« first day (1714 days earlier)      last day (3122 days later) » 

3:00 AM
h1 = #, h2 = ##
 
oh, h2s is the plural of <h2> :P
Aug 22 at 17:53, by Peter Taylor
@Doorknob Firstly, we should discourage the use of single-# in answers. It's bad practice to have more than one <h1> in an HTML page.
 
Bad practice according to Peter?
I disagree entirely. I think h1 looks much nicer.
What's worse is mixed though.
 
bad practice according to every HTML standard ever
(I just had never thought of it that way, and when Peter brought it up I realized h2 was more proper)
 
Why does it matter?
 
54 secs ago, by Doorknob
bad practice according to every HTML standard ever
 
3:04 AM
1 min ago, by Alex A.
Why does it matter?
We're not writing HTML pages.
 
uh, yes we are
view-source:http://codegolf.stackexchange.com/questions/60152/standard-loophole‌​s-only
@quartata haha, beat me by 0.1 of a byte
 
yasss
 
Well yeah, we are writing HTML pages in that sense, but I mean that isn't the point of what we're doing.
 
sure it is
 
If we were working on one big collaborative HTML page, then I would agree.
 
3:06 AM
How else are people supposed to view your posts? >.>
 
I didn't know CJam could grab web pages.
 
CJam can do a few things. Pyth can do more.
 
@AlexA. well, we are, aren't we?
 
I realized that was poor wording on my part right after I said it.
Because yeah, we are.
@AlexA. Who starred you?
 
@mbomb007 Try something like self.end = 0 in Tape.__init__, self.end = max(self.end, index+1) in Tape.__setitem__ and replace the while in Interpreter.call with while pc < self.tape.end: maybe?
(might have an off by one error, haven't tested thoroughly)
 
3:09 AM
Hey, I see double underscores on both sides! Must be Python!
 
@Sp3000 There are three difficult concepts in computer programming: naming variables and off by one errors.
9
 
0
A: Standard loopholes only

quartataGNU sed, 0 bytes Even better..

The real winner
 
@quartata but you didn't get the bonus ;P
 
Still won.
First code golf contest I've won.
Tastes like victory.
 
:D
 
3:13 AM
would've won tumbleweed if not for the -3...
 
or the answers
or the comments
or the views
or the anything
 
@Maltysen Err, Tumbleweed is no comments, no votes, no answers, and low views for a week or two weeks.
 
derp
 
Which is probably effectively impossible on PPCG, incidentally.
 
Hello, anyone knows how I can insert tabs in my code submission?
 
3:15 AM
you can't
 
@xsot The Stack Exchange software automatically removes them
 
It's happened four times though. All in 2011, 2012, 2013.
 
@Dennis Damn, ninja'd. :D
 
3:16 AM
Huh, zero score. I guess +1/-1 is possible.
 
Oh, okay. How do people usually work around it then?
 
I wonder if deleted answers count.
@xsot Four spaces.
 
@xsot What's the context? Why are tabs necessary?
 
Also, really, tabs are converted automatically, from what I've heard.
 
they are
 
3:17 AM
Note that tabs are rarely necessary. Even when writing code, one should use spaces to indent rather than tabs.
 
I have a python submission that has 3 levels of indentation.
 
0
A: Sandbox for Proposed Challenges

DennisCUDDLE calculation code-golf math According to the Wikipedia page on the number 69, it is of note that 692 = 4,761 and 693 = 328,509 together use all decimal digits. The number 69 is in fact the lowest number that satisfies this property. For a similar reason, 32,043 is remarkable: 32,0432 = 1...

 
> LogarithEm
Okay, that's pushing it.
 
The E had to come from somewhere...
 
Why were you casually browsing the Wikipedia page for 69?
3
 
3:19 AM
Found a link in this challenge:
4
Q: Find a numeric coincidence when representing numbers in various bases

anatolygRecently, when doing some code-golf challenge, I came up with with two solutions, in 69 and 105 bytes. It's a remarkable coincidence, because: 69 (decimal) = 105 (octal) 69 (hexadecimal) = 105 (decimal) What other numbers have this property (using different bases)? You should help me answer t...

 
Likely story. ;)
 
@Dennis maybe work "exponent" in their somehow
"CUmulative Decimal Digit Least Exponent", maybe?
 
@xsot Can you do something like for j in range(128*(len(set('%o0'%i))>7))?
 
