« first day (1574 days earlier)      last day (3465 days later) » 

9:00 PM
I think if we manage to run custom jscripts on chrome it will work. I haven't found a way to do it yet.
 
I will ask him when next we meet. This works even in the mobile version of chat?
 
OK, I need to message my former student and ask him to decipher that physics stuff.
Yes, @Mike, I used to do it all the time on the iPad until they broke Safari.
 
"decipher" lol
 
@UserX That's the right term... as written, it doesn't make much sense. It's written for a different audience.
Have you posted it on Meta.SE, @Ted?
 
I need a way to do it on chrome. Where should I head? Android SE or meta?
 
9:01 PM
dunno
 
I'll make a meta post.
 
To clarify, by meta, I don't mean meta.MSE.
 
@UserX MetaPost is a LaTeX graphics package.
 
Why not meta.MSE? I guess you mean the main meta SE but why
 
Because your question has absolutely nothing to do with MSE...
 
9:03 PM
Chrome on a desktop works fine, @UserX :P
No, I never posted it, other than in here, @Mike.
 
And lol André Nicolas hit 300k.
 
Actually, I shouldn't encourage you to post it anywhere, since I don't know what you're asking about.
Keep my name out of this!
 
Huh? @Mike ... I thought you were asking how I got MathJax to load on iOS.
 
@TedShifrin Two conversations.
 
I just deduced that.
 
9:04 PM
@MikeMiller lol no
 
OK, I FB messaged my friend in Britain to ask if he can explain that stuff.
 
I want to run mathjax chat on mobile.
 
And "Have you posted this on Meta.SE" was meant "Have you posted that chat sucks now on meta.SE"
 
oh, @Mike ... I've posted all sorts of stuff ... both at the iOS-app site on Meta, and on Apple's site.
Like here, everyone ignores me (well, not quite everyone).
 
Then that's not a question for Meta.SE or Meta.MSE since it's a script made by someone not affiliate with stackexchange.
I guess you might post it on the android site or something.
 
9:06 PM
Yea, I'll head to do it right now. How does "According to Mike Miller(link to your account), the chat sucks. Help" sound?
 
lol
 
I'd generally prefer against.
 
Right, don't get @robjohn in trouble. :) But perhaps he can dig up my explanation of how I got his stuff onto Safari ages ago.
 
That's a joke :P
 
I know.
OK, I guess I should do something with my life. I'll start reading Sharpe.
 
9:07 PM
Mike I got a personal question. How did you end up first year grad student at UCLA 20 years old?
 
Don't bitch at me when you discover it's hard going, @Mike.
And my copy is in my office, so I can't answer any questions :P
 
@UserX He ate is fudging veggies, bro.
 
That is one book I will not be keeping when I downsize. Although he does get a preface from Chern for it.
 
I use volumizing shampoo, @UserX.
@TedShifrin Why'd you recommend it if you're not a fan...? >:(
 
I warned you it was hard and non-standard, or some such verbiage.
 
9:09 PM
Maybe I should learn all my geometry from the 20-page section in Milnor's Morse theory book. ;)
 
He does Cartan connections and all sorts of examples, so I like that. But, despite the fact that he taught a beginning course out of it, I would never dare do so.
That's not enough geometry, @Mike, but it's well written and to the point. And nothing's wrong with Volumes 2 and 3 of Spivak.
Just pick and choose.
 
Hence winky face.
 
@Pedro: Have you solved your problem? Or do I need to cogitate?
 
Maybe my best bet is to pick stuff up as I go... I just know that geometry of connections is key for the stuff I want to look at, so I wanted to learn it, at least the basics.
 
@UserX: Mike Spivak has a question for you. :)
DIdn't I send you my geometry notes, @Mike? Geez ... :D
 
9:12 PM
@TedShifrin Not yet, I am trying to solve it using an answer.
 
If you have an answer, why aren't you done? :D
 
I am not quick with this things.
I am trying.
 
It's a nontraditional problem (hence my not knowing it instantaneously). But it's built on symmetry in the circle, obviously. I'll ponder in a moment.
 
He's being mean, @Pedro. He's doing it to me too. Don't let him get to you!
 
@TedShifrin Okay. What question?
 
