There are billions of dollars thrown at the wall to see what sticks in the test chambers of the Portal Franchise. Lots of testers, thousands of cubes, a sadistic robot, all of it to be used in the testing chambers. I understand that some testing is required to test devices(Long Fall Boots, Gels,...
Just because there is no "single best answer" to this question, should not be a reason to downvote this question. Many new players wonder how important the race/class combination can be, and this question is relevant to them. Please only downvote bad questions. — Lee White24 mins ago
@LeeWhite A single line question, that's exactly the same as the title, is a bad question. I don't play Guild Wars 2, but this seems to be running the line very close to both Primarily Opinion Based, and Too Broad. The question needs more context, and what the goal is trying to be accomplished. — Frank19 secs ago
Wow. I totally messed up the grammar on that last sentence.
And on that subject, I'm not even sure if racial skills can be used in WvW at all. Last I checked (which was a few months ago, admittedly), they couldn't.
@Frank As someone who does/has played GW2, I disagree that this is too broad. There's only 5 races that an Ele can be, there's only 6 racial skills for each race, and this question would fall under Good Subjective.
@Frank Although I don't think this question in particular is a good question, the argument that it doesn't have enough words in the question to be a good question doesn't work. There is such a thing as a one-liner question that is valid for our site. Sometimes extra details in the body are superfluous, and to just blanket claim that they're always required is doing users a disservice. They may be required in this question, but then say that rather than making a bigger claim.
Every question can be improved with a little bit of context. Doesn't have to be much, but something. Repeating the title demonstrates little to no effort, and that's what I vote on.
@Frank The question I just linked has exactly as much information as is needed to generate a unique answer. What extra details would make it a good question for you?
Either way, said user in the question under discussion has edited their question after some clarification was given in the comments as to why they should
@StrixVaria That's silly. Obviously it can only be one of the prime numbers of the Zenith series. Don't those people know anything? (Also, let's play the "who can guess the reference" game ...)
@Frank Effort is good, sure, but it's not mandatory to prove to everyone that you've given effort if you have a uniquely identifiable objective problem.
It's amusing to me, because sometimes that kind of context ("Here's what I tried" or "Here's what I think the answer might be but am not sure") annoys people because they consider it extraneous or worse, adding speculation
@Sterno Yes. If you want to add it to your question, whatever, I'm not going to cut it out of your question. But you should by no means be required to add that information.
Yeah, like with minecraft-redstone questions, I get questions that ask "How do I do this very specific and wrong implementation" and I'm just like "No, just do this it's easier".
@Frank If I'm playing a game, and I don't know how to do a thing, I ask a question on Arqade. Period. I don't research beforehand. I don't waste a lot of my own time experimenting in game.
@StrixVaria A question that does nothing but repeat the title is a bad question. It demonstrates an utter lack of effort and thought on the asker's part.
And that demonstration is what I base my votes on.
Oh, Mrs. Office Manager, you couldn't send that last email out last week? You know, so that everyone in the office knows what's going on before the new hire started?
@Frank An assertion that is repeated over and over without backing justification is a bad assertion. It demonstrates an utter lack of effort and thought on the asserter's part to justify their claim.
@Frank You just repeated the same thing you said at the beginning, after I said a bunch of stuff disagreeing with that. So you're not going to change your opinion, which is whatever. I can't force you to think a certain way, and it would be stupid for me to try. But what you just said is an opinion, and it is disingenuous to tell users your opinion framed as if it's site policy. Please don't do that.
I find myself constantly wishing I had some idea what the research tree looked like. For example, if I want to unlock plasma weapons, do I have to go down the laser weapon path first to unlock it, or am I going in completely in the wrong direction?If I want to get a satellite nexus, what do I nee...
Well, let's go back to the door code example. What additional effort would you want? Saying "I have guessed these things" is not important information; there is only one code, and we don't need the asker's guesses to answer. What additional context is needed? "I need the door code to unlock the door so I can open it"?
If you're voting on perceived effort, you're voting on the user and not the question. Someone should go grab that handy guide some smart person made that one time.
@Frank And I can see why that might influence your vote since those things are important to you, but I don't feel they actually improve the question for the typical user who came here for the exact same information.
@OrigamiRobot Too bad I can't search for his name anymore.
@Frank and what @Strix is saying is that your opinion is not site policy, so the comments leading users to believe such aren't fair to them, which isn't okay.
I mean, do I really need to add context about why I want to see the full research tree? Don't we all know why people want to see the research tree?
And if I want to see it because I want to get to plasma weapons fast, and another guy wants to see it because he wants to get his airforce up to speed quickly, that context is completely irrelevant to the question
@Frank I feel like you're misunderstanding the fact that a moderator just asked you politely to discontinue an action that he feels is not in the best interest of the site's users.
