« first day (2595 days earlier)      last day (1739 days later) » 

12:49 AM
They are getting upvotes on really generic answers that don't actually apply?
 
 
2 hours later…
2:36 AM
There is this user who has only really interacted with the user you mentioned
 
Anyway you can raise a mod flag and they can look into it, if you feel something is off @Kulfy
 
3:00 AM
@Natty tp
 
 
1 hour later…
4:05 AM
@Kulfy I'll back you up on voting irregularities.
 
 
2 hours later…
6:30 AM
OT no-repro, Finally, I had to reinstall Ubuntu.
 
6:44 AM
@Natty ne
@Natty tp
 
I doubt it... but I don't know much about yarn.
 
6:59 AM
While not NAA, this seems both low in quality and not at all a reasonable solution.
 
@Zanna I'm afraid that it might get declined :/
@karel Thanks :)
@pomsky Should I flag this mod attention or some other Q/A (cc @Zanna @karel)
@Kulfy It's gone and I can't flag that.
 
@pomsky Well I saw the user is pasting a same answer in every [wireless] question. removing bcmwl-kernel-source and installing Realtek drivers. Even if the hardware is Qualcomm.
Who deleted answer to this question? Was any mod involved?
 
7:17 AM
 
@pomsky I'm still <10k
 
@Kulfy Yes, and answer posted to this one too: askubuntu.com/questions/1150912/wifi-adapter-missing-on-19-04
 
@pomsky Which mod?
 
mitch
 
I'm not sure if Mitch saw my flag
 
7:20 AM
@Kulfy that was a reply to the chat message, didn't mean you personally :)
 
@pomsky Oh. OK OK
 
7:48 AM
I see no indication that Ubuntu is being used there.
 
I don't think it's OT. It's just a very generic question.
 
no repro (I don't think questions that turn out to be hardware problems or problems with hardware-only solutions are necessarily no repro, but in some cases, like this one, there's no indication in Ubuntu that specifically would suggest the solution.)
@Kulfy I think that question is perfectly good. It could be written better, and it could show a bit more research, but really it's fine, the OP reports what they observed, it's clear, and it can be (and has been) specifically answered.
 
@EliahKagan Yeah. And as far as I remember I must have MS's link where they announced the feature. Need to dig up history.
 
I cast my dupe vote yesterday. :)
 
Still 2 more needed....
 
8:07 AM
I think I was wrong to VTC this question, which was automatically deleted after being closed. I believe the commented workaround (which should have been posted as an answer) applies to a variety of problems gaming in Wine that manifest that way. It's less applicable today (because gaming in Wine tends to work better) but I think still applicable. I've voted to undelete the question.
I ended up referring to that comment in this CW answer elsewhere. For some reason I had not noticed, or had forgotten to take action based on, the comment there requesting that the broken link be fixed.
 
8:21 AM
Does that latest edit (revision #11) improve the post? I don't think the code formatting was unclear before, and a link with a useful title was replaced by one that just says "This question".
 
I'll consider it not as a very goof edit but ok-ish
 
When I want to prevent links from taking up too much space in my own posts, I sometimes make them like that, but it's not ideal, and I should really do it less. I avoid removing readable titles from links without good reason while editing other people's posts. I think I recall something on meta about how that makes the posts less accessible--I think hard to understand when using a screen reader--but I'm not sure.
 
Not OT-EOL 14.04 was supported in 2016
 
Ah, found it. (Or at least some related thing.)
9
A: Should posts be edited to have readable links?

MateoMany times you can go too simple on the links, for example - Read this article for more information: http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2013/01/12-default-ubuntu-phone-apps-to-be-community-created Is a bit too long, but if you edit it to - Visit this article for more information. You have l...

I remember thinking it was unfortunate that Mateo's answer only got voted a little higher than mine, since Mateo's answer is far better than mine on that meta question.
@Kulfy I've voted to leave it open. It needs at least one more review.
I'll just re-edit the post.
 
I tend to use [blabla - sitename] instead of [this article]. This gives the reader an idea about the link without even visiting the link.
 
8:28 AM
Yeah. I think that's a very good way of doing it.
 
IMO [this] is very much vague
Any difference in this answer and this answer
Command is same.
 
9:06 AM
I don't think it adds anything at all. I've voted to delete it.
 
@EliahKagan Unfortunately that was part of a large pattern. I've fixed a handful of them and commented on one but there are more.
The majority of the user's edits are good and many of the ones that shorten readable links to non-readable links make other changes that are good, in some cases vital.
@Natty tp
 
9:20 AM
Unclear. I've commented. I hope my comment helps the OP give the requested information.
 
@EliahKagan They saw your comment. You might consider taking it down.
@EliahKagan OP last signed in Sep '18 and I don't think they'll come back and provide those details.
 
@Kulfy Thanks, I've removed it.
@Kulfy I guess not. Well, the close vote I cast will be even more likely to be useful. :)
 
@EliahKagan I guess you downvoted this answer. Answerer found some solution and then they deleted the answer. Was that answer deleted by the owner?
 
