« first day (2798 days earlier)      last day (2126 days later) » 

8:02 PM
:/
 
Weber electrodynamics is an alternative to Maxwell electrodynamics developed by Wilhelm Eduard Weber. In this theory, Coulomb's Law becomes velocity dependent. In mainstream contemporary physics, Maxwell electrodynamics is treated as the uncontroversial foundation of classical electromagnetism, while Weber electrodynamics is generally unknown (or ignored). == Mathematical description == According to Weber electrodynamics, the force (F) acting simultaneously on point charges q1 and q2, is given by F = ...
 
ugh. that feeling when you get halfway through writing up an example and you realize it's more complicated than you wanted it to be
 
fun beans
 
@Shing I don't think this is a question about "inertial frames" at all - an accelerated frame, such as being in free fall, is not an inertial frame in Newtonian mechanics. Nathaniel's point is that you can't actually feel acceleration that applies evenly to the entirety of your body - humans are not "Newtonian inertial frame detectors".
 
We have found 'alternative quantum theory, alternative electrodynamics, alternative fluids' today so far
 
8:06 PM
@enumaris Why beans, I wonder? (You really like that turn of phrase :P)
 
It'll be interesting the day someone tries to present an alternative theory to classical mech
 
Anonymous
@ACuriousMind Sounds like a variation of "cool beans" ;)
 
@bolbteppa i can give you another one: stochastic electrodynamics as an alternative to QED
 
@ACuriousMind :D beans is a fun word
 
(Note: my mentioning of it should not be construed as an endorsement)
 
8:10 PM
@ACuriousMind I am confused, but we surely feel acceleration when we are in an accelerating car (even when our heads is "fixed" by the sit)
 
@enumaris 'kay, fun carrots
 
okay, I kind of missed the comments.
 
Anonymous
fun broccolis
 
time to fix my code
 
But SED comes up in Bush's review on pilot wave hydrodynamics, so that's how I know about it
 
8:11 PM
@Shing What you feel is the force the seat exerts on you as it pushes against you, not the acceleration.
 
Anonymous
@Shing You could try paragliding to check :P
 
I bet @JohnRennie is sad about that last minute game-tieing goal that just happened...
 
Yeah, there's about 4 or 5 formulations of classical mechanics but they're all equivalent while these examples all have issues
 
fun game: name all the formulations
 
8:13 PM
There are the Hamiltonian, Lagrangian and kindergarten formulations :P
 
Anonymous
@enumaris JR watches football?
 
Hamilton-Jacobi :P
 
he bet that England and Japan will meet in the finals
 
@Blue Yes, but only as a stress test for his laptops
 
Japan lost yesterday
 
Anonymous
8:14 PM
@ACuriousMind lol
 
(But I'm guessing he doesn't follow closely since they couldn't have met in the finals anyways)
 
Anonymous
@enumaris They played well though
 
'In Maxwell electrodynamics, Newton's third law does not hold for particles. Instead, particles exert forces on electromagnetic fields, and fields exert forces on particles, but particles do not directly exert forces on other particles. Therefore, two nearby particles do not always experience equal and opposite forces...
The Weber force law is quite different: All particles, regardless of size and mass, will exactly follow Newton's third law. Therefore, Weber electrodynamics, unlike Maxwell electrodynamics, has conservation of particle momentum and conservation of particle angular momentum.'
 
Anonymous
But Belgium had a swift comeback
 
oh wait
I'm wrong, they could have met in the finals
I thought they were in the same half
 
8:15 PM
There's also the Gauss formulation of mechanics and a Mach one and a Hertz one I think
 
@ACuriousMind yeah, you are right. but it is still strange to me. does human really sense acceleration that way? I can tell I am in a accelerating car when I can't stand stably. (also, I can simply hang a ball in the car, and measure its inclined angle. )
 
Apparently the first or one of the earlier uses of hypergeometric was Wallis who called a series like
$$f(z) = 1 + z + z(z + 1) + z(z+1)(z+2) + z(z+1)(z+2)(z+3) + \dots $$
hypergeometric, now I can kind of see one placing these terms as the coefficients in a power series
$$f(z) = 1 +az + a(a+1)\frac{z^2}{2} + a(a+1)(a+2) \frac{z^3}{3!} + \dots$$
but what maniac would form
$$f(z) = 1 + \dfrac{a \cdot b}{c \cdot 1} z + \dfrac{a(a+1)b(b+1)}{c(c+1) 1 \cdot 2 } z^2 + \dfrac{a(a+1)(a+2)b(b+1)(b+2)}{c(c+1)(c+2) 1 \cdot 2 \cdot 3} z^3 + \dots $$
 
