« first day (3399 days earlier)      last day (1526 days later) » 

12:05 AM
@Robusto Because all three were flagged no longer needed.
 
 
3 hours later…
3:06 AM
@RegDwigнt "Also I don't know anything about music. Is it hard?"
@RegDwigнt Sorry, I don't listen to KPOP.
You can tell it's KPOP without listening. All you have to do is look at the Hangul in the title and you're there.
@tchrist I wonder how one determines whether something is needed or not. It's a comment. Rare is the comment that is actually needed.
 
@Robusto Doesn't matter, they're all of to the chatroom of their discontent now.
 
Ashworth writes an answer in a comment on every single question and somehow they stay up there.
 
No they don't. Not all of them.
 
OK, somewhere north of five digits of comments, then, making a wild guess.
 
I didn't spend too much time on it. The flags came from someone whose opinion I had reason to take seriously. But I loathe spending more than a moment on comment flags.
The comments aren't gone. I undeleted them and moved everything.
Rebooting to install updates.
 
3:15 AM
Yes. Which is another way of saying they are gone. Very few ever pursue the dialogue into the chat.
Not that I care if some of mine get deleted. It just bugs me when many people @Robusto one of my comments and then that gets deleted, leaving a gaping hole. It just seems messy.
There, I said it. I'm done with it.
 
 
2 hours later…
5:09 AM
@Robusto You're right. I hate it when I do that, too.
 
> Il y a un an, vous affirmiez que vous n’aviez « pas le temps d’avoir une fiancée ». Et aujourd’hui ?

C’est vrai que je n’ai pas le temps pour. Je suis en studio dès le matin, ou en tournée.
@tchrist How do you feel about this word order?
I actually didn't think French occupied itself with that same question, one which is amongst our most popular here.
 
@Cerberus I think you've caught one of those weirdo kaybeckers who strand prepositions.
 
But, now that I see this, I seem to recall seeing avec in a similar position.
 
Maybe.
 
En fin d'une phrase comme ça.
 
5:22 AM
I just don't like that pour hanging out there at the end. "You want to come with?" is fine in Germanic, but not in Romance.
 
But you may be right, that it is wrong or informal this way.
 
Oh, it does happen.
I wouldn't write it.
It happens notoriously in Québec, but I imagine that's not from there.
 
Ah, I see.
 
I'd've written pour ça.
Or pour tout ça, you know, that sort of thing.
 
I've no idea, it might be Québecois.
 
5:24 AM
They do this.
 
Yes, I would certainly have added an object myself.
I have been listening to Coeur de Pirate a bit of late. I had all but forgotten the name of the band, it took me ages to find it again.
They are from that province.
 
Then that would be why.
 
But this is not related to them.
An interview with a French singer.
Could it be because he is a gypsy?
I have noticed some other things in his language that sounded wrong to me.
 
> A few non-standard dialects of French seem to have developed preposition stranding as a result of linguistic contact with English. Preposition stranding has been found in areas where the Francophone population is under intense contact with English, including certain parts of Alberta, Northern Ontario, New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island, and Louisiana. It is found (but heavily decried) in very informal Quebec French.
 
I believe he was born Spanish.
 
5:26 AM
Spanish never does that. Nor Portuguese. Not even Brazilian.
 
@tchrist Oh, borrowed from English, even!
 
peut-être
Languages in Collision!
 
It's quite a crash.
 
> Wh-movement: Qui est-ce que tu as fait le gâteau pour?
Whom did you bake the cake for?
Standard French: Pour qui est-ce que tu as fait le gâteau?
> Pseudopassives: Robert a été parlé beaucoup de au meeting.
Robert was much talked about at the meeting.
Standard French: On a beaucoup parlé de Robert au meeting.
> Relative clauses: Tu connais pas la fille que je te parle de.
You don't know the girl that I'm talking to you about.
Standard French: Tu ne connais pas la fille dont je te parle.
Another, more widespread non-standard variant: Tu ne connais pas la fille que je te parle.
 
@tchrist Okay, this does really sound like a big, fat Anglicism.
 