9:14 PM
He wants to know how he can buy a copy of the book you have, @UserX :)
 
What book?
 
No idea. I borrowed it from my school about a year or two ago. I can send him photos of the book or something.
 
Cover your eyes and ears, @Jasper.
 
@JasperLoy it's a military secret
 
@TedShifrin Are these notes precisely what you write on the board, out of curiosity?
 
9:16 PM
@TedShifrin how do I contact Mr Spivak?
 
I just emailed him, @UserX, to ask if he minds my giving you his email? I guess that's silly, since his email is on the Publish or Perish website.
 
I mean his super secret behind 100 proxies email that he uses for these kind of jobs winks @JasperLoy
 
@TedShifrin Yes, very silly.
 
@TedShifrin what do I write? Hey I'm the Greek guy that has that stolen version of your never-translated-in-Greek-hardcover hardcover Greek book.
 
@PedroTamaroff A hint: Moving the fixed point to $\infty$ (and if there are two, the other to $0$) is usually a non-stupid move.
 
9:18 PM
Yeah, precisely that.
 
@DanielFischer I am following the advice given by Joonas.
 
@UserX You are 17 already, you should write what you want to say.
 
You can say you're the person I told him about :) @UserX
 
At least I can do what he asks me to do. =D
 
@MikeMiller I think it's repeating Greek a lot.
 
9:19 PM
Make sure you send him the phone number of your local police department as well, @UserX.
 
@PedroTamaroff What was that?
 
But yea that's the only problem
 
OK, back to the kitchen with me.
 
@TedShifrin what's his email?
 
@DanielFischer Well, I have $|z|=2$ and $0$. I want to find a transformation that sends the circle to $\Bbb R$ and $0$ to $i$. This is achieved by $i\dfrac{2+z}{2-z}$.
 
9:20 PM
@UserX: Since I emailed him to ask if it's ok, let me let him answer :)
 
Then I have $|z+1|=1$ and $i$. I want a transformation that sends this to $\Bbb R$ and $i$. If I take $S_1(z)=z+1,S_2(z)=\frac{z-i-1}{1-(1-i)z},S_3(z)=i\frac{1+z}{1-z}$, $S_3S_2S_1$ does the job.
 
@PedroTamaroff Oh, I thought you had $\lvert z+1\rvert = 1$ and wanted $0$ fixed.
 
@TedShifrin Okay then... I'll be gone for an hour. If he answers make sure you ping me so I see it.
 
He's giving us different problems, @DanielF.
OK, @UserX. Thanks.
 
It seems you still have?
 
9:22 PM
@DanielFischer Actually, I have $|z+1|=1$; and I want $0$ fixed and $-1$ to $i$.
 
Ah, that's the one you gave me, @Pedro.
 
@DanielFischer I see.
 
Yes, @Pedro, moving the fixed point to $\infty$ isn't stupid.
 
@DanielFischer OK.
 
@UserX: He says it's fine. Email me at shifrin@math.uga.edu and I'll send it to you. (Yes, I know this is silly.)
 
9:35 PM
@Ted He ends his definitions with a flower. Adorable.
 
Who? oh, Sharpe?
 
Yeah.
 
9:51 PM
@Chris'ssis Are you here ?
 
@Hippalectryon Not really.
 
@Hippalectryon I was working on some integrals. Now I'm here.
 
@Chris'ssis I'm troubled on my result for $\displaystyle S=\sum_\mathbb{N}\dfrac{(a+k)!!}{a!!k!!}$, with the double factorial (usual notation)
@Chris'ssis I get $\displaystyle S=\sqrt{\dfrac{\pi}{2}}\dfrac{a}2\sum_\mathbb{N}B(a/2,k/2+1)$
 
@Hippalectryon Something is wrong there. Set $a=1$
 
9:56 PM
@Chris'ssis I can compute the Beta sum, but
I don't see how the $\pi$ diseappears
 
@Hippalectryon Does it seem to me or your sum diverges? What is $a$?
 
I used the formula $z!!=\sqrt{\dfrac{2^{z+1}}{\pi}}\Gamma(z/2+1)$
$a\in ]1,\infty]$
@Chris'ssis i'll write a quick latex to show you how I got that
 
@Hippalectryon it diverges ...
 
