« first day (921 days earlier)      last day (4297 days later) » 

00:00
Here's an interesting podcats I listened to today. I went for a half-hour walk, decided to make it an hour, then I went home and sat on the couch, listening, until it was finished.
4
> Could widespread child abuse and bad parenting in earlier eras explain some of history's brutality?
I often wonder the same thing.
I don't do podcasts. Maybe I should.
My brother keeps trying to turn me on to the Skeptics Guide to the Universe.
I was hoping the early edition would have good news, but my husband said when he made his report that the cops were saying they had recovered a lot of stuff, but it was unclear how much might be relevant.
I feel very preoccupied by it.
I've tried it a bit with a local working group. It can be interesting.
I've found it even more interesting to furtively introduce recording-machines into situations.
Or merely give the impression you are turning it off with a convincing gesture.
Depends on what exactly you're trying to capture.
--At any rate, sometimes it can be difficult to get things started, and the machine can feel intimidating; or on the other hand it can overcode/overdetermine things.
00:16
Gotta go. later.
@KitFox I would think about Ricky Gervais anyway; really interesting energy that feels totally natural.
Of course I don't know exactly what you're doing or how many voices you might be trying to involve. Just some thoughts/immediate reactions :)
Good luck with whatever you might end up creating!
(Another quick thought might be that recorded materials potentially have a testamentary and potentially therapeutic value independent of their broadcast-ability.)
 
1 hour later…
01:38
@KitFox I started with these.
 
2 hours later…
03:15
@Robusto It's good to be aware of how decisions like bombing cities can be made.
And the use of aircraft no doubt changed warfare a lot, although artillery and chemical weapons also resulted in quick, huge massacres (as in 40,000 casualties) in the first world war.
But his statement that civilians were not killed in large numbers in European wars between the Renaissance and the second world war is not entirely true.
My home town, for example, was burned to the ground and massacred by the Spaniards in 1600. It wasn't a huge city, but still.
I also believe the religious wars depopulated various regions in Germany between 1618 ands 1648. No doubt some towns or cities were massacred.
And what did the English do in Ireland?
The Russians in Poland?
I wouldn't be surprised if they burned and pillages cities too.
It could be argued that fewer civilians were massacred between 1648 and 1939 than in other periods mainly because there weren't as many wars that took place in or near cities.
But, yes, WW2 was really something different, with such a huge war between such huge powers and so many cities bombed to the ground.
As to Mediaeval wars, I think many were perhaps not so extremely bloody.
Cities were massacred, yes, but perhaps not that often.
It's hard to compare, if only because everybody lived in the countryside.
03:42
Another observation: the speaker suggests that perhaps chemical weapons weren't used at all in WW2 because people had seen how devastating they were in WW1 (which they hadn't seen about air bombings).
But it could also be that deploying chemical weapons is just very difficult, and they're less effective when you're already losing the war.
I don't know.
 
1 hour later…
04:48
Bombs that were dropped on London, most probably in September and October 1940.
 
1 hour later…
05:53
Hello
@Cerberus
need to revise this: Once enabled, it becomes available across the whole OS.
 
2 hours later…
ali
ali
07:32
hi
anybody there
 
1 hour later…
08:40
Yeah
I am here. @ali
 
1 hour later…
09:55
@RegDwighт yeah typo, nothing new.
10:30
@Cerberus Yes, that is one point I took issue with as well. I think he was glossing over an in-depth analysis of that point because, well, he already had 2.5 hours of material and you can't explore every branch. He also neglects to mention the wholesale slaughter visited on civilians in Europe from the Vandals through the Vikings, the various religious atrocities (the Albigensian Crusade) and so on. But his point about how the mass-murder of civilians became "accepted" in modern warfare stands.
10:51
today I had a problem with my program so I showed my laptop to my professor and he saw my root user name "JasonOwnzBiatch"
worst part is I laughed at his face because of the name
0
Q: articles in English

gabba2k7Mostly it is more or less clear to me how to use them, but when it comes to a certain sentence I start to cast doubt on my understanding of grammar. Could anyone please consider several cases of using articles? In each given case I am trying to explain how I see it, any corrections or answers ar...

