« first day (1903 days earlier)      last day (3275 days later) » 

13:00
yeah, and i either have to pick bullshit speakers for their gender or listen to someone whinge about how there's no women
@Ohnana o lawd
If you're asking publicly for speakers and no women applied, are you supposed to create a woman?
@Ohnana yeah that's a sucky choice, but if you have put in the effort you'd know they were whining without cause
0
Q: Boston Key Party CTF 2016 - 04 March 2016 at 22 pm UTC, lasts 48 hours

HamZaLet's participate at Boston Key Party CTF 2016. The CTF will begin on 04 March 2016 22:00 UTC and ends on 06 March 2016, 22:00 UTC. As usual, we will play as team sec.se. The team communicates through the CTF team chatroom.

2
@RоryMcCune doesn't matter, it's a college campus
also, the women in computing society is working with us, but no one wants to speak
pllssss step outside of your comfort zone
@Ohnana surely if you say "we invited x women speakers specifically, and unfortunately they weren't able to make it" and ask for other ideas, that leaves you in a decent position
@Ohnana rookie tracks are good for that
B-Sides london has a rookie track and matches rookies up with mentors
it's billed as first time speakers so there's less pressure
13:04
at this point i just want to have a traditional conf go well
@Ohnana comfort zone is the best place to be
@Ohnana yeah if it's the first conf. run the goal is to get a win under the belt then look to develop on future runs
@Ohnana no good female speakers?
i just don't want to deal with whiny newspaper op-eds
what about bringing up new ones?
13:05
@AviD i asked 10 people, 3 committed and bailed
the other 10 were managers or inept
that's 13
out of 20, 7 declined, 3 dashed, 10 were unsuitable
@Ohnana ouch
yeah, eternal sadness
and my keynote had to bail on me :(
@Ohnana you should have asked @Simon, he could just put on a wig and a skirt.
then you'd have 11 unsuitable. :P
13:07
quite.
Sure, I would also constantly take selfies and post them on instagram during the talk.
i think i would football tackle you halfway through
@Simon ooh @RоryMcCune you should try that next time.
disturbing
unless @Simon was implying thats what all women do.
13:08
@AviD I knew you were gonna say that.
@Ohnana geez, sorry to hear, sounds like you had some awful luck there :(
@Ohnana cant resist a guy in a skirt?
I hope you will burn in hell for a day when you die.
@AviD who takes selfies
@Ohnana wow, major fail.
13:08
@Simon and you could call yourself Simone
@Simon just for a day?
well, the people who were in charge of getting a date/room fucked up on me and changed the date
@Ohnana ughhhh
apparently everyone in the universe has something to do on the new day
@Ohnana whyyyy
13:09
@RоryMcCune That's too easy, what about Simonia?
quality planning you have going on there
@kalina i know T_T
everything i'm responsible for is going splendidly
this is why further in advance = winning
@kalina they also should've booked you for the after-party!
pls
13:12
the after party will be me sitting in a chair and breathing into a paper bag
oh, so many potential euphemisms
@Ohnana awww, don't be so mean to yourself. I wouldn't brown bag you.
wait what
of course @MarkBuffalo jumps in with something like that
I don't think he understands what the purpose of a paper bag is.
13:13
wait... did I misunderstand?
do you really think that is appropriate bantering?
@RоryMcCune OH EMM GEE I NEED TO DO THIS FOR APPSECIL!!!
@AviD Oh shut up, you'd be the first one to go to the booth and ask "play some real music".
sure, but thats not the point
and what would the point be?
13:17
i am so confused
@Ohnana Me too.
I'm not yet I'm supposed to be the dumbass here.
3
You guys are disappointing.
"speaking of disappointing"
lmao i looked that up on urban dictionary
@Simon thats what your mom said!
13:19
@Ohnana yeah...
