I am looking for a verb synonymous to bringing someone in to demonstrate something. As in:
“To prove their point in front of the judge, the the defense [brought in] an “expert” who was supposed to…“
I’m looking for an expressive idiomatic verb that would capture the obvious cynicality (and perh...
I have been using the word strawman to describe source code that is extremely simplified or contrived to illustrate some syntax or usage of something where the actual source code is irrelevant and the contrivance is not important much less a negative connotation.
Here is an example that I would...
When water reached the boiled point, you say "the waiter boiled." How about food that reaches its cooking point?
Example sentence:
Like __ clams, her eyes snapped open.
Are there any other words similar to these words:
Award, Bestow, Donate, Grant, Give, Provide, Tax
...that give a meaning of: I freely give to you a portion what I have acquired or earned, without hesitation or expectation of anything in return. You are owed this, without question. There is no...
Is there a word or phase for someone who is forced to act naïve?
For example, someone knows how to read and write, but because of their circumstances, they could be hurt or worse if anybody besides themselves knew. Not necessarily someone forced to keep a general secret, but someone forced to ke...
> Die Volkswirtschaftslehre (auch Nationalökonomie, Wirtschaftliche Staatswissenschaften oder Sozialökonomie, kurz VWL), ist ein Teilgebiet der Wirtschaftswisswnschaft.
Is there a word for somebody who likes to be taken care of and pampered? I thought of attenion seeker but that has a negative comnotation. Is there any regular word which is not necessarily negative?
In the context of family, the term "immediate" refers to member of the family connected by birth, adoption, marriage, civil partnership, or cohabitation.
Is t here a term that refers to the rest of the family?
> It has alternatively been suggested that the word may be a frequentative formation in -le suffix 3 from pose v.2 with shortening of the stem vowel (for a possible parallel, compare nuzzle v.1 beside nose n.); with the possible semantic development, compare pose v.2 2a. However, if this is the case, the uniformity of the -u- spelling in all of the earliest examples is striking (contrast the formal variety shown by nuzzle v.1),
> and furthermore shortening of the reflex of Middle English open ō to u is not easily accounted for (which is a problem also encountered in the etymology of nuzzle v.1).
(OED3)
OED has three putative etymologies for puzzle and doesn't really like any of them.
Question: "He told me, not you." This can mean "He told me. You didn't tell me." Or it can mean "He told me. He didn't tell you." Right? And what kind of ambiguity is it? Lexical?
Found this: Lexical ambiguity is the presence of two or more possible meanings within a single word. Also called semantic ambiguity or homonymy.thoughtco.com/what-is-lexical-ambiguity-1691226
I see a notification for spam flags on chat messages for some random chat rooms. Is this normal? I checked it, saw nothing unusual. Clicked on "not spam" or "invalid" I think.
Syntactic ambiguity, also called amphiboly or amphibology, is a situation where a sentence may be interpreted in more than one way due to ambiguous sentence structure.
Syntactic ambiguity arises not from the range of meanings of single words, but from the relationship between the words and clauses of a sentence, and the sentence structure underlying the word order therein. In other words, a sentence is syntactically ambiguous when a reader or listener can reasonably interpret one sentence as having more than one possible structure.
In legal disputes, courts may be asked to interpret the meaning...
This looks more like it.
Why don't I see more downvotes on this meta question I made?
Vote up or down on the question to show agreement or disagreement with the idea. Even better, let me hear your reasoning in an answer. :)
Stack Exchange: "Answers belong only in answer boxes."
ELU: "Yeah, right." ¹
I hate to see countless okayish questions covfefeying around, even though most...
A creature which walks on two legs can be referred to as biped; bi- meaning two.
A creature which walks on four legs can be referred to as quadruped; quad- meaning four.
What is the corresponding word for a six-legged creature?
@NVZ That's a hard one. 'you's ambiguity isn't usually considered lexical, it's the referent that can be more than one thing. I don't think you would say the variable 'x' is ambiguous, it just is underspecified. But I suppose maybe...maybe that could literally be called lexical ambiguity.