The one downvote on that answer was from me, yes, and I had also cast the first delete vote, which was before the edit. It was not deleted by the author. @pomsky cast the final delete vote. Do you think it should be undeleted?
 
Well they were talking about this solution. I don't know what was helpful in this
I think it should remain deleted.
 
9:32 AM
Yeah. The OP reported having the drive but it not working. A report that it did work or does usually work doesn't really answer the question of how to fix it when it doesn't.
 
But they mentioned "found a solution". Sounds weird.
 
Yeah, that is weird. But they said, "No reason why it shouldn't work under Ubuntu…" Maybe they misunderstood the question.
 
Yeah. May be.
 
@EliahKagan Yeah, sorry, I forgot to leave a "link-only answer is not an answer" comment before deleting
 
Though good, I think it's not strictly necessary. The system displays some information about why answers may be deleted. I actually pinged you in case there was something about the edit that I had missed that might warrant undeleting the post. I thought I was going to have to go afk for a while around then.
 
9:41 AM
@Kulfy that's unlikely
 
@Zanna It was marked helpful by the way but I don't see action taken.
 
I think flags like that would only get declined if they seemed frivolous
Because there's no specific action implied
That would mark the flag automatically
 
Yeah. For a custom mod flag about possible voting irregularities that is specific enough to make clear the cause of concern and whose factual statements are accurate, links are the right ones, concern makes sense, etc., mods are highly likely to mark the flag helpful even if they determine that there's no action that has to be done (or are unable to determine anything and take no action).
 
@Kulfy maybe they investigated and they sent messages, or they investigated and found nothing suspect
 
Also, a small number (compared to your helpful flags) of declined flags is really not a problem at all.
 
9:44 AM
Actually I was expecting "voting corrected"
 
@Kulfy that's not done by mods
I'd expect profile deletion of any sock puppets
 
If you mean the thing that appears in the reputation tab, that can only be triggered by a the actions of a bot, for short-term serial voting, or by an investigation and action taken by SE employees (I think CMs do it), for longer term targeted voting.
 
You'd see minus points and "user was removed"
Perhaps
Bbl
 
@EliahKagan 12 declined and 1301 helpful :)
@Zanna I see.
 
(unrelated) Next time I feel tempted to engage someone in comments about a non-moderation-related side topic, I will remember this whole situation and not do it. That's not on AU, happily. That the user pushing the (literally) philosophical argument was a moderator (and the one who locked the original question) is... not great.
I guess that's sort of off-topic because it's a different site. I'm just glad I don't see stuff like that here very often.
 
9:50 AM
@EliahKagan I was carried away by Oli's post
@EliahKagan It's a very poorly formatted question.
 
Yes, the OP's question and comments there are also bad.
I think this question is currently unclear.
 
10:30 AM
Is there a better dupe-candidate for this one?
 
@EliahKagan OP is using EOL version
 
Good point. Well, it's closed as unclear now. I doubt they'll want it reopened--they seem to have indicated that they solved the problem.
 
10:59 AM
@Zanna Do you think that comment you posted should now be replaced with a "Related, though not a duplicate:" comment with a link to the related post? I don't know what the related post was, which is one of the reasons I'm asking rather than trying to add a comment.
 
VTC'd
 
 
2 hours later…
@Natty tp
 
dupe, OP abides:
@pomsky COOL it worked, thank god, do I need to delete this post since its a duplicate or no? — Dwyte 15 mins ago
 
1:19 PM
@Kulfy In case you missed it, the user is suspended for a week for voting irregularities.
@Zanna Also this user's profile (mentioned in this comment by Zanna) seems to be nuked from orbit (cc @Kulfy).
 
1:33 PM
@pomsky Well I pinged terdon in AUGR to have a on my flag. He did. Happy to see people in penalty box who play game with the system.
@pomsky Well may be Zanna was right. That account was made just to upvote answers by the earlier user. Like in this question they upvoted and accepted the answer of the other account even when the answers were similar and made it possible for other account to upvote (15(accept)+10(upvote)) posts.
165 reputation was generated by that user only.
 
I think this question is unclear (see comments).
@Natty tp
@Natty tp
 
@EliahKagan ugh
 
Perhaps SE could add a "What! What are you doing!" comment flag.
 
Hahaha time
 
lol
@Kulfy Regarding the edit there, should the OP be asked to post an answer with information from the linked page? Or just leave it alone?
 
2:21 PM
@EliahKagan I suspect it was this question so I think I should just delete my comment there
 
Oh.
Yeah, I wouldn't bother linking to that there.
 
Removed the comment. Thanks for spotting that :)
 
No problem.
 
Back soon
 
Ok.
 
2:55 PM
Some Error Occurred on this post
 
@Natty tp
 
3:08 PM
@EliahKagan If OP posts an answer, it won't go with the title. Since title asks whether the mirror is down and answer might say how to change mirror. IMO we should add a comment [related] with the link of question which does exactly the same, i.e. changing the mirror. I can't find a question for Desktop though question for server is available. Also, IMO it's better to have a link from AU only instead of some other 3rd party link.
 