I don't want to edit this. I cannot. Any volunteers?
11:17
I will give it a shot
Jez
Jez
hahahahahaha this episode is so freaking creepy
@KitFox I've gotten my science news from SGU. They're informal but not stupid. I have q subscription to Scientific American but either I don't have the right time to read it, or it is disappointing/too Discovery magazine/too polemical.
11:36
@Jez Hahaha wow
11:52
@RegDwighт I would simply change the title to "How can I speak English with nuance and precision? No, really."
12:20
Good morning.
Good? It's Monday. How is that good?
It's raining.
Hi Matthew. How was the wedding?
excellent :)
I now have a sister (in law)
12:24
:D
Glad to hear it.
Apparently I do need to check my emails more often
Did I overflow it?
last monday I was emailed about being the compare between speeches, but I didn't know
so I had to wing it
it all worked out fine
Wow. That must have felt pretty good.
0
Q: Why can't I understand even a word of the song In The Bleak Winter?

Alex Suhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0aL9rKJPr4 It is incomprehensible to me. I keep losing track of the song even with lyrics.

12:26
@KitFox it did :) also somewhat nervewracking
@MattЭллен The thrilling part what makes it feel so good when you're done.
@RegDwighт How about "I don't know"?
@KitFox how about "we should be asking you"?
That's far too nice.
I would hate to imply that I care.
maybe direct them to Cognitive Sciences
I understand like 50%. Perhaps 40. Then again I'm also focusing on typing here.
With the lyrics, I bet I'd understand 100%. At least.
12:30
With the lyrics, I got the first verse, no problem.
All this church music is notorious for not being discernible. Opera, too.
I had a hard time without them, but I'm out of practice wrt choral singing style.
Not to mention Internet Explorer!
HaHA!
The focus is on proper shapes, not proper pronunciation.
Is anyone a headphone expert here?
12:31
In what sense?
@MattЭллен nah, you can't possibly know that. The answer to the question as stated could be "because you have a banana in your ear".
I'm not sure Cognitive Sciences deal with bananas. On a second thought...
in a general way: aural cognition can be impaired by many things including blockages to the entry of the ear canal. ;)
That's far too general. This question is specifically about one person. You're not helping.
Now, "try switching it off and on again", that would be useful advice. Or "try jQuery".
12:54
@RegDwighт They don't werked. Pls halps.
I am rolling with it. Just rolling with it. No sense in even being irritated at the lack of organization.
breathes deeply, finds her zen
A few more months and I will we out of here.
*wee
Propelled out by the force of your urination?
Rolling in the deep?
Rolling in the deep.
@MattЭллен Whee, not whiz.
;-)
In the grey, grey ghost that I call home.
The project lead wanted me to go find a corner in the cafeteria and set up to do my presentation.
I told him I would convert it to handouts if he insisted on doing it there.
you selling snake oil?
No, trying to get information from users.
Much harder than selling snake oil.
13:08
oh! the focus group?
Yeah.
You're still not done with that?
There will only be 2 or 3 people for it, which suits me fine.
I thought we should feed them.
Haha. That is quite focused, but a group?
@RegDwighт I haven't done it yet. I was preparing last week.
And we're calling it a "user discussion" instead.
13:09
Why don't you just interview yourself. You'd provide much more insight.
you could call it "The first anual user picnic"
people would be much more enthusiastic
What I would like is to talk to the one teacher leader that I interact with most frequently, without my stupid project lead interfering.
@MattЭллен you misspelled anal.
@MattЭллен About an anal picnic? I don't think so.
giggles
har har :D
13:11
Zwei Idioten, ein Gedanke.
well, too many Ns spoil the broth
Too many bros before hos.
guys, what would you think about me when you saw my root user name "JasonOwnzBiatch" while you were trying to help me out with a problem as a proffessor?
I would think you were a professor at the Naughty America University.
I would think you were a college student.
13:12
Jinx.
!!/tell Reg jinx
@KitFox yup
@KitFox Command coke does not exist. Did you mean: joke
Damn.
13:12
The bot is wrong.
pheww, so nothing serious then
9
Q: How can I practice pronouncing "Coke" so it is not mistaken for another word?

