« first day (5003 days earlier)      last day (213 days later) » 
00:00 - 18:0018:00 - 00:00

18:05
@Cerberus same reason some people don't use keepInventory=true. to challenge themselves
I work crosswords without a dictionary, and the easier ones I work from left to right top to bottom.
it's a fun challenge.
@MetaEd But then the challenge has to be fun.
I liked the game less before Googling was allowed, it seemed a bit boring, random guessing?
@Cerberus Because it makes the game harder, and as you wrote, nothing guarantees that you don't get a picture from Google.
OK.
I actually like the puzzling/research aspect of it, I think.
Tomorrow, I will note my ungoogled guess somewhere, then use google and go ahead. I'll have two scores then.
@jlliagre Good idea.
OK the first one was easy.
No Googling.
18:13
Same score.
You guys are Googling for WhenTaken? 😦😦😦
At first, I never did.
Then I began doing it when the others did it, and it was more fun.
Cheating!
Now we're supposed to do today's game without Googling.
SPLITTERS
18:15
@Vikas But putting the photo into Googles Images is always illegal.
I don't Google for any puzzles here.
yesterday, by jlliagre
When I started playing, I didn't use Google or anything at all. I was wondering how @XanderHenderson could have such high scores then I understood Googling was part of the answer. Too bad it's not possible to play without being informed of the actual location and date. I would like to be able to play once with no external assistance then a second time with Googling allowed.
@Cerberus I'm cool with it either way. I got lucky today going rawdog, but on another day I could get 400.
Second one. Also easy.
The year is kind of impossible to get close to.
18:21
By the way, isn't there a harder version of Wordle? It simply became too boring for me. I now usually solve it in three attempts, rarely four. I wonder if there is smth which is harder to solve (six or seven-letter word, larger vocabulary (harder words), two type of color highlights rather than three, etc.
@Alexander That's overconfidence XD You can't do it always in 3-4 attempts.
@Cerberus #3 is easy too.
@Robusto Really?
It seems less obvious to me.
Both the year and the place.
Well, the year wasn't easy, but I've done worse.
You found the location easy, really?
I'm just going to guess.
18:25
Well, look at the picture op close
It helps if you know history.
I know something that happened in that year.
So that is what I will guess.
The name of the city is written in plain text.
But I didn't think you would know that.
@jlliagre Really!
The third one?
Sorry, the second one.
Yeah, the second one was easy.
18:28
The third location is obvious, especially if you already know it well.
The precise year is unguessable.
@jlliagre I didn't know it well, but I know what happened on the dates involved. The ones printed on the column.
@jlliagre How is it obvious??
Corrected.
@Robusto Oh yes, but that doesn't help to know the date of the picture.
No, of course not.
How am I supposed to know it was there?
18:29
I was uncomfortably off on the date.
I know only one important thing that happened in the year on the thing.
But you wouldn't know that.
And it was apparently not what the thing was about.
@Cerberus You know it if you are a citizen of that country.
I read a lot of history.
@jlliagre Yes, of course. But that applies any any picture!
That doesn't make it "easy"!
3 mins ago, by jlliagre
The third location is obvious, especially if you already know it well.
It is not obvious, in my opinion, unless you already know it well.
Which is...a kind of tautology.
@Cerberus That was the idea ;-)
18:32
Misleading.
I mean, almost everyone who have heard of that country also know that place.
Even if they don't know that that photo was taken on that place.
That is not the same thing.
Too many that.
I do not know the place from the photo.
But everyone on the chat has heard of that place.
18:34
The square or the monument?
I haven't looked at what it was.
I just didn't recognise it.
The square.
But how is that relevant?
Everyone had heard of Bogotà, but nobody would recognise a square in it.
And this photo didn't even show the square, just the foot of some monument.
Because all demonstrations in that city start from that place. Of course, not everyone know that.
But I do not reocognise the place!!
Think harder, and admit that what you said was unfair.
Now, the fourth one, is also hard.
18:37
I will guess a well-known place where it could be.
I was quite lucky with the year on that one.
@jlliagre Listen. You know Amsterdam. You probably even know Dam Square. If I showed you a photo of the foot of some building there, would you recognise it?
Not without googling ;-)
Only if you happen to know that particular building well. Otherwise, it is not obvious at all.
But you were telling me it should be obvious to me, because I knew the name of the square.
I never saw the monument in person, but I knew which city it had to be in. Beyond a reasonable doubt, that is.
But the dates were very revealing for a certain event that the monument commemorated.
18:41
@Robusto How?
Because of the dates?
@Cerberus We're still talking about #3, right?
@Cerberus I wrote it after you wrote Also easy, I thought you had it so commented it was obvious if you already know it.
@Robusto Yes.
@Cerberus Yeah, like I said, it helps if you know history.
@jlliagre Ahh OK. That was probably about no. 2.
@Robusto Well, I am an historian...
But so many things happened in the past...
18:42
Sorry guys, I have to leave for a moment.
Later!
Yeah, there's a lot of history. That's why I read a lot of it.
@jlliagre Ciao for now.
They really don't teach history anymore. Too bad.
I'm amazed when people can't place the dates for the French Revolution(s).
Or other notable events.
Or have no idea when and why the Peloponnesian War happened.
Or any of a number of dates and events and forces at work.
But those dates are a bit more significant than 1830, aren't they?
@Cerberus Not if you've read about that country's last couple centuries. It's pretty interesting.
The 4th one.
I just had no idea about the location.
@Robusto Well, I have obviously read about those many times.
But I don't remember the exact years of most things.
18:53
@Cerberus Then you should remember the Three Glorious Days.
I don't know.
@Cerberus Yeah, I do have a knack for dates of things. I don't know why.
I mean, when I saw the year and the language, I did think of an event that must have occurred around that time.
As for #4 I did a bit better than you because I am married to an Asian woman and have a facility for the different features of various Asian countries. Most people just see the epicanthic fold and lump all those faces together.
Now, #5 for me was a complete pull-it-out-of-my-ass guess.
@Robusto Yes, I expected no less.
I was in doubt between the country I picked and the one where it actually was.
But I didn't see anything in the script that suggested the actual country to me—probably incorrectly so.
18:59
@Cerberus There is a certain style of calligraphy associated with that country.
@Robusto Did you get close?
@Cerberus Closer than I had any right to. But I really screwed up the date.
@Robusto I did see a style that looked familiar on the placard or what was it, but I had no idea where it might be from.
@Robusto Hmm.
The last one is very interesting.
But very hard.
Several continents which I cannot exclude.
19:20
Well.
This was the 5th one.
It was one of three continents. I chose the one farthest away from the correct one.
And the date was too far off. But I just had no idea.
#WhenTaken #147 (23.07.2024)

