English Language & Usage: Multi-Layered Discourse Room

Robusto

12:28

Is this the quiet room?

JSBangs

12:41

not anymore! i'm here now

Robusto

Woo-hoo!

So what's shakin'?

JSBangs

well, you know, work

and stuff

0

Q: 'aphorism' and 'maxims', what's the difference?

Quotes, sayings, aphorisms, maxims. what's the difference. esp. aphorism v.s. maxim. BTW. Should I capital the first letter of the title sentence? how?

Robusto

Yeah ...

JSBangs

i feel like we need a term for these questions

Robusto, you're USian, n'est ce pas?

Robusto

USually, yes.

Well, we could call them "non-linear differential equations" but I think that's already been claimed by mathematics.

Or we could call them GAFT questions.

JSBangs

12:54

mathematicians are always ruining my fun

Robusto

They're like that.

JSBangs

I was thinking of something along the lines of Yet Another ...

but not sure how to continue

Robusto

GAFT = Get A Frickin' Thesaurus ... except without the euphemism.

3

JSBangs

oh, that's ok then

Robusto

1

Q: What is the Latin translation of "Blood is eternal"?

I realise this is an English Q&A site, but I was hoping someone on here might also be versed in Latin and be able to help. It is for a tattoo I am getting designed. My first search turned up the result "Sanguis Eternus", but I am not 100% convinced this is correct. Can anyone help? Cheers!

translation latin

Voting to close.

JSBangs

12:56

me too

though i'm going to answer in a comment

Robusto

@F'x: You're violating the FAQ, you villain!

Kosmonaut

13:32

8

Q: Why are the United States often referred to as America?

People often refer to the country US as America and to the people from the US as Americans. As far as I know, that's the only case in the world where a continent's name is used for a country's name (let me know if I'm wrong). Why does that happen?

proper-nouns

Sorry, I'm trolling the chat (slightly).

Robusto

That's OK. Good to see you in here, @Kosmo. You've been busy, I take it.

Kosmonaut

@Robusto Yeah, I had a first draft submission for a publication due yesterday.

Robusto

Ah. A few all-nighters, perhaps?

Kosmonaut

Well, it wasn't too bad.

Yesterday was an all afternooner.

Robusto

0

Q: how to use in or on in English language

can you please explain the difference between the use of "in" and "on".Kindly explain in detail with examples

prepositions

Kosmonaut

13:38

Because it was due in Europe

Robusto

Dupe

Ah, time zones. They can be tricky.

Kosmonaut

Dupe, yes... also too broad of a question.

Robusto

What was your article topic, if I may be so bold?

@Kosmo: BTW, four close votes on "in or on" in case you were shy about bringing the hammer down.

Kosmonaut

It is about self-organization in the suffix system.

JSBangs

suffix system in which language?

Kosmonaut

13:43

Well, my paper focused on English, with a bit of French and German, but should just apply to language in general.

When we borrow whole words from other languages, productive suffixes can emerge and then find their function in the language

Robusto

How does such a suffix emerge? Usage first?

Kosmonaut

Well, borrowed suffixes emerge from the pile of borrowed whole words containing the suffix.

Like we borrowed a ton of -ation words as whole words.

So, clearly these borrowings provide some sort of template.

And once you reach a critical mass (don't ask me what that is), you begin to see derivations increasing.

Robusto

Interesting.

Billare

The closing of this question: english.stackexchange.com/questions/17385/…

I dunno, the duplicate seems to be rather sparse?

0

Q: How to use "in" or "on" in English language

Possible Duplicate: When to use in, on, at? Can you please explain the difference between the use of in and on? Kindly explain it in detail with examples.

usage prepositions

Have rather sparse number of answers, I mean.

Robusto

So when a word gets introduced into a language, it comes with a lot of baggage. The nose of the camel into the tent?

Kosmonaut

13:51

@Billare The question was closed because it was too broad.

Billare

Is it really fair to close the question when the duplicate answer has only one upvote?