5:29 AM
> To standard French ears, these constructs all sound quite alien, and are thus considered as barbarisms or "anglicismes". However, not all dialects of French allow preposition stranding to the same extent. For instance, Ontario French restricts preposition stranding to relative clauses with certain prepositions; in most dialects, stranding is impossible with the prepositions à (to) and de (of).
> A superficially similar construction is possible in standard French in cases where the object is not moved, but implied, such as Je suis pour ("I'm all for (it)") or Il faudra agir selon ("We'll have to act according to (the situation)").
 
Yeah, it is even more egregious with de.
@tchrist Ah, yes, that is the case in my quotation.
 
Still sounds a little
See, don't you want me to finish that? :)
 
Does your source pass judgement on the last construction?
 
Apparently.
Preposition stranding, sometimes called P-stranding, is the syntactic construction in which a preposition with an object occurs somewhere other than immediately adjacent to its object; for example, at the end of a sentence. The preposition is then described as stranded, hanging, or dangling. This kind of construction is found mainly in English and in some other Germanic languages or dialects. Preposition stranding is also found in languages outside the Germanic family, such as Vata and Gbadi (two languages in the Niger–Congo family), and certain dialects of French spoken in North America. ��2...
There a large section there on Dutch, a smaller one on French.
 
> for example, Dutch in can mean either in or into when used prepositionally, but can only mean into when used postpositionally
I don't think I agree with this, or perhaps that text is a bit old fashioned?
One could say, "welke zak zat hij in?", but perhaps that is slightly informal.
 
5:37 AM
More than it would be in English?
At least you don't have to figure out which case for "in welke".
Accusative with movement, dative if it just sits there. :)
 
Welk doesn't have cases!
 
That's the point.
 
Right.
 
> Auf welchem
 
@tchrist Somewhat more informal than in English, yes.
Wikipaedia is rather cautious about Dutch.
 
5:40 AM
> Für welchen
 
Oh, you mean, you don't have to worry about cases there, unlike English.
 
That kind of fussiness.
 
Yet another class of very popular questions here.
 
Can you tell that him was originally dative in English, not accusative?
The -m gives it away.
But we've lost all that now, of course.
Somebody else has died in Seattle today.
 
Yeah, him and hem looks dative.
 
5:44 AM
And the highschool lad whose test came back positive Friday has a strain of the virus that's a lineal descendent of the very first U.S. case in Washington State six weeks ago.
 
On Wednesday, we had zero cases.
On Thursday, one.
 
And there's no way the second person could have contracted it from the first.
So whom else has it gone through?
 
Their number has so far doubled every day since ___.
We're now at ten.
 
I think this is going to explode here over the next week.
 
(In Dutch, that would have been sindsdien: we cannot use the praeposition/conjunction sinds without an object or clause!)
 
5:46 AM
And then again the week after next, at which point they'll be imposing serious measures. And Trump may have perished of a heart attack by then for having watched the stock market.
 
Or he may have caught the disease.
 
Been to see the Holy Father again, has he?
Try reading that one with an Irish accent. :)
 
I think il Papa didn't have it?
 
No se sabe.
Non si whatever in Italian, but he speaks better Spanish.
He looked danged sick.
 
No doubt.
That would be something, if the Pope, Khamenei, and Trump all got sick.
 
5:49 AM
I wouldn't put them in the same wagon.
 
No, I don't think they would like it.
Poena cullei (from Latin 'penalty of the sack') under Roman law was a type of death penalty imposed on a subject who had been found guilty of parricide. The punishment consisted of being sewn up in a leather sack, with an assortment of live animals including a dog, snake, monkey, and a chicken or rooster, and then being thrown into water. The punishment may have varied widely in its frequency and precise form during the Roman period. For example, the earliest fully documented case is from ca. 100 BC, although scholars think the punishment may have developed about a century earlier. Inclusion of...
 
We know nothing right now. We'll know more in six months, but it will have run through a lot of us by then. Once that's done, we'll know a lot more, like in a year or two.
 
Perhaps it will wane in Summer.
Like the flu.
 
And perhaps not. We don't know.
 
Indeed not.
 
5:51 AM
About 20% of colds are from coronavirus not from rhinovirus, you know.
 
We have fewer colds in summer.
 
Yes, but maybe it's only the rhinovirus ones that calm down.
We're not as confined then, but there's some temperature and humidity effect in play as well.
 
Could be.
 
Like I said, we know nothing.
 
