if anyone from Finland was here, and @JohanLarsson was paying attention ;)
 
1:29 PM
@MattЭллен wrong seems that.
... says I.
... arrr.
 
says you!
 
NO U!
oops. U, NO!
@MattЭллен Vodka is being fomented right now in big vats.
 
1:56 PM
 
How can something have the tinge of becoming? That sounds ridiculous to my ear.
 
2:13 PM
the tinge of becomingness, perhaps?
 
user116848
This seems kinda funny:
 
user116848
> Today I caught you staring at me for like the 10th time. And when I looked at you, you immediately looked away. So...wanna tell me why you're always staring at me?
 
user116848
I found it on some lame website but it looked creepy and funny.
 
it's probably the Slender Man out to get you
 
user116848
:D
 
hey
2:19 PM
 
May 4 '12 at 9:46, by RegDwight ΒВBẞ8
@MattЭллен You know, it's only 34km from Petting to Fucking, but a whopping 656km from Fucking to Wedding.
 
user116848
lol
 
hey
😜
 
 
1 hour later…
3:35 PM
@Cerberus It's poorly done. It's not aligned and it makes no visual sense.
 
v(o_ov)
 
3:54 PM
@MattЭллен I have no praise for you except for your looks. What is this "for"?
in the case of "no" only except is acceptablle, so I learned.
like I have nothing except this.
 
room topic changed to English Language & Usage: We finally gave up our dreams of a live studio audience and started using a laugh track (no tags)
 
4:22 PM
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 I didn't notice when I saw the image. It looked fine to me.
Its purpose is in no way to be an artistic masterpiece.
It's just functional.
 
4:38 PM
 
4:50 PM
@Cerberus pfft. And you're always going on about esthetics :)
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 One always needs to strike a balance.
 
By the way, did you hear? The beta of Nokia's Here Maps has leaked.
Offering first-class offline maps and navigation.
 
Huh. Well, I don't use navigation much. I typically pre-navigate where I'm going to go.
 
Enjoy.
 
5:31 PM
@JohanLarsson such a rich and versatile language!
 
6:04 PM
@MattЭллен Boo!
 
hey
 
@hey Where is the mother? LOL
 
@MattЭллен It depends on where you start and what route you take :D
 
6:20 PM
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 It's nice to have as a back up, you never know. You can download all of Canada for free.
Or the entire world, which is 9GB.
It works quite well for me, so far.
It's just a little bit less fluent than Google Maps on my old, RAM-deprived phone.
 
I used that world map app... forget its name... that you recommended to me two years ago when I was in Austria. It was incredibly annoying to use. Immediately after I got a data sim I stopped using it and went back to gmaps.
 
Oh, that one.
Well, Here is much better.
Much.
It also has free offline voice navigation.
I don't remember what that other one was called either, but I only recommended it as the "best" option that was both free and offline.
This one also has traffic, public transport, etc.
PS even works offline!
For traffic you need data, obviously.
 
@hey That's not true for John Connor from the Terminator movie franchise.
 
How is that a reply to my comment?
 
6:28 PM
"terminators"
 
The only thing the Raiders are terminating is hope in Oakland.
 
let's move to San Antonio
 
Sorry, I don't do red states.
 
they have the most hall of famers
Texas that is
 
I don't choose my environment based on how sports hall of fame membership.
 
6:35 PM
neither do I, but I'm just saying...
...the red necks play good football
 
And the littlenecks are good in a clam roll.
 
6:53 PM
 
@Robusto you better be careful mr shiney may send you an anti-football pictures message like he did to me >8(
 
I do not fear Mrs. Hiny.
 
I respect his request.
 
Request for what?
 
no more raider pictures
 
7:03 PM
Well, you were posting these extremely annoying animated gifs. Incessantly.
 
@terdon if you wanna ban me go ahead, no problem
 
@IceBoy Ban you? Just for posting something that I find boring? That would be presumptuous. I'm just glad you stopped posting but I would never consider banning someone for something that innocuous.
 
Just don't tell me my team is "annoying" pal
 
In fact, he didn't tell you that.
 
@IceBoy No, not your team.
I would be equally annoyed if it were another team. In fact, I'd probably be equally annoyed if it were kittens. Animated gifs are annoying. Whatever they display. If they happen to be about something I find extremely boring, such as sports teams of whatever stripe or color, that just makes it worse.
 
7:09 PM
> Animated gifs are annoying
4
+1
 
some are, it depends on context
some are funny
 
One can be funny and annoying at the same time. Just look at Sarah Palin.
 
Well, she is funny. :)
 
ok ok ... I was just making convo :-)
 
7:13 PM
@IceBoy No problem here, just as long as you know I don't go around suspending people just cause they do something I might find mildly annoying.
 
I believe you.
 
Just between you and me, sometimes I wish I could, but you have never woken the beast in me in such a way :)
 
we all have that beast within us in one form or another my friend :)
we are only human
 
Dunno about that. I mean you are, and I am, but @Matt's a bit too green to pass.
 
:D
 
7:18 PM
Yeah. my beast isn't within me :D
It's right out on display
 
honesty, up front is admirable
 
Hi
 
Hi
How are you?
 
How are you
Fine thanks
 
Fine thanks.
 
7:22 PM
:)))))))
 
Wow suddenly it's cold in here
 
What's up IP?
:D
 
just chatting, how was classes?
 
It's really good
 
that is really good
 
7:24 PM
Okay
 
posted on September 30, 2014 by sgdi

Keep going until March the ninth Two years of me making rhymes Not all of them good That is understood I write ones worth reading sometimes

 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 you should be used to the Arctic icy winds :-)
 
@IceBoy No! it's a myth that Canadians all live in igloos!
 
If you know Persian it's really good and useful for me for translation
 
icic
 
7:27 PM
I didn't find any Iranian people here yet
 
icy icy
 
@IceGirl here... in chat? we have lots. Or, have had.
 
Yes here
But i didn't see them yet
 
yeah, some of them don't come here anymore.
 
:(
 
7:29 PM
I haven't seen any for awhile either.
 
Except me
 
:D))
 
:)
Mr. Shiny i like your picture
 
Thanks. It's me.
 
:)
See you later my friends. Goodbye
 
7:33 PM
later IP
 
7:53 PM
wouldn't wanna bya!
@terdon sports = salt on the wound.
 
Indeed.
 
wakes up from coma after car accident ... So how did the Pats do last night?
 
someone made a lot of money betting the over
 
8:13 PM
@Mitch The Patriots are over. Get used to it.
> Thank you for reviewing 20 close votes today; come back in 3 hours to continue reviewing.
 
 
1 hour later…
9:23 PM
Frustration n. : The feeling of being 4 upvotes short of reaching 10k and having already hit your rep cap for the day.
 
 
2 hours later…
11:45 PM
@terdon May your frustrations always be so minor.
 
Hear hear.
 

« first day (1419 days earlier)      last day (3496 days later) »