@Ohnana dammit now you made me go look it up, thats awful
@ThomasPornin PORNU GET UP, WORKING FROM HOME IS NOT AN EXCUSE TO SLEEP IN
@Simon right, working from home means naps during the day.
@Simon spoken like somebody with an inflexible day job
@kalina I can come in at any time, work from home whenever I want.
13:21
working from home means you can wake up in the morning, write off the entire day, go back to bed and then work during the night if you wanted to
So, did you say something?
Hell, I could have taken the day off today.
woo grats
@AviD i mean it's a lot nicer than a lot of things on UD
"off" is my default state and then upon awakening I decide if I want to be productive or not.
you were saying?
We were talking about me, why did the discussion go back to you?
13:22
@Simon would anyone know the difference?
ARE YOU TRYING TO PROVOKE ME INTO WRESTLING?!
I will not do it.
No, my back hurts.
I cannot wrestle anyone.
@Simon you should be more careful with your donut
@Adi allo
aww poor back hurts because you're getting old
13:23
@RоryMcCune a speaker from last night's gig called off, then on then off 4 days before conf. Eventually turned up on the night, but with no commas at all for that 4 days... Annoyed more than a few people.
@AviD probably not
@RoryAlsop that's lame. I've offered to be an explicit backup speaker at some conf's just to try and reduce the organizers stress levels :)
@AviD maybe it would be quieter perhaps
I got my freaking headphones on 24/7.
I don't make a damn noise.
@RоryMcCune you'd never guess who it was...
13:25
@RоryMcCune oo thats a pretty cool idea. should start implementing that.
@RoryAlsop ..him was it...
Adi
Adi
@Simon 'sup, homie?
ah well no surprise there then
@Adi NM, you?
13:25
@RoryAlsop holy fucking hell i would have told them to leave
@RoryAlsop cmooooon now we're all in suspense
With 150 attendees, from all the banks and usual suspects
@AviD yeah get someone who's has some talks to hand and doesn't mind doing something impromptu :)
Adi
Adi
@Simon Oll kuut in te huut.
@AviD technically known as not a Rory
13:26
@RoryAlsop with any hope it'll give people pause before booking someone with that rep. again :)
@RоryMcCune I wasn't organising this one, but there was a lot of scurrying around
@RoryAlsop ahhh okay I know who that is. but wow....
@Adi wot
I nearly ended up doing my talk I did on Friday again
Adi
Adi
@Simon Finnish pronunciation of "All good in the hood"
13:27
@RoryAlsop WAS IT @RoraΖ?!?
@Adi Oh, noice!
starting to understand what happened all those years ago ;-)
@AviD I don't! Who was it?!
never you mind
Wow, look at all this mod privilege.
They're discussing about someone and we're not allowed know who.
13:29
@Simon "we're not allowed to tell us who"?
nothing to with mods, and nothing to do with me - you can feel free to ask yon scottish roros.
That was a clusteuuuuuur.
@Simon Well, we could talk about people they don't know...
@Matthew Like who?
Did you hear about what that guy did, at that thing? It was disgraceful!
13:31
@Matthew OH MY GOD THAT WAS SO SURREAL
I can't believe he did that thing!
@Simon You know, that guy! Yeah, that's the one
huh, according to this, sec.se gets more spam than most sites. 3rd highest of SE sites... (plus SO, SU, and Meta.se).....
3
A: How much spam traffic does this site get?

SallyI'll expand on the comments by S.L. Barth and Ferrybig. Here is the list of 100 most recent spam posts (with a few false positives mixed in), as reported by SmokeDetector bot. According to it, the average is about 5 spam posts per day: more during the business days, fewer during the weekend. (The...

basically you're not really useful for anything other than spam
> There are Big Five sites with lion's share of spam: SO, SU, Drupal, AU, and Meta. After that, there is everybody else - and Information Security is the top of that group.
13:32
unsurprised that AU is in the top 5
@Simon Hey i'm a legit rory, The other rory's say so
@RoraΖ Do they?
