> Basically, because law enforcement believes it needs to build a much bigger haystack as it searches for needles, we're handing other countries a key selling point in setting up services to compete with US services: "you can't trust any service based in the US, because it's subject to government surveillance." ... I've seen a number of companies lately who advertise the fact that they're not based in the US to suggest that they're more secure and can keep your data private.
This is true. There was this small scandal recently when the Dutch Government was going to buy some database software for medical information from an American company, but it was all over the news that American companies cannot be trusted, because of the Patriot Act and other laws.
I want to compute similarity of sentence 1 and 2. Two sentence are:
1- "A mathematician found a solution to the problem."
2- "The problem was solved by a young mathematician."
I can use tagger,stemmer,parser but I don't know how detect these sentences are similar.
please help me.
The answer is best approximated as "yes", although there are some strictly non-context free components of English. The approximation of saying "English grammar is context free" is more true than false, in that the vast majority of the sentences you will encounter will be parsable by a simple EBNF...
@RegDwighт Depends what one means by “regex”. You can do recursive-descent parsing with modern patterns, because the AⁿBⁿ restriction does not apply here as it does to the original regular expression definition related to regular formal languages. However, that doesn’t mean you should do so, and in fact, you really should not.
but something that is worth getting a second opinion from some of sites senior memebers
i have some interesting thing to talk / share its regarding to what i call the most prolific pedophilic image of united states president its DICK Cheney. here is the picture
i won't go on disclosing any links between this pics, and cathy o brien CIA torture and mind control program mk ultra survivor but this pictures speak for itself ; just have a look at the young child sitting on earth and to its NE DIRECTION 20 degree to N; you see the reason why his first name is dick but there are some bizarre controversies and relationships associated with this picture the correlation is mind blogging
i don't need to visit the room as such i mean its all over GOOGLE
but usually the old forums has it not new
since we can talk about every nic n corner of whatever living and non living exists in this world but sometimes i feel the big , real and important stuff gets left out
@Saladin Remember how we agreed on your doing it in a single line? If you have more text, put it on an external page, then link to it from the single line granted to you.
or its just a book of lines coz if 1 single bit of it has ever existed i expect a high national level inquiry which includes members of media, public servants top lawyers to investigate this claims
i think if we don't respond to this ; this i think the guys at white house have achieved their purpose which is MIND CONTROL; feeding too much noise so the reality get blurred
VALIS is a 1981 science fiction novel by Philip K. Dick. The title is an acronym for Vast Active Living Intelligence System, Dick's gnostic vision of one aspect of God.
It is the first book in the VALIS trilogy of novels including The Divine Invasion (1981), and the unfinished The Owl in Daylight. Together with Dick's last book, The Transmigration of Timothy Archer (1982) (thematically related to the unfinished trilogy and included in several omnibus editions of the trilogy as a stand-in for the unwritten final volume), VALIS represents Dick's last major work before he died. Radio Free ...
> ...humour is usually banned from this kind of discussions because the subject matter is too often deemed too serious. For Cleese this is a grave mistake, one that stems from conflating "serious" with "solemn". Serious matters, according to Cleese, can be handled with a lot of humour and laughter and yet not lose one bit of their importance, while solemnity on the other hand serves no purpose other than being pompous and serving the ego of the self-indulgent.
British English has so many dialects that you can rhyme anything with anything, pretend that there is at least one dialect in which it's actually true, and be right.
> Social kisses that are cross-cultural can be even more complicated. Ef Rodriguez, a social media strategist in Boulder, Colo., recently moved to Amsterdam with his wife and went on an outing with his wife’s Dutch cousins.
Keep your tongues on the other side of the world where they belong.
Not all over our kissers.
I would be offended if somebody “offered me their cheek” demanding a kiss, and I would be even more offended if they swooped in for the smooch. Harsh words would be spoken. Or worse.
I absolutely do not kiss anyone, irrespective of gender or sexual orientation, when I greet them. Nor am I ever confronted with it. It simply Does Not Happen.
In the US guys will only shake hands first time if they are strangers. If friends no. If the men are friends but haven't seen each other in a long time, they will shake hands or maybe even a 'bro hug'.