[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in link text in body, potentially bad asn for hostname in body, potentially bad ip for hostname in body, potentially bad keyword in body (72): What Does car insurance cover? by Nitish Raj on stackoverflow.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, pattern-matching product name in body, potentially bad ns for domain in body, +1 more (392): What is Vital Lean Keto? by bilvanrow on apple.SE
@Spevacus That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
Not sure how to feel about that one. Couple of users on Stack Overflow with the name Amy Carter, one of which is >1000 rep, though their activity is relatively stagnant.
From my understanding, just because something is related to a spam type, does not qualify it as a pre-existing campaign. For example, just because it's drug related, doesn't mean it's the same campaign. ISO certification spam is relatively common, and we have no way of knowing that this is the same campaign as the others.
user435118
@Spevacus I don't think there's any harm in blacklisting it, no fp's and it can add more weight.
It would need to be a specific product name (or in this case a certification type spammed by one company or provider) and have some sort of overlap in something we've blacklisted.
Oh yeah absolutely, there's probably next to no harm in bumping it up, I just wanna be clear here, for my sake, about what exactly qualifies as a pre-existing campaign
user435118
@Spevacus I'm not 100% sure but I think you're right. My bad.
> Bad phone number in body, bad phone number in title, numbers-only title ---------- Bad phone number in body - 3146357319 found normalized Bad phone number in title - 3146357319 found normalized Numbers-only title - Position 0-14: (314) 635-7319
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at beginning of body, potentially bad ns for domain in body, potentially bad keyword in body (44): Pelatihan ISO 22000 by johnn son on askubuntu.com (@Ollie)
@Ollie Ah, I see. Nothing special about today. I just go through the transcript once or twice a day (preferably when there's not a lot of members giving feedback, or chatting :p), and there are usually a few things that need to be watched that got missed, so I add them.
@Ollie That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
