05:41
OE length-based minimal pairs:
> on bær lic (on the bare body)
> sie seo bǣr gearo (let the bier be ready)
> creow se coc (the cock crew)
> spræc se cōc (the cook spake)
> Nys nan man gōd, buton god ana (No one is good but God alone)
> þa bead he ful gyld to his here (The he commanded full tribute for his army)
> byrgen utan fæger, and innan fūl (a sepulchre fair outside, and foul within)
> In MnE, the vowels in the pairs of words bare/bier, cock/cook, good/God, full/foul are clearly different in quality. In OE they were probably only different in quantity. The sounds must have been similar enough to justify the same spelling. They were written with the same letter, but one vowel is short, the other long.
> Sometimes the written long vowels were marked with an accent - <cóc>, or a vowel-letter would be doubled to mark a long vowel - <goos>, <tiid>, which became common in the following Middle English period. But there was no general need to mark vowel length, because the context of the word would prevent any ambiguity of meaning.
> So, pairs of OE words with vowels which were spelt with the same letter have reflexes in MnE with vowels different in quality of sound as well as quantity (either short or long) as a result of later sound changes. The OE vowels differed in length only, and this was sufficient to mark differences of meaning.
Another minimal pair was hwæt what and hwæte wheat.
> The evidence, then, that long and short vowels with the same quality were different in OE, and affected the meaning of words, comes partly from the big differences to be seen in words which have come down into MnE with vowels of different quality. These shifts of quality in long vowels began to happen at the end of the ME period, between the 14th and 16th centuries, and are described as the Great Vowel Shift.
> So the number of pure or single vowels in OE is fourteen, twice the number of vowel-letters used in the OE alphabet, for each letter is used to represent a short and a long vowel.
@Cerb See the preceding quote for the idea that there were 14 vowels, each using one of seven letters in a short vs long form. This is how they talk about these things, which is why I said I did regarding Latin: it had 10 pure or single vowels, using 5 letters to denote these.
Oh my. OE also had phonemic length is its consonants, with minimal pairs there too!
hopian [hopiən] to hope
hoppian [hopːiən] to dance, hop
cwelan [kwelən] to die
cwellan [kwelːən] to kill
> In OE, double consonant-letters represented consonant sounds which were pronounced long, differently from single short consonants. They became simplified in time to short consonants, but the double letter spelling was often retained, especially if the consonant was at the end of a word, as in eg, bucc (buck), eall (all), hyll (hill).