Kosmonaut

@Robusto Well, actually, I'm not sure if the baggage really carries over. It's just that when the words you borrow all seem to have something in common, people start to make connections.

Sometimes it can be the "wrong" connection, if pure etymology is "right".

Robusto

Also interesting.

Kosmonaut

The suffix -ical came about because -al was applied to nouns ending in -ic or -ics.

Since -ic was also already an adjectival suffix, I guess this caused people to glom the two together to make -ical.

-ic is actually Greek and -al is Romance.

Billare

Another thing: is vgv back?

"nicolas ainsworth"?

Robusto

13:57

@Kosmonaut — I've seen other Greek/roman amalgams. I wonder if many of these were filtered through the late medieval period in Europe.

Kosmonaut

The earliest -ic words actually came via French

@Billare He doesn't seem to be a registered user. Where has he posted?

kiamlaluno

(I wonder if also garlic comes from French.)

Kosmonaut

@kiamlaluno No, it doesn't!

kiamlaluno

Does that mean French don't like garlìc? ;-)

Billare

nicholas ainsworth

Sorry.

kiamlaluno

14:03

How can you find a user who didn't register?

Billare

Where does "garlic" come from then?

Kosmonaut

@Billare It is Germanic, I think.

The lic portion is related to the word leek.

kiamlaluno

@Billare: Old English gārlēac, where _gār means "spear."

Kosmonaut

Which is why it is called Knoblauch in German (where Lauch does mean "leek").

Billare

LOL, interesting etymology.

Kosmonaut

14:04

Yeah, it's not obvious.

kiamlaluno

(The Dictionary application is always useful.)

As NOAD says: "because the shape of a clove resembles the head of a spear."

Billare

The nicholas ainsworth fellow does seem to be posting a fair number of nonsensical questions, no?

kiamlaluno

I got it; it's the user who asked about double -ing.

Billare

And a long sentence about "had had"

Robusto

@Kosmonaut — My Old English prof also thought it could be the -lic suffix meaning "like" ... as in "spearlike" — but leek is plausible as well.

Kosmonaut

14:09

@Robusto I think the German Knoblauch is the best evidence in favor of the "leek" argument.

Rhodri

Leeks and garlic are all part of the onion family, which is also suggestive.

kiamlaluno

(Are we going to make a leek soup?)

By the way, do French people make garlic soup?

Robusto

No leek soup, please.

Kosmonaut

@Billare I don't see any reason to assume it is not an original user account. I'll give the benefit of the doubt.

kiamlaluno

Mmmmmmm! Leeks.

Billare

14:11

@Kosmonaut Right. I wasn't suggesting anything be done; just pointing out there were unusual similarities.

Kosmonaut

Yeah, I will keep an eye out.

Rhodri

@kiamlaluno Mmm, leek soup. The Welsh half of me is suddenly very interested.

kiamlaluno

("He dreams of 'leeks in the oven,' with some Parmesan cheese.")

Kosmonaut

@Rhodri Hopefully that half includes the taste buds.

Robusto

Well, if you'll pardon the pun, you'll find many a leek in an English Gardena :)

kiamlaluno

14:13

(I am not sure I want to discover which kind of leeks there are.)

Robusto

Most of England before the Norman Conquest was part of what was known as the Danelaw.

And after 1016 it was entirely Danish-ruled.

But Beowulf predates that, of course.

"Hwæt. We Gardena in gear-dagum,
þeodcyninga, þrym gefrunon,
hu ða æþelingas ellen fremedon."

...
Eeuwww. This translator gives *hwæt* as "what"; in the context, it means something more like "Hey! Listen!" or "STFU I'm gonna sing now!"

Rhodri

@Robusto What what?

Robusto

In the translation of the first three lines of Beowulf, noted above.

JSBangs

mmmm, leek soup

Rhodri

Sorry, I should have added a smiley

Nobody ever gets my jokes.