No.
Except that it is bed-time.
I wish you a good night.
 
5:53 AM
And beyond.
And you.
 
Adieu!
 
 
8 hours later…
1:45 PM
@Robusto of course you don't. Which is why I said "for reference" and "not that it matters".
@Cerberus meh, that's loser talk. "I don't have time for a girlfriend" is loser talk for "I'm such a loser no girl will even look at me".
(I should know. Because I really really really have no time for a girlfriend.)
 
2:18 PM
@Cerberus What about a good ol push down the stairs?
 
 
1 hour later…
3:31 PM
@tchrist two comment locks in two weeks. I'm starting to think it's me.
I'll have to prepare for this coming Friday if no one else comes up with a good one. What's a category other than SWR that might attract lots of traffic and get on the HNQ?
 
@Mitch More than that. It's because I'm tired of having to either delete or move 57 SWR comments for every new such twenty-questions puzzle. People keep answering in comments, which brings flags and discursion, which brings more work for me.
Does that make sense?
 
3:59 PM
@tchrist can't you just ignore 'answers' in comments? They're not actual answers until someone makes an answer out of them. They're help to what they comment on if they're incorporated, otherwise they're ignorable.
Oh...but they're flagged so you have to deal with it. Why can't dealing with it just be 'ignore' or 'not helpful' or whatever is a 'not worth it' answer?
 
4:48 PM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Few unique characters in answer, repeating words in answer (172): What is the meaning of 'skrt'? by yeet on english.SE
 
5:07 PM
@Mitch That wasn't creative enough.
 
> Adhesives: 4 packages.
Adhesives: 4 packs.
Which is more natural? I think "packages" is
I think that we only tend to use "packs" with cigarettes, playing cards etc.
And for more diverse things it's "package".
I'm translating a table that describes how much/many of particular medical material/items should be presented for testing.
If the company wants to obtain state registration for her surgical adhesive material, it must provide 4 packages of it. "Упаковка" in Russian. Four standard packages, the type of packages the company intends to sell the adhesive in.
 
5:22 PM
pack of discreet things all the same type
a package is something that get delivered.
 
Or something that is wrapped up?
Be it in wrapping-paper or underwear.
 
yeah
a pack is packaged, though
 
So it is.
 
5:49 PM
I'm in some debate groups, and a phrase that frequently comes up is "morality is subjective."
In jest, I recently said "morality is subjugation."
What would you call what I did there?
 
A kind of pun?
 
Ya
morality is subj-
morality is -ugation
morality is -unctive
Long story short, they're trying to argue that I didn't do a play on words (a pun).
 
6:04 PM
The definition of a pun is subjective.
 
@adamaero The other day, I was reading this article on "[some number] Rhetorical Devices You Didn't Know". There were so many long, archaic words for "devices" I used in everyday speech and never considered myself to be that witty in using them. The morale of the story being, that what's clear, is that replacing "subjugation" with another word wouldn't have the same effect on me, and that there definitely is a name for every dumb or smart idea anyone came up with writing their sentences.
Heh, trouble in Physics chat again.
 
@adamaero An intentional malapropism?
@M.A.R. probably with their puns
 
I dunno how to laugh punnily, but you might pull it off, o' master of puns, great @Mitch
 
@MattE.Эллен But a package is not always a pack. It is definitely packed though.
@M.A.R. If you were French and cute, I'd say 'hon hon hon!'
You may very well be French.
 
That sounds like a Victorian laugh
 
6:09 PM
Or like a honking goose.
But that's the French for you.
 
If I say I can't tell the difference sometimes, would that be racist?
Or classist?
 
It's only *-ist if it is negative.
 
@Mitch cool
 
I was thinking more like the comely noble British Victorian era ladies
 
Like if you call someone pejoratively 'You dog', it is awfully rude to dogs as a group and you'd be considered speciesist.
 
6:11 PM
@Mitch That's istist
 
@Mitch !!!
You cow.
 
@M.A.R. It is, and I meant it to sting.
 
Which Sting.
 
@Cerberus xswl
 
Every second dark and brooding celebrity nicknames themselves Sting
 
6:12 PM
@M.A.R. Either @Robusto or @RegDwigнt has made that joke before. I think... @RegDwigнt
 
Dangit.
 