Anonymous
@Shing That's mostly non-uniform acceleration
 
@Shing When you can't stand you are feeling the difference between the force applied to your feet and to your head; likewise, the ball on the string is "feeling" the difference between the force at the attachment point of the string and the ball itself
 
Anonymous
Also your legs are on the floor
 
Anonymous
8:18 PM
So any acceleration of the car will affect your legs first
 
Anonymous
And then the rest of the upper body
 
Anonymous
Basically your lower body will pull forward or backward your upper body as ACM says
 
You are only ever detecting differences in acceleration, otherwise you could distinguish being in free fall from being outside the influence of gravity entirely.
Realise that the astronauts on the ISS are continually under the effect of Earth's pull, yet they feel none of it.
 
Anonymous
If you want to experience real uniform acceleration without spending years trying to become an astronaut, just jump from a really tall building ;)
 
Anonymous
You'll fall with $g$ :D
 
8:21 PM
^Don't try this at home :P
 
RIP
 
@Blue drag?
 
Also jumping in the atmosphere is not a good example because there's air
 
@ConstantineBlack No problem; let me know if you have more questions.
 
Anonymous
8:23 PM
@AvnishKabaj Eh, air drag wouldn't affect a human. At least not a considerable amount. But yeah, if you're paragliding...
 
Anonymous
Our surface area too less
 
@Blue You'll feel the air rushing past you, therefore being able to tell you're accelerating.
So for the purposes of this discussion, neglecting friction is not such a good idea
 
Ride a bike in a cylinder
You'll feel centripetal force
 
@bolbteppa the article here includes the following sentence:
 
Anonymous
@ACuriousMind Well, "cheap" alternatives are never perfect :P
 
8:25 PM
@Blue if I want to live I'll paraglide
 
"Later Euler generalized the factorial sequence in the form $$\Delta : n = a(a + b) (a + 2b) \cdots (a + (n - 1) b)$$ and this is what he (and his immediate successors) understood as a hypergeometric sequence."
 
@ACuriousMind and @blue ok, you are right. what about assuming I am a box standing very still. and let there be friction. surely there the car accelerate large enough, I will "slide" backward?
 
So that tells you something about how the terminology evolved.
 
Anonymous
@AvnishKabaj On a side note: I had once searched for "paragliding deaths + statistics", but surprisingly the number of deaths is very very low. Like 0.0001% or so. I was a bit surprised, especially considering that there are so many things which can go wrong
 
it also notes Euler as having studied the hypergeometric DE in 1778
 
8:28 PM
anyway, human probably really sense acceleration that way.
 
no idea why he chose to study it
bah, i'm reading it backwards
he studied the series expansion of that kind and noted that it satisfied a certain DE
 
Yeah
Wallis was in the 1600's I think
It's a bit confusing
I think Gauss first wrote it in general form, maybe not
 
@Shing Whether you slide depends on how strong static friction is.
 
math history is weird
especially stuff from back then
 
Anonymous
"Statistically, paragliding is as safe as driving. Each year, about 1 out of every 10,000 Americans is killed in a car accident – there were about 32,000 deaths in 2011, for example. In Germany, where paragliding is much more popular than in the States, about 3 people are killed per year, out of 33,000 pilots."
 
Anonymous
8:33 PM
Ah, okay, the value I gave was off by an order of magnitude
 
The Wallis form $1 + z + z^2 + z^3 + \dots \to 1 + z + z(z+1) + z(z+1)(z+2) + \dots$ explains the name a bit
 
attempted fix #1 completed...running tests now :D
 
@bolbteppa i don't follow
 
Anonymous
Oh, and paragliding is popular in Germany? @ACuriousMind I didn't know
 
@Blue Uh
I've never met anyone who paraglided, fwiw
 
8:34 PM
it's all relative
 
what % of germany have you met?
 