::sobs::

JSBangs

14:18

* pats Rhodri on the back

Robusto

Ah, I didn't notice, but further down the page he refines the translation. Good job.

nvcc.edu/home/vpoulakis/translation/beowulf1.htm

Kosmonaut

@Rhodri You should have said "can I get a hwæt hwæt?"

4

Robusto

@Kosmonaut — Lulz.

kiamlaluno

@JSBangs: You are late: we already had the leek soup.

Robusto

Lulz is OE for "laughing drunk under the table"

Rhodri

14:45

@Billare I think the main similarity between nicholas ainsworth and vgv8 is that he doesn't bother fact-checking before posting.

0

Q: Famous ungrammatical phrase?

Look at this famous phrase used by a British talkshow host when saying goodbye to his audience: 'Nice to see you, to see you nice!' Nobody in the UK (including my grandmother who was a frequent viewer) seemed to think it sounded strange... I think it's grammatically acceptable - due to som...

grammar-checker

Almost all of the surrounding details here are wrong.

kiamlaluno

@Rhodri: Do you mean that vgv8 checks, or nicholas does not check?

Rhodri

Neither of them check, as far as I can tell. I should have said "they dont' bother fact checking" above, sorry.

kiamlaluno

@Rhodri: Well, you also said "the main similarity between;" I don't know why, but my brain read "the main difference between."

RegDwight

Dupe alert.

1

Q: BookList or BooksList

Hi all, I'm wondering wether or not I should use a plural form noun with a collection name. For example, which one is correct, bookList or booksList (obviously they are variables in a programming language)? Thanks in advance. Kai.

grammatical-number

2

Q: Is it correct to say "lesson count" or "lessons count"?

Possible Duplicate: “user accounts” or “users account”? If I mean "number of lessons", which grammatical construction should I go for? I can imagine three of them: Lesson count Lessons count Lessons' count

count

3

Q: "user accounts" or "users account"?

Is it correct to say "user accounts" or "users account", when referring to the accounts any user has on a site like this one? In general, in the case of a noun that is used as adjective for the noun that follows, is it better to use <plural-noun> <singular-noun> or <singular-noun&g...

usage word-choice nouns

1

Q: Use of the plural with list, and when item count is 0

Possible Duplicate: “user accounts” or “users account”? I keep asking myself which form is the most correct when listing items on a website: "Article list" or "Articles list"? Also, when nothing was found, do you say: "No items were found" or "No item was ...

grammatical-number list

kiamlaluno

Hey! That is one of my questions!

RegDwight

14:54

And why is this still open, me wonders:

1

Q: Why is "It was a dark and stormy night.." not a good opening?

Also, why has it spawned an award for bad writing?

usage questions

Rhodri

That's not a terrible question, surely? Though it might be better on the writing site.

RegDwight

My point exactly.

kiamlaluno

Now it is done. :-)

JSBangs

"dark and stormy" belonges on writers.se, for sure

Robusto

@Reg: Good to see you up and around. How's the cold?

Rhodri

15:02

I still think Robusto is wrong; it's a splendid opening sentence :-)

RegDwight

@JSBangs: I wonder if you have actually read Pinker. Because he actually agrees with you in a few key points. (I'm in chapter 4 at the moment.)

Robusto

@Rhodri — Feel free to submit it to a publisher. Your fortune is assured!

RegDwight

You argue that we do not need words to have concepts, and that is exactly what he says.

@Robusto The cold sucks huge balls, what should I say.

Rhodri

@Robusto Great! Now I just need 20,000 other words to go with it.

Robusto

15:16

@Rhodri — The average novel is 80-100,000 words, so get busy.

@RegDwight — Refresh my memory. Which side of the issue do you come down on?

Rhodri

@Robusto That would make my last fanfiction epic a novel. Eep.

Robusto

And ... T-Rex is trolling again:

0

Q: Are there words that are always plural?

