« first day (2153 days earlier)      last day (2859 days later) » 

2:01 PM
!!learn caaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat <>http://i.stack.imgur.com/bGad8.jpg
 
@allquixotic Command caaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat learned
 
@allquixotic O_o
It's not a photo?
:-(
 
catsit?
 
I'm not sure if there's an unwritten rule that caaaaats must be real caaaaats
 
2:05 PM
Need some "Raumens" in there.
"Raumen!"
 
But I admit, that's a great image
 
Bwuh?
 
#GDFR
 
that might be a vegan sausage made from a vegan pig...
 
So eating vegan animals is okay?
 
2:09 PM
nope?
 
And yet cannibalism isn't?
 
(there's actual vegan sausages. Made from soya. I doubt this is one)
 
I've eaten vegetarian sausages, they're actually quite nice
 
quarn has eggwhites for binder.
 
2:11 PM
Frankfurters taste like salted tofu anyway
 
There used to be this local healthfood store run by a really old north indian chap who sold really really good vegan hotdogs.
 
I did not know that. They're still reasonably nice
 
I have a friend who was vegitarian, and mentioned they were nice so I looked it up ;p
 
@qwertyuiop Arguably it is difficult to tell whether there is any actual animal content in most cheap hot dog sausages, or if there is then the trouble is what particular animals were involved... but still...
@JourneymanGeek My brother does not partake of the meat products also
I cannot remember for sure, but it might be the reason we tried veggie sausages
 
in The Frying Pan, 1 hour ago, by Journeyman Geek
so "meat in a tube, sometimes identified" ?
@Mokubai heh, if you check what's in your food, you end up working out what's filler and what's not
 
2:16 PM
@JourneymanGeek Never investigate the additives and filler in processed products, that way madness lies.
 
@Mokubai I typically do that
 
Hiya, would anyone know, on an outbound mail, if SPF records usually checked at the remote mailserver first?
In fact, is outbound mail sent directly to the receiving domain's MX server, or is it sent via the sending domain's MX server first? Mail is magic and wizardry to me
 
@Sean "email"'s core protocol is really SMTP.
Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) is an Internet standard for electronic mail (email) transmission. First defined by RFC 821 in 1982, it was last updated in 2008 with the Extended SMTP additions by RFC 5321—which is the protocol in widespread use today. SMTP by default uses TCP port 25. The protocol for mail submission is the same, but uses port 587. SMTP connections secured by SSL, known as SMTPS, default to port 465 (nonstandard, but sometimes used for legacy reasons). Although electronic mail servers and other mail transfer agents use SMTP to send and receive mail messages, user-level client...
SMTP is little more than a text-based protocol that gets piped over TCP (usually over TLS for security these days).
Mail goes from one mail server to another simply by establishing a TCP connection and sending the appropriate data. At the TCP/IP layer, it's an IP:port TCP socket established, then send data, then hang up. That's it.
 
smtp servers check MX records to determine which is the primary exchange for mail for delivery.
 
Everything else on top of that -- whether the receiving mail server decides to accept the inbound mail, for example -- is extra.
 
2:26 PM
yup
 
:30676153 Are you a mail server? Yes => No
                                 No => Yes
Feck this ghetto chat mark-fuck
 
\o/
 
Thanks! I think I'm getting a grasp on how SMTP works.
 
But yeah, if you send email to someone@whatever.com, the SMTP server has to query DNS to determine the MX record, which basically maps a domain to an IP address.
 
2:27 PM
^^
 
It's sent to the sender's SMTP server first, right? So if a server sends from a@a.com to b@b.com, the server sends it to a.com's mailservers, which then send it on to b.com's?
 
@Sean You're assuming a particular architecture of mail server that does not necessarily have to be the case.
 
yea once the SMTP recieves it depending whether or not it needs to relay the message or not.. it will query DNS for MX to find the server that handles the primary exchange. Then deliver.
 
In the very absolute simplest email setup, there is NO server on the "sending" end. Nothing listening on any TCP port. Just an SMTP client.
 
right on
 
2:30 PM
You can literally establish an outbound TCP socket from any arbitrary computer on the Internet, to any other arbitrary computer on the Internet, on a port that happens to be listening as an SMTP server on the receiving side (in your exmaple, b.com), and send an email.
 
yeah either you can client -> direct server -> delivery.. or client provider server -> relay to server -> delivery
some providers require you to use TLS /auth if you're attempting to relay mail thats not intended for the network (spam prevention)
 
I think I understand. Maybe I'm going a little XY on myself
 
I have just reset your smart portal password to Password1 << I cry...
 
speaking of spam.. ive been on sorbs once or twice :(
 
@allquixotic And get rejected. Hard. :-(
@djsmiley2k Hey at least your default admin password isn't "admin". And can't be changed.
 
2:34 PM
:D
 
@qwertyuiop only cause spammers are dicks and ruin it for everyone
 
@Sean some companies' email setups can be very complicated and involve a lot of relays and intermediary servers; then there is Exchange, and IMAP, and POP, which are more on the receiving / email storage side of things, but that's completely different and separate than SMTP.
 