Feb 7 at 21:12, by RegDwigнt
@Mitch what's Sting to do with any of this.
wow, so recently too.
 
Although, every joke has probably already been made in this chat.
 
By @RegDwigнt or @Robusto.
 
You guys have been talking since 2010 and you still don't seem to be running out of words
 
6:13 PM
Dec 31 '18 at 22:48, by Mitch
Nov 9 at 14:20, by Mitch
Oct 18 at 14:11, by Mitch
Jun 1 at 19:04, by Mitch
May 17 '17 at 19:08, by Mitch
there's nothing new under the sun
 
Well I do
@Mitch but at nights?
@Mitch Not as impressive as your other self-citation
 
@M.A.R. I think there's room for jokes about that. Probably involving cats.
But then that'd be doggist.
 
I don't want to remember that movie again.
I have watched only five minutes and a trailer. It has been enough.
 
@Mitch I've never self-citated myself
 
Kinky, but not even close to enjoyable
@Mitch So you had five other Mitch clones?
 
6:16 PM
@M.A.R. click on that reference.
 
Which one was the scrambled-TV-signal Mitch?
 
@M.A.R. You must be thinking of another <itch in another universe. Namely that univese where I have a memory of these things.
 
@Mitch OK, that joke has been done before, to be sure
 
Ah... the universe where all '<' are replaced by the letter 'M' for some crazy reason.
@M.A.R. It's not a URL so you're safe.
 
@Mitch There are certain jokes that come to mind but they're harsh.
 
6:18 PM
That's mean.
 
@Mitch Nothing is safe these days.
 
Or rather I bet it would be mean if I understood it.
 
@Mitch Wow, you're advanced.
 
Even things that don't have cameras spy on you. Like this bottle of water.
 
@M.A.R. Cough into your elbow, wasgh your hands often, try not to touch your face.
 
6:19 PM
@Mitch I was never the average person
@Mitch That first one seems tough
 
@M.A.R. You bottle of water is not taking pictures of you (yet!) but it is tracking its location and volume used and temperature.
 
And I was touching myself with both hands while reading that message. Will I die.
 
Not -possibly- to be used against you but definitely to be used against you.
 
@Mitch Which advertisers will use to sell me . . . I'd be inclined to say Viagra, but I've been getting very weird ads these days.
 
yesterday, by Mitch
dbq — duìbùqǐ 对不起 — "sorry"

xswl — xiào sǐ wǒ le 笑死我了 — "LOL" (literally means "makes me laugh to death")

bhys — bù hǎoyìsi 不好意思 — "excuse me; sorry"

sjb — shénjīngbìng 神经病 — "psycho" (informal; usually refers to people who speak or behave annoyingly or offensively, rather than people who literally suffer from mental illness)

xxj — xiǎoxué jī 小学鸡 — "childish, immature people who speak or behave stupidly" (literally means "pupil chicken")

awsl — A wǒ sǐle 啊我死了 — "Ah, I am dead (because this is so cute / admirable / incredible…)"
 
6:22 PM
A trampoline, a trip to the closest rain forest, and women's T-shirts.
 
@M.A.R. well, just don't cough directly into your hands.
@M.A.R. I don't feel comfortable anymore.
 
I tend to cough often since it's a side effect of this immunosuppressor drug I'm taking. After the outbreak, I haven't coughed at all
Maybe once.
@Mitch I, uh, meant to type "my face" but I'm distracted
 
@M.A.R. Isn't Spring coming there soon?
 
So there, the internet has that message now.
 
that's supposed to solve all our problems.
 
6:24 PM
Well, a couple of days ago it was -10 degrees outside.
The cold seems reluctant
 
@M.A.R. That sounds like a 'no' to spring-like weather
 
Remember the Stark words.
 
@M.A.R. It's like everything we say is part of a pattern that's already been catalogued before.
 
I only miss beautiful, blue-eyed zombies
And maybe a bit of a medieval war
 
It's March so winter is over. any more snow or below freezing temperatures is an anomaly. Even if it is steady for a few weeks.
 
6:28 PM
Here the weather has been erratic for as long as I remember
Few years ago, a few miles north, it had snowed on April 1st
-7
Q: Is this movie based on Coronavirus?

