« first day (2373 days earlier)      last day (2595 days later) » 

3:00 AM
They'll just cancel your internet
 
I don't see how they'd know what was legitimate traffic and what was just "dummy" traffic.
 
Alternatively, ATT could pay MS $500mil for a CA to quietly be injected in the next Windows update...
@NathanOsman doesn't matter. log everything
I have a feeling I'll be running a lot more spiders and maybe even a Tor exit node or two.
but it won't really make much of a difference. They can isolate legitimate traffic pretty easily because where I do and what I do is pretty predictable.
 
Sigh.
 
Just put a filter of sorts on my traffic, I'm pretty sure machine learning can identify with decent confidence what my real traffic is.
 
I wonder if having an ISP's root CA sign a certificate for another domain name constitutes fraud?
I, for one, would think so.
 
3:05 AM
us government: $80 mil and it won't be.
 
ooh, good question.
@KazWolfe unfortunately true..
 
Law, get in here!
 
Lol.
They aren't probably going to be able to tell us.
In recent history, there has only ever been one sure-fire way to find out if something is legal or not - get sued for doing it.
 
i would assume it would be fraud (misrepresentation), but is it really?
they do have a right (in a weird way) to know what traffic is going through their infrastructure.
 
@KazWolfe I hope the judge in that case knows the necessary hashtags.
 
3:07 AM
This would only a logical expansion to allow for actual data collection in accordance with the site's privacy policy.
 
@Zacharee1 I did 20 VTC reviews today for the first time in a while :)
 
Because the user had to willingly install the CA, they've agreed and expressed consent to the ISP monitoring things, I'd think.
 
Repeat after me: I am not installing my IPS's root CA.
It's just not happening.
 
Repeat after me: If I do not install my ISP's root CA, I will not have internet.
Or, "My computer will install my ISP's root CA for me by way of a software update."
 
lol
 
3:09 AM
Sidenote: can you imagine how crazy that is anyway? Do you know how "consumer-friendly" it will be to install a root CA on an Android handset?
IoT devices? Printers?
 
We can't vote with our wallets anymore. There's nowhere else to go if what I think is about to happen will happen.
Even less with CAs. You don't think all the other ISPs will follow suit?
 
This is where we do need Anonymous.
 
@NathanOsman Assuming IoT is even secure.
 
And VPNs
 
@KazWolfe Oh lol, good point.
 
3:10 AM
And MAC randomization
 
@AndroidDev Won't help.
 
@AndroidDev VPNs won't help if your ISP is forcing you to install a root CA to get Internet.
 
You can identify who is browsing without even knowing where they come from, given enough data points.
 
@NathanOsman super easy.
 
People have their own little "signatures" as to how they browse the internet. Where they go, what they like.
 
3:10 AM
Install an app.
 
@Seth Apps can inject root CAs?
What...?
 
@NathanOsman They will be, or else Android loses the entire market share.
 
@Seth And what about printers?
@KazWolfe Stop making me so cynical.
:P
 
@NathanOsman But after going through the VPN, you could tether to a second device that doesn't have the rouge CA, right?
 
@NathanOsman Install, yes.
 
3:12 AM
Yay, I can haz inverted busses and anonymous nets in verilog . . . Le me iz happeh . . . but also very much behind on this goddamn lab
 
@NathanOsman I'm only pointing out probabilities.
 
@AndroidDev If they have a root CA, the chain of trust is broken.
 
I dunno what technical limitations the OS adds but it's not hard.
 
@Seth So I can write an app that adds my root CA to any phone it is installed on?
 
@NathanOsman Yep
 
3:13 AM
Surely there is a warning?
 
Not OS generated, that I could tell.
 
@Seth What the...
 
Put it this way... Apple allows installing of root CAs. I've done that for testing purposes. If Android doesn't allow that to happen, Android users are going to be told "lol sorry, you can't use your android to browse the interwebz. gtfo"
 
That can't be right
 
So, Google will have to add that feature -- they won't have a choice unless they want to lose 100% of their market share.
 
3:13 AM
/facepalm
 
@AndroidDev Since when did the government or mega corps care about right?
When did they care about anything other than $$$?
 
@Seth Google tries, on rare occasion.
 
Not since you or I have been born that's for sure.
 
To be fair, so does Apple when it's convenient.
 