@Maltysen Neat, I'll use that.
 
Seems to me like all CUDDLE-less numbers are some power of 10 (and 0).
 
3:27 AM
@Sp3000 for j in len(set('%o0'%i))/8*range(128) works. Thanks!
 
@Doorknob Any idea who this guy is?
 
totally not me
 
Ah of course, i is at most length 8 :P
 
Compare.
 
3:29 AM
Illuminati confirmed
> ARCTIC SCIENCE PRIZE [NORWAY, GERMANY, USA, CANADA]: Eigil Reimers and Sindre Eftestøl, for testing how reindeer react to seeing humans who are disguised as polar bears.
 
I just went and saw The Martian
so much space
 
I just finished reading that!
It's awesome.
 
I also just finished reading that
Can confirm: Is awesome
Was the movie theater underwater? Did you have to tread water during the movie?
 
no
 
> PROBABILITY PRIZE: [...], for making two related discoveries: First, that the longer a cow has been lying down, the more likely that cow will soon stand up; and Second, that once a cow stands up, you cannot easily predict how soon that cow will lie down again.
 
3:38 AM
Special announcement: anarchy golf now supports ><> (and it has replaced A+ as being the first language in the list :D)
 
So... the amount of time a cow stays standing follows a geometric distribution?
 
No, then it would be easier to predict when it will lie down again.
 
(I should have actually said "exponential distribution" which is shaped like geometric but is for real numbers not integers)
 
Yes
But that would apply to the probability that a lying cow will stand.
 
An exponential distribution describes things like half-lives. The probability of decay is completely independent of how long the particle has gone without decaying.
Which is similar to how the probability of the standing cow sitting is independent of how long it's been standing.
 
3:46 AM
Yep. Because the exponential distribution is "memory-less"
 
Which would means that the time it stays standing follows an exponential distribution.
 
Well, we don't know that it's independent of how long it's been standing. Presumably it isn't; one could imagine that the cow will want to lie down after having been standing a while.
 
@AlexA. What year? (i.e., link?)
 
> The probability of cows standing up within the next 15 min increased (P < 0.001) with lying time in all experiments, which was consistent with the first hypothesis. The probability of cows lying down within the next 15 min did not significantly increase with standing time.
 
@El'endiaStarman I don't know how to link to specific spots on that site but it's 2013.
 
3:49 AM
From the paper abstract.
 
Ah, PhiNotPi is doing what I wanted to anyway. Read the paper. :P
 
Haha I didn't bother to read it
 
lol @ "$31.50 USD (24 hour online access)"
 
That's a deal!
I'd totally spend $31.50 to read cow math.
 
3:51 AM
That's probably one of the worst deals I've ever seen.
 
> The probability of cows lying down within the next 15 min did not significantly increase with standing time.
That sounds like it's a uniform distribution.
 
How hard is it to find the integer partitions of a number?
 
Hard-ish.
I don't remember if it's in NP, but I think it is.
 
@PhiNotPi such exciting research!
 
@Dennis 7/10
 
3:53 AM
We need a cow-spots drawing challenge
 
Closed as too broad
 
(I assume Dennis is talking about golfing. Time complexity is of no concern.)
 
Haha like Dennis' groups solution that was O(n!^n)
 
I'm writing a Pyth program. Input 28 has been going for 5 minutes without results...
 
CJam is going to miss you once you've completely turned to the dark side.
 
3:54 AM
There seem to be only 3718 partitions...
 
The algorithm on Wikipedia seems like it would be in P with just a quick glance.
 
If you want it to be fast, you could pentagonal number theorem it I guess
 
@AlexA. >:|
 
:3
 
There are like 6 versions of starred tags now
 
3:57 AM
@Sp3000 No, Pyth has the built-in ./. I'm trying to use it in a challenge.
 
@Calvin'sHobbies I know. :/
 
No you don't
 
@Dennis Oh, I thought you were trying to test your abelian question without ./. nvm
 
I just thought of a random question about algorithms and time complexity. Let's say that you have a problem, and there is a set of algorithms that can solve the problem. Is the following situation possible? For any E>1, there exists an algorithm to solve the problem in O(n^E), but there does not exist an O(n) algorithm?
 
Sorting?
You have to make at least n-1 comparisons.
 
4:02 AM
Isn't sorting like O(n log n)? Whether or not n*logn < n^E depends on the size of the list.
 