sergI always fear my conversation sounds like this: — What would you like to drink, sir? — I will take some cock, thanks. — ROFL. Any tips on how to pronounce Coke so it is not mistaken for anything? :)

@TemporaryNickName Depends on whether you are concerned about people thinking of you as a grown up.
@TemporaryNickName yeah, nobody would take you seriously. For the rest of your life.
Damn, jinx again.
13:13
But I wouldn't worry about it. You are a college student, right?
So nobody will think of you as a grown up anyway.
I mean, except for other college students.
And kids younger than you.
@KitFox yeah I know
The solution is so obvious. Just buy a biatch. Then you'd actually own one.
Haha. There is really nothing to worry about.
13:16
no ownz means I can physically harm biatch (cowards)
@KitFox What's the big deal in people thinking of others as "grown ups"?
@AmaanCheval You'll understand when you are older.
Ah. That.
Apr 5 at 19:37, by RegDwighт
user image
Well done.
13:16
I will sell you this biatch for 2000 dollars.
Bulldog?
Yeah I guess.
It's kind of freaking me out.
baby boar?
13:17
No, I was actually making that fox.
This is a by-product of LEGO experiments.
Pointy tail and pointy nose has got to be pretty impossible.
Not to mention the crafty, feminine features.
Pointy is not the issue. Orange is.
So make a brown one.
@TemporaryNickName You're weird.
Because we all know how easy that is. waves magic wand
13:19
@KitFox this is LEGO. There are even less brown parts than orange.
Y must u b8 me so?
Beight?
Bait.
Anyway, I was going to listen to that podcats.
kthxbai
13:20
It's a frigging two and a half hours.
miss you kiss you
Rob sure listens to a lot of shit.
Yeah. It's like, how does he have time to chat all day?
He's chatting on autopilot.
Like you couldn't tell.
!!/define robusto
@RegDwighт robusto strong, robust, vigorous, sturdy
13:24
!!/hang e
  +---+
  |   |
  |
  |
  |
__+__
e
-e--e-----
!!/learn randomelu 'http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/$rand(1,25000)'
@KitFox Command randomelu learned
@TemporaryNickName Take it to the other room please.
13:25
!!/randomelu
I still wish I could drop the pingback.
So it would one box.
Guys, today I was in a classroom to use a computer and some Asian dude randomly showed up and said "Whatsup niggahs" to his friends. Do you think he was being a racist?
No.
13:28
@KitFox Yeah, I've tried to talk Zirak into using message IDs for pings instead of names when the message is single line, like it does with the mustache command
Yeah. He said he might do it.
It's a fun toy.
Fun might be overstating it.
It's a toy
It's an elaborate ruse.
Having a paper handout feels so 20th century.
13:48
supply them all with Google glass from the future
then chip the attendees with GPS trackers so they can't go missing
14:06
hee hee hee
So he's changed the plan again and now I'm back to adding stuff to the presentation.
Not that we will get that far, because I think we'll have about a half hour anyway.
it's good to be prepared just in case
gives @Matt a sharp look
no? is that the wrong thing to say
I'll blame it on the tiredness
You always say the right thing. You're British.
14:12
Oh, new challenge. My uh. Brother-in-law's girlfriend just emailed me that she has a new diet.
Looks like she can't eat anything.
oh, that sort of challenge.
so you'll try to make a stew with nothing in it?
rubs hands together
Exciting, eh?
Oh right, but I have to finish this presentation in 15 minutes. I better do that first.
pretends to be @Mahnax oh yes!
Curry would probably work.
Looks like no beans, no grains, no garlic (!), no onions, no dairy, no fruit, no gluten.
Also, several vegetables are out.
Hmm.
Gah. Presentation!
is this diet directed by a doctor?
14:26
I don't know.
She's got intestinal issues, but she might be the type to follow popular trends.
So she might not.
FODMAPs are short chain carbohydrates and monosaccharides which are poorly absorbed in the small intestine, including fructans, galactans, fructose and polyols. The term is an acronym, deriving from "Fermentable, Oligo-, Di-, Mono-saccharides and Polyols". The restriction of FODMAPs from the diet has been found to have a beneficial effect for sufferers of irritable bowel syndrome and other functional gut disorders. The low FODMAP diet was developed at Monash University in Melbourne. FODMAP absorption Poor absorption of most FODMAP carbohydrates is common to everyone. Any FODMAPs that are ...
This seems excessive to me.
But I like a challenge.