If $1 + z + z^2$ is geometric then $1 + z + z(z+1)$ is hyper-geometric :p
 
ah, fair
 
$1 + z + z(z -1)$ anti-hyper-geometric
:(
 
hyper-anti-geometric
 
8:36 PM
@enumaris Probably <0.01% :P
 
high sampling error maybe
 
hypo-geometric (hypo opposite of hyper :p)
 
I approve
I guess you could sorta see hypergeometric arising by doing $\frac{a^n b^n}{c^n}\mapsto \frac{(a)_n (b)_n}{(c)_n}$ where $(a)_n=a(a+1)\cdots (a+n-1)$
 
@enumaris Sure, the kind of people I meet are typically not the adrenaline thrill seekers
 
England fell asleep, historic pentalties for their failure now
 
8:38 PM
where by comparison the Wallis version is just $a^n \mapsto (a)_n$
 
That's interesting
 
@Blue paragliding is generally done in controlled conditions.
 
England is tired indeed
 
Anonymous
@AvnishKabaj That's what it seems from the statistics...although I'm still scared to try :P
 
Anonymous
What if I get stuck on the top of a tall tree?
 
8:40 PM
@Blue pull a znmb with your friends
 
Anonymous
I don't even know tree climbing :P
 
@Blue *impaled
 
@Blue Then the tree is your home now; embrace your inner monkey!
 
Anonymous
Lol. Though the scarier part is of course the parachute not opening in time :P
 
Anonymous
Or me getting entangled with the parachute ;)
 
8:42 PM
Parachute is also scared of you not opening in time
 
Paragliding and base jumping are different I think
 
Think about that for a bit
 
are they already kicking penalties or are they setting that up?
 
@Blue Schrödinger's paraglider?
 
Aaah no
I'm the one confused
 
8:43 PM
You're not dead until someone observes you.
 
Anonymous
^ That's an interesting thought :P
 
@Blue hangliding
Go for that
 
That's indeed an interesting though
 
If a @Blue crashes in the forest, does it still make a sound?
 
I like to subscribe to Quantum Immortality
 
8:44 PM
@enumaris I subscribe to Quantum Immorality.
 
sounds kinky ( Í¡° ͜ʖ Í¡°)
2
 
Anonymous
@enumaris That's the nicest emoji nose I've ever seen
 
Anonymous
100/100
 
lol
 
1-1
 
8:46 PM
the commentator is pure british
K A N E A G A I N
 
feels like watching penalties from a google text-based update is not good lol
 
Columbia 3 England 2
 
only cus England kicking second right?
 
Columbia still 3!!! on the bar
@enumaris nope, blocked
 
Unbelievable
 
8:50 PM
Columbia 3 England 3
equalizer
 
whelp
 
now one more round
 
basically sudden death now lol
 
RIP
 
My money's on colombia
 
8:51 PM
Oh my god
 
England blocked!!!!
 
England will do it
 
Great save
Now win or sudden death
for england
England wins
 
wowzers, down to the wire lol
 
the britass commentator is going crazy lmao
 
Anonymous
8:53 PM
@AvnishKabaj Send the bitcoins now
 
So England Belgium? Neat
 
all the bitcoins?
 
That's what they get for fouling players all the time
 
@Semiclassical England Sweden, not?
 
8:53 PM
England Sweden
easier half imo
 
Dunno why I jumped to that
 
Englad half is Sweden, Croatia and Russia
 
@bolbteppa Yeah columbia kinda sucked in this game
England has a bad luck, lots of definite shots missed by inches
 
other half is Uruguay-France and Brazil-Belgium
 
Belgium vs Brazil... I wish Japan played on that one
 
8:55 PM
Friday will be nuts
 
'cuz Japan was actually p good
but then Belgium recovered quickly as well
so maybe they'll beat Brazil - I just want them to go
 
Belgium has some good players
 
@Blue only Zimbabwe dollars
 
last I checked (2 years ago lol) Eden Hazard was in contention for best player
 
Interesting
 
Anonymous
8:58 PM
@AvnishKabaj Well, around 100,000 trillion Zimbabwe dollars should suffice. I'll buy a pizza with that ;)
 
Anonymous
Actually, what's the conversion rate...lol
 
1 Z = nearly 5 in our broken currency
 
Anonymous
Where Z stands for?
 
zimbabwean dollar
 
Anonymous
"Zimbabwe's central bank allowed its citizens to exchange the country's almost worthless currency for US dollars. Its 100-trillion-dollar note is worth just 40 U.S. cents."
 