@Chris'ssis Olol
I did the inverse of what I wanted
I wanted $\displaystyle S=\sum_\mathbb{N}\dfrac{a!!k!!}{(a+k)!!}$ shame on me
 
OK :-)
 
9:59 PM
Let me correct that, i'll probably ask again smthing because I guess the $\pi$ will remain
 
@Hippalectryon this is what Mathematica says
(2^(-(1/2) - (1/2)*Cos[aPi])*((-2^(1/2 + (1/2)*Cos[aPi]))*Gamma[(3 + a)/2] + 2^(1/2 + (1/2)*Cos[aPi])*Gamma[(3 + a)/2]*Hypergeometric2F1[1, 1, 1 + a/2, 1] + Pi^((1/2)*Cos[aPi])*Gamma[(2 + a)/2]*Hypergeometric2F1[1, 3/2, 3/2 + a/2, 1]))/Gamma[(3 + a)/2]
 
@Chris'ssis 2 secs let me write it down
 
@Hippalectryon I'll leave soon. Tomorrow morning I have an interview ...
 
@Chris'ssis It will take 5 mins
 
10:16 PM
I can't manage to find my error
 
@Hippalectryon I'm not able to see what you posted there.
 
@Chris'ssis Grr that site errors i'll post it here
$$\displaystyle a\in]1,\infty[$$
$$\displaystyle S_n=\sum_{k=0}^n \dfrac{a!!k!!}{(a+k)!!}, z!!=\sqrt{\dfrac{2^{z+1}}{\pi}}\Gamma(\frac{z}2+1)$$
Hence
$$\displaystyle S_n=\sqrt{\dfrac{2}\pi}\sum_{k=0}^n\dfrac{\Gamma(a/2+1)\Gamma(k/2+1)}{\Gamma(a/2+k/2+1)}$$
$$=\sqrt{\dfrac{2}\pi}\frac{a}2\sum_{k=0}^n B(a/2,k/2+1)$$

We know that $\displaystyle\sum_\mathbb{N} B(a/2,k/2+1)=\dfrac{a}{a-1}$

Hence $$S_\infty=\dfrac{a^2}{a-1}\sqrt{\dfrac{1}{2\pi}}$$
@Chris'ssis Do you see the error ?
 
@Hippalectryon there are more mistakes. I'll look at that tomorrow and fix it.
 
Oh ok thanks
 
Tu fais trop de fautes, M @Hippa.
 
10:30 PM
@TedShifrin Montre les moi :-)
 
C'est pas à moi de le faire; c'est à Chris'ssis.
 
@TedShifrin Elle est parti/pas dispo
 
Elle est partie? :)
 
Pas dispo plutôt
 
J'ai corrigé une faute. Ça suffit. :)
 
10:32 PM
@Hippalectryon For instance, how did you get that $$\sum_\mathbb{N} B(a/2,k/2+1)=\dfrac{a}{a-1}$$ ?
 
@Ted What did you mean by "love your real names"
 
LOL, one's a cat typing on a keyboard, the other is "X"
 
I thought my name appeared as orpheous or something, does it appear like fdhsh fhsh?
 
yeah, like the latter
 
That's my 100th email(not joking), I got bored typing names
 
10:33 PM
you need 100 different email accounts?
 
I forget passwords easily. I tried 10 different passwords to open this one too
My name's John :P
 
Imagine how it'll be when you're my age.
John doesn't sound very Greek.
 
Γιάννης
It's greek for John...
 
I get the Johnny ... although I don't know about the s at the end :P
 
I wonder if Spivak will assume it's spam because of the name lol. Most male greek names have s at the end, but when you call someone by name you skip it.
Those two sentences are not connected.
 