I scored 722/1000 🎉

1️⃣ 📍 86.7 metres - 🗓️ 1 yrs - ⚡ 199 / 200
2️⃣ 📍 54.1 metres - 🗓️ 7 yrs - ⚡ 191 / 200
3️⃣ 📍 263 km - 🗓️ 2 yrs - ⚡ 189 / 200
4️⃣ 📍 2625 km - 🗓️ 1 yrs - ⚡ 143 / 200
5️⃣ 📍 15022 km - 🗓️ 34 yrs - ⚡ 0 / 200

https://whentaken.com
20:14
@Cerberus I understand. By the way, the more you play WhenTaken, the more you know what location its author like to present. There is no randomness here. In particular, the one we were just discussing about was already there two days ago.
Same column.
Different year.
Chichén Itzá probably wins the number of appearances contest.
20:30
@Cerberus That's not bad.
#5 is funny because the location is within easy driving distance of where I now live. I could not have recognized it.
@jlliagre That and Machu Picchu.
Or the various ruins around Mexico City.
Paris certainly gets its fair share, as does NYC.
@Robusto I tried Bolivia, got 12 points.
@jlliagre That's as good a guess as any.
The hairstyles really threw me on that one.
Also, the blanket wraps.
They were of a pattern I simply did not recognize.
#WhenTaken #147 (23.07.2024)