Are there words that have no plural counterpart because they are, in fact bi-contextual - not that there is anything wrong with that......Rabies/Rice? Is there a term/rule for this phenomena?

words

@Rhodri — Well, usually they have to be good words, interestingly ordered by a skillful practitioner ...

RegDwight

@Robusto I have no idea because I have never really given it any thought, or a tleast I have never had a discussion on the matter. But that's precisely why this book might turn out helpful.

Rhodri

@Robusto Either that or you have to throw enough sex scenes to distract the readers from your crap words.

RegDwight

But I do find it a bit insulting that I am not allowed to read stuff just because someone somewhere happens to not like it.)))

Robusto

15:24

@RegDwight — ???

Here's something fun to read:

books.google.com/…

RegDwight

23 hours ago, by JSBangs

@RegDwight, The Language Instinct. I would have thought you had better linguistic taste than to go in for Pinker

Robusto

The discussion by two 13th century students is an enjoyable diversion on the nature of the conceptual vs. the real.

Or 14th century ... I forget.

RegDwight

So now I have no taste just because I'm reading a book I had never even heard of until someone (a linguist, no less) mentioned it in this very chat.

Kosmonaut

@Robusto This has to be a dupe; we must have talked about uncountable nouns and all that.

RegDwight

That's like saying, don't go watch Titanic, it sucks. Well, thanks a bunch but I would like to build my own opinion. Even if I know in advance, even if I am 100% certain that Titanic sucks, I will still watch it. Because otherwise, how can I possibly argue why it sucks?

JSBangs

15:29

@RegDwight, i should probably have included a smiley with my original comment

i didn't mean to be so negative about it

RegDwight

@JSBangs Yeah, no hard feelings.

JSBangs

i just dislike Pinker (and Chomskian linguistics in general), and was giving you a gentle ribbing about it

RegDwight

I figured as much. Nobody likes Chomsky on this site.

@JSBangs But back to my actual question, you do realize that he agrees with you on certain key points?

Robusto

@Kosmonaut — I'm pretty sure we have.

JSBangs

he does agree about concepts not requiring words, yes

RegDwight

15:33

@Robusto I have read The White Company as a child. But I don't remember much.

JSBangs

but he generally presents the Chomskian view of human language as a content-rich innate system

with a supposedly robust set of linguistic universals, etc.

Robusto

RegDwight

@Robusto Um, yes, I've seen that, like, two minutes ago?

Robusto

So you looked. OK.

Kosmonaut

The Language Instinct is not a Chomskyan view — it is in-between.

It's certainly not perfect, but I think it can be an interesting book for a general audience.

Robusto

15:39

@RegDwight — While you were answering I was posting. The White Company is not really a children's book. It's a pretty good satire on the entire medieval English society.

You should read it again as an adult, if you have time.

RegDwight

Feb 8 at 15:33, by RegDwight

Conan-Doyle is totally underrated.

Robusto

Indeed. Oh, btw, I love that the woman Corso encounters on the train is Irene Adler !!!

RegDwight

That is actually one of the very few names that I do recall.

Robusto

The Club Dumas is such a lot of fun. I didn't have time to read much while my son was home from school last week, but I'm making up for it.

JSBangs

here's the paper i've been wanting to link since yesterday: umass.edu/preferen/You%20Must%20Read%20This/…

Robusto

15:44

Irene Adler is "The Woman" Sherlock Holmes always refers to. From "A Scandal in Bohemia" etc.

@Kosmonaut: Whaddya think: Is this a possibility for dupifying T-Rex's post?

9

Q: Politics: Singular or Plural

Which is correct: Politics is out of scope OR Politics are out of scope

usage grammatical-number

RegDwight

@Robusto Hm. I remember mentioning measles and billiards myself. I think it was on that news question...

6

Q: The news is good. Why?

We use The news is good. instead of The news are good. What is the rationale behind this? Are there similar situations in English?

grammatical-number present-tense

Robusto

I would go with either. Except it's not really clear what T-Rex is asking.

RegDwight

@Robusto That's what NARQ is there for.