@pomsky aha well spotted @Kulfy
 
3:25 PM
Do we have any other questions on the topic of what exit codes mean? IMO the existing answers leave something to be desired. Even if I could post "Related:" comments (one in each direction, I mean), I think that might be helpful.
Or I guess an answer could be posted with information from there. It might be viewed as an attempt to reply to the accepted answer rather than its own answer, though.
Should this answer be considered NAA (as alleged in Smokey feedback)? My inclination is yes--the only information it gives (rather than links to) is a recommendation about something other than what driver to use.
 
3:58 PM
Voted to delete
 
 
1 hour later…
5:26 PM
OT-EOL 15.04 reached EOL in Feb '16 and question was asked in April '16
This answer wouldn't help IMO
 
-5
Q: Why is exit code 0 a Success and 1 a Failure

Rohit TanejaAs 0 is a boolean false and 1 a true, shouldn't APIs in HTTP return response_code 0 for Success instead of a 1?

0
Q: How do you set the exit status of a shell script?

NerdOfCodeRecently, I was wondering how you change the exit status or end status of a script in bash. For example; say we run test.sh and inside the program it exits using exit 0… I was wondering what would be a normal procedure to change this exit status to say 1? I know that you could use exit 1 but is t...

 
@Zanna Is that even asking about process exit codes?
(unrelated) Do people edit tag wikis anymore? I never see tag wiki edit suggestions in review.
Can a SEDE query show us all the tag wiki edits?
I looked at our tag wiki and then the corresponding tags' tag wikis on Stack Overflow and Unix & Linux.
@Zanna Btw that stuff about tag wikis reminds me (in a way that is circuitous), did you decide if you wanted to make an SE Chat - Trello cross-indexing and chat-searching chat bot?
"Decide if" is poor wrong phrasing. I mean to ask if you have looked into it or have further thoughts about it.
 
6:16 PM
there must be a duplicate candidate for this one: askubuntu.com/questions/1163389/bulk-change-file-extensions
 
That seems like an XY problem. Are the files BitTorrent metafiles just without .torrent extensions? Or are they trying to make BitTorrent metafiles?
They seem to be saying they want to replace all the file extensions with .torrent, rather than to add .torrent.
Given that they don't know what the extensions are, that seems like it constitutes a loss of information.
 
If it's just a question asks how to add extension, I think this would help
9
Q: How to add an extension to all files via terminal

UAdapterI would like to add the .zip extension to all files. I tried this, however it does not work: ls | awk '{print $1 " " $1".zip"}' | xargs mv -f

@EliahKagan But if a file is like blabla.png.torrent, it would ultimately be considered as torrent file. Isn't it?
 
But it wouldn't be a torrent file.
Wouldn't that be like renaming a LibreOffice Writer document from .odt to .mkv? It would in some respects be treated as a video file, but it wouldn't be one.
 
Yeah. We don't know about the actual file. But as it stands as of now, I think adding extension is enough.
Or it's unclear.
 
I've commented to request a clarifying edit but also with a link to the question you suggested.
 
6:39 PM
 
@EliahKagan I think it kind of is, or at least invites answers to talk about them?
Sorry, I had no intention of dropping links and vanishing
I went through the rest of my search results and edited a bunch of titles
 
I'm glad you dropped links. :)
 
And did various other actions on stuff I found that seemed in dire need of attention
But I probably made loads of awful mistakes due to editing on mobile in the middle of the night
@EliahKagan sigh
 
Are you on mobile?
 
6:50 PM
@EliahKagan I have not had time to think about it, but I will task add it when I next turn on my laptop
@EliahKagan yes :(
Regarding those posts about shell exit codes, I have concluded that we probably don't have anything better than the post you originally mentioned. Probably any additional answers that would be useful about that should be posted there
Time to sleep
Hope I didn't destroy the front page with all those edits
I was too grumpy about nobody who interacted with these posts previously editing titles like "help with script" or "Subprocess /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)" (can that be somehow banned as a title?)
Time to sleep D:
I've just had a possibly terrible idea
The post with that title should exist
And it should ask how to find meaningful errors in APT's output
So that we get properly titled questions and people can write better search terms for their APT issues
 
7:05 PM
Would you like to post a self-answered question with that title?
 
7:27 PM
I'll task add that too
 
7:50 PM
Lemme try with Natty
 
[ Natty | Sentinel ] Link to Post Contains Blacklisted Word - i need; Ends with ?; Low Length; No Code Block; One Line only; IntelliBL - 0.0; Low Rep; 6.5;
 
This won't help. I think.
Is turnkey Linux another Ubuntu based distro?
If yes, this should be off-topic.
 
8:35 PM
 
8:54 PM
3 answer which have +1 looks like inspired from one another askubuntu.com/q/436546/816190
 
 
3 hours later…

« first day (2595 days earlier)      last day (1739 days later) »