@xnor Thank you for that meta post. I think that's an important discussion.
 
I was thinking that the algorithms themselves have time complexity of the form O(n^value)
 
Ditto Alex's comment
I think someone mentioned taking us off HNQ at some point, but I forgot how that discussion went
 
Maybe I can phrase it this way... can you have a set of algorithms O(n^2) O(n^1.5) O(n^1.25) O(n^1.125) etc.
without actually having an O(n) algorithm?
 
The closest example I think think of is matrix multiplication, which is O(n^3) naive, O(n^2.373) exists but we don't know whether we can get O(n^2)
 
4:07 AM
That's actually what inspired the question.
 
But I can't imagine how you can get arbitrarily close but not reach it though
... ah :P
 
@Sp3000 Our site traffic would plummet.
 
3
Q: Easy challenges and Hot Network Questions

xnorI've noticed many challenges getting to the top of Hot Network Questions because they are really easy and get many answers that feed the activity-rewarding hotness formula. In turn, the visibility attracts more answers and more votes and keeps the cycle going. Can we do something about this? Som...

 
It's probably worth noting that Christianity.SE actually has its questions penalized, so it's harder for them to hit the HNQ list. This was a good decision in the past because otherwise there would have been many, many low-quality questions that got upvotes and answers. However, this is now under review because we've tightened our scope and we have better quality control.
8
Q: What is the reason for the lack of "hot network questions"?

ThaddeusBIn my two and a half months here, I don't believe Christianity.SE has ever had a hot network question, whereas the average site should get at least one every few days. I see several possible reasons for this: Our site has a much lower vote-to-view ratio than average Our questions attract signi...

@PhiNotPi Perhaps you can treat this limit-style. For every n, there exists an E where n^E - n < 1, so O(n^E) ~= O(n). In other words, a true O(n) algorithm may not exist, but you can get close enough that it doesn't matter.
 
4:27 AM
@xnor How much more expensive is it to convert to Python 3?
 
I think only one char for the print
lemme make sure
 
Because 3.5 {*range(1,8)} should save 2
So -2+1?
 
haha right
or a bytes object
{*b'1234567'}
 
Ahaha, nice :P
 
I'm making some KOTH server progress.
 
4:30 AM
Yay
 
@Sp3000 same # chars though
 
btw if you Python 3, you can error out with -print(l)
 
probably worse if something needs escaping
 
My server has now been able to download and run this "KOTH" from GitHub.
 
@Sp3000 that's great
 
4:32 AM
@PhiNotPi Nice!
 
Too bad {n}|s=={0}and-print(l) is the same length :/
 
it might be worth it to get everything on one line
 
The results file is stored here: koth-phinotpi.rhcloud.com/servertest/report.txt
 
replacing the if with another short circuit
and the loop with the comprehension
 
Actually, I don't think f(1234) works with the current one
(or f(29) for that matter)
 
4:34 AM
uhoh
oh, does it not check that p==0 at the end?
I think changing {n,p}|s=={0} should do it
maybe i should just check directly that sum(l)==n
 
I don't think that works
Since n changes
 
yes, this would be with not updating n
 
Ah, right
In any case, stupid way to save bytes maybe? def f(n,s={*range(8)},l=[],p=0):{n,p}|s=={0}and-print(l);p and f(n-p,s,l+[p]);[f(n,s-{x},l,p*10+x)for x in s]
 
you know, I think that could be a lambda :-)
 
... actually yeah it could :P
 
4:42 AM
oh, wait, that probably doesn't actually save chars given that we have to print
 
Ah :P
 
how are you dealing with s having 0?
 
He's been in therapy for it
 
you could do p*10+x, but you're not doing that
 
 
1 hour later…
5:58 AM
 
 
1 hour later…
7:52 AM
hi all
 
Brace yourselves, binary matrix challenge imminent.
 
@MartinBüttner :)
or python bashing...
 
8:16 AM
I notice a sad lack of fastest-code challenges since my absence :(
 
8:40 AM
0
A: Sandbox for Proposed Challenges

jimmy23013Repeatable combinations List all of the repeatable combinations (I'm not sure how it is usually called) of size k from n items. A repeatable combination is an unordered multiset that every item in it are also in the n items. Note that: It is unordered. So a previously printed set with a diffe...