@Seth Sad but true
 
3:15 AM
(To counter my own point, they only try when it makes them money and it makes them look good)
 
@Seth I'm tempted to use this as a wake up call. "Hey y'all folks that installed my app - guess what! I broke TLS! I know everything you did!"
But I don't think Google would be too happy.
 
@NathanOsman You get arrested for fraud and hacking.
 
@KazWolfe THEN WHY WOULDN'T THE ISPS?!?!
 
@NathanOsman Because they're ISPs.
 
IT'S THE SAME FREAKIN' THING.
 
3:16 AM
wat. there is a "government root certification authority" root CA on my phone
 
And have infinitely more money.
 
@NathanOsman lets back up to the billboard a second here...
 
@Seth Quick. Put on your tinfoil hat.
 
And have the lobbying power to make it legal for them to do it.
 
3:17 AM
Where is your $700,000?
 
@AndroidDev oh, so they fixed it?
 
Ok... I can't tell which is worse. Trump's administration saying publicly, "You don't deserve privacy because we want money," or Clinton's administration saying, "You don't get privacy, but we're not going to tell you that you don't get it. It's just going to disappear and you'll never know until Snowden 2.0."
 
Gah, stupid virtual keyboard...
 
@KazWolfe I actually kinda prefer Trump's because at least we still have a voice while this is going on.
Snowden 2.0, lol.
 
@NathanOsman HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
What voice do any of us have?
We can kick and scream all we want. All of the bloody US can drop into riots because of this. It won't change a damn thing.
 
3:20 AM
Snowden 2.0: "Guess what, the government has a quantum computer capable of fast prime factorization. In other words, we broke RSA."
That will be fun.
 
@NathanOsman Snowden 2.0: "Guess what, we at ATT have access to everything you do because we snuck a law in demanding every machine have our root CA"
 
@NathanOsman honestly wouldn't be surprised.
 
@NathanOsman @KazWolfe And then there's the whole thing about Obama handing over DNS...
 
@Seth Is the government smart enough for that though? We can't even get people back to the moon.
@AndroidDev ICANN?
 
@NathanOsman Private sector contractors.
All the government needs to be able to know is how to push a button.
 
3:22 AM
@KazWolfe Can people stab their conscience that badly? Thinks for a moment. Hmm, never mind then.
 
@AndroidDev SOPA and PIPA should be tarred and feathered.
 
@NathanOsman Yeah
 
Those acronyms are lame BTW.
 
@NathanOsman I worked a bit at Northrop Grumman. It's very very need-to-know. You might not even be told you're working on a government project.
Just "here's a project, do it"
 
Every time Trump tweets, this bot prints it out and burns it. 🖨🔥 https://twitter.com/burnedyourtweet/status/846858076800077824
4
 
3:23 AM
@KazWolfe "Here, make a quantum computer to factor prime numbers. For no reason, of course."
4
 
There's Prime95 too, though...
 
@NathanOsman No... "Here, make a quantum computer with <specs> for research and development and the advancement of tech"
 
@Seth What. The. Actual. Heck.
 
ikr
 
@Seth 10/10
The problem is there are so many ways to destroy the internet and privacy for profit, and there's nothing we can do to defend against it.
I mean, even my current employer is doing some things that I consider very scary and immoral, but I don't have the ability to really raise objections (except to quit) because nobody will listen. It can make them too much money to give up just because one of their developers has concerns about privacy.
 
3:30 AM
It's because people don't have the Libertarian mindset.
You know the saying, "absolute power corrupts absolutely".
Well, the best (and in fact only) way to mitigate that is to reduce the amount of power as much as possible.
 
Well, that requires the people who have power to willingly give up power.
I think it's more likely that world peace happens two weeks ago.
 
@KazWolfe Or the people to wake up.
But I'm not holding my breath.
The last time this happened, the war of independence occurred.
 
It's why the US is stuck with the electoral college. Nobody in power is going to do anything about it, because it's what got them into power.
@NathanOsman How can you incite a revolution against the country with the best military on the face of the earth?
 
It's a mind game.
You have to play it as such.
 
See, that's the problem. And this is going to get me on 40 watchlists and probably bring the FBI to my door.
Nobody responds to peaceful protests and mindgames. They just don't work.
They're a nice PR stunt, but do they ever change anything?
 