I've got postfix set up and running, but there's no settings I can find which point it to my domain's smtp server. The IP address of the server is on the SPF record though, so there's that. When I send out an email from @thisdomain.com on the server, as far as I can see, it's sent to the destination via the domain's mailserver, without issue.
 
SMTP is the process for sending email only, and there is no necessary connection between receiving email and actually keeping them around. You could technically use SMTP as a pretty okay instantaneous communication link between two hosts if you wanted, with no storage, like HTTP.
 
2:38 PM
I'm not sure if I'm missing a settings file or that is literally how smtp can work
 
@Sean Postfix IS YOUR SMTP SERVER!!!
netstat -pant | grep post -- it'll be listening on the well known SMTP ports
 
@allquixotic :V So I am missing something blatant.
 
> SMTP by default uses TCP port 25. The protocol for mail submission is the same, but uses port 587. SMTP connections secured by SSL, known as SMTPS, default to port 465 (nonstandard, but sometimes used for legacy reasons).
Postfix by default should be listening on at least one of those TCP ports
 
@Sean flurdy.com/docs/postfix is worth a bookmark/read
 
You're right, postfix is listening on :25.
 
2:39 PM
you don't "point Postfix at your domain's SMTP server"; Postfix is your SMTP server.
 
Sean, also.. some providers also check incoming smtp connections to verify reverse dns to ensure that the mail server has an associative PTR record.
 
The only reason you would do anything differently is if Postfix is some kind of internal server, that needs to relay messages to your "main" server.
 
Sean, DNS should be fine as long as the MX+A+PTR records exist.
 
2:43 PM
Good job that doesn't onebox
 
I kiiinda don't think that should be oneboxed
 
.... mildly nsfw
 
Last month, one of the hostnames@domain.com was blocked because of excessive spam to my personal email address, the result of lack of foresight for a PHP debug script. My local mail log was spammed with rejections from inbound.mailserver.com I think this is why I'm confused
 
@qwertyuiop it did.
not any more
 
How do you post a link without oneboxing anyway
Huh..
I got a <Image not found> box
 
2:43 PM
you add a > in front of it ;)
 
If postfix is the SMTP server, how come my mx-appointed mailserver is acting as the relay? Am I missing some missing config or just being really dumb
 
Any mail you send to a mail server that doesn't have a mailbox on the local machine would relay by design. But ideally you would want to only allow relaying to outside hosts if clients are using tls/auth.. (I dont use postfix, i still use qmail lol -- dont laugh)
I dont know postfix
conference call.
 
@Sean Because that's how you have it set up. It doesn't have to be that way, but it seems you have it configured that way.
It's a valid configuration but not necessarily required.
 
@allquixotic More investigation needed then I think! I can't see a setting which would do that, but I guess it has to be there.
Either way, thanks for everyone's help! I've learned more in here in 5 minutes than spending a couple of hours trying to figure it out by myself
 
:D
 
@allquixotic Only downside is having to pick a favourite
 
oh no, Verizon sent me a bill for $0.00 due July 20th!
how am I ever going to pay that?!
do I send them an empty envelope?
 
Bob
o.O
 
does the envelope have to be vacuum sealed to indicate "here is a packet of nothing"?
 
3:15 PM
I got a bill for minus £28 last year
 
Bob
5
Q: Dealing with NTP reflection attacks in IPTables

Jeff AtwoodWe're dealing with an NTP reflection / amplification attack at our colocated servers. Here's the traffic: It's churning a bit of CPU on our router: Unfortunately it is not big enough to cause our upstream provider to blackhole the traffic, which means it's passing through to us. We've use...

 
I wonder what banks would do with a check for zero dollars and zero cents
 
@BenN throw it in the trash? ;p
 
@BenN The same as I did for the bill of minus £28: Ignore it.
Or "Return to sender"
 
3:24 PM
@allquixotic Is that... @JourneymanGeek?
 
yeah
 
@Rahul2001 yup he likes his pasta :)
 
EVERYONE LIKES PASTA
 
lol. tomato and garlic. Lots of garlic
I'm pretty sure that bowl of pasta had like half a head of garlic in it
 
@BenN: Almost as good as making an over payment over and under the cost of a postage stamp. =]
Nothing like receiving a check for 25 cents and seeing postage to mail it for > a dollar.
lol
 
3:32 PM
> The current pricing of the Intel SSD 540s makes my recommendation quite simple: don't buy.
 
Bob
> Front line support for you. Paid peanuts and the only difference between them and real monkeys is that real monkeys can actually think for themselves.
 
I saw that.
 
@DavidPostill you just can't trust those australians....
they areturning their country into a supervillian island
first all the animals will literally kill you immediately
and now with all the uranium
 
nice, opus rocks for voice recordings
2 hour telecon: flac = 233 MB, 128k MP3 = 107 MB, ogg/opus = 54 MB
sounds just as good
 
Bob
3:48 PM
@allquixotic I was going to ask "what about CELT" but apparently that's part of Opus now :P
what about HE-AACv2?
hmm, though it is a biased source :P
apparently it's pretty close
 
Anyone here good with windows ce 5.00 ? :D
 
@qwertyuiop ah like bob then
 
Bob
???
 