(And there's always the downvote button. "This question is unclear or not useful".)

Kosmonaut

@JSBangs There was an interesting point a colleague made the other day that was related to that topic

Robusto

But if I start downvoting T-Rex questions where will it end?

Kosmonaut

15:52

Thinking about language "universals" and things that we take for granted as natural and rooted in our mind/given in advance

Robusto

@Kosmonaut — Yes? Go on.

Kosmonaut

In sign languages, there is verb agreement

Well, many sign languages

But all sign language verbs that inflect are verbs of transfer

This is because of the iconic natural of transfer in a visual medium, as opposed to an auditory medium

Robusto

Interesting. How do verbs inflect in sign language?

Kosmonaut

Actually — and again this is not my observation, but I love it — sign languages are the only languages that literally inflect.

Because inflectere is a Latin word meaning "bend" :)

But basically think of the word give

Oh, first I should say, referentials work in a different way in sign language

Instead of having pronouns, you basically have a certain visual space, where you basically "store" a reference to something for later use

So maybe the upper lefthand corner of the space in front of you is "mom" and the upper righthand corner is "the remote control"

You designate these spots

Robusto

That's really cool. I never knew that. I love the "clipboard space" idea.

Kosmonaut

15:59

And then you have verb agreement by signing GIVE but moving your hands from reference #1 to reference #2

Actually give is a bad one because it is ditransitive and needs 3 arguments

Maybe SEE.

Robusto

It forces you to reexamine your assumptions about what constitutes language in general.

Kosmonaut

It's a great mini-argument against language universals in the real UG sense.

Robusto

I read a story by Ursula K. LeGuin which was about ants creating literature out of chemical compounds that they could "read" with their antennae. I wish she had gone into the language aspect of it more.

...

Writers.SE?

0

Q: Confusion about a stanza from Rudyard Kipling

Following is the stanza Teach us delight in simple things, And mirth that has no bitter springs; Forgiveness free of evil done, And Love to all men' neath the sun! What does second line and third line mean? And does the last line mean love to all people who work hard under the ...

meaning

RegDwight

Pinker mentions modifying verbs to indicate continuous action, in ASL.

Kosmonaut

@RegDwight I think they use reduplication for that... am I remembering right?

RegDwight

16:06

"Any verb in ASL can be modified to indicate that the action is being done continuously: the signer superimposes an arclike motion on the sign and repeats it quickly. A verb can also be modified to indicate that the action is being done to more than one object (for example, several candles): the signer terminates the sign in once location in space, then repeats it but terminates it at another location."

Kosmonaut

Yeah, that's reduplication.

RegDwight

"These inflections can be combined in either of two orders: blow toward the left and then toward the right and repeat, or blow toward the left twice and then blow toward the right twice.

"The first order means 'to blow out the candles on one cake, then another cake, then the first cake again, then the second cake again'; the second means 'to blow out the candles on one cake continuously, and then blow out the candles on another cake continuously'."

Kosmonaut

Sign languages are really cool.

@Robusto I think the answers show this is clearly for Writers.SE

RegDwight

I'm somewhat on the fence about that one. But I have no idea what is being asked here:

0

Q: How to express to look more or all side and consider more or all views for a thing ?

one side -> on the other hand -> all sides one view -> multiple view -> all views

words sentence

Kosmonaut

What in the world?

RegDwight

16:18

-> more world -> all worlds!

(I hope I'm playing by the rules.)

Kosmonaut

@RegDwight So, you're on the fence about that Rudyard Kipling question?

kiamlaluno

0

A: "Influence of media in our lives," or "influence of media on our lives?"

Your earlier question was closed as an exact duplicate. That means someone else already asked the same question and got good answers. I suggest you check them out. There's a link in posted in your earlier closed question.

That "answer" should be a comment.

RegDwight

@Kosmonaut I have no idea whether it would be on-topic on Writers.

Kosmonaut

@RegDwight Would you say it could be on-topic here?