3:34 AM
@KazWolfe As if you're not already on 15 for using Linux and not having Facebook? :)
 
This ---^
 
yeah, pretty much. I've stopped really covering my tracks. It's just too much work at this point.
As much as I hate saying this, people will only respond to violence, or everyone's last resort.
People aren't rational.
 
My opinion is thus: the government can and will track whom it wants. But due to the sheer size of the population, just doing simple steps will make you less of a problem. They will pick on easier targets.
@KazWolfe People are stupid.
The end.
 
@NathanOsman Machine learning, and algorithms allow far more people to be recorded thoroughly, and can raise alerts to human operators whenever necessary.
They watch every target they can, but only actively look as those marked as "interesting"
 
Hmm... I can't argue with that.
I guess the only way to combat that would be to dump a ton of useless data into the system, poisoning it. No idea how one would go about doing that though.
 
3:39 AM
Machine learning. It's easy to pick useless data out of ordered data.
If all of a sudden, a whole bunch of garbage gets thrown into the system, that garbage can just be disposed as exactly that, garbage.
You can mask yourself by hiding your own real traffic against other real traffic that mirrors yours (e.g. people who use tor are usually grouped together with like-minded people), but you can still isolate certain people given enough of a dataset.
If I start "visiting" Wayfair or some other site I never use often, it's gonna get discarded. It doesn't fit my profile. Something looks off with that data.
 
@KazWolfe same way it happened last time. Britain was the best military power on the earth at the time.
Unfortunately modern technology makes it practically impossible today..\
 
exactly... plus, there's a scale and training factor.
A vast majority of the people probably knew how to use (and owned) weaponry. Very few people do now. Those who do can probably get crushed within a month, at worst.
Now if the military joined a theoretical revolt, then there's a chance.
 
and the militia. Still have some of that.
 
tl;dr: we're boned.
 
or. start small. implement STV voting at a local level. It'll grow.
 
3:45 AM
@Seth This just in: STV banned!
 
ಠ_ಠ
 
actually, no... there is a surface now. nobody knows cybersecurity.
 
puts your faith in a new perspective.
 
Cybersecurity professionals are being sniped up everywhere across the board. Private, public, anywhere.
 
well, new for the western man.
 
3:47 AM
Oh hang on.
 
point being, a bunch of smart hackers can do a lot of damage.
We're already effectively in a cyber-war on a few fronts.
I have a feeling the next 15-20 years are going to be very interesting.
 
There we go.
 
that is an abuse of mod powers
600 away from 20k. this is awesome.
 
Yup and you have that 500 point bounty between you and user with 161 points
night all :)
 
@KazWolfe What is?
 
4:04 AM
@NathanOsman editing after 2m mark
 
@KazWolfe I don't even know what the limit is for normal users.
So how am I supposed to know when I exceeded it?
And @ThomasWard just arrived.
You missed a good conversation.
 
Not really caring at this second - insomnia
actually didn't open here it just reopened and refreshed because phone Safari is evil
closes chat
 
4:24 AM
hi thomas
Might I make another suggestion, @NathanOsman?
 
Sure... why not...
 
Right now you're showing the icon if a user hasn't viewed the tour. Instead, why not show when the user has? That way, reputable users can get away with not having the icon a bit easier.
but the script is awesome so far. thanks! :D
 
4:55 AM
@KazWolfe "get away with" ?
You mean avoid sending an HTTP request?
 
@NathanOsman this way, if a user that should have the badge doesn't (high rep, multiple pages), the appearance doesn't change.
 
@KazWolfe Ah.
Okay, I'll have to write a rep. parsing routine though since the pages display such things as "4.2K", which can't be parsed as an integer.
 
don't worry about it if it's a big deal.
 
Meh, it's a challenge :D
Might not get to it until tomorrow though.
 
the script works great as-is, and is already being useful. it would just be nice to move cases around so that it's more accurate
 
4:58 AM
And more efficient.
 
Lol, Kali has been removed from the title.
But not the question body...
 
Nobody tell him.
 
I changed the title.Thanks! — Cristi 4 mins ago
@KazWolfe ...and surprise, surprise, they haven't done the intro.
:P
 
yep, i see that! :D
 
5:49 AM
hmm... sff.se needs a hard question.
 
 
1 hour later…
7:13 AM
hey @seth, yet another dupe
WOT IN TARNATION
 
7:40 AM
Looooool.
 
ouch
 
@KazWolfe I hope that wasn't because of the script...
 