9:01 PM
wut
did i misread google
 
Anonymous
Indeed. 1 Z = 5 definitely not Rs. 5 :P
 
Anonymous
"

Use of the Zimbabwean dollar as an official currency was effectively abandoned on 12 April 2009. It was demonetised in 2015, with outstanding accounts able to be reimbursed until April 30, 2016.[5][6] In place of the Zimbabwean dollar, currencies including the South African rand, Botswana pula, pound sterling, Indian rupee, euro, Japanese yen, Australian dollar, Chinese yuan, and the United States dollar are now regularly used.[7][8]"
 
im the worst
 
@ACuriousMind Go on...
 
Sid
Colombia-England at some stage looked like they would murder the ref
 
9:04 PM
@DanielSank My message after that is me going on ;)
 
@Blue memes are the source of all knowledge
 
Sid
(There's actually a hilarious video on YouTube about Referees getting hit)
Unfortunately I can't find that video now
 
Anonymous
@Sid Did Zlatan hit a referee? I expect him to be in the video :P
 
Sid
@Blue yup!
Fairly sure he was thers
 
Anonymous
Yay, guessed right :D
 
9:08 PM
Fair bet that Zlatan would be in there
 
Sid
In one part, The ref is showing a red card to a player. The player takes the card and shows it to the ref. :P
 
Anonymous
Awesome XD
 
welp, all tests passed on modified code
seems to be correct now :D
 
@enumaris A bug in tested code is not a bug, it is a test not written.
 
there's probably bugs
I mean, if you want to get rid of every bug you'd never push anything out for production
 
9:12 PM
@enumaris Tell that to the people writing code for e.g. the space shuttle.
I mean, sometimes a bug slips even past them, but surely they don't have that attitude
 
obviously if your work is mission critical you need to be more thorough
but even then, they have shown bugs in the past...
good thing I don't produce anything on that level lol
 
Anonymous
Speaking of that, I find it very weird that so much of academic code is never released. I get hesitant to trust any "simulation" based papers due to that
 
@enumaris All work is mission critical. I'm firmly opposed to viewing programming as this discipline where it's somehow okay to deliver faulty products by default. The "A bug is not a bug, it is a test not yet written" is serious: If you're diligent, you should have tests for any reasonable permutation of inputs you expect to your programs.
 
Anonymous
There might be so many bugs in them, especially because the people writing them are not professional coders
 
@Blue Two reasons they don't release it: 1. They're ashamed of it. 2. They don't want anyone to steal it.
These are not mutually exclusive
 
9:15 PM
Mostly 1
Good thing I don't deliver products
I'm the only one who actually uses my code lol
 
Anonymous
@ACuriousMind Well, they can obviously use appropriate licenses. Hardly they contain any "novel algorithm" or anything like that
 
see point 1.
 
Anonymous
1 seems more reasonable, lol
 
Anonymous
I've seen FORTRAN code written by some condensed matter people. It's one of the cruelest forms of torture to make anyone decipher and debug those :P
 
@Blue Licenses can't prohibit someone else taking the ideas (optimizations, algorithms) in your code and expanding on them.
 
Anonymous
9:18 PM
They don't even write comment lines!
 
Anonymous
Phew
 
Well written code doesn't need comments! ::thinks of the large legacy codebase he partially maintains and weeps::
 
Anonymous
lol
 
Anonymous
@ACuriousMind But on the flip side, see, making it compulsory to reveal academic code, will improve quality of research and publications overall
 
Anonymous
In the current state, it gets difficult to say who is faking results
 
Anonymous
9:21 PM
Especially if the person is not a renowned scientist already
 
@Blue I wish I shared your optimism
How many people are really gonna read through other researcher's poorly documented code?
And how many are just gonna cut and paste the bits they think they can use, proliferating erroneous throughout the discipline?
 
Anonymous
@ACuriousMind That's exactly what I was getting at. If they're forced to share code they'll also be forced to document it properly, to avoid embarrassment
 
Anonymous
Well, there are some good arguments on both sides of the line :P
 
my prof in undergrad
published his code as and addendum
to a paper
it was written in fortran 77
I could not get it to compile
 
@enumaris Mhhhhhh, spaghetti.
 
Anonymous
9:26 PM
@enumaris lel
 
I spent like 3 months trying to get it to compile
then I gave up on the project
 
I once implemented a Monte-Carlo algorithm in C, claimed by papers in the 70s to yield particular results. I didn't reobtain the results, but insisted I could not find any error in my code (the code was horrible in retrospect, btw :P). I eventually got full marks for it (probably because the grader couldn't be bothered) but I still don't know whether my code was wrong or those papers were wrong.
 