100% legit rory
@RoraΖ picture of you in a kilt. Now.
@AviD whatever floats your boat
13:35
@kalina Picture of you in a boat?
OI
@AviD
And I'm the creep.
in or on?
where do bug reports go
I'm impressed with the difference detector here: security.stackexchange.com/review/reopen/70784
13:36
Last time I was on a boat, I was thrown up on. 4 times.
@Lighty depends on the severity
@Simon I was roried, otherwise I wouldn't have tagged myself as such
@kalina in a boat? on a boat? I really dont know.
@kalina GUI bullshit not working
does it matter what kind of boat it is?
13:36
@Lighty meta.se
@RoraΖ You could be an extreme roro wannabe.
@kalina Just as a question?
@AviD no but it matters whether I've been destroyed and turned into a boat in some manner
@Simon That would be so un-Rory like
@Lighty yes with sufficient enough detail to not get downvoted and red freehand circles liberally
13:37
@kalina as a boat.
@RoraΖ pls
@kalina You can change form?
@AviD I'm not really large enough to cosplay a boat
maybe you need @Simon's mom
@kalina that would be a big boat
I'm sorry @Simon, I couldn't resist
13:39
Apologize to my mom, not me.
I'm sorry @Simon's mom
I know you can hear me
since you're everywhere
...due to being so large
-.-
Maybe @Simon could cosplay as a boat...
I'M 154.2 POUNDS
So much traffic here...
IS THAT BOAT WEIGHT MATERIAL?
13:40
thats
69kg
154.2 pounds is 69kg
hehehehehehehe
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
I weigh about the same
less prolly
65kg last time I checked xd
Im a toothpick
@Adi Hey you. :p
Maybe you could be a celery then.
skinny guys with no muscle mass /sigh
13:43
@kalina I'm working on the muscle mass
I'll make sure to remember that the next time you say men are assholes.
I have a very legit excuse why I'm not working out atm...
@Simon men are assholes
@Lighty Me too: I'm too lazy.
im about 65kg too
13:43
@StuW Brag about it.
I am analysing some network logs, does anyone have a short way of filtering AD queries? :p
OSCP and diy are more important than the gym atm lol
Actually, don;t brag about it, it's unhealthy xD
@Lamia I'm assuming AD is binded to a certain port?
@StuW a balanced life is more important
13:44
It probably is unhealthy :)
@Simon netbios?
@StuW heh another UK based tester
Okay
at this rate we can change the name of this forum to "UK testers , and a couple of others"
hehe
13:45
@Lamia What about it?
@RoryMcCune I work for your employer too :p
@Lamia Are you looking for LDAP queries?
@StuW well I wondered with the handle... that makes 4 of us
Look at you nurdz all working at the same place.
@Simon I am actually trying to find out if it was used, thanks
13:48
@Simon but... but... you said this immediately after linking something to do with Wireshark...
I'll be a nurd the day I'll obtain my OSCP cert.
you've been a nurd for a long time before that
still enjoying Hearthstone?
@RоryMcCune This can be the new internal chat room!
@Matthew that would be amusing
We're invaded!
14:01
it's fine, let them think they're taking over and then I'll bring the fire and cleanse this place
metavision.com <-- another AR challenger enters the arena $949 for the dev kit
what are people's dreams for virtual reality?
@RоryMcCune
> Unique Meta 2’s unique neuroscience-driven interface design
"neuroscience-driven" sounds like a marketing buzz word for, "we hired a neuroscientist to 'okay' something we designed"
Looks awesome, though
@deed02392 An MMORPG.