@NVZ there are 6 votes so I don't think it is that nobody cares, but that a number of people have different opinions evenly divided. My personal opinion is 'It depends' so definitely 'could be yes or could be no depending on the comment and question'
@Færd a good white wine = un bon vin blanc = /œ̃ bɔ̃ vɛ̃ blɑ̃/
classic exercise in French pronunciation
@Færd 1) No. In traditionally analysis of English phonology, it does not have any nasals in it's repertoire. Of course, lots of slurring and partial realizations will get many native English speakers to pronounce nasals. But that's not official.
@Mitch You have lost me. What did I misread? I think I didn't get that "medium rare" part, to me it means (of meat, especially beef) cooked so that the outside is browned and the inside is still partially red, and in that context it makes no sense to me.
I can't always understand your jokes, they are deep. =)
@Ahmed You can understand most of what I say by using a dictionary, looking them up on wikipedia, or search google for references, then thinking the absolute worst.
@Ahmed goes to middle of room to sulk about sulking in the wrong place
I am looking for a word that would describe someone as being hopeless because they are part of a deteriorating situation, but not something as strong as "victim." I am describing the essayist's tone and have "Her overall tone was quite lyrical, but in general dark and somewhat hopeless." This p...
@caub no need to be sorry here. 'farly' would seem to be a reasonable creation of an adverb from an adjective, but it turns out not at all. and I could see a similar thing about 'distant'. again language (or maybe just English?) is weird.
@Mitch If I am in US in the south, Tennessee for example, with a long enough beard will that be a problem? Just curious. Or I can ask someone in real life... Hmm.
I know. I mean a potential terrorist wouldn't wear a turban and a long beard before blowing stuff up or killing someone. He will mostly likely be a clean shaven person so he could mix easily in the crowd.
@Ahmed depends, but most likely not. also depends on where exactly. All sorts live everywhere in the US. In rural parts of the South there are not many immigrants so the locals may ask you inappropriate questions, but they'll serve you at a business just fine. In any big city in the South you won't have a problem at all.
I don't know anymore since 2017 started. I used to think that whatever problems with race you see in the news about the US that it was just vocal about things and that in fact was less racist than many other (especially European) countries.
@Ahmed in the south being 'black' or perceived as what is really African-American is very different from being 'brown but not African' like Latin or Middle-Eastern. And East Asian just doesn't fit in that. It's all based on appearances.
@Jasper The extremely small minority of white supremacists, and their encouragement by changes in the US government have amplified their voice. I think for the most part white people are pretty cool about overt racism, but things like movies and other media tend to reinforce what are essentially non-existent stereotypes about blacks.
simplify to make it easier to make a decision (by how well it sounds): mix in the crowd vs mix with the crowd first one sounds better but 'into' is probably the likely one that fits best
@Jasper right. "Hmm...they're different somehow but there's no history to tell me what to think about it. They're good at kung fu and technical stuff, right?"
programming is getting on my nerves. you can do everything in every language, but some languages do it it differently, or have different syntax for the same thing, and then there are APIs/frameworks that might do the same thing, but then maybe not, and now I just know what I want to have been done but not how to actually do it.
@Mitch honestly JS is becoming the prevalent language, it's simple, powerful as a scripting language, even if tchrist would surely prefer another one, fast. It lack a bit typing, but there are good emerging alternatives to make codebases scale nicely
s/typing/stronger typing
JS is to programming languages what English is to spoken languages :p
I am Kajal Lodwal and my question is about English learning If anyone knows the answer please reply me. My question is:
What could we call a person with deep knowledge in various fields?
I am looking for a term for unobtrusive architecture amidst architecturally superior ensemble. E.g., a contemporary building in a college campus or in a European old town that features some stylized elements and color of the old buildings, but is generally bland and deliberately "un-architectural...
It is possible to run an online magazine so that the current issue may yet contain further articles in addition to the ones already published. What is the best adjective to describe the current (ongoing) issue of such a magazine.
"Ongoing issue" usually means a current problem that needs to be a...