« first day (2594 days earlier)      last day (1751 days later) » 

 
2 hours later…
5:07 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url-only title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, +8 more (892): awaretalks.com/keto-fit-sverige/ by leeonelrobbinson on askubuntu.com
 
5:31 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url-only title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, +6 more (693): first2fitness.com/keto-10x/ by persesonrow on askubuntu.com
 
 
4 hours later…
 
2 hours later…
10:43 AM
@Natty ne
@Natty tp
 
11:01 AM
Is this answerable? They didn't quite say what produced that output.
 
[ Natty | Sentinel ] Link to Post Low Length; No Code Block; Low Rep; Unregistered User; 2.5;
 
@EliahKagan "available" is a file but dpkg found folder.
 
11:20 AM
@Zanna I was thinking of updating your meta post to include this. What do you think?
 
Oh thanks
I saw that they had done that and worried vaguely whether I should be doing something
Hmm
I'll try to think about it and probably forget :S
 
I left a comment on your post.
Was this link required in the post?
I rolled back the edit.
 
11:50 AM
@Kulfy thanks!
@Kulfy another edit was made... hmm
 
12:06 PM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Mostly punctuation marks in answer (50): Disable authentication prompts in 15.04? by guma77 on askubuntu.com
 
@Zanna Though it isn't required IMO but the link which was inserted after looks ok-ish
 
12:33 PM
 
[ Natty | Sentinel ] Link to Post Low Length; No Code Block; Unformatted Code; Low Rep; Unregistered User; 3.0;
 
Hmm, I expected that Natty would've caught that one itself.
 
 
1 hour later…
1:52 PM
Maybe it's not as vigilant at the weekend
 
2:31 PM
:)
 
@Natty tp
Borderline NAA, not should if should flag.
I don't think it's inherently NAA to recommend a website to do something that would ordinarily be done locally. But such recommendations should probably be well-justified by the details in a question. This particular question isn't as detailed as it should be but does use wording that strongly suggests the video is large.
 
by heavy in the question, do you think OP certainly means large?
 
I think that's what the OP means but I could be wrong.
 
I'll leave it then
maybe they mean it's a very sad story
 
NAA (see comment)
@Zanna Well I think we can still delete it. It has serious quality problems and I don't think it's likely to be improved. It hardly even identifies the website it recommends--if the website moved to another URL, readers couldn't find it based on that answer, and it doesn't give any distinguishing characteristics of the site besides that it supports drag-and-drop.
@Zanna Would the OP think that's relevant to how to do the conversion?
I find it odd that the question has two upvotes. The OP didn't say anything about what went wrong with the two programs they tried. Fortunately they were able to get an ffmpeg solution that worked for them anyway.
 
2:58 PM
@EliahKagan sorry, I meant I'll leave the word "heavy" in the question body. I voted to delete the wrong answer (although I did not flag it)
 
Oh, yes. I definitely wouldn't remove "heavy."
I wonder if that question is a duplicate of something.
 
@EliahKagan unlikely. I was just trying to joke about what else heavy might mean
 
3:13 PM
@Zanna Sorry, for playing a bit dirty here, but could you please add the second question from comment as the top one in the list of targets here? This one is more to the point.
And then you may remove the command-line tag.
 
3:41 PM
@pomsky done... sorry I didn't notice the second link in your comment when I voted
Haha if only I'd won that election, no temptation to add dubious tags
 
4:02 PM
@Zanna thanks :)
 
4:39 PM
This comment is no longer needed. (It made sense on the answer, but ended up getting dragged along when the answer was converted to a comment.)
 
[ Natty | Sentinel ] Link to Post Low Length; No Code Block; One Line only; Contains Whitelisted Word - You can; Low Rep; 2.5;
 
 
1 hour later…
6:51 PM
@Natty tp
 
 
1 hour later…
8:14 PM
If I'm not wrong there's some unusual pattern in upvotes on the post of this user
Either I'm thinking too much or there's something wrong going on.
Like in this answer they described how to install realtek wireless drivers but OP has Qualcomm atheros
Should I report this?
 

« first day (2594 days earlier)      last day (1751 days later) »