Feb 4, 2017 20:45
@egreg I tried to make the table as simple as I can and at the same time raise my question.
The central column is for the data shared for all case studies
Feb 4, 2017 20:43
@egreg what is the point if I provide some complicated formula?
Feb 4, 2017 20:38
@egreg It is not spreadsheet, in fact, it is just an example, I filled the cells with dummy things. I have formulas in each cell
Feb 4, 2017 20:31
@StefanKottwitz I posted the question. tex.stackexchange.com/questions/352061/…
Feb 4, 2017 20:05
@StefanKottwitz Thank you.
Feb 4, 2017 20:01
I mean two equal cells
Feb 4, 2017 20:01
I have merged three cells; then I want to split these three cells to two cells. How I can do that?
Feb 4, 2017 20:00
@StefanKottwitz OK.
I have another question please..
Feb 4, 2017 19:58
How to solve this issue ?
Feb 4, 2017 19:58
Feb 4, 2017 19:57
The mathematical symbols crossing the lines of the cells
Feb 4, 2017 19:56
I have a problem with writing mathematical formulas in a table
Feb 4, 2017 19:55
Hi
Nov 18, 2016 20:35
@DavidCarlisle Thank you.
Nov 18, 2016 20:31
@DavidCarlisle I have a question please; I have a long document. The template for this document is designed for a single sided print, (the left side of each page has more space than the right side. If I want to print double sided, this template is not very useful. How to change the margins based on odd and even page number?
Nov 18, 2016 20:26
Hi @DavidCarlisle
Sep 21, 2016 15:53
@DavidCarlisle Thank you so much. I appreciate your help.
Sep 21, 2016 15:35
@DavidCarlisle Thanks. could you tell me how to centre it?
Sep 21, 2016 15:34
 
Jan 30, 2017 09:26
@Jackson Thanks for your suggestion, I have posted the question.
Jan 29, 2017 18:03
Hi,
I would like to know how many antennas are inside an iPhone 7 for the 4G connection?
Is it possible to have multiple antennas on an iPhone to make the received signal stronger and give better data throughput?
 

 English Language & Usage: Multi-Layer

Not for the faint of heart or those easily triggered by Englis...
Dec 29, 2016 20:30
I think you made a very clear explanation. Thank you.
Dec 29, 2016 20:28
Yes, I am talking about two impacts
Dec 29, 2016 20:23
and why ?
Dec 29, 2016 20:23
The impact of the A and the B are considered.
or
The impact of the A and the B is considered.
Dec 29, 2016 20:22
I have a question please
Dec 29, 2016 20:20
hI
Dec 15, 2016 22:31
Thank you.
Dec 15, 2016 22:10
Using "the" in the following case is right or wrong:
The authors of this article investigated the characteristic of ...
Or
Authors of this article investigated the characteristic of ...
Dec 15, 2016 22:06
Hi
Dec 12, 2016 22:35
@AndrewLeach Thanks.
Dec 12, 2016 22:28
@AndrewLeach someone told me I should use loose not lose!
Dec 12, 2016 21:47
Could anyone tell me if "lose" is the correct word here:
Moreover, the glue scheme does not lose its advantage despite the presence of water
Dec 12, 2016 21:45
hi
Oct 14, 2016 23:48
@Mazura Thanks
Oct 14, 2016 23:43
Hi, which of these is better concerning formal writing:

The mentioned works gave us a good background understanding
in the area of pipe design ...

A good background understanding in the area of pipe design has been gained from the works mentioned above ...
Sep 22, 2016 10:32
to better understand the xxxx. OR to understand the xxxx better.
Sep 22, 2016 10:32
Hi
 

 Wolfram Mathematica

Welcome! This is the main Mathematica chat room for mathematic...
Oct 31, 2016 00:39
hi
Oct 15, 2016 20:52
@JacobAkkerboom could you please try integrate with respect to t?
Oct 14, 2016 16:05
Hi,
Can someone try to solve this integral with Mathematica 11.0?

\int_a^{\infty } e^{-b t} (t+1)^{-c} t^{d-1} \, dt

Thanks in advance
Oct 9, 2016 15:39
@MichaelE2 I agree with you. However, for someone beginner, it is not easy to find these ways. Thank you.
Oct 9, 2016 14:54
@MichaelE2 Hi
Please see this example
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Solve%5Ba%2F(1+%2B+b+x)+-+Log%5B1+%2B+b+x%5D+%2B+1+%3D%3D+0,+x%5D
Oct 8, 2016 20:24
Why using wolframalpha.com can solve an expression, while using Mathematica 9.0 can't?
Oct 8, 2016 20:19
hi
Oct 2, 2016 17:05
In Mathematica 9.0, how do I set the precision back to the default value?
I used this line to increase the precision

$PreRead = (# /.
s_String /;
StringMatchQ[s, NumberString] &&
Precision@ToExpression@s == MachinePrecision :>
s <> "`30." &);

However, it ruined my calculations. Now I want to move back to the default settings.
Oct 2, 2016 17:00
Hi
Sep 28, 2016 10:22
Found the mistake, Thanks
Sep 28, 2016 09:56
Dear friends,
I have the following code; I appreciate if someone helps me what is wrong with it?

KK = 3;
limm = 4;
yall = {};
For[j = 0, j <= limm, j = j + 1, pt = j;
px = 2^pt;
outloop = 0;
For[i = 1, i <= KK, i = i + 1, ntest = i;
Which[ntest == 1,
y1 = px + 1,
ntest == 2,
y1 = px + 2,
ntest == 3,
y1 = px + 3]
outloop = outloop + y1;
]
y2 = N[(outloop)];
yall = Append[yall, outloop];
]
Sep 27, 2016 23:54
Hi