I scored 822/1000 🎉

1️⃣ 📍 1207 km - 🗓️ 0 yrs - ⚡ 166 / 200
2️⃣ 📍 5 km - 🗓️ 1 yrs - ⚡ 199 / 200
3️⃣ 📍 2 km - 🗓️ 1 yrs - ⚡ 199 / 200
4️⃣ 📍 256 km - 🗓️ 14 yrs - ⚡ 164 / 200
5️⃣ 📍 6162 km - 🗓️ 12 yrs - ⚡ 94 / 200

https://whentaken.com
@Araucaria-Him I beat you by only one point. Statistically insignificant.
That's too much like hard work!
20:37
What else ya gonna do with your free time?
Finish my PhD?
Or watch TV
Probably better than the latter
Finishing things is highly overrated.
Yes, couldn't agree mor
Not sure my other half sees it that way
@jlliagre I recently heard a great quip about that...
Go ahead.
20:45
Aren't the Quips an L.A. street gang federation?
there should be a chain of fried chicken restaurants in the Yucatan called...
Chicken Eatsa
Hmm ... I do remember that from somewhere ...
Where was it ...?
Oh, yeah.
Jul 4 at 13:46, by Robusto
Idea for a Mexican fast-food chicken chain (better than Los Pollos Hermanos): Chicken Eatsa.
I 'm still cryin
I had to google Eatsa.
@jlliagre it's not really a word?
at all?
'eats' is
and sometimes ya gotta mangle things a little to make them fit.
20:47
And nobody even gave that a single star ... sniffs
2
I'm glad googling is allowed to guess the mysteries of this chat.
I'm still not sure where I heard it from though.
Some weirdo probably
I don't get no respect.
@Robusto Now you got it!
I ruined it.
20:48
@jlliagre I will cuddle it in bed tonight.
them.
@Robusto Save them up and redeem for... 1/20 of a Dave and Buster's tickets.
@Robusto Une nuit étoilée !
which, with 500 of them you can 'buy' a funny eraser.
@jlliagre But do I have to cut off my ear?
20:50
Not that time.
Uh-oh, rollover wienermobile accident in Chicago area.
Someone get a big bun.
@jlliagre Yup, that is the reference.
He gave his freshly cut ear to a woman working in a brothel. Weird.
I do. Corrected.
@jlliagre Vincent was crazy for her. I mean really crazy.
21:02
Jul 14 at 1:53, by jlliagre
user image
Pretty good likeness.
I posted it during the Bastille Day but it's a coincidence.
And I made my Chicken Eatsa joke on Independence Day. Coincidence? I think not.
21:23
That's "wierd".
21:35
@jlliagre It's funny because... well... 'eatsa' = 'Itza' ... and 'Chichen' ... OMG ... it's ... almost... it almost sounds like...
'chicken'.
I can't see my keyboard for cryin
You're just jealous. :-p
I mean there are a thousand chicken wing places.
I mean these Korean BBQ places are poppin up like mushrooms.
@Mitch Thank you for enlightening me :-)
@jlliagre Buffalo chicken wings are the 'original' spicy fried chicken wings, with blue cheese dressing and celery.
It's not good for you.
1 chicken wing has 5000% Recommended Daily allowance of everything bad.
@Mitch Wait - buffalo have wings?
21:39
cholesterol
triglycerides
added sugar (you can't taste it but it's there)
@Araucaria-Him Buffalo has chicken.
trans fats
cis fats that are homophobic
denatured DNA
unnatural DNA
probably heavy metals
for that extra zing
@Araucaria-Him I refuse to answer that.
like Metalica
Tell AI not to quit its day job.
Oh wait, that is its day job.
#WhenTaken #147 (23.07.2024)