10:36 PM
@MikeMiller I just noticed that the reputations of Mike Miller and Mike Miller differ by a $0$ ;)
 
@Chris'ssis $$\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^n B(a,k+1)=\sum_{k=0}^n\int_0^1t^{a-1}(1-t)^k\mathrm{d}t=\int_0^1t^{a-1}\sum_{k=0}‌​^n(1-t)^k\mathrm{d}t$$ $$=\int_0^1t^{a-1}\cdot\dfrac{(1-t)^{n+1}-1}{(1-t)-1}\mathrm{d}t=\left[\int_0^1t‌​^{a-2}\mathrm{d}t-\int_0^{1}t^{a-2}(1-t)^{n+1}\mathrm{d}t\right]=\frac{1}{a-1}-\c‌​dot B(a-1,n+2)=_\infty\frac{1}{a-1}$$
@Chris'ssis I multiplied by $a$ once by error. Still, that doesn't give the right result
Correcting that gives us $S_\infty=\dfrac{a}{a-1}\sqrt{\dfrac{1}{2\pi}}$
 
@DanielFischer In the same sense that the reputations of Daniel Fischer and Daniel Fischer do?
 
There you go with the disconnectivity again.
 
@MikeMiller No, $6012$ vs. $612$.
 
@DanielFischer I am failing.
 
10:37 PM
Oh, I see.
I'm not used to thinking about digits, you see.
 
@PedroTamaroff How far have you got?
 
I want a transformation that fixes $|z+1|=1$ and $0$ and sends $-1$ to $i$.
 
Seems like a pretty crummy metric in general.
 
You're not metrizable, @Mike.
 
@DanielFischer Well, first I used $1/z$ to send $0$ to infinity as you said.
 
10:38 PM
There's two of me, @Ted
 
My circle gets mapped to $\Re z=-1/2$.
And $-1$ is fixed.
 
One of you is more than sufficient. Of course, @Hippa created a second me.
 
Ah... this one's the real deal.
 
@PedroTamaroff Right. And $i$?
 
Or, some version of a real deal. In contrast with Hippa's, I mean.
 
10:39 PM
@DanielFischer $i$ is sent to $-i$.
 
@Hippalectryon you said that $$\sum_\mathbb{N} B(a/2,k/2+1)=\dfrac{a}{a-1}$$
 
@Mike: Y'all look rather different :P
 
@PedroTamaroff So, in that configuration, what do you want your Möbius transformation to do?
 
@DanielF: The cranberry/apricot hazelnut Linzertorte is next.
 
@DanielFischer I am not sure.
Hm.
Fix the line.
And infinity.
 
10:41 PM
@TedShifrin Sounds interesting.
 
well, it does have apricot jam as a glaze :)
 
And, OK and swap $-1,-i$.
 
So far, so good, @Pedro. And?
 
@Chris'ssis :O sorry, that's because on my paper sheet I used different notations. Let me correct that.
$$\displaystyle a\in]1,\infty[$$
$$\displaystyle S_n=\sum_{k=0}^n \dfrac{a!!k!!}{(a+k)!!}, z!!=\sqrt{\dfrac{2^{z+1}}{\pi}}\Gamma(\frac{z}2+1)$$
Hence
$$\displaystyle S_n=\sqrt{\dfrac{2}\pi}\sum_{k=0}^n\dfrac{\Gamma(a/2+1)\Gamma(k/2+1)}{\Gamma(a/2+k/2+1)}$$
$$=\sqrt{\dfrac{2}\pi}\frac{a}2\sum_{k=0}^n B(a/2,k/2+1)$$

We know that $\displaystyle\sum_\mathbb{N} B(a/2,k/2+1)=\dfrac{1}{a/2-1}$

Hence $$S_\infty=\dfrac{a}{a/2-1}\sqrt{\dfrac{1}{2\pi}}$$
@Chris'ssis Oh no you're right
 
@PedroTamaroff So, a) what Möbius transformations fix $\infty$?
 
10:42 PM
@Chriss'ssis: I thought it was past your bedtime.
 
Since it's k/2 I can't use that formula @Chris'ssis
 
@DanielFischer Linear ones.
 
Careful there.
 
linear in the sense of high school @Mike
 
Boo.
 
10:43 PM
@Hippalectryon It's too much mess in your proof there.
 
@PedroTamaroff Okay. And which of those map $\operatorname{Re} z = -\frac{1}{2}$ to itself?
 
LOL ... applause for @Chris'ssis.
 
@DanielFischer I'm writing it down.
@DanielFischer It's not so obvious to me which ones do that.
 
@PedroTamaroff Break it into parts, the ones keeping the left half-plane and one swapping the half-planes.
 
