[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, potentially bad ns for domain in body, potentially bad keyword in body (294): Green CBD Gummies by SofiaMawby on apple.SE
@Rob That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer Append -force to the command if you really want to add this pattern.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Blacklisted website in body, potentially bad ns for domain in body, potentially bad keyword in body (101): Psorizin Cijena by Point King on meta.SE (@Ollie)
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Few unique characters in body, luncheon meat detected, no whitespace in body, potentially bad keyword in body, repeating characters in body (300): SQL HELP_ME _PLEASE by RandomName on stackoverflow.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, pattern-matching product name in body, potentially bad ip for hostname in body, +1 more (392): Dragons Den Keto UK by DragonsDenKetoUK on apple.SE
@JeffSchaller That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer Append -force to the command if you really want to add this pattern.
> Numbers-only title, phone number detected in title ---------- Numbers-only title - Position 0-12: +18052849329 Phone number detected in title - Phone number: 18052849329
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Few unique characters in answer, mostly punctuation marks in answer, repeating characters in answer (204): Как решить задачу by A_A on ru.stackoverflow.com (@VictorVosMottor)
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Blacklisted website in body, link at beginning of body, potentially bad asn for hostname in body, potentially bad ip for hostname in body (141): Employee Scheduling Software by chandru breziot on stackoverflow.com
@Ollie There isn't a "Potentially bad keyword in body" detection on this report. The "support" in the URL triggered a "Bad pattern in url answer", so maybe you saw that one.
This user has two answers, all of which seem to promote the same product thing. I can't find any proof of affiliation, but I am sure that they are affiliated. Should I mod flag?
@10Rep That pattern looks like it's already caught by Blacklisted website in body and Blacklisted website in answer Append -force to the command if you really want to add this pattern.
@SmokeDetector I'm not sure this is spam. It's very promotional, but the question is explicitly asking for such resources, and affiliation is disclosed.
@cigien Indeed. Those privileges are based on the amount (and correctness) of watches provided, AFAIK. Being a moderator doesn't make one automatically well-versed in SD/MS.
Would it be ok to mod flag this and explain that it is spam because of the clear affiliation in the domain name and username? stackoverflow.com/a/68200251/12708583
@10Rep that's definitely spam, flag away. This isn't even excessive self-promotion- the user, by saying "This helped me", is trying to deceive readers into thinking that there is no affiliation.
@Ollie Nope, that post is neither spam nor abusive enough to warrant a red flag. Your feedback did cause Smokey to send that message, but it's a message that should have been sent. No need to worry.