it certainly is a challenge
> Sources of galactans
Galactus isn't listed. I'm not sure of the veracity of this article
Haha. Meeting time. bbl
Have fun!
14:49
@KitFox Brutality is part of human nature.
15:15
The only bad thing about free lunch is waiting for lunchtime.
@MετάEd I don't agree with that statement.
Damn, of course I can't do curry without garlic and onion. Hmm.
is she off all types of onion? maybe you could use shalots or chives?
I think all types.
This is definitely going to be interesting.
I wonder how she feels about mustard.
Mustard and balsamic vinegar and ginger maybe.
Over...not tofu. Not broccoli.
Maybe summer squash and sweet potatoes and eggplant.
Roasted.
I bet I could do lentils tarka.
@Robusto Right, but I was under the impression that he was only talking about the early-modern period and the 19th century (ca. 1500–1800) when he said that Europe was less cruel against civilians. And so even that is dubious. But it is a minor point; what is interesting and surprising is how this became "acceptable" in such a short period of time leading up to WW2.
Oh, I think that has garlic.
lentils are pulses, no?
15:25
Hello!
Frig.
How was the wedding?
Hee.
15:25
@KitFox Humans have an enormous capacity for helpfulness and empathy, beginning at an early age. But they also have the capacity to devalue anything to the point that its suffering does not matter. And once you have devalued something (or someone), brutality ensues.
@Cerberus Super :D, thanks for asking.
Cool.
Were there any bouquets thrown? Or merely buckets?
:D My brother needed a bucket at the end of the night! I'm not sure if my sister in law threw her bouquet
Oh, dear.
yeah, but it's all good fun
15:27
I suppose it's very British!
we were meant to be having lunch together yesterday, but they were both too off colour
@Cerberus quite
Haha.
@MετάEd That's in interesting view
I'm not sure what Hyacinth would have said...
"oh, Onslow!"
or something like that
15:28
@AmaanCheval I think it's backed up by scientific studies of humans (as well as other primates) and several thousand years of historical record.
Haha yes.
@MετάEd Seems like you could still attribute it to poor parenting.
Especially since no parent loves her children as much as I love mine.
Of course.
@MετάEd What's interesting how different cultures define which people are still "one of us".
And to what extent people really lived up to these norms.
One of the few good things about Christianity is its attempt to greatly enlarge the inner circle, at least in theory.
I sometimes wonder what the effect was in practice.
They killed a lot of people like me.
@Cerberus fracturing the religion into lots of sub groups that have their own special ideas
15:35
@KitFox Yes, it certainly didn't reduce killing. But it may have increasing helpfulness towards strangers / the poor / the weak. Or not.
@MattЭллен That's always a problem with stricter religions.
But the same values of helping the weak and helping strangers were still preached in (nearly?) all sub-groups.
Right. Be charitable or be punished.
So just make sure you're cruel when no one is looking.
Or have a good reason why that particular person doesn't count.
Then again, even though this is emphasised less in some other cultures, hospitality and charity and helping strangers were far from new.
@KitFox What would our world have been like if we (our ancestors) had all worshipped Roman and Germanic gods?
There will always be indifference and cruelty.
But.
Maybe. Maybe not.
Gah, stupid dietary restrictions. This recipe has stuff that I'm pretty sure is not fodmaps-friendly, but it says it's OK for that diet.
15:44
I blame God for creating people who could have dietary issues. We're meant to be omnivores.
@KitFox I think you can teach people (starting at a young age) to devalue nothing: that every creature is valuable and precious. (See Jainism for an example.) Gandhi used to say that this was the only hope for humanity, and that it would be hard and have to start early in life, precisely because it is unnatural.
I don't think people are innately cruel. When I devalue human beings, I usually just ignore them.
I don't feel the urge to kill them.
@KitFox That's a sample size of one. I see your devaluation and raise you the holocaust.
That's a sample size of one as well, and he was treated poorly as a child.
and was a painter
15:47
@MετάEd Even ticks?
Yes.
> Britse topmannen: vertrek uit EU kost Groot-Brittannië ruim honderd miljard
British CEOs: leaving the EU would cost Great-Britain € 100 billion.
