Hi,
I was wondering if anyone could please help me with this.
What is the difference in meaning when the catenative verb “like” is followed by an infinitive, or by a gerund? For example: Do you like ski jumping? vs. Do you like to ski jump?
Also, what is the difference between:
My brother taugh...
I don't think it's a duplicate: the other questions/answers mention that there may be a difference in meaning, but don't say anything about the actual meanings.
OK, first let's take a look at what some grammar books say, then try to make it comprehensible with some examples:
CGEL says:
The infinitival is more associated with change, the gerund-participle with actuality. Thus someone who has recently turned forty or got married might say "I like bein...
Some verbs are followed by ing, e.g. I enjoy swimming. We can't say I enjoy to swim. Likewise, some verbs are followed by to, e.g. I decided to make a plan.
Which particular verbs are followed by ing and to? Can you please provide a list for that?
Moreover, which verbs can be followed by both ...
> These words relate to ways people move on foot. All are of moderate informality. Walk is the most general and neutral of these, encompassing all manner of moving on foot short of running or leaping. Stride refers to a swift, purposeful way of walking; it suggests long steps and an energetic rhythm: striding through the station a few minutes before the trains departure. Amble, stroll and saunter, in sharp contrast with stride, suggest a slow, wandering movement without a clear-cut goal…
There is a whole page dedicated to the differences between amble, saunter, stride, stroll, strut, swagger, and waddle.
The only problem with Use the Right Word is that it contains too few entries.
Several times, I have had conversations, all over instant messenger, finish with "word" or "Word up G".
As it ends a conversation, I am guessing it is like "goodbye".
My question is what is the meaning of "word" and "word up g"? Also, what is the origin?
@Martha But all of those pings were of the most extremeliestest importance! Especially Kosmo's "Hey @Martha, do you see this @Martha mention? @Martha, @Martha, @Martha. Also, @Martha!"
@RegDwight It must be a y-chromosome thing. My boss has the hardest time learning two simple facts: (1) I am always right, and (2) Everything is his fault.
Hey, you're all over my German. I can't say a phrase without you getting all over me like bum on a baloney sandwich.
@Martha — Yeah, that extra chromosomal arm is packed with so many things: inability to drive, love of shopping, certainty that intuition trumps fact, and on and on.
@zizi I don't want to play riddles, nor do I want to guess when you're in the mood for caring about what others say; I've set the chat to ignore your messages
@Vitaly not it itself; it brings traffic if it stays high, and for long
I've heard this one repeated by women I know a few times, but it sounds like a product of confirmation bias to me. Is there supporting evidence for the claim that if you don't wear a bra you should expect saggier boobs at old age?
I've been reading a facsimile edition of Defoe's Captain Singleton and have noticed a little quirk of the text; where an st or a ct appear, they are joined with a little curl over the top, but nt, rt and pt aren't. This appears to be the case wherever these combinations appear in a word.
Is ther...
Not being an English native speaker, I find there are many words I pronounce differently from how an anglophone would (and differently from the phonetics prescribed in typical dictionaries). However, what confuses me is that my anglophone friends cannot understand me at all, even when there is on...
@Cerberus There is no discussion as far as I can tell. The guy hasn't responded to any of the questions (yet?). I think for Clippy's comment that it's amazing because that comment would be enough for any rationally-thinking person to convince themselves there are no deities. Too bad there aren't many rationally-thinking people in general.
@Cerberus However, if he does respond, I'd love to see how the discussion goes. The guy claimed to be rational on a site dedicated to rationality. There is no way for him to keep claiming religiosity without losing his face altogether (which he understands perfectly, by virtue of having read major LW posts).