RahulI recently watched a movie Contagion (2011) starring some very high rated actors like Kate Winslet, Gwyneth Paltrow, Matt Damon, Lawrence Fishburne, Jude Law etc. It seems to have precisely predicted how Coronavirus originated and spread. I couldn't help but wonder if this movie is about Coronav...

 
@Mitch Yeah, I looked it up.
 
@Cerberus Hm... none in that list are a fitting response.
user image
2
 
6:52 PM
Nice graph.
 
@Mitch awsl
 
7:20 PM
@M.A.R. I believe @Mitch's whole point is that we did run out of words like five years ago, and are are now doomed to forevermore repeat the words we've long used up.
@Mitch how the hell do you people wash your hands. That is unacceptable.
How can you wash your entire palm but then magically miss two tiny stripes right in the middle of it.
 
@RegDwigнt They're very creasy
 
But you've not missed them. You did wash them. They just need more washing than the rest but you did give them washing like the rest.
 
@RegDwigнt There are still words we haven't used but really there's good reason for that. Those words would add nothing.
@RegDwigнt Don't get me started on ties worn by doctors. Biggest vector of disease ...
after children at day care.
 
True, I haven't used the word galkroshyndally yet. Because I don't know what the fuck it's supposed to mean.
 
@RegDwigнt All the good words have been taken
 
7:26 PM
Most of the bad ones, too.
 
ugh...they're awful.
 
Shit was literally taken first thing in the morning.
 
Good job!
 
How to respond someone answered you in the way you wanted (expected)?
 
@RegDwigнt You're really growing up!
 
7:27 PM
@Student404Mus By saying "thanks"?
Give us an example.
@Mitch well you go and try growing down. It's really not easy at all.
 
Yeah. 'Thanks' is pretty universal for that idea.
 
I took the easy way out.
 
@RegDwigнt not exactly.
I'll tell a short story
 
I successfully completed did one thing this morning and now I feel like the rest of the day is free.
@RegDwigнt Oh it's pretty easy. Just get older.
But that thing I did wasn't really me, it was other people finishing up their thing but I can scratch it off my todo list.
I should probably complete a task that is actually me doing something.
 
I and my teacher planned to meet Tomorrow, for some reason she changed the meeting to Wednesday, the day i liked to be for my reasons.
 
7:30 PM
Nice. So it all worked out.
 
How is it better to respond in this situation? Is it by saying only "as expected"?
 
Are they aware of the fact that they changed their plans to match your hopes?
 
No
She doesn't know
 
Just say 'OK'
 
Here where my response makes sense.
 
7:31 PM
No need to thank them for something they were just doing because they wanted to do it.
 
I want to exhibit my feelings to ...
 
Maybe you should ask over on Interpersonal Skills
 
How to formulate this question in short and formal?
 
Yes, you are happy and thankful that your teacher changed their plans to fit yours, but they have no idea about that, they're just doing something because they wanted to.
 
Exactly
 
7:33 PM
Did they just send you an email like "Let's meet Wednesday" ?
(and Wednesday is what is good for you?)
 
indeed
that's the case
 
Just say "OK, let's meet Wednesday"
 
Fine. Thank you
 
Or if you really feel strongly "OK, let's meet Wednesday, that works best for me."
Or "OK, let's meet Wednesday, that works best for me too."
 
Yes. I'll use the last expression.
 
7:43 PM
Wow I just went and checked on my laundry real quick, and you guys typed up a whole novel.
 
Your laundry is a fast typer like that
Oh.
You mean us?
You should check on your laundry more often
 
Of course I had to cross the hall first, and then the moat. And then walk past a couple cottages. But I usually pass those fairly quickly, cause that's where all the servants live.
 
That's when we go wild
 
Right. Ist die Katze aus dem Haus, freuen sich die Mäuse.
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Few unique characters in answer, mostly punctuation marks in answer (123): Words or phrases to describe how street beggars typically look? by dat boi yep on english.SE
 
7:58 PM
It's interesting how our smoke detector never detects actual smoke.
Maybe it was programmed by Boeing.
Or maybe everyone on this site is a non-smoker, but I'm finding that hard to believe.
I'm tempted to go buy some Cubans just to test.
 
@RegDwigнt 1) who is it supposed to help, and 2) don't they get notified by some other method?
 