would cost, or are we definitely leaving?
@Cerberus I didn't say "should". I said "can". So yes, you "can" teach people that ticks are valuable and precious. Again, see Jainism.
15:48
There are billions of people on the Earth, and only tiny fraction of them are actually brutal.
Would, thankfully.
Google translate left out would
@MετάEd So does Jainism do so?
@MattЭллен Ahh I see. Funny.
@KitFox About a fourth of them, though, want strong, brutal leadership. The authoritarian followers.
So we'll kill all of those, then we're fine.
Sunshine and rainbows will follow.
15:49
rimshot
@KitFox A tiny fraction actually are brutal, because society is designed to punish brutality and foster kindness. The fraction increases as society collapses.
@Cerberus "Jains make considerable efforts in everyday life not to injure plants any more than necessary. Although they admit that plants must be destroyed for the sake of food, they accept such violence only inasmuch as it is indispensable for human survival, and there are special instructions for minimizing violence against plants."
Jainism (pronounced ), traditionally known as Jaina dharma, is an Indian religion that prescribes a path of non-violence towards all living beings and emphasises spiritual independence and equality between all forms of life. Practitioners believe that non-violence and self-control are the means by which they can obtain liberation from the cycle of reincarnations. Currently, Jainism is divided into two major sects; Digambara and Śvētāmbara. Jainism is one of the oldest religions of the world, identified with the Śramaṇa tradition of ancient India and connected by some to the Indus Valle...
I don't like damaging plants either if there is no real reason to.
But how about weeds in your border?
@Cerberus I don't agree with that statement either.
I love kicking the heads off dandelions
15:51
Stupid dandelions.
yeah. they had it coming
@KitFox Why not?
@MattЭллен !
@Cerberus Brutal people are more powerful than non-brutal people. Kind people make easy targets.
@Cerberus Perfect example of what I'm talking about. When you identify some plants as weeds you have devalued them.
if you get it just right, it will fly for miles
15:52
@KitFox True.
@MετάEd Absolutely. So Jainism wouldn't weed out undesirable plants?
Will nobody think of the children?
@Cerberus What hits home from all this is that human beings have a nearly infinite capacity to arrive at worst outcomes from seemingly logical, well intentioned premises. And that our lust to make war supersedes rational discourse.
Kicking the heads off children? I don't think that's a good idea
@Cerberus I'm no expert on Jainism. The article has some information on that though.
@MattЭллен It's only a difference of degree.
What I really, really dislike is damaging plants or animals or anything beautiful or complex for no good reason. This includes throwing away leftovers. If you have some sort of reason, then I am ready to devalue, say, noisome insects.
15:55
@Cerberus Right. And using exactly the same logic you can devalue noisome people.
My rationale for smashing mosquitoes is "because I can." Same with eating animal flesh.
But anyway, devaluing doesn't necessarily lead to cruel behavior.
@MετάEd they're not even the same kingdom
@KitFox I agree. It takes devaluation plus a little fear or inconvenience.
@MattЭллен Why should that matter?
@Robusto Yes. But could it also be that the Industrial Revolution gave rise to a sort of utilitarianism where a goal can justify any means? I.e. that this way of thinking was fairly new for civilised people? I think we have in a way returned to "even the best goal doesn't justify all means" after WW2. Let's hope it will hold for a couple of centuries.
@MattЭллен "They're not even the same color."
15:57
@MετάEd because it does matter. it's always mattered.
@MattЭллен "They're not even the same religion."
genetics affects who we are likely to help and hinder
@MετάEd Yes, absolutely. But most people are far more reluctant to devalue stuff that's higher on the ladder.
we are more likely to help a human over a fly
Certainly.
15:58
@Cerberus Right, or more closely related or friendlier. We will devalue a dog but the circumstances in which we will do so are different than for a tick.
A cat is a rat is a dog is a child.
@MετάEd Yes.
Lunch and presentation. bbl!
15:59
Bye.
@KitFox It's like those circular species.
@MattЭллен You can take it up with PETA.

« first day (921 days earlier)      last day (4297 days later) »