Mathematics

Associated with Math.SE; for both general discussion & math qu...
Dec 30, 2015 14:33
I look at this exercise of A. Pressley:

Show that the Gaussian and mean curvatures of a surface S are smooth functions on $S$.


I did this:

We consider that $S$ is smooth, so also its parametrization $\sigma$.

Having that $\sigma$ is smooth, its partial derivatives of all orders are continuous.

So $$ E=\|\sigma_u\|^2, \ F=\sigma_u \cdot \sigma_v, \ G=\|\sigma_v\|^2, \ L=\sigma_{uu}\cdot \mathbf{N}, \ M=\sigma_{uv}\cdot \mathbf{N}, \\ N=\sigma_{vv}\cdot \mathbf{N}, \ \mathbf{N}=\frac{\sigma_u \times \sigma_v}{\|\sigma_u \times \sigma_v\|}$$ are smooth functions.
Dec 30, 2015 14:26
Hello everyone
Dec 29, 2015 16:45
Hello everyone!
Dec 28, 2015 21:47
Why is $S$ a smooth surface by assumption ? @DanielFischer
Dec 28, 2015 21:40
Yes, that is what I tried to solve the exercise. So it is correct to assume it. Or not? @DanielFischer
Dec 28, 2015 21:37
@DanielFischer so we do not have to assume it? Why is it so?
Dec 28, 2015 21:33
At math.stackexchange.com/questions/1590177/smooth-functions is it correct to consider that $\sigma$ is smooth? @DanielFischer @dREaM
Dec 28, 2015 21:20
@DanielFischer @dREaM do you know the answer of my question chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/26467814#26467814 ?
Dec 28, 2015 21:17
Does anyone know?
Dec 28, 2015 21:12
The dot product and Cross product of two smooth curves is also smooth. Or not?
Dec 28, 2015 21:11
Hello everyone
Dec 23, 2015 22:12
@TedShifrin Thanks!
Dec 23, 2015 22:08
Is the text I wrote above the justification why the sign changes because of the direction of $N$ ? @TedShifrin
Dec 23, 2015 22:05
Hi @TedShifrin

About the exercise of yesterday ( http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/26379097#26379097 ) :

The Gauss map is equal to the unit normal $N$.

When the orientation of the surface changes, the unit normal changes its sign, so therefore the Gauss map changes its sign. Correct?

Does it follow that the derivative of the Gauss map also changes its sign, so the Weingarten map?
Dec 22, 2015 23:58
Hello @TedShifrin

I look again at an exercise in differential geometry and need some help.

The exercise is:
Show that the Weingarten map changes sign when the orientation of the surface changes.

The Weingarten map is defined by $W_{p,S}=-D_pG$, where $D_pG$ is the derivative of the Gauss map, the rate at which the unit normal $N$ varies across $S$.

So does the sign changes because of the direction of $N$?
Dec 22, 2015 22:45
Ok. Thanks for the hint! @OFFSHARING
Dec 22, 2015 22:44
You mean to set $u=r \sin\theta$, $v=r \cos\theta$ ? @OFFSHARING
Dec 22, 2015 22:24
How can we calculate the integral $\iint_{\{u^2+v^2<1\}}\sqrt{1+4(u^2+v^2)}dudv$ ?
Dec 21, 2015 23:11
To see if it is a surface of revolution we always have to look if $z=\text{constant}$ is a circle.
To say which surface it is, do we have to take for example $x$ to be constant? @TedShifrin
Dec 21, 2015 23:06
@TedShifrin what do you mean?
Dec 21, 2015 23:03
$u^2+v^2=c$ is a circle. Correct? @TedShifrin
Dec 21, 2015 22:56
Isn't $z=\text{constant}$ a Line perpendicular to the axis?
An example is $r(u,v)=(u,v,u^2+v^2)$.
@TedShifrin
Dec 21, 2015 22:51
$z=\text{constant}$ a Line. Correct? @TedShifrin
Dec 21, 2015 22:48
so is a parametrization of a surface of revolution of the form $r(u,v)=(f(u,v), g(u,v), h)$? @TedShifrin
Dec 21, 2015 22:45
At the parametrization of the surface should one coordinate, the one that corresponds to the axis of revolution, be constant? @TedShifrin
Dec 21, 2015 22:40
A surface of revolution is obtained by rotating a plane curve around the axis of revolution. Correct?
What are 'slices'?
@TedShifrin
Dec 21, 2015 22:13
@TedShifrin Don't have a clue. Can you help?
Dec 21, 2015 22:04
Does for example a paraboloid of revolution have a specific form, so that we recognize it? @TedShifrin
Dec 21, 2015 22:02
If it is a quadric cone, a paraboloid of revolution, a hyperbolic cylinder. @TedShifrin
Dec 21, 2015 22:00
How can we know what kind of surface is a specific surface?
Do we look at the parametrization? Or at the first fundamental forms of the surface?
Dec 21, 2015 21:57
HI!
Dec 19, 2015 15:13
We have the ellipsoid $\frac{x^2}{p^2}+\frac{y^2}{q^2}+\frac{z^2}{r^2}=1 , p, q, r \neq 0$.

