@ktm5124 I vaguely doubt that will happen. People are reluctant to cast votes down because nays come with a cost. Even if it does, nays are ridiculously undervalued. One yea represents a gain sufficient to to counteract the loss of five nays.
@Tonepoet Now, when a question gets put on hold, and my answer to that question gets accepted, what happens to my gain of reputation if the question gets closed? Would I lose all the points I gained?
Hmm, well most of the questions are kinda hard. I'm a little more intimidated by E.L.L. though, mostly because the questions use more technical language than many of the ones posed here and I'm pretty sure the E.S.L. students have more explicit knowledge on the subject of English than the common native speakers who visit here.
Worst of all, I'm not the very scholarly sort, so it would be easy for me to slip in a piece of misinformation that would wreak havoc on an E.S.L. beginner's perception of the language...
It is interesting how English language learners often know more about English (especially its technical details) than native speakers. I suppose that everyone is a little spoiled by their native language.
Hmm, I was just about to ask if it wasn't the same way for most languages before your edit. I think the issue at hand is that most of us learn to subconsciously mimic others through exposure and practice.
But those who learn a foreign language must learn the reasons as well.
It's especially fun when those "reasons" reflect back on your native language. Like how learning purpose clauses in Latin can help you recognize one in English.
Hmm. I feel as if I am in the minority in this room when I say I only know English as of yet, so I can't really say I know how that feels unfortunately.
I suppose reading some of the rules in these antiquated grammar textbooks may be similar though.
I remember glancing at ELL and finding a lot of questions that I had to research before I knew the answer to them. I learned all kinds of new things during that research.
I really do think the trickiest thing may just be learning the difference between shall and will these days. I usually just try to cheat my way past it with contractions, if able. The Kings English by The Fowler Brothers gives much information about it, but I fear their allegation that it may be futile for anybody who hadn't learned it natively to even try is possibly correct.
@ktm5124 I'm not sure. The extent of my understanding so far relates to some aspects regarding how the meaning of the two words change based upon which person they are used in.
@englishstudent In general, for myself, if I hear 'sir' or 'ma'am', it sticks out like a sore thumb, and I figure the speaker must be southern, or just out of the military, or if Indian, not long speaking in the US. The first usage sounds overly deferential (sycophantic), but the second sounds like they're just from somewhere else. That is, I don't think it is special to Indians that they sound too deferential if they use it, non-Indians also sound different when they use it.
@englishstudent have you heard people complain about it? It is polite and does show respect, but in the US it is not that common any more so it is perceived as too polite.
People are internally polite/mean/curious/sex-crazed/gossipy/money-hungry/ashamed everywhere. It's just that the language habits may have them explicitly or not.
@englishstudent Thanks. I remember back when I first found out that ELU existed. I immediately had like 5 questions about English that I wanted answered. And then a couple new things just popped in my head (the '[sic]' question) fortuitously. I think they tended to be open-ended, speculative questions about English in general, rather than about one given sentence.
@englishstudent oh. yes, I suppose. Just using it once is surprising to me, and even in the US South, you don't really use it so easily in a request. In the South in the US, if some one older requests something of you, you might respond 'Yes, sir' or 'Yes, ma'am'. Or to get their attention you'd say 'Excuse me sir/maam'.
But you just wouldn't drop a 'sir' in the middle of a request like that.
To @tchrist's point (which I was trying to address in my third comment above) is that language is not inherently good/bad/polite/shameful/etc/etc, but different communities may have different language habits that sound extreme to the other communities.
to people who use sir a lot, it may sound like Americans are a bunch of disrespectful jerks. They may very well be so, but the language habit is not the thing that is showing it.
In the South, from a young age, you are always reminded to use 'sir' or 'ma'am'. If you live in the South and everybody around you is using sir or ma'am, and you have decided not to do so, yes, at that point you are a total disrespectful jerk.
@englishstudent of course there very well may be sociological things that encourage particular language habits (general social conservatism in the South compared to the rest of the country).
For example in Persian, there are a number of French loan words that are very basic: merci for thank you, maman for mom. But French was never a colonial power in Iran or a strong political influence (like say between Russia and France). But those words filtered in simply because of the general social prestige of French things.
@Mitch Well, I don't think they will be paying anything.
@Mitch Yes, although my secular Turkish friends warned me against him from the beginning: he is a wolf in sheep's clothes, don't trust him, he will grab power as soon as he can, he is a still a religious fundamentalist.
@Cerberus It's not literal. The inference is more like "We're going to make you feel bad for your actions'. What kids say to each other on the playground before a fight.
@Cerberus right. it makes the other government look childish (to me). but I've had a hard time following who did what when and what the implications are of each move in the context of the previous one.
The Turkish government automatically bestows Turkish nationality (and voting rights) on everyone of Turkish descent, which is why we have lots of Turkish voters in Holland, of whom 65% favour Erdogan, sadly. Erdogan wants those people to go out and vote in the Turkish referendum granting him huge powers.
But the Dutch government and the EU are of the opinion that it will put all powers in the hands of the president and turn Turkey in a de facto dictatorship, which it already is to some degree.
So we didn't want their ministers campaigning in Holland, also because it would result in unrest here.
Perhaps we should have let them campaign and ignore them, I don't know.
So the government forbade Turkish ministers from flying here.
The minister of "family affairs" secretly came by land last night.
Speaking of deference, I could defer to the opinion of @Cerberus regarding whether or not I should post this answer to this question on the basis that a websearch for "besides the point" doesn't directly return a meaningful result, which seems against the point of the research required policy.
An explanation of how the expression came to be would be interesting and useful; although it isn't strictly necessary to answer the question, that's often how we used to deal with simple questions on ELU. But you know what people are like these days, only 5 out of 10,000 are needed to close a question...
Questions would get closed before the answers closure seeks to prevent can be made, and then once fixed they can be reopened faster for the wanted answers to come in.
@Cerberus that seemed like a weird response. because the Dutch government doesn't like it, they would suppress democratic participation to get what they'd prefer.
> before the answers closure seeks to prevent can be made
I'm afraid I can't parse that.
@Mitch Well, the government is legally allowed to declare any foreign person a persona non grata if he or she is expected to disrupt "public order", i.e. cause unrest.
@Cerberus My opinion on the matter is that closure prevents premature answers to poorly posed questions that might not be so helpful, so that the question can be posed in a manner that elicits a useful answer instead.
@Mitch Yes, but with icons we can easily put a link afterwards. We just have to hover the mouse over the wordings and copy paste the link. Making brackets like we do in chats just seems like a hassle.