@Memor-X Wouldn't that be "Mother and Weird-Gender-Undetermined-Individual-That-In-A-Later-Interview-With-Nasu-Is-Revealed-To-Be-Female-So-Daughter"?
@Yuuki yeh but they still refer to one another as father as son
Blaming the situation on the King for not giving her the crown, she asked if the King hated the "son of Morgan" that much.
Freed of the mask forced upon her, with a face identical to her "father", she said "....Father",
@Yuuki yeh, in the actual Legend Mordred is born from Morgan le Fay, in the Nasuverse, thanks in aprt to Merlin giving Artuia a penis making her a futa (dam Incubus) Morgan...
enchanted Artoria with a spell to obtain sperm from her. She developed it within her own ovary to give birth to Mordred.
From what I've known, E.N.D is the most powerful demon created by Zerif.
Zeref tells Natsu to choose between life and death. He’s practically telling him that he’ll have to decide if he wants to live or if he’s going to kill himself for the others’ sake. Because we all know that when Natsu realiz...
if it feels like the rest of the show is fine, except for maybe one poorly developed plot point, which is to say that the one significant flaw does not have a lot of impact on the overall impression from the series, it doesn't lower the score significantly, maybe just by a quarter point
with some titles I know right away that I can't be completely honest with myself because how great they seem to me, and so I rate them 10/10 to show that this is the kind of stuff I like most, but for others it's not a reliable rating
Im trying to find this anime where this boy had an older brother but he got killed. The older brother played a game and the boy has to play that same game to find out who killed his brother
I've said this before, but I don't trust anyone to rate anything any more accurately than "good" vs "bad". People are pretty terrible at going beyond that for psychological reasons alone, and very few people put in the work to design an objective rating system which avoids these psychological flaws.
though you'd still get deductions for it in an audition.
@Hakase have you actively done so?
Many people believe they grade work objectively without a rubric. Every study that has looked at this (and there are many) show that all of these people fail to do so.
@Hakase If you don't have something written down somewhere and check against it before assigning each grade, I don't think I trust you to say anything more than "good" vs "bad"
Not that there's a problem with that, but just that many people seem to think that they are justified in making more precise claims, and they aren't. Stick to what you're good at. Human psychology is good at determining "good" vs "bad", not "7/10" vs "6/10"
from what I know, people aren't designed to hold the whole systems in their head, but to work with generalized concepts which are pieces of the big systems
@LoganM good vs bad is 2 points, from which you can go further to deciding between "minimum good" and "maximum good" (7…10), then "minimum good" and average good (7…8.5), then somewhere inbetween that until you can't say you're sure about how you feel and leave it at that
I know because I've seen TAs grade work without using rubrics. They're absolutely terrible. And these are people who are Ph.D. candidates in physics, who have a very well-developed number-sense. Everyday people are no better than random number generators.
You'll find all sorts of spurious correlations to random things, like how the weather was when you were watching it or whether your speakers are in need of replacement.
@SeptianPrimadewa I hope not. 100% action would be 100% unwatchable, even if it is Kancolle.
in cases where something is definitely not in order to provide the best experience I not only refrain from rating, but also from watching coz wtf we gotta fix those speakers :p
my approach to playing music is entirely different, it seems
I just try to play from memory since I can't read any notation
Your psychology is not a Boolean variable. Absolutely everything you encounter is relevant to it. You can't ignore that and expect to end up with something objective. You have to do something to explicitly remove those aspects from your rating. If your criteria are as vague as "I noticed some issues", you're going to be rating series lower just because you happened to be more attentive that day, which is silly.
I've looked all over the place for this but I couldn't find anything on the manga just the anime version which was a little annoying after Kuro and Keita got so close. So yeah I was just wondering do they develop a relationship or are they forever just friends?
the total rating is the average of the most obvious strong and weak points
it doesn't get tough if there are no particularly strong points either way − that way it's just a "meh" work, which is around 6 and below "recommendable"
thing is I try to focus on the good parts (coz this is where my interest lies obviously) and so my understanding of ratings is strongest within the 7.5….9.5 range
if it's obviously bad, I just cross it off the list completely
thing is… it has to be good at something first for you to get interested enough to analyze the flaws more precisely
so if everything is perfect, but this one aspect is plain horrible, you'll have a way better idea how it ruins the whole experience and how it could have been avoided, rather than if the show was just okay and there were several not very important flaws
there was this one movie that got a 5/10 from me, which is probably the lowest scoring title with me that I got to analyze so deeply as compared to other low scoring works, because it had several aspects which I had very high hopes for
but the plot was awful and the characters were not doing almost anything, they just died one after another (ok nvm this)
@LoganM I learned to analyze my own emotions well enough to know how each strong point makes me sway my general opinion of the work, from which the total rating gets formed. Apart from that I don't really have any other objective tools to measure my personal opinion :p
so for now the problem of objective ratings remains unsolved
In the first place, I don't understand why anyone even wants ratings more than just "good" vs "bad" for entertainment. I mean, all you really want to know from the person is whether or not you should watch it yourself. Surely, to zeroth order, all you care about is whether the person says it's good or not.
if you want to get more precise than that, it's better to look at how similar your tastes are to the rater's than the rater's very subtle opinions on how a minor character's hair was drawn with the wrong shade of green in one scene and so they subtracted a tenth of a point. Even if you agree with the rater that this was a mistake, it's not likely to be a relevant fact for anyone deciding to watch the series.
In teaching, we have to do this sort of judging, because that's one of the big services we offer. And so we spend countless hours making, testing, debating, and applying very elaborate rubrics to do this (significantly more than it takes to read through the assignments). But if you don't need data at that level of precision and you know it's going to be a hassle to get, why bother?
@Yuuki Yes, people want lots of things. Most of them are stupid.
I can say with absolute certainty that I never care for a single person's opinion on a qualitative score of any work of entertainment more than "good" vs "bad". If they want to give me adjectives, fine. But don't give me numbers. I understand numbers quite well, and your opinions aren't numbers.
It may be useful to aggregate the opinions of a large number of people into a number, though the right way to do this is not at all obvious. But letting people be significantly more precise than just "good" vs. "bad" only lowers the overall usefulness of any sort of aggregate, because there are no standards in place for what constitutes what.
The biggest problem with all these rating systems is that everyone has their own. Game sites have editors who write reviews and give ratings based hell knows what, very often not on what they just wrote right next to it.
So the ratings are intended first and foremost for the people whose rating system vision is similar to the rater's. This means you're likely to get a consistent score from the users whose highest and lowest rated items are the same as yours. You're likely to have the same rating patterns, so you can safely assume that the new show that they liked a lot, you will also like …
@Frosteeze haze (uncountable) Very fine solid particles (smoke, dust) or liquid droplets (moisture) suspended in the air, slightly limiting visibility.
@LoganM in any case, no matter how non-objective rating systems are, you can get a good general idea of how various ratings correlate with your own, based on multiple tests (watch a movie/series, compare your own score with provided) which is basically all you need
Orochimaru suppose to be the one who wants his Sasuke body, But after hearing Sasuke's decision to protect the village, Orochimaru announces that he will also help in the war effort against Madara.
Why did Orochimaru helps him?