@Mitch 1) presumably the sikhs, and 2) presumably I don't know.
 
@RegDwigнt 1) I think they have enough of their own problems than to worry about our smokeless smoke. 2) You're the one with superpowers. If you don't know then nobody does.
 
I did say "presumably". I might well know it. At this point we're merely presuming that I don't.
 
8:14 PM
That's horsetwaddle.
I mean that in the best possible way.
 
8:43 PM
@Robusto Just came across this wonderful quote by Carrie Fischer that reminded me of what you said:
> My mother would say, "do drugs, do whatever you need to do, but... why don't you sing?"
Wonderful video. Didn't think I would bear a minute of it, ended up watching it all on a single breath.
Thought it'd be about a cringeworthy, cranky and confused old lady. Ended up being about a different person entirely.
The only cringeworthy bits were those excerpts from award speeches where she followed a transcript written for her by someone else.
But as soon as she was off the cuff, she was pure brilliance. Who'd've thunk.
 
 
2 hours later…
10:53 PM
Another actual question:
> help.
i'm composing something for piano and violin.
but it needs something. i do not know what and i need help.
pleas give me fead back.
thank's.
Actual answer:
> Dude, if you don't give precisions, nobody can help you...
 
That is complete.
 
I beg to differ and posted a more helpful answer.
> The something that it needs is more cowbell.

Though if you keep randomly switching out Es with As, leaving out other Es entirely, and putting breath pauses where none belong, I cannot guarantee that the cowbell alone will do the trick.

Godspeed.
 
11:09 PM
Complete+.
 
Thank you. All my stuff is always complete+. (Except all the scores that I show to @Rob. Those are always incomplete+ just to mess with him.)
Someone else in some other thread just asked if they should be worried about the "carona virus". I told them they shouldn't, because that is literally not a thing that exists.
To think that I could be using all that time to transcribe Duruflé instead.
But it's past midnight, and I'm trying to develop some semblance of discipline. I found that whenever I don't stop working on something by midnight, I can't stop working on it till 4 in the morning.
> The Chopin Mazurka in Ab was published posthumously by Krystyna Kobylanska in 1930. Not much is known about it and it has no known dedication. However it is still an excellent piece encapturing an elegant piece through a continuous sotto voce.
An excellent piece encapturing an elegant piece, eh.
(And there's not a single dynamic marking anywhere in the score, so the continuous sotto voce is a continuous hammering mezzoforte.)
 
@RegDwigнt I hesitate to ask but... is there a MIDI instrument for cowbell?
 
@Mitch I hesitate to answer but yes there is.
 
@RegDwigнt I . didn't hear any hesitation. So I doubt your earnestness.
 
SORRY I FORGOT TO HESITATE MORE LOUDLY
 
11:23 PM
Thanks.
 
I was hesitating in sotto voce, you see.
Listened to too much Chopin as a kid.
 
too much rubato
demasiado rubato
bastante rubato
 
Nah not to worry. When Chopin plays robbers, you just play cops.
You steal his time right back.
What's he gonna say, he's dead.
 
all that music he made, now he's decomposing.
 
It's interesting to read all the various contemporary accounts. Some say he just couldn't keep strict time at all, ever. Others report that he was a human metronome the likes of Freddie Mercury.
Well, they don't really mention Freddie Mercury. I'm paraphrasing.
> Collection of piano songs for Vivaldi No.2: Trio Sonata in G minor, RV 73
That is not a song, you giant ridiculous plum.
 
11:31 PM
So Freddie Mercury had good rhythm is what you're saying?
I never knew that.
Thanks for teaching me.
I learn so much.
 
@RegDwigнt Every composer needs to have some incomplete symphony.
 
He was an atomic clock.
About to oh, oh, oh, explooooode.
 
@Cerberus I have a number of them?
 
@Cerberus oh ist that so. Good thing I have one, then.
 
@Mitch Better!
 
11:33 PM
No mine is better. It is even more incomplete.
 
One starts with a C
 
Mine doesn't even start. It only ends.
 
I have a John Cage Pastiche that I've been working on forever.
Hm... I'll be having some for dessert later.
 
Sorry to inform you Dr Lecter, but John Cage has been dead for thirty years.
 

« first day (3399 days earlier)      last day (1526 days later) »