RRR is a 2022 Indian Telugu-language epic action drama film directed by S. S. Rajamouli who wrote the film with V. Vijayendra Prasad. It is produced by D. V. V. Danayya of DVV Entertainment. The film stars N. T. Rama Rao Jr., Ram Charan, Ajay Devgn, Alia Bhatt, Shriya Saran, Samuthirakani, Ray Stevenson, Alison Doody, and Olivia Morris. It is a fictional story about two real-life Indian revolutionaries, Alluri Sitarama Raju (Charan) and Komaram Bheem (Rama Rao), and their fight against the British Raj. Set in 1920, the plot explores the undocumented period in their lives when both the revolutionaries...
> Sweet, rouse yourself; and the weak wanton Cupid Shall from your neck unloose his amorous fold, And, like a dew-drop from the lion's mane, Be shook to airy air.
@Mitch And the last time I set foot in a cinema anywhere was in 2008. That was in Durham NC. One of the Harry Potter films. And I walked out of that one.
I like how much the movie struggles to show us the logical integrity of optimism. It's the ultimate proof it's one of the hardest battles you can choose to fight
@Mitch I think I just got bored. The HP films were mostly not very good. I wanted my dinner. And I just went in out of impulse. Once upon a time I used to enjoy impromptu visits to the cinema.
Melancholy and cynicism are way more easily trusted, perhaps as a survival strategy. But we're no longer being chased by predators in the wild, might as well upgrade our firmware
@FaheemMitha It takes a lot for me to walk out of a movie...I always feel like near the very end -something- in the plot will occur that will reinterpret and redeem the up to then idiocy that may have seemed.
@Mitch I never cared all that much about "doing own stunts". I mean, it was cool at first, oh yeah, cool, Jackie Chan breaks his leg while filming, oh, Tom Cruise does it too?! But nowadays it's like the cheapest compliment you can give an actor or actress
@Mitch I'd already read the book, so I knew what was going to happen, more or less. Otherwise I might have stayed. Also, it kind of depends on ones mood, you know.
That day I think I thought it would be more fun to go home and have dinner, so I did.
If I can believe for the moment that an actor is a serial killer, I can also easily make the leap that they're doing all the wild stuff too, as long as it looks cool.
@M.A.R. I've never really cared that Tom Cruise does his own stunts. Big whoop. The stunts aren't that great and don't (seem to) take much skill, look no different from green screen.
@Mitch I mean, still. You watch a movie, and everyone is going crazy about this scene or the other, and your contribution to a conversation would be "Did you know X does his own stunts?" Lame.
@FaheemMitha I thought RRR was appropriately representation of the Brits (deservedly demonized, like with one OK Brit). I had never seen that before in an Indian movie (wither about or by Indians)
Also we have this HP printer that's been working for as long as I can remember, like a universal constant. Never needed anything besides a few cartridge changes.
@FaheemMitha I love movies, and love watching them in movie theaters (and sadly couldn't do it for most of that last 2 years). But that part of the entertainment industry is slowly slowly fading.
@Mitch She didn't classify those as such, I was just borrowing her expression. But it fits any sumptuously photographed, ponderously IMPORTANT and genteel film that leaves one feeling unsatisfied.
@tchrist So 42% for people over 40. I'm surprised it's that high. Don't people have other things to do with their money? And I assume those are domestic US figures.
I've gone to great lengths to ignore Harry Potter, because I'm yet to be convinced it's worth reading, and to be fair, I haven't used such discretion for any other series or books
@M.A.R. Pratchett is probably a better writer than Rowling. And he is funny, at least some of the time. And he knows how to turn a sentence. And sometimes he says quite profound things, even when he's trying to be silly.
@FaheemMitha The major opinion I have of them, which is really borrowed from someone much more impressive, is that the books 4 through 7 really needed an editor to cut out about half the pages (or more, but because the first ones were so popular, the editor didn't feel like they had the power to say 'No, all that teenage whining is awful, cut it out'
"Prisoner of Azkaban" is actually relatively well written and plotted. And short. A virtue which she seems to forget about in her later books. She's not much of a prose stylist, that's for sure.
@Robusto Yes, I'm familiar with them. I've always thought the first would make an excellent film. Though finding a director who would do it justice would be almost impossible. Especially these days.
Like that part when that girl tries to seduce him, and her husband turns up and attacks them with some flying mythological creatures. Her name was Serret, I seem to recall. Something about the Lord of the Keep? He turns into his namesake, the sparrowhawk, and flies away.
@Mitch Not only is her plotting perfunctory and her prose style awful, but she simply doesn't understand how to create a game. I mean, quidditch? It doesn't make any sense at all.
> Quidditch has been criticised for its emphasis on catching the Snitch.[17] Rowling claims that Quidditch is a sport that "infuriates" men in particular, who are bothered by the unrealistic scoring system.[1] Because of the emphasis on the Snitch, legal scholar William Baude called Quidditch "a really stupid game".[18]
@Robusto I think the target audience, nerd kids who like the idea of magic, is very much disjoint from kids who give an inkling of interest in sports. And so quidditch sort of gives them this fun-house mirror version of what they might think that sports looks like.
@FaheemMitha it's regarding this response of yours. You're saying what makes Pratchett enjoyable is lacking in Rowling, only that they're both addictive
But her books move well, and they're engaging. And the characters are sympathetic. I thought Hermione Grainger was a standout, though she's a bit too good at everything. Really, those books should be called "Hermoine Grainger and. .."
Hmm I really like Pratchett's humour, but I didn't really like any of the books that I read. The plot was just not interesting. I'm not sure whether jokery had the body to fill a fantasy novel.
@M.A.R. I read the one on which the Discworld computer game was based (which had his great humour). Unless his books are so generic that they all look the same?
It was about the Nightwatch and a cult and a dragon.
@Cerberus I sort of enjoyed them at the time. I read some of the early ones when they first came out. Quite a long time ago, now. I guess late 80s, early 90s?
I wouldn't consider myself a Pratchett fan, though.
If you want well written magical stories, one of the UKs leading exponents of that in the 20th century was Diana Wynne Jones. Though she's hardly as well known as Rowlings.
@Mitch Oh. I didn't know that. I didn't even know it was based on a novel.
@Cerberus Guards! Guards! The novel was pretty funny, it was my first Pratchett novel, so I really enjoyed it. In the others, the humor has quite some overlap, and overall it's large swaths of characters doing stuff with small, profound chunks of reflection, and the good stuff compensates for whatever other stuff is in the book
Generally English writers are quite good at being funny. Both DWJ and Pratchett can do it when they want. Rowlings, not so much, I think. She's just not subtle enough a writer.
They can be a bit too absurd for their own good, I admit. And if you read a couple of novels in succession, a lot of the messages about, say, prejudice and hate and whatever can be a bit repetitive.
@Mitch Noted. Though I doubt I'll ever read it. I don't do much novel reading these days. Or any kind of reading, really. Other than things I need to read, and short articles.
It's actually an interesting question, what make the HP books so appealing to children. After all, there are lots of writers. They mostly don't become billionaires.