Hello :)
 
8:38 AM
Would you people please slow down on shooting at spam. I get no chance to hit one before it is killed :)
 
it's smokey!
I can't get any either
 
@Zanna smokey recognizes, but does it shoot as well?
 
yeah it adds 3 spam flags now, it got souped up
 
bad, bad...
We need a feature request :)
 
hahaha you can still get the odd flag in in if you are really fast, or when smokey is unsure
 
8:49 AM
@Zanna I've gotten maybe 2-3 spammers since smokey went up to 11.
 
o.O
it's not good
 
9:02 AM
@Zanna Hi ! So . . . let's see what's not working
By the way, script produces no output, because there's no print() function there, i.e. it's basically silent script
 
Hi @JacobVlijm @JourneymanGeek @Serg @Zanna Good morning ! :)
 
@cl-netbox morning
 
Hey @cl-netbox!
 
@Zanna Just run sudo apt dist-upgrade and reboot ... then you are running kernel 4.10 ! :)
@Serg How are you doing ? :)
 
@cl-netbox I'm fine. About to go to bed after I help Zanna troubleshoot my script. Have work today and then lecture. How about you
 
9:07 AM
@JacobVlijm Everything good ? :)
 
@cl-netbox absolutely. terribly busy on the music part currently. Little time for scripting :)
 
@Serg Well, I'm fine as well ... although a bit sad that my latest answer didn't get much attention ... was some work to get it done. :)
 
@Serg lol sorry for being stupid
 
@Zanna No worries ;) I should have explained the usage in my answer a bit in a rush. I pasted a bit in haste, since you have beaten me with prename command there ( I was about to post the same answer , but quickly switched to python)
 
@cl-netbox I can't, I don't have space (or RAM) for a VM, so just testing in live mode
 
9:10 AM
@JacobVlijm music is a great thing ... brings many positive aspects to people ... and it should make as much fun to work on it as scripting - right ? :)
 
haha sorry about that too
 
@Zanna are you using laptop ?
 
yeah
 
@Zanna ah okay ... just download the latest daily then -> cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/zesty-desktop-amd64.iso ! :)
 
@Zanna If you have DVD drive, you could get one of these: amazon.com/ORICO-Aluminum-Lenovo-Laptop-L127SS/dp/B00KBON2BO/… That's how I have main SSD and bigger HDD where I store all my VMs and backups from phone
 
9:12 AM
no DVD drive :(
 
@cl-netbox Yeah, be it in a totally different way :)
 
Anyway, on this jolly note, I should go to bed. I made the rookie mistake of getting excited about this renamer question, and look - it's 3:12 AM now
 
@Serg sleep well my friend ! :)
 
this thing has 32GB eMMC, 2GB RAM, no ethernet port, 2 USB ports, one micro SD slot, HDMI, headphones jack (but no audio drivers) and that's it
sleep well @Serg :)
 
@Zanna then forget about VMs ... hahaha :)
 
9:14 AM
yeah XD
anyway the 4.8 kernels are not working for me after 4.8.0-32 so I'm going to install 17.04 as soon as it's released, no matter what
 
@Zanna I give my VMs 8 GB RAM and 4 cores ... they run as if it was bare metal ... fast as lightning ... hahaha
 
this machine is basically a large phone with a keyboard...
 
@Zanna you can do it now ... zesty beta is completely stable
 
my phone actually cost twice as much :)
hmm maybe I should
@cl-netbox luxury!
 
@Zanna still another 8 GB and 4 cores left for host ! :D
 
9:18 AM
At least I have quad core
it's actually really fast
even with eMMC instead of real SSD
My boot time is ~7 seconds
 
WOW that's great
@Zanna yes do it ... many improvements under the hood :)
 
bbl :)
 
see you :)
 
Happy Birthday to Marco Ceppi, one of our early users and mods
14
 
@JacobVlijm which instruments are you playing ? bass ? drums ? guitars ? keyboards ?
 
9:22 AM
I'll grab a screenshot and send it to him, let him know he is missed and should come here more often. ;)
(Or don't, up to you!)
 
Hi @James ! :)
 
Hi!
 
10:12 AM
0
Q: Chromium's depot tools won't work

S.ToonsiI am really new to linux but I need Chromium's depot tools to download WebRTC's source code. Anyway, I have been trying to download it by following the instructions on their website: http://dev.chromium.org/developers/how-tos/install-depot-tools However, it always gives me an error on the command...