 
@Sp3000 i was actually really disappointed that they didn't have it the last time i went there
nice
 
9:07 AM
@MartinBüttner I have a slightly controversial challenge idea :)
by which I mean.. very...
fancy hearing about it?
 
0
A: Sandbox for Proposed Challenges

jimmy23013Make your language unusable Try to write some code in your language and make it not satisfying our criteria of being a programming language any more. Examples like making it not able to output, or disabling all the loop constructs so it won't be able to do primality test and making sure the use...

 
9:35 AM
0
A: Sandbox for Proposed Challenges

jimmy23013"Standard compliant" web browser Your task is to write a standard compliant web browser that: Support HTTP protocol: (link to be added) Support TLS 1.2 for HTTPS: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5246 Support rendering HTML5 documents: http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/ Support rendering XHTML1.0 docum...

 
Jimmy's on a roll
 
hi @Sp3000
 
hi @Lembik
 
hi
 
Hey Lembik
 
9:52 AM
Is this question's title a little unclear?
 
Wrong link?
 
No...?
Sums of digits 1 through 7, yeah?
 
Oh question title, right
A little
 
It's more like "Sums of Numbers Composed of Only Digits 1 through 7"?
 
That's probably a bit too long IMO - it's kind of a tradeoff between brevity and clarity. The current one isn't too bad, and you find out the exact intention pretty quickly upon opening the question
 
10:01 AM
Yeah - when I read it, though, I thought it meant 1+2+...+7, and it confused me reading the question.
 
Same - it's the subtle difference between "sum" and "sums" :P
 
Oh, and, since it would take longer than necessary to post this to sandbox, would just printing a number to console (as code golf) be a good question? Super simple, just define a number and print it.
 
How is it determined which number to print?
 
Like, given the number "-1221", (as hard coded) print the number.
 
How is the hardcoding done?
 
10:09 AM
Totally up to the programmer.
 
I'm trying to see how this adds to a standard Hello World
 
So, like, you could do -3*11*37 or just -1221.
 
I'm a bit confused what the task is. Is it just you pick any number you want, hardcode it into the program and all you do is print the hardcoded number (and there's no input)? If so, I don't see why you would choose to factorise it like that, say
 
No - I specify the number.
 
So... you pick a number, and all submissions need to output that same number? Is this going to be a big number?
 
10:14 AM
Larger than Java's Integer.MAX_VALUE.
Or less than it's negative component.
 
Depending on how easy the number is to compress, I'd imagine that for some languages it'd just be easier to print the number as a string
 
Exactly. That's why it'd be a code golf.
 
Well that's what I meant about Hello World - if you pick a number that's hard to compress, then it'd be no different from a HW
(basically the whole challenge depends on the number you pick - some numbers are easier to compress using arithmetic, others by printing char-by-char, and some just can't be compressed well at all)
 
It wouldn't be too difficult to compress. Different languages would be more efficient for different methods.
(it probably should be a popularity contest with a focus on brevity.
 
10:30 AM
Well, I can't really sandbox-check it without the number and I'm assuming you're not going to post the number until you make the question, so we'll see
 
I'm gonna come up with a fairly difficult number to arithmetize. I'm still thinking about it.
Here's my number: -184642425887198622.
 
Doesn't look easy to use chars, so I guess you'd need an expression that beats 19 bytes
 
Correction : -184642425887198623*
The 2 makes it easy to divide.
 
I don't see how the 2 changes anything
 
-19×101×140663×684032359 = -184642425887198623
 
10:40 AM
Yeah, but the factorisation of the previous one wasn't any easier to use either
 
It's slightly easier - same distinct primes, smaller chars total.
-2×3×7×4396248235409491 = -184642425887198622
 
The thing is, unless you have a large prime power in there somewhere, it's not any more efficient to use the factorisation
 
Unless you calculate that specific prime somehow (i.e. a small sieve).
For example, 140663 is the 13067th prime.
 
That'd only potentially help for golfing languages
 
But, nonetheless, it's still another solution - there are hundreds of ways to find this. Therefore, the question.
 
10:50 AM
Well let's put it this way: even if a golfing language had a one-char operator to get the nth prime, you wouldn't save any bytes doing P13067 compared to 140663
 
Mm, true. But there are certainly more (way more clever than my generation technique) ways of finding this.
Maybe a restriction should be that you cannot use the number itself?
 
