Coffee is what I use. But YMMV. FWIW, sleep is the one thing we can't live without. Well, also air. Sleep and air are the two things we can't live without. Ok, food too. Sleep and air and food are the three things we can't live without. And companionship. The four things we can't live without ...
In the foundations of mathematics, Russell's paradox (also known as Russell's antinomy), discovered by Bertrand Russell in 1901, showed that the naive set theory created by Georg Cantor leads to a contradiction. The same paradox had been discovered a year before by Ernst Zermelo but he did not publish the idea, which remained known only to Hilbert, Husserl and other members of the University of Göttingen.
Let R be the set of all sets that are not members of themselves. If R qualifies as a member of itself, it would contradict its own definition as a set containing sets that are not member...
You can walk if you are forbidden to board the bus. The supermarket which used to give me a mask now would turn down my entering if I don't carry a mask on my own.
@Robusto coffee is not what we need to live. I actually hate drinking coffee because it's too bitter.
I looooooove it. I drink hot coffee even on breaks during hot summer rides. Nothing else has that slightly bitter, but overarching boost when you're kicking it hard.
> Spreek bijvoorbeeld met eenzelfde persoon af om lichamelijk of seksueel contact te hebben (bijvoorbeeld een knuffelmaatje of ‘seksbuddy’), mits u klachtenvrij bent.
The National Institute for Health and the Environment: if you are single, you are advised to have a steady "hugging mate" or "sex buddy".
Most games are commonly referred to as games in one context or another.
The "units of play" of blackjack aren't called games (there are shoes and there are hands), but everyone says that blackjack is "a table game" (as opposed to a slot machine).
Conversely, people rarely actually say that tennis is a game, but one of the "units of play" of tennis is called a game.
Auto racing, on the other hand, is usually called a sport, or at least a contest, and the "units of play" are laps and races. The word "game" isn't commonly used.
But that doesn't mean that F1 isn't a game.
Just like nobody calls a Boeing 747 a cantilever monoplane, even though it is.
F1 is certainly at least a contest. Are all contests games?
@TerranSwett Wittgenstein stumbled the question what a game is.
In his earlier work, he tried to define it by using criteria.
In his later work, he felt that such an approach was inadequate, and he switched to the 'family' model.
Where some groups of games satisfy a set of criteria, but other games strongly resembling some of the games in a group are still considered games even though they do not satisfy all criteria.
Something like that.
I for one have attempted a definition:
> A game is an activity in which participants try to achieve certain goals by playing according to certain rules, where some of the rules or some of the goals are different from those in real life.
@Cerberus I think this all depends on custom. Some things we call games, some we call sports, some both. We go to football games, but football is a sport. We go to tennis matches, and tennis is definitely a sport. We might play a game of golf, but it's still a sport. Chess might make it into the Olympics, but it's still a game, not a sport—even though the physical demands are consistent with a physical workout.
And by custom I mean tradition. So you oughta be all over that.
@Cerberus Well ... but are all competitions games then? I think there's a difference between, say, running a marathon competitively vs. doing (playing?) curling, which is like shuffleboard on ice and can be accomplished between slices of pizza.
If you want to introduce a participial clause with words like if, when, once, and until, should the subjects of the main and the subordinate clauses match?
I feel as though there are some preferences sometimes, but I can't work out a rule.
Here, for example, the subjects are different, but it sounds okay:
> Keep stirring until browned.
([YOU] keep stirring until [IT is] browned)
But maybe not here?:
> Once arrested, take him to jail.
Compare:
> Once arrested, he should be taken to jail.
Maybe the subjects should be the same and disagreements are exceptional.