Anonymous
Unfortunately, yeah. Graders hardly check code assignments
 
Anonymous
Same here
 
@ACuriousMind Interesting.
 
Anonymous
9:34 PM
@ACuriousMind Speaking of that, what's the formal way to transition from Poisson brackets to commutator brackets, and the classical Hamiltonian to the Hamiltonian operator, and Hamilton's equations to Schrodinger's equation? I can understand them well as intuitive analogies but haven't yet found a mathematically rigorous formulation
 
@Blue There is no fully rigorous formulation, due to the Groenewold-van Howe no-go theorem - you cannot directly map all Poisson brackets to commutators in a naive and desirable fashion. Rigorous formulations are e.g. deformation quantization, mapping a deformed classical Poisson bracket - e.g. the Moyal bracket - to the commutator.
 
Anonymous
"Groenewold-van Howe no-go theorem"
 
Anonymous
wow, such a big name theorem
 
Anonymous
There's no wiki article apparently :/
 
Anonymous
@ACuriousMind Interesting, I'll check those out
 
Anonymous
9:38 PM
(hearing them all for the first time in life :P)
 
@Blue Either google "Groenewold van Howe" or look at e.g. physics.stackexchange.com/q/297279/50583 for a start
 
@ACuriousMind is it obvious that diagonalizing the matrix associated with Hamilton's equations of motion is the same as solving $\{H,f\} = cf$?
 
@DanielSank Sort of. The time evolution of any phase space function $f(x(t),p(t))$ is given by $\{H, f\} = \partial_t f$. When you diagonalize that matrix, you are looking for functions such that $\partial_t f = c f$.
 
I suppose that's true.
 
I mean, all this is still valuable insight - but it is also "well-known", for certain values of "well-known" ;)
 
9:54 PM
And, come to think of it, this is why I advocate learning Hamiltonian classical mechanics firmly before embarking on quantum mechanics - many of the quantumly important structures are already there, hidden in plain sight
3
 
Anonymous
That's really good advice, yeah ^. I've come to appreciate a lot it recently :)
 
Anonymous
Tbh, I find classical mechanics a lot more elegant in many ways
 
and then you start doing QFT and wonder where all that nice Hamiltonian stuff went
 
@JohnRennie, just saw England beat Colombia - congrats!
 
@Semiclassical It's still there, this time hidden in murky sight
 
9:58 PM
which I guess is really my way of slagging off the Lagrangian formulation
(it deserves respect, i'm just not fond of it)
 
Anonymous
10:31 PM
1
Q: If quantum speed-up is due to the wave-like nature of quantum mechanics, why not just use regular waves?

Steven SagonaThe intuition I have for why quantum computing can perform better than classical computing is that the wavelike nature of wavefunctions allow you to interfere multiple states of information with a single operation, which theoretically could allow for exponential speedup. But if it really is jus...

 
Anonymous
Umm, does anyone understand this question? ^
 
Anonymous
Computation using classical waves and dynamical systems doesn't make much sense to me
 
10:50 PM
@Blue Half the people in software that think they're professional coders aren't either
 
Anonymous
@danielunderwood That's true too
 
Anonymous
The entry bar for software is way too low
 
Anonymous
Which is both fortunate and unfortunate
 
@Blue The world is becoming software. You can't sustain an exponential demand for developers with trained and disciplined professionals
There's a good talk by Uncle Bob about how Turing was the first "true programmer" just 75 years ago, and today there's hundreds of millions. If you keep up doubling the number of programmers every five years, half of all programmers will always have less than five years experience
 
Anonymous
Yeah, that's the "fortunate" part ;) Also, software is slowly becoming the profession guaranteed to pay at least a minimal salary
 
10:58 PM
@Blue I mean, engineering...
but yeah.
 
Anonymous
@ACuriousMind That's very true, and not necessarily a bad thing either. But one concern for sure is that a lot of tasks are gradually getting "automated". So the clerk-type software jobs will probably get wiped out in the future
 
Anonymous
For example, being able to use MS-Excel was once a "skill"
 
@Blue It still is one.
 
^
 
Anonymous
@ACuriousMind Most companies would hate it if you list it in your resume :P
 
Anonymous
10:59 PM
It's like a basic requirement
 
@Blue uh, no. my mom uses excel all the time at work, and it was a skill she listed on her resume. it's the same sort of thing as being able to type at a high wpm, etc.
 