People'd probably circumvent by adding 1 or something
 
At least three non-reductive steps*
 
So far the only language that I can think of that'd be able to compress anything is CJam
 
Simply because it loads to stack then empties?
 
10:54 AM
Maybe Bubblegum too. Should check that actually
Because W = -1 and J = 19
 
You could also take it in chunks, with that method. Or hexadecimal, in general.
-28ffb4edd790d9f is shorter.
 
True
I dunno, feel free to post it if you want? I just don't think there'll be that many interesting answers, that's all (maybe someone might find something and everyone else copies, for all I know)
 
Or base 36: -1ei29yg72ra7.
Yeah... it should probably be a popularity contest with the most interesting method, then.
 
That's not what I meant, but okay...
 
Well, if someone copies, it'll be obvious then.
 
11:01 AM
Don't forget that base36 might look shorter like that, but you're neglecting the code to do the conversion
 
I thought that mathematica could deal with it...? (looking up now)
Yeah, you're right. :\
Wait - is compiled code typically shorter than source? It must be, right?
(totally different subject)
 
Not really.
 
Oh. Never mind then.
 
Let's say you invoke MessageBoxA to display something. That's going to be a few bytes. But the compiled executable must have a valid DOS stub and PE32 header ;)
 
Ohhh, okay, that does make sense.
But for long code, would it be shorter?
 
11:11 AM
Depends. If it's native code, yes.
If it has a lot of compiled resources no :)
You can generally decrease the executable size using a compressing linker (like crinkler) or PE compressor such as MEW11SE as it's commonly done in sizecoding.
 
Huh. Okay. Reason why I ask is mainly for force-compiled languages, like Java. Why do we count source bytes, not compiled bytes?
Compiled is the actually executed code, after all.
 
Because this is codegolf, not sizecoding.
Java is another story, where the "compiled" code is for an abstract machine, not actual hardware. Can't really compare it to native code (PE/ELF), where headers would create an overhead. That's why, in traditional sizecoding, Java/.NET and the like are disallowed because they require an external runtime.
> Compiled is the actually executed code, after all.
And this is slightly inaccurate, since compiled native code is machine code, but what's really executed is Microcode.
 
11:29 AM
@Dennis Damnit Dennis, you made me have to reverse eng Bubblegum
(Is there an encoder somewhere that I missed?)
 
11:44 AM
@Sok I would really like to see a better Pyth-solution for my Rubiks Cube question. Try again? 38 bytes are possible (though I used a feature, that wasn't in Pyth when the question first was published)
 
12:04 PM
@Dennis btw I get 129 bytes for Python's zlib for FizzBuzz
 
1:01 PM
-3
Q: Java program code challenge?

Joseph MaliyamunguWrite a program that asks the user to enter certain number, then asks the user to enter another 20 numbers, after entering them all, it prints out the number of occurrences of the first number. See example below (text shown in boldface is supposed to be user input). Enter number to search for: 2...

 
@Sp3000 I use zopfli for DEFLATE. That seems to have been a mistake for FizzBuzz. LZMA isn't even worth trying for such a short output. I haven't published an encoder yet.
 
1:28 PM
Thought about sandbox-sniping CUDDLE, but it just gets too unwieldy with BigInteger :(
 
I've been wondering about how to determine when there is no CUDDLE. or can you show that that only happens for 10^n and 0?
 
@Dennis Ah k, well I've basically set mine up over here to try a bunch and take the best - Python beats zopfli some of the time it seems
 
@MartinBüttner It would make intuitive sense that it only happens for those, but I can't think of a good way to prove it beyond an exhaustive search up to the limits of the input data type ;)
 
I really dislike it when people downvote challenges without saying why they didn't like it...
 
Link?
 
1:38 PM
dear combinatorics experts... If I have a vector n elements. How many different ways can I set a of the elements to 1 and b of them to -1? No LaTeX :)
 
My RTTTL Obfuscation challenge.
11
Q: RTTTL Obfuscation

quartataRTTTL, or Ring Tone Text Transfer Language is a music format that was invented by Nokia in the dawn of time when dinosaurs roamed the land. It allows for fairly crude pieces of music (no chords or anything), and the format is pretty simple which is why I think it's pretty cool. Take a look at thi...

 
You know what I really dislike
 
You're at +12/-1, I wouldn't lose any sleep over it.
 