@TerryChia nice, but I meant more in terms of experience
14:15
:P
for example I want an omnidirectional tread-mill
@MarkBuffalo @Simon would say that with that helmet on your head, you mostly look like a nurd.
and force feedback
and obviously full body tracking :P
says it is based on unity engine
*waits for headset based on Unreal / serious sam / quakeII *
@ThomasPornin Reminds me of an old Star Wars: Galaxies helmet
Chitin, I believe
14:17
we either need neural linking or a full body exoskeleton
> Comey, a well-respected figure in Congress, likened impenetrable digital encryption used to protect customer’s privacy such as that of Apple to a “vicious guard dog”. “We’re asking Apple to take the vicious guard dog away and let us pick the lock,” Comey said. “It’s not their job to watch out for public safety. That’s our job.”
@deed02392 You want programmers to link directly to your brain? After you've done security assessments? Are you insane?!
5
Shut up, Comey.*
> “The logic of encryption will bring us to a place in the not too distant future where all of our conversations and all our papers and effects are entirely private,” Comey said.
No shit! That's the fucking point!
@MarkBuffalo Sounds excellent to me!
I have an idea. Security services can have access to exactly the information that all MPs are willing to provide to the public in unredacted form
even I think that's a bit too far
14:27
@Matthew hell yeah
@Ixrec You think what is too far?
what Matthew said
@Ixrec You must be a spook!
heh
equips tinfoil hat
14:28
@Ixrec I don't know - any MP goes into a meeting which isn't public knowledge, it means that all members of the public are allowed to go into meetings that aren't security service knowledge. They don't publish whatever they say in the bedroom to their partner, security services can't listen to bedroom talk!
enters room and sees tinfoil hats What's going on today?
3
@Arperum SCREEEEEEEEEEEECHES
@Lighty pats Where did the evil lizardman touch you?
@Arperum butt ;(
stu w equips tinfoil hat (+5) paranoia (-5) trust
14:31
@Arperum ᕙ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)ᕗ
@Lighty Isn't that generally an alien thing to do?
@Matthew We should be able to know what goes on in their bedrooms
It should be a matter of public knowledge
@Arperum nods ;(
After all, when we have our hacked phones in our bedrooms, they can listen in
takes off tinfoil hat
evil lizardman put a tinfoil had in my but
14:32
lie back and think of rule 34
googles rule 34
slowly backs away
@StuW WHAT THE FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK
@StuW UM?!
14:34
Yeah, I googled it...
AT WORK
@MarkBuffalo never google rule 34
My boss is going to come in and beat me with his belt
at work, home, on the bus... just don't do it
incidentally, my impression of the security v privacy debate is that no one seems to know of an option in between "NSA has 100% access to everyone's data" and "the terrorists have perfect secrecy too", are there any proposals out there that might create a middle ground option?
@RоryMcCune "I know that now." - Jack / Subject Zero
14:35
@MarkBuffalo does not want to think about rule 34 implications
@Ixrec well, the USA has a thing where you get a judge to grant you permission to search
@MarkBuffalo Even if we somehow manage to fix computer security, that seems still unlikely. Microphones and cameras are already pretty small. Insect sized drones might not be too far off. etc. There are still plenty of ways to pull off targeted surveillance.
that's a decent middle ground, as long as the burden of proof is heavy enough
@CodesInChaos Yeah, that's true.
"he went on this website" not good enough "he posted pro-terroristic threats for months and made a direct threat" yeah sure.
14:36
@Ohnana Except Judges have been signing off on warrants for no reason in a lot of cases
And of course outside your home there will be plenty of targeted cameras as well.
@Ohnana if we had a technical solution to "you can only search phones that you got warrants for" then that would be great
@MarkBuffalo which is why the burden of proof has to be higher
but isn't the whole point of the recent Apple case that we do not have such a solution?
@Ohnana I used to troll extreme right-wingers online, with a friend.
Like they were the 'start a revolution' type
You don't want to know how that ended up
14:37
@Ixrec i mean, they searched it as best they could
it's like trying to read a burnt paper, it's not there, you're not getting it, move on with the investigation
@MarkBuffalo you idiot :')
welcome to the internet
where nothing is truly sfw
@Lighty luls
@Ixrec What would a middle ground be?