 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Blacklisted website in answer: Dell Inspiron 3542 b40 i5 8gb ram 1TBHD not shutting off by nikoll on askubuntu.com
 
@cl-netbox Only guitar. Classical guitar (although that is more a technical significance than a musical/style).
 
@JacobVlijm only ??? well, classical guitar is extremely difficult to play ... hats off (once again) ! :)
 
10:28 AM
haha, well, anything in life is difficult. The trick is how to learn that it is easy.
 
@cl-netbox Not really. The guitar is one of the easiest instruments out there. Anything with frets is "easy". Of course, no instrument is actually easy, but the guitar is far easier than the celo or the violin etc.
 
@terdon Not true I think
 
@JacobVlijm No? Why not? Having played both guitar and violin I can assure you guitar was far, far easier to learn.
 
why?
Strings only play 1 tone at a time, while we need to play polyphonic stuff
 
Because you have an area of up to ~2-3 cm within which the tone is correct. On fretless instruments, a mistake of a millimeter changes the note you play.
 
10:30 AM
@terdon If you look at a good player, the finger is positioned always exactly in the same position within the area
 
@JacobVlijm Not necessarily, the violin can also use two strings at a time. And so can any string instrument if you pick instead of strum. But also consider things like the lute.
@JacobVlijm Sure. But you don't need to do that in order to learn.
 
...No, but you will either use 5x the necessary pressure, or get aweful cracks
 
And you can move a bit, for example to bring up the pinky and place it 5 frets down. That will easily cause your index finger to move a few mm and that's not an issue with fretted instruments.
@JacobVlijm ?
 
@terdon depends ... I think every instrument is difficult to learn, especially when you want to become a professional ... this level needs more than talent and climbing to the next level is hard, be it guitars, drums, violins or whatever. :)
 
Of course. As I said, no instrument is easy. But some instruments are easier to learn than others. Mastering any instrument is very hard.
 
10:33 AM
@terdon polyfonic stuff on strings is ... very simple, compared to guitar.
 
But give a child a piano and then give it a violin and tell me which one was more unpleasant.
 
to hear or to play? :)
 
@terdon That's a point ! :)
 
@JacobVlijm Why? Depends on what you're doing. I've seen base players play ridiculously complex polyphonic stuff on an upright base, for example.
And middle eastern fretless instruments are played much the same way as the guitar.
 
@terdon base ? do you mean bass players ? :)
 
10:35 AM
@JacobVlijm To hear. Believe me, my neighbors were very happy when I switched to the guitar and stopped practicing the violin :)
@cl-netbox Yes.
 
We did a test once, after two minutes, I can play the cello completely in tune (that is: plucked)
 
@terdon Stanley Clarke ... :)
 
@JacobVlijm Of course you can! And I could do so with the violin when I played it. It's just harder to learn.
@cl-netbox For example.
 
...Also tone quality is extremely difficult on guitar. (although many guitarists only have one dimension, bad players)
 
As I said, mastering any instrument is hard. But I don't think you can argue that getting to the point where playing is not painful to your audience is easier on the guitar or the piano or any other non-chromatic instrument.
 
10:38 AM
@terdon which model do you prefer ? Gibson or Fender or something else ?
 
And yes, I know you can bend the strings so the guitar isn't really non-chromatic, but you get what I mean, I hope.
@cl-netbox Electric? I own a beautiful Gretsch. If I were to go to a solid body, probably a gibson.
Ideally, an SG with Les Paul magnets. sigh
 
@terdon On the guitar, that should be easy, because most beginners play so soft, they won't hurt :)
 
@JacobVlijm Not so for the violin. let alone the sax.
 
^ true! just for fun, I bought a 5 string banjo when I was 16. Not good for your neighbours.
 
I can teach someone to play do re mi in a few minutes on the guitar (OK, their fingers will hurt but they should be able to do it) and seconds on the piano. On a fretless instrument though, even that first step is very hard.
 
10:40 AM
@terdon Gretsch ... wow - great axe ... I like Gibson Explorer / Les Paul / Firebird and Gibson Thunderbird bass guitar most ! :)
 
Oh, I don't like the explorer at all. Too "metal" for me :P
 
hahaha
 
I'm into blues and jazz stuff so the gretsch is perfect for me.
 