RegDwight

It certainly feels off-topicish, as per the FAQ (criticism and discussion of English Literature). But we have to keep in mind that it is fundamentally not very different from Yoichi's questions. Here's a weird sentence, what does it mean.

Kosmonaut

16:25

I don't really like those either.

But this goes a bit further.

RegDwight

Yeah well, as I said, I dunno. I'd probably vote to close if my vote weren't binding. The point is, deciphering someone's words is deciphering someone's words, be that someone Rudyard Kipling, Charlie Sheen, or a Washigton Post scribe.

Kosmonaut

Well... it depends.

It is hard to quantify.

RegDwight

It certainly is!

psmears

I agree with @Kosmonaut that this goes further than the others, and I'm not sure I can put my finger on the exact reason either

I think the things that bug me about it (which don't necessarily make it off topic) include the fact that it reads somewhat like a homework question

RegDwight

Mar 12 at 18:54, by Robusto

@RegDwight — If you can't quite put your finger on what you think is off-topic about it, yet act on such uncertainty, that doesn't sound like judicial restraint to me.

psmears

16:35

and that there's no demonstration of effort on the part of the asker to understand (a la "I've looked up the word spring in a dictionary and it said this - but that doesn't seem to fit...)

Kosmonaut

@psmears This.

RegDwight

@psmears Well, if it is a homework question, you're spot on.

5

A: How to deal with homework questions

Draft, based on the StackOverflow policy This is an attempt to reconcile two extreme positions in a way that is acceptable to the majority of the community: Some might feel it's irrelevant that it's homework:we should always provide a complete answer. Others might feel this site is not the pla...

psmears

The question could be rephrased as "Please explain this entire stanza to me"

RegDwight

"*Make a good-faith attempt to solve the problem yourself first*.
If we can't see enough work on your part, your question might be voted down and closed.

*Ask about specific problems with your existing approach to answering the question*.
If you can't do that yet, try doing more of your own work first or searching for more general help."

psmears

(part of me thinks it could reasonably be turned into three questions - one about each line where there is uncertainty - but I don't feel that that's a better option...)

RegDwight

16:40

(I will never figure out italics in this chat.)

Martha

@RegDwight It's the line break in that post: putting in a line break turns a post into preformatted text, essentially.

RegDwight

Ah yes! Of course! That is so obvious!

kiamlaluno

(I will never figure out if Italics is the name of a population.)

RegDwight

Thank you, @Martha.

Robusto

17:17

Well, back from lunch. Cashew chicken at a "Japanese" restaurant. Something decidedly fishy about that.

RegDwight

The cashews or the chicken?

It's not a Japanese restaurant if there is nothing fishy about it.

Warrior Bob

Especially if it's a nice sushi restaurant

Robusto

Well, nowadays most "Japanese" restaurants around here feature Chinese and Korean food and are usually run by Koreans or Chinese.

I won't eat sushi at a restaurant that doesn't have a Japanese sushi chef.

Warrior Bob

@Robusto: Whereabouts are you? I'm in California, USA and it's similarly common to see Korean/Chinese restaurants serving ostensibly Japanese food.

Robusto

Boston area.

Warrior Bob

17:25

Oh wow. Maybe it's a coastal thing.

Robusto

Nah. It's everywhere now. 20 years ago you couldn't get sushi except at a Japanese restaurant. Now every Asian culture thinks they can do sushi.

At least in America.

The point is, you really have to study to be a sushi chef in Japan. It's all about knowing when the fish is good and when it's bad, and what parts are good and what are not.

Warrior Bob

I agree - there's usually a pretty clear distinction between the places with trained chefs and the places that are making it up as they go.

<3 sushi :)

Robusto

@WarriorBob — Same here. But the good stuff is really expensive, and I don't want to eat the bad stuff.