I scored 742/1000 🎉

1️⃣ 📍 25 km - 🗓️ 1 yrs - ⚡ 198 / 200
2️⃣ 📍 10 km - 🗓️ 5 yrs - ⚡ 195 / 200
3️⃣ 📍 3 km - 🗓️ 14 yrs - ⚡ 173 / 200
4️⃣ 📍 264 km - 🗓️ 51 yrs - ⚡ 91 / 200
5️⃣ 📍 12769 km - 🗓️ 10 yrs - ⚡ 85 / 200
@jlliagre There are a deluge of kids joke sites out there. And very few from actual comedians.
@Robusto Managers won't care, they'll hire it to replace 10 people with actual talent.
@Mitch Virtual comedians?
or actual non-comedians?
@Mitch Where's it going to find the actual talent to replace the ten people with?
21:51
@jlliagre AI isn't even "dad joke" funny. It's mentally challenged, but not in a fun way.
@Araucaria-Him that's the point, the managers will hire the untalented AI so they can lay off several talented people. ie, the managers don't actually care about quality.
@Robusto It's pretty spot on for popsicle stick jokes or bazooka joe bubble gum wrapper jokes.
which are horrible
@Mitch Oh, I thought you meant they were going to hire the AI to fire the comedians and replace them with some actual talent.
@Araucaria-Him oh.
no.
just fire the comedians.
no hiring anybody else.
But that's probably something managers will do which is hire an AI to do the firing so they don't have to have those uncomfortable conversations.
Do you think I'm being too literal?
and the AI can also choose who to fire, so it's not the managers fault.
Best part of this... the manager is the one who gets fired first.
21:59
@Mitch Hear, hear
@Araucaria-Him I don't know... I may not be articulating well.
@Araucaria-Him well, to be sure, many others get fired too.
@Mitch It doesn't matter, I can't hear you. I can only see what you're typing
@Araucaria-Him same.
@Mitch That's good because I have a strong Scottish accent.
@Araucaria-Him rereading what I wrote, it came out wrong. should be 'replace the 10 people with actual talent'... it's the 10 people who have talent that are being fired, not 10 people (talented or not) replaced with some talent.
@Araucaria-Him I think we'd both be a bit nervous if I could actually hear you.
or see you.
Turn and look over your shoulder out that window.
22:06
@Mitch Oh, I see. Well, if you'd drawn a syntax tree, there'd have been no misunderstanding. Maybe if you articulate it clearer while you're typing the prosody will disambiguate it?
next to the street light
@Mitch I think you've put on some weight
between the recycliing dumpster and the regular garbage
Suits you.
@Araucaria-Him Thanks. I've been trying to bulk up.
@Araucaria-Him we should all be more profligate with our parentheses.
22:07
You'll have to let me in on your secret. The protein shakes don't really do it for me any more.
@Mitch Yes, what's a few parentheses between friends.
@Araucaria-Him I don't know if that actually works.
I'm pretty sure that one can gain a lot of wait by eating lots of carbs, but that is what converts into fat.
I think what gets muscle mass is weight training with heavier weights. (and just eating enough, not necessarily lots of protein).
Oops, the boss is back and I haven't done the washing up ...
@Araucaria-Him Frankly we should all be communicating in LISP.
@Araucaria-Him snort
I didn't know you had a cat.
Here's a thing those LLM trainers should do...
@Mitch She doesn't like me referring to her like that ...
preprocess all the text computing their parse trees along with the word vectors and train on that.
Then you'd get your 'grounding'
Also, noe more free piece of advice to the LLM makers.
22:15
@Mitch I'm about to get a grounding right now. Hasta luego folks
Record everything we say surreptitiously using alexa, siri, radio waves, whale song, bluetooth enabled light bulbs, whatever
and train on that.
@Araucaria-Him ta!
@Mitch No, that's me.
 
1 hour later…
23:26
@jlliagre Ahh good to know.
@Robusto Understandable!
I was thinking, it could be any continent but Europe and Antarctica and Australia.
00:00 - 18:0018:00 - 00:00

« first day (5003 days earlier)      last day (213 days later) »