I know pretty much nothing about Windows Embedded, sorry.
 
4:15 PM
@Bob qwertyuio is also chinese(?)
 
@bwDraco me too :D :D
Just kinda handed the scanner device
told 'this is broken, see if you can fix it, the software is here...'
I'm like :/
Reflashing it with a base image install now.
 
4:35 PM
It would still require a means to get the machine to execute arbitrary code first.
 
yeah, but the transfer distance is cool
to be able to filter down sounds like that is pretty nice
 
"Tourist, don't get sick, we have stadiums, not hospitals" -- this one is from the Cup, I believe.
I saw one in English yesterday on facebook, but FUCK THE TIMELINE ALGHORITHM FOREVER
 
be careful o0
 
@HackToHell That's OK, I'm no tourist (still go no hospitals, though)
 
4:46 PM
why, no funding ?
 
Centuries of widespread, institutionalized corruption and money laundering
 
900 bits / hr
according to the whitepaper
pretty slow
but reliable
 
It feels like this over-the-Internet copy I'm doing now is getting about that speed
 
@DavidPostill, what is the purpose of the sock comment?
 
4:50 PM
They dont state whether or not thats 900 bits / hr with / with out compression
but still 900 baud is a lot better than 900 bits
still freaking cool
 
I'm getting 33 kbps today on my work network .___.
Or should I say... notwork badumtssss
 
5:27 PM
My mom confiscated my laptop for a month... :/
I was coding instead of studying...
Apparently that's a crime now... D:
 
@Dave Asking for accepts ... :)
 
Is brass a metal?
Do you say brass metal shim or brass shim?
 
@Boris_yo Brass is a metal alloy made of copper and zinc
brass shim
 
5:50 PM
brass may also include small proportions of a range of other elements including arsenic, phosphorus, aluminium, manganese, and silicon
 
@Rahul2001 You can probably say the same for almost all metals. They are never 100% pure :) (unless you pay loads of money)
Examplehttp://www.hydro.com/en/Products/Casthouse-products/High-purity/ Aluminium
Purity ranges from 99.99 to 99.9999 per cent (4N to 6N)
 
:D
Anyways, goodnight guys...
It's going to be a long day tomorrow
 
Not for me @DavidPostill :( The OP is new and may (probably) not know to accept and the answer clearly took effort! I've done the same on your posts :s
 
6:14 PM
Does someone have an idea for what is this plug?
I tried with an Ethernet cable and doesn't fit.
And phone plugs are much more smaller
 
@DavidPostill So if I wanted to specify metal I would also have to include copper and zinc?
 
6:31 PM
@PichiWuana Looks like a phone plug to me. In the uk we have the RJ11 socket on the device side and a larger socket on the wall: novatech.co.uk/products/cables/networkingcables/Novatech/…
 
Oh...
@Mokubai Thank you very much!!
Do you think I can change it for a Ethernet plug alone? Something simple? Or should the Internet provider come to my house?
 
@PichiWuana It depends if it is connected to your phone system...
If it's not connected to the wires in the street then you can do what you like with it
 
@Mokubai You mean that if it's not connected to the wires in the street, I do can change it for an Ethernet plug?
 
@PichiWuana If it's your home wiring you can do what you like with it. At least that's how it works here... Whether the cable behind the walls is usable for ethernet is another question entirely...
 
I understand
 
6:46 PM
Telephone = 2 bits of low quality copper, ethernet = 4 pairs of quality controlled wire
 
6:57 PM
Oh
 
7:26 PM
 
8:14 PM
@Boris_yo I would call brass a metal as both (main) components are metal ... some alloys contain non-metals - for example cast iron is iron (metal) + carbon (non-metal).
 
8:37 PM
lol
Where is the river?
 
Middle-right looks vaguely river-ish
Or maybe you're supposed to just hit Verify without selecting anything?
 
@BenN Personally I would refresh the captcha
 
9:27 PM
chocolatey.org pretty cool pkg manager for windows
 
10:01 PM
> Although these boards are available now, they could be removed from the market in the near future. Intel has been attempting to stop Asrock from manufacturing motherboards with this feature for several months now. At one point, Asrock called its line of non-Z170 BCLK OC motherboards the “Sky OC” series, but it was forced to cancel that product line. It later reintroduced the Sky OC series boards rebranded as the Hyper-OC series, but as Intel has intervened with this product line before, it is quite likely to do so again.
Apr 5 at 1:06, by bwDraco
ASRock going "f--- you Intel, we're putting a dedicated clock generator on the board to enable overclocking anyway" is not going to end well.
 
10:18 PM
Here you go, president of the european commission slapping leaders last month.
lol
 
 
2 hours later…

« first day (2153 days earlier)      last day (2859 days later) »