@KitFox No, just like I'm excited. I get interested in random things sometimes, I guess. I'd never thought about that before, and I like things that make me think :)
I posted a half-assed one-liner answer that generated seven imperial tons of comments and then I expanded it, prefixing it with "Now that this has sparkled some discussion, I feel like I must expand on this." And then Martha was all like funneh and then the rest was like history.
One difference is that as far as Merriam-Webster is concerned, the word "commentor" does not even exist. Same goes for "commenter".
Edit:
Now that this has sparked some discussion, I feel like I have to expand on it.
I do see the word "commenter" (but not "commentor") being used on Reddit, blo...
@KitFox ah, but you misunderstand. Zero length is no length. That doesn't count as short.
I'm trying to research reasons for not acceding to our consulting company's desire to use the Knockout.js framework. Besides just shouting, "Learn to code in the front end and you won't have to rely on yet another fucking framework!"
Yeah I never understood frameworks. And I mean okay, JS is at least an interesting beast actually, but there are frameworks for CSS or even friggin HTML.
> Adding ponies will help too, but mostly concentrating on keeping things small, understandable and idiomatic (whatever that means) will keep your JS from becoming a write-only mess.
The Read the Bills Act (RTBA) is proposed legislation intended to require United States Congress to read the legislation that it passes. It was originally written in 2006 by Downsize DC, a non-profit organization focused on decreasing the size of the federal government. The proposed act is a response to the passing of bills like the USA PATRIOT Act that are thousands of pages long and are passed without copies being made available to the members of Congress who vote on the bill. The bill is aimed at limiting the size and growth of the federal government.
Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) stated hi...
Don't start pulling at that thread or the universe will start to unravel.
> Having delivered a talk on how to write your own JavaScript library (detailed notes) at the conference, Dmitry shared his thoughts on the new library over breakfast the next morning. “Just what the world needs—another sucky JavaScript library,” he said. When I asked him what made it ‘sucky’, he elaborated. “It’s a JavaScript library written by Java developers who clearly don’t get JavaScript.”
I mean, if they don't read the shit they pass, it should have passed. But obviously they do read the shit after all, so it didn't pass. Except if they do read the shit after all, then there's no problem in passing something that tells them to continue doing just what they're doing anyway, right?
@Robusto and the people who passed it are still there, getting paid with the press's and comedians' money and acting in their name and on their behalf.
Hey, ease up. It's Saturday and I don't want to think about the perilous instestinal blockage that is the U. S. Congress.
As Will Rogers said, "If pro is the opposite of con, what is the opposite of Congress?"
> In his talk on building JavaScript libraries, Dmitry compared JavaScript’s global scope to a public toilet. “You can’t avoid going in there,” he said. “But try to limit your contact with surfaces when you do.”
> : the formal product of a legislative body : statute; also : a decision or determination of a sovereign, a legislative council, or a court of justice