@terdon SG doesn't have that fat sound of original Les Paul ... imho :)
 
3 mins ago, by terdon
Ideally, an SG with Les Paul magnets. sigh
with Les Paul magnets
 
10:43 AM
@terdon yes ... it is a great guitar - really :)
 
This is my guitar.(maker). A good friend of mine. ottovowinkel.com
 
@JacobVlijm cool :)
@terdon yes those Humbucker pickups are great ! :)
 
@cl-netbox Do you play the guitar?
 
@terdon no unfortunately not ... but I was a singer in some local metal bands some longer time ago ... also I played a little bit drums (not good enough though) ... but I really admire good guitar players. :)
 
OK. I was asking since you seem to know your way around guitars.
 
10:50 AM
@terdon yes I know a lot about them ... used to hang around in music stores that time ... :)
@terdon These old models are of great quality - they still rule the music world - right ? :)
 
Yep.
I have a beautiful classical guitar made by "Panagis brothers" famous Greek luthiers of the 30ies-40ies (I think). It used to belong to my half-sister's grandmother and must be more than 50 years old now. Still the most beautiful instrument I've ever played. The only one I could compare it to was an Alhambra I tried in Spain.
 
@terdon wow ... very very nice ! :)
 
@terdon Alhambra is bad, but those old ones are interesting! Spruce or cedar?
 
@JacobVlijm Bad? Seriously? Why bad? And I don't remember the wood I'm afraid.
 
@terdon For a guitarmaker, tone distinction and volume always are clashing demands. Either you have to be good to combine the two (as a maker) or you simply skip one of them. Alhambra totally skips distiction and projection, in favour of volume.
If you play in a bigger hall, the sound drops dead on the floor in front of you.
 
11:01 AM
Wow. OK.
 
Is the top red (-ish) or yellow/white -ish?
 
yellow/white-ish.
Actually, the wood is almost certainly the same as this one: classicalguitars.gr/en/care_16
Mine has pretty much the same body and saddle but different rosette and no pick guard.
So yeah, no, red not white. I admit I haven't looked at it for a while. I play acoustic and aren't very comfortable on classical so I don't use the poor thing anywhere near as often as it deserves.
I had actually lent it to a friend of mine for a few years since he plays classical and I wanted it to be used. Sadly, we no longer live in the same country so I had to take it back.
 
Spruce, definitely spruce! the better quality top. Extremely interesting. While cedar dies away after 30 years or so, spruce only gets better in general. I see the name Panagis mentioned often, but this is the first photo I see. Probaly a beautifully singing instrument. Do you know the mensura by any chance? default = 65 on modern instruments, but the old ones sometimes are bigger.
Take good care of it, or I will go steal it from you. @terdon
 
I am now. I didn't as a young kid. It is now stored in a closet at room temperature with the strings loosened. Is that good enough?
 
Cheers @all!
I'd be happy about some input on Host CFLAGS for cross-build of GCC in case anybody has an idea.
 
11:15 AM
@terdon Yeah, the most important is that humidity should not be too low.
 
@JacobVlijm It shouldn't be. It's a normal, heated room at my parent's place.
Not a dusty basement or anything.
 
@terdon should be fine.
 
Cool. And I'm right that having the strings loose is good, correct?
 
@terdon well, leaving it on won't hurt, as long as the temperature isn't too high.
 
@JacobVlijm They're on, but loosened. I had read somewhere that you don't want to store a guitar with the strings tightened to their normal level since that puts strain on the neck. And you also don't want to remove them completely because you need a little tension to keep the shape. I had understood that the best thing to do is leave the strings there, but relatively loose. Not completely loose, but not tight either.
 
11:21 AM
I have no scientific explanation for it, but instruments also get stiff (sound) when not played for a long time. Similarly, the same guitars, in the hands of players with a good sound, become better sounding ones over time. In the beginning, I thought it was crap, but it isn't.
Well yes, leaving them on is all right, but guitars should be able to stand normal tension for many years.
 
OK, thanks.
 
12:18 PM
^ you smoke too much.
 
I'ld rather it be too much than not enough smoke detecting wouldn't you?
 
@RobotHumans Sure, although that is relative :) chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/36355750#36355750
 
Sweet. Smokey now flags.
 
12:57 PM
I think I'm doing something wrong
what does || do between commands?
 
do second only if first fails
 
OH
 

« first day (2373 days earlier)      last day (2595 days later) »