That would not make any sense, you would have stuff like $\langle \delta^2, \phi \rangle = \langle \delta, \delta \phi \rangle = \delta(0) \phi(0)$ and there is no sensible way to define that.
...?
Sounds like nonsense to me, but I know very little about set theory.
I look on nonstandard analysis as on tool that allows us to extend some constructions that is not possible within standard analysis (in general). for example the multiplication of 2 generalised functions. I ask you because it is very interesting area for me
WTH, you address someone as "her" just because they used female name for their display name but when I say I am female some people .. Let's not get into that again. Use "it", I DON'T CARE.
@JonasTeuwen Don't you know that the Dutch only do three things right: Mayonnaise; becoming a pirate ghost ship; and crumbling at the hand of the Nazis (although the Belgians are better at the last one).
@JonasTeuwen I did everything with the FT, and never really looked deeply at the LT. It looked similar, and I figured that I could probably pick it up like a new programming language :-)
@AsafKaragila I really think you should stop doing that... Whether the remark was offensive or not, I think you've crossed the line of good taste yourself at least twice in the last ten minutes.