@MarkBuffalo newb
When in doubt, prefer Wikipedia :)
14:41
@Ixrec Either encryption works, and no-one but the intended recipient can see the contents, or it doesn't work, and a known entity can definitely see the contents, and other entities might be able to see the contents, but you can't prove it either way
@M'vy When in doubt, use my phone :p
@MarkBuffalo works too
@Matthew or it may have worked and no-one can see the contents - not even the intended recipient
If I don't know what something is in this room, I will use my phone to look it up
sorry guys - thought that was common knowledge :)
14:44
@StuW it's ok @MarkBuffalo makes these mistakes regularly :P
@RоryMcCune I came dangerously close to buying an iPad yesterday.
@StuW I dispute that would count as working. I would contend that would be "file shredding" rather than "encryption"
never google stuff from a chat room on a work PC
@RоryMcCune To be fair (c'mon, throw me a bone here... NO euphemism intended), we were talking about paranoia things, so I thought rule 34 was some kind of tinfoil rule.
@Matthew true :)
14:45
@Matthew I think there are various trade-offs along that line. For example allowing passive decryption vs active interception, audit trails, secret sharing to require multiple cooperating entities,...
you're so innocent and cute
@MarkBuffalo Nah, that's rule 69
@MarkBuffalo see goes to show need to have that tinfoil hat on at all times, or You'll end up like a "Lemon Party"
@RоryMcCune What is a Lemon Party?
Hang on, I'm opening google.
@MarkBuffalo DO NOT
ABORT
@MarkBuffalo ABORT AT ONCE
14:46
@Lighty it's ok I think he knows that one
But the big problem is how you force the user to use a backdoored device. Especially in this age of globalization, where each country would like its own backdoor.
@RоryMcCune We can't take the chance
@StuW Dear god..
...what I have just witnessed
14:48
@Lighty well @AviD did once go to that site after it was mentioned in here (and I even warned him not to)
hmm, need to bookmark this site for later.
@CodesInChaos They only work for the legitimate backdooring parties though. If you are a bad guy, you still have access, potentially, with no safeguards. I have no faith that the details of such backdoors would be protected well enough
@Matthew This is how, over the years, I've had free-reign in some places :-]
@ThomasPornin Aw, you even spelled it right!
The key thing about doors is that they allow anyone through, once they're open. And these are huge targets to anyone who wants to make a lot of money. Not saying it would be easy to exploit them, just that if you design in a way in, you can't control who uses it in the long term
14:53
@Matthew All you really need is the leaked use-case documents for those backdoors
It practically tells you how to do it
that's pretty much what I meant, is there any hope of ever inventing a "door" that only allowed some pre-designed authorities through?
What you need to exploit a backdoor is the private key associated with that backdoor. Which should at minimum be stored in non exportable form in a HSM.
@Ixrec Usually they can be protected with keys... but once you get those keys... heh. Just HEH.
who would have thought, you can protect back doors with keys
you can protect front doors with keys as well
and windows
Or you might find a fail safe built into the key checking process: a run-of-the-mill buffer overflow/rce.
14:56
Reversing the software won't help, since it only embeds the public-key.
No, reversing the software helps
oh, @MarkBuffalo and @CodesInChaos are having a disagreement
gets popcorn
There are often fail-safes built-in
@MarkBuffalo How? Consider PGP style messaging where the client always adds NSA_PUBLIC_KEY as another recipient. The only way to exploit that backdoor is by knowing NSA_PRIVATE_KEY.
Or private_key.length + buffalo overflow
Dude.
14:59
That system is still quite fragile (passive sniffing, no audits, no forward secrecy, etc.) but it's basically secure.
Assuming your definition of secure allows for the NSA reading your emails.
@CodesInChaos These days, most intrusions come from the inside
@CodesInChaos And how does this help against the problems that the NSA/GCHQ are claiming it will? Why would actual bad people use this?

« first day (1903 days earlier)      last day (3275 days later) »