People who receive a downvote and then feel entitled to an explanation
 
@Geobits I know but I want the feedback so I can make better challenges.
 
1:40 PM
(n) * (n-a)
(a) * ( b )
 
@quartata Sometimes there's just no constructive feedback to be had.
 
Well, let's start the questionnaire then.
1. Have you argued with anyone in the past week?
 
No.
 
@randomra oh! Is that the same as {n \choose a+b}{a+b \choose a} ?
 
You passed the questionnaire.
 
1:40 PM
Ah I see.
 
The problem I have is that many times if I DV something and do explain it, the OP will get defensive and start a mini-argument in the comments. It's just not worth it sometimes.
 
I am getting very suspicious of Geobits right now
 
@Lembik should be
 
If I can think of something constructive to say that won't be taken as "hostile", I normally do.
 
@quartata Also, some people will just downvote any pop-con on sight.
 
1:41 PM
I think he did say that I should use the beautiful PLAY format instead of RTTTL
 
@randomra I am not 100% sure what you wrote.. is it {n \choose a}{n-a \choose b} ?
 
@MartinBüttner That's kinda what I figured but I was holding out for it to be something sane
 
Maybe I should consider adding "Is it a popularity contest?" to the questionnaire. Some people just don't like them.
 
True, but I didn't downvote it despite your use of a terrible format :D
 
@Lembik yes
@Lembik if you write out the factorials, they are the same
(your and my version)
 
1:43 PM
-1
Q: fraction of positive numbers in a matrix (Mathlab)

programWhich command will return the fraction of positive numbers in a n-by-n matrix A in Mathlab?

 
A lot of off topic main posts today
 
It's probably still September in some places.
 
@randomra great..thanks
@randomra it feels like it should simplify
 
@Lembik so what's your challenge idea?
 
Ooh someone's making a challenge?
 
1:52 PM
It's Lembik, so expect it to be something to do with matrices or strings filled with small numbers :P
 
I think it's too controversial actually
 
Alright one second while I pull out Octave
 
but here it is (was).. on old unix network systems "ypcat passwd" would give you the password file
which you could then use to hack people's passwords by bruteforce
 
What does ypcat do?
Is it just like regular cat?
 
It looks like a butchering of copycat.
 
1:53 PM
I thought it was y(our) p(et) cat
 
@quartata the passwords are managed by a network server .. yp is short of "yellow pages" strangely
 
Ah I see.
 
eventually..in the 90s, people realised this was a bad idea
as fast computers could find a lot of passwords
but.. these systems still persist
 
Well, it probably wasn't all that bad until processing speed caught up with pw complexity anyway.
 
really bad sysadmins just remove the ypcat binary so users can't use it
@Geobits password complexity was fixed at 8 characters on these unix systems
 
1:55 PM
Hmmm... we are going to have a real problem in a few years at my work
 
@Lembik Ah, right, we're talking old ones. Rainbow tables FTW :)
 
We started with X products and a single code branch
 
good sysadmins moved to shadow passwords
 
Now we have X products and X branches
 
@Geobits old and still existing systems :)
 
1:55 PM
My team got to keep the original main branch
Now Visual Studio says I have incoming changes to nearly every file, and the numbers keep increasing
 
That sounds about right. Nobody wants the main branch.
 
so.. the challenge was going to be to implement ypcat passwd in the smallest number of chars, assuming the sysadmin has deleted the binary
 
We were about to make a drop when we split, so they gave us the main branch to minimize the impact to our team
 
a golf challenge!
who would have thought it :)
 
That doesn't sound like you at all, Lembik :P
 
1:57 PM
So... how do we test it works?
 
@Sp3000 I can run it :)
 
I can't :/
 
I have an old system to try it on
@Sp3000 you could compare what it does to a real ypcat passwd ?
the code is freely available
do you have linux?
 
@Lembik it is n! / (a! b! n-a-b!) which is a 3-way choose
 
Not currently :P (guess I'll sit this one out)
 
1:58 PM
but for roughly these reasons I cancelled the idea
@Sp3000 I am not going to do it
 
When chess gets too easy, some people move to blind chess. This seems to be an example of blind golf.
 
@randomra thanks!
 
Ah k
 
@trichoplax :)
 
1:59 PM
I do like the idea of golfing security hacks
 
I was doing cyber security all of last week, which is where the Python pickle came from
 

« first day (1714 days earlier)      last day (3122 days later) »