My stance is for you to please stop posting your opinion framed as site policy.
2
If you want to have an argument on the merits of whether or not people should be required to prove they've exerted a certain amount of effort before asking a question, please do that on meta.
Until that argument takes place and a conclusion is reached, please stop telling users (and particularly new users) that such a limitation is in place.
@Frank But he already stated that he has no issue with the fact that it's your opinion and your downvote and that you have every right to do with them as you please. That's not up for discussion. You both agree on that. His issue is with, as he said, the fact that you're framing your downvote usage in comments as universal site policy to new users.
@OrigamiRobot Are you putting them to work in your labor camp?
Also, the 5th tower in Pandora's Tower is annoyingly hard.
I suppose I should go get the new weapon and immediately head back out to upgrade it. Annoying, seeing as how I'd just upgraded my sword and got new armor just before entering the tower and enemies still do ridiculous amounts of damage.
What I really should do is modify these JSP pages seeing as how I'm at work.
Every now and then an A rare astronomical event occured in the sky. When I click observe I get a starchart.
One of the things I can use them for is trade ships.
Is that(astronomical event) the only way to obtain starcharts?
I am currently a farming town hall 7, and I am debating where to put my Town Hall. I have seen people put their Town Hall in the corner of their village with bombs surrounding it. However, I have also seen people put it near to their walls.
I am trying to keep a steady trophy level while also ga...
@Unionhawk To be fair, it depends on what you're doing. If you're a casual user, you probably won't see much improvement by increasing your speed by 40x.
The scenarios where the upgrade makes a huge difference: * Large downloads (say, Steam) * Uploads of almost any kind (indirectly, because people insist on using ratios)
What really is mind blowing is that Comcast tells people who have trouble getting a stream that should only take about 10% of their bandwidth to work that things will be better if only they doubled their downlink.
That is dishonest.
(please sample this fine example of needlessly complex sentence structure, brought to you by Italy)
@GnomeSlice It could've been much simpler. One step simpler would've been "What really is mind blowing is that, when customers can't get a stream to work that only should take about 10% of their capacity, customer support replies that things would be better if only they doubled their downlink."
or "When customers complain they can't get a stream to work that should only take about 10% of their capacity, Comcast customer support tells you that things would be better if only they just doubled their downlink; now that is mindblowing and dishonest."
etc.
At any rate, going back to the point, I thought the transition from the Netherlands internets at 15 MB/s to my home internets at 500 kB/s would've been terribad. However, it wasn't.
The connection speed is the highest of how fast you can push bytes to the servers and how fast the servers can push them back, plus you must count the time required for the bytes to actually do the distance. I think the bottleneck is almost always latency once you get to ~10 MB/s
Really, "fast enough that speeds are affected by latency more than bandwidth" should be the criterion the FCC should use to determine what "broadband" actually is.
Love how Java tosses warnings at me if I cast something I pull from a session object to a generic type... except that HttpSession's getAttribute always returns types as Object and you have to cast them to use them.
There are certain times in the early game when you should be on "high alert" for a jungler to come into your Lane. For example early level 2 ganks, after they completed their first jungler route, etc.
Is it possible to say "at 3 minutes top lane should be extra careful as that's when the jungler...
@Unionhawk Not much to figure out: "It does not come from Unionhawk" comes from Unionhawk, so it's wrong: it comes from Unionhawk. As a result "it" is wrong. QED
@badp You'd probably have an aneurysm if you heard people here try to pronounce "manicotti". I don't know how to say it, and I try something new every time, and I'm pretty sure I'm always wrong.
@badp My great-grandmother only spoke Italian, and must have had some kind of regional dialect that's not standard Italian, so I know all these pronunciations for things that aren't actually right and it's horrible.
If that helps you figure out the region, so be it. Either way, I'll just have to remember that my idea of how Italian should be pronounced is way off and to forget what I "know".
Hmm nice timing IKEA! I'm buying a new, larger bed when I'm moving out, and they're offering (effectively) an 15% discount. (You get a pas with 15% of the purchase on it that you have to spend at IKEA within 3 months, not a problem)
Grilling is a form of cooking that involves dry heat applied to the surface of food, commonly from above or below (as in North America).
Grilling usually involves a significant amount of direct, radiant heat, and tends to be used for cooking meat quickly. Food to be grilled is cooked on a grill (an open wire grid such as a gridiron with a heat source above or below), a grill pan (similar to a frying pan, but with raised ridges to mimic the wires of an open grill), or griddle (a flat plate heated from below). Heat transfer to the food when using a grill is primarily via thermal radiation. He...