I want to show that it is a smooth surface.

$r(u,v)=(p\sin{u} \cos{v}, q\sin{u} \sin{v} , r\cos{u})$ a parametrization of the ellipsoid.

I calculated that $r_u \times r_v=(qr\sin^2{u} \cos{v}, pr\sin^2{u} \sin{v}, pq\cos{u} \sin{u})$.

So that it is a smooth surface, one has to show that $r_u \times r_v \neq 0$, or not?

This doesn't stand. For $u=0$ : $r_u \times r_v=(0,0,0)$, or?

Does one not show in this way that it is a smooth surface?
Dec 19, 2015 14:28
@robjohn can I ask you a question about differential geometry?
Dec 19, 2015 14:21
oh ok.
Dec 19, 2015 14:20
@Huy are you familiar with differential geometry?
Dec 19, 2015 14:15
@gansub I don't know. Sorry.
Dec 19, 2015 14:10
@gansub What is your question?
Dec 19, 2015 14:06
Is anyone familiar with differential geometry?
Dec 19, 2015 14:01
We have the ellipsoid $\frac{x^2}{p^2}+\frac{y^2}{q^2}+\frac{z^2}{r^2}=1 , p, q, r \neq 0$.

Is $r(u,v)=(p\sin{u} \cos{v}, q\sin{u} \sin{v} , r\cos{u})$ a parametrization of the ellipsoid for each $u$ and $v$ ?

Or do $u$ and $v$ have to satisfy a condition?
Dec 19, 2015 13:58
Hi!
Dec 15, 2015 22:11
Dec 15, 2015 22:09
@MikeMiller Is it a picture of yours? hihihi
Dec 15, 2015 22:09
Dec 15, 2015 22:08
Hello guys
Nov 4, 2015 22:37
@TedShifrin So at the first question do we just define the sequence?
Nov 4, 2015 19:27
@TedShifrin :(
Nov 4, 2015 19:21
@TedShifrin
For the first question.
We can show that there is such a sequence as follows:

If there is no such $T_0$ , by definition that means that for every $T_0>0$
there exists $0< T'<T_0$ such that $\gamma$ is $T'$-periodic.
We use this to define the sequence iteratively: to get $T_1$ , we take $T_0=1$
in the above, and we let $T_1$ be the corresponding $T'$ . Then, we "take $T_0 =T_1$ in the above, and we let $T_2$ be the new "corresponding T ′
. Etc.: given $T_n$ we define $T_{n+1}$ to be the T ′ corresponding to $T_0=T_n$.
 

 La tertulia

General discussion for spanish.stackexchange.com
Dec 19, 2015 14:45
Ok. Thanks!
Dec 19, 2015 13:23
How do we say in spanish "What a beautiful song!" ? @MattE.Эллен
Dec 19, 2015 13:23
Hi!