@Blue I'm not sure what a "clerk-type software job" is. Data entry is not a programming job. When I say "programmer", I do mean someone who's writing actual code
 
Funnily enough, excel is how I got into software. My freshman year, I was in a research group and tried doing my data analysis in excel. I eventually found out that using matlab took like 5 lines to do the same thing that an hour of excel did and I went from there
 
you'd also be surprised at what she's been able to do using excel that other people were doing manually.
 
@Blue I haven't used Excel in like forever, and I don't think I could do anything beyond the most basic with it if you asked me to. It's definitely still a skill valued for certain positions.
 
Anonymous
11:01 PM
@ACuriousMind For instance, a lot of website designing has become automated - you have websites like Wix now. People tend to hire lesser web developers nowadays for designing websites for them, as they can easily do it themselves
 
@Blue uh...[citation needed].
 
@Blue They still hire a metric ****ton of web developers, though.
 
yes, a lot of websites are built using wix or whatever, but most professional companies hire web designers/web developers.
 
The hover-over text of today's xkcd
is a riot.
 
lol
 
11:03 PM
And what they don't hire in web developers they hire in data analysts to control their ever growing influx of prima facie meaningless data
 
Anonymous
@heather My point was basically that a majority of web designing can be and will be made automated in the near future. Although, yes, a lot of web developers are being hired, the bar for becoming a web developer is much lower than becoming a programmer or algorithm designer
 
@Blue i think i am going to continue to disagree =)
it really depends on the job, doesn't it?
 
@Blue This is very context dependent. It's mostly in IT and the programming heavy fields where people would look askance at putting it in your resume.
 
there are programmers who can't do FizzBuzz stuff, but web developers that can put together crazy stuff. there's a spectrum, like for anything.
 
Are there industry projections about web design becoming increasingly automated?
 
11:07 PM
And if you mean that you know some of the sophisticated tools the hide under the surface then you really are claiming experience with a Turing complete programming envrionement.
 
Web development should be a crime
 
@danielunderwood Much of web development is a crime.
I'm looking at anyone who thinks it is OK for a webpage to hijack my keybindings.
And I include Stack Exchange in that group.
 
I never know quite what to say when people ask if I can program
certainly I can do scientific programming/scripting
 
Extra keybindings I can sometimes live with, but overriding scroll drives me insane
 
Anonymous
@heather Well, I don't know what you define as "web development". Would you consider designing another "Facebook" as web development?
 
11:09 PM
The content does not get to change how the actual application works.
EVER.
 
but that's a far cry from development
and that I have basically no insight on
 
@Blue i dunno, facebook isn't just web development, is it?
it's a lot of stuff.
 
Anonymous
@Semiclassical Well, writing scientific programming scripts can be considered to be a type of development
 
Anonymous
Especially at a R&D type company
 
i suppose
but I think there's definitely different levels of programming expertise, and I'm not near the high end
 
Anonymous
11:12 PM
@heather True. By web development, I mostly meant creating a website like this one
 
Anonymous
@Semiclassical I think one of the main aspects of becoming a good programmer is having a sound knowledge of algorithms and data structures. I'm continually surprised by how many orders of magnitude my programs get speeded up, using the right algorithms and the right choice of data structure (normally with the help of the SO guys)
 
yeah
that's consistent with my experience doing big matrix eigenvalue computations in mathematica
my computations ran so much faster when I figured out how to do them in not-stupid ways :P
 
Structure is a big one too. Not necessarily overly-complex structure, but just not writing stuff like
`if: for: for: if`
 
(for instance, realizing that the Eigenvalues command had a Method for banded matrices...)
 
Anonymous
Also, you know, the little things like - calling rand() in C is much more time consuming
 
Anonymous
11:17 PM
than say XORShift
 
Anonymous
All those little details matter so much, when you're writing a large program with lots of loops
 
Anonymous
In a single iteration it is not much noticeable
 
Anonymous
But once you have like 10,000 iterations, things get pretty slow
 
Anonymous
11:34 PM
@dmckee I think a very few companies do mention "Advanced Excel" or something similar as a requirement, but that's very rare
 
Anonymous
Oh, and that classic Turing complete joke :P
 
11:59 PM
dang, my order shipped past 3 pm...
so it won't be picked up by USPS today...and tomorrow is a holiday...so...won't get it for a while :(
 

« first day (2798 days earlier)      last day (2126 days later) »