JSBangs

there is a good supply of high-quality sushi in Seattle, where I lived until very recently, but an even larger supply of cheap tasteless stuff

Warrior Bob

I've been fortunate in that around here, the "bad" stuff is really just blander. It's still tasty, just not exquisite. It isn't gross by any means. We get a lot of "California-style" rolls that I'd never see in Japan, but they go over well enough in the little sushi bars here.

Robusto

17:30

@Warrior: What part of California?

JSBangs

@Kosmonaut a lot of language universals are obviously false on their face once you add sign languages to your sample. this is a fatal counterargument against some of the stronger forms of UG

Warrior Bob

@Robusto At the moment, the central coast - near San Luis Obispo if you happen to be familiar with it.

Robusto

Yep. SLO.

Martha

My opinion of sushi (and chopsticks) is that I'm not living in the stone age. I don't need to eat with sticks, because there are much better tools available. Similarly, I don't need to eat my protein while it's still raw and disgusting, because we have the technology to cook it.

Robusto

@Martha — Chopsticks are perfect for some things.

And sushi is good. Mmmmmboy!

Warrior Bob

17:32

@Martha To each his/her own I suppose! I've actually grown to enjoy chopsticks (and the taste of raw fish) quite a bit but I definitely can't fault anyone who doesn't :)

RegDwight

Thanks for the link, but that's all common sense, at least to me personally. This bit is especially relevant: "Chomsky’s notion of Universal Grammar (UG) has been mistaken, not for what it is – namely, the programmatic label for whatever it turns out to be that all children bring to learning a language – but
for a set of substantial research ﬁndings about what all languages have in common." That really says it all.

Robusto

I don't fault the person, I fault the argument.

RegDwight

@Martha Forks were invented like two hundred years ago or something. Not exactly Stone Age.

Martha

@Robusto Well, yeah, I've used quite a few chopsticks in various crafty projects, or for reaching into deepish crevasses, that sort of thing. The one thing they're not suited to is delivering food from the plate to the mouth. They are especially unsuited to delivering rice from the plate to the mouth.

JSBangs

hey, i just got [Enlightened] again

kiamlaluno

17:36

(I guess I could not use the "history is cyclic" argument.)

JSBangs

@Martha, indeed. i never understood why rice is the main thing for eating with chopsticks. it seems to cry out for a spoon

Martha

@RegDwight Forks were invented millennia ago. Eating forks were invented probably around 600 years ago.

RegDwight

@Martha My point exactly.

Sticks were invented millenia ago, too.

And I am not sure how eating sushi with a fork is even supposed to work.

Warrior Bob

@Martha @RegDwight and fish were invented well before that.

Martha

Oops, gotta go.

RegDwight

17:40

@WarriorBob Everything was invented roughly 5000 years ago.

Warrior Bob

So... in summary, sushi is ancient, and eating it is delicious, but possibly anachronistic, QED :)

RegDwight

Sometimes I wonder what the world would be like if they had totally forgotten to invent eating.

Robusto

@Martha — It depends on the rice. The kind of rice they eat in Japan is sticky rice, which clumps together in sticky balls that are entirely suitable for being picked up by chopsticks.

I'll allow that chopsticks suck for your Minute Rice or Rice-A-Roni.

Chopsticks are also perfect for noodles. I use them to eat spaghetti even.

kiamlaluno

0

Q: "In time " versus "on time"

Which one is correct, "submit your work in time" or "submit your work on time?"

usage prepositions

It seems todays' topic is "'in' versus 'on'."

Robusto

17:56

Cultural note: Sushi and sandwiches were both invented by gamblers who didn't want to stop gambling long enough to eat a proper meal, but didn't want the gunk from the meal to mess up the game.

This is why sushi is really finger food. No chopsticks required! :)

RegDwight

@Robusto It depends on the noodles, too. Spaghetti (spaghettini, spaghettoni, bavette, maccheroncini, capellini) work fine, but what about, say, gobbetti or conchiglie rigate?

Robusto

The nori (seaweed wrap) protects the fingers.

@RegDwight — It only works with long noodles.

Transcript for

English Language & Usage: Multi-Layer…