Aw come on @Pedro :)
 
10:45 PM
@Hippalectryon $$\sum_\mathbb{N} B(a/2,k/2+1)= \frac{2}{ a-2}+ \frac{ \sqrt{ \pi} }{2}\frac{\Gamma\left(\frac{a}{2}-1\right)}{ \Gamma \left( \frac{1+a}{2} \right)}$$
 
Tsk tsk @Ted
 
@DanielFischer Well, I think I got it.
I need two reflections.
 
I told you it's time to retire, @Mike. :)
 
First, I reflect along the line I got.
This sends $-1$ to $0$ and $-i$ to $-1-i$.
 
@Ted Not until I can tsk before you can delete... then it's time to retire.
 
10:46 PM
Then I reflect along $\Im z=-1/2$.
 
It'll be a matter of days, @Mike.
 
This gets me to where I want, @DanielFischer.
 
But then who will I whine to?
 
@PedroTamaroff And two reflections composed are?
 
@DanielFischer Basically I have to reflect along the line $y=x$, I think.
 
10:47 PM
then you and Pedro will whine at each other.
 
I'm out. Tomorrow I have an interview ... (early sleep is needed)
 
So this is all that symmetry and double ratio baloney, but with lines which makes things easier.
 
@Chris'ssis I was hoping to have a cancellation on the denominator, but $\sum_{k=0}^n B(A,k/2+1)=\int_0^1 t^{A-1}\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{1-t}-1}$
@Chris'ssis Ok, see you :-) thanks for the help
 
glares @Pedro for his baloney
 
Sounds like a nightmare, @Ted
 
10:48 PM
precisely @Mike
but you're the two competitive young guns
 
@DanielFischer I'm trying to write the transformation down.
How do I determine the reflection along this line?
I think my problem set has it.
 
You don't reflect along a line.
 
@PedroTamaroff Möbius transformations are orientation-preserving. You don't want a reflection. (Two composed is okay again.)
 
You rotate so that the two half-planes are swapped.
 
@DanielFischer I want to reflect along the line $\Re z=-1/2$.
 
10:52 PM
reminds @Pedro that $1/z$ sends upper half-plane to lower ...
 
@TedShifrin so does multiplication by $-1$...
 
Apparently, I need to find a transformation $T$ that sends this to $\Bbb R$ and then take $T\overline{T^{-1}}$.
 
@Pedro understands inversion in a circle, perhaps not inversion in a line :)
 
Your problems are having you use non-conformal stuff all of a sudden? That's bonkers.
 
@MikeMiller No, where did you get that?
 
10:53 PM
You kept saying reflection, @Pedro
 
@TedShifrin Well, symmetry, reflection.
 
@PedroTamaroff You cannot reflect across a line using a conformal transformation. In addition, you wrote $\overline{T^{-1}}$, which usually denotes complex conjugate...
 
@MikeMiller Yes.
 
symmetry!=reflection
 
That's not conformal.
 
10:54 PM
I don't know what to do then.
 
Conformal transformations, by definition (whatever your favorite definition is), are orientation-preserving. Complex conjugation is not.
What's the actual question?
 
@PedroTamaroff How would you swap the upper and lower half-plane?
 
I have to find a transformation that fixes the freaking line and sends $-1$ to $-i$.
@DanielFischer Inverting.
 
@PedroTamaroff Keeping $\infty$ fixed.
 
@DanielFischer A rotation.
 
10:56 PM
@PedroTamaroff Yes. And how about trying a rotation here?
 
But that doesn't fix my line.
 
@DanielFischer

How did the answer to [this](http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1037753/is-frac1e-gamma-log-x-prod-limits-p-x-p-textprime-fracpp-1/1038058#1038058) get the last inequality? Not only am I gaga, pretty much I haven't really dealt with infinite products. :/
 
@PedroTamaroff If you rotate about a point on the line, it does.
 
(wondering why I can't make the linky thing here... or maybe I can't see iy but everyone else can)
 
@DanielFischer I want to rotate about $(-1/2,-1/2)$.
 
10:58 PM
@Twink: Why're you removing everything?
 
Oh, I see, thanks. @MikeMiller
 

« first day (1574 days earlier)      last day (3465 days later) »