« first day (2076 days earlier)      last day (2847 days later) » 
00:00 - 16:0016:00 - 00:00

12:12 AM
@Cerberus Turkey? I couldn't find any women as president or prime minister
Re female leaders, I've heard that lots of dudes have problems with it (also women). But didn't most of us grow up with mothers?
 
21
Q: What is wrong with "have put" in "I have put the water in the freezer"?

CoffeeDayHow to talk about putting water in the freezer to become ice? I have to tell the child that I have put the water in the freezer and after some time it will convert into ice. http://ell.stackexchange.com/a/76262/26777 As a side note "have put" sounds a little weird here. Maybe someone ca...

I, personally, have no choice but to go with the accepted answer for now.
And although I don't spend much time on the main sites, I kinda miss GoDucks on ELL.
 
@Mitch They had a PM in the nineties, I believe.
@Mitch Exactly!
Tansu Çiller (Turkish: [ˈtansʊ tʃiˈlːæɾ]; born 24 May 1946) is a Turkish academician, economist, and politician who served as the 30th Prime Minister of Turkey from 1993 to 1996. She is Turkey's first and only female prime minister to date. As the leader of the True Path Party, she went on to concurrently serve as Deputy Prime Minister of Turkey and as Minister of Foreign Affairs between 1996 and 1997. As a Professor of Economics, Çiller was appointed as Minister of State with responsibility for the economy by Prime Minister Süleyman Demirel in 1991. When Demirel was elected as President in 1993...
 
1:09 AM
Isn't it weird that incidental means 'happening causally' while incident is empty of the idea of causality altogether?
 
@Færd I don't see any causality in incidental?
It can be casual, though.
 
Whatever dictionary I check says something about the connection of what happens incidentally to something else; causal connection especially.
 
Link?
 
ODO:
1Happening as a minor accompaniment to something else
1.1Occurring by chance in connection with something else
LDOCE:
1 happening or existing in connection with something else that is more important
2 [not before noun] naturally happening as a result of something
 
Strange.
 
1:17 AM
Yeah!
 
Hmm I think I see what they mean.
I would say that is a different sense of the word.
"That befalls to x".
Incido = fall upon.
 
Ah, interesting.
 
And it only works in the construction x is incidental to y.
I think.
 
That makes sense.
Thanks.
 
But, yes, I see what you mean by the two senses' being in a way opposites.
 
1:21 AM
But I don't think native speakers think of the root when they say incidental.
 
Both senses are old.
They probably developed either in a time when people understood the origin of the word, or perhaps even already in Latin.
 
It's curious why the causal sense got lost in incident.
 
In incident, it is implied that an event befalls a person, I would say.
 
And the noncausal sense got almost lost in incidental.
 
In that sense, your causal link is not possible.
@Færd It doesn't!
 
1:25 AM
Doesn't it?
 
Only in x is incidental to y.
And even then perhaps not always.
When you say x is incidental, I would read that as "x is like an incident, it just happened".
 
But just happened isn't listed in those dictionaries' definitions.
 
> Incido
1. To fall upon accidentally; to light upon, in thought or conversation: ...
5. To fall in with, coincide, agree with, in opinion, etc.: ...
@Færd By that I meant that it simply happened, without any apparent causal link.
 
@Cerberus Yes, that's waht I expect it to mean, but I can't find it in the definitions. I should look again.
All senses of incidental connotes some kind of connection with something else.
 
> Occurring by chance in connection with something else: the incidental catch of dolphins in the pursuit of tuna
The connexion is that there is no causal link.
Or at least no intentional link.
 
1:30 AM
True.
 
When something befalls you, there is a conexion between you and it.
But it's not intentional.
 
But if it weren't for tunas you couldn't say the incidental catch of dolphins.
It's strange to me that it can't just happen without a connection.
 
I don't understand why you think it can't.
 
My understanding of the word (as is used in English) is limited to the definitions I showed you.
 
If no conected element is apparent, then it just happens.
> 3. a. Casually met with or encountered. rare.
1856 J. Cumming Script. Read. Deuteron. viii. 143 The green moss and incidental flowerets break out from the rifts and rents. 1871 Blackie Four Phases i. 122 The+braying of an incidental ass. 1876 Geo. Eliot Dan. Der. v. xxxviii, A store of magical articulation with which he+promised himself to frighten any incidental Christian of his own years.
From the OED.
 
1:36 AM
I see.
 
Usually some connected element is apparent; the word is then used to indicate that whatever conexion you might expect between the two elements isn't there.
 
Isn't? Or is?
 
Isn't.
You expect intention or causality, but no, it's just incidental.
 
> naturally happening as a result of something
 
Or perhaps some other conexion.
@Færd That's the other sense.
 
1:39 AM
Ah you're talking about this sense. I see.
 
It is admittedly a complex and confusing word.
 
Maybe there's no admission or denial of any connection in this sense?
 
In which sense?
 
The one you quoted from OED. It just means it happened, and was rare.
 
Well, naturally happening as a result of something to me means "there may be a causal conexion, but but an intentional one".
@Færd Yes, I suppose you could say that.
 
1:43 AM
> Casually met with or encountered.
= It was just there, with or without a connection to sth else.
 
Yes.
 
:D
 
> A store of magical articulation with which he+promised himself to frighten any incidental Christian of his own years.
Any Christian of his own years that he might chance upon.
Or that might chance upon him.
 
But would you be misunderstood if you used incidental in this sense?
When talking to normal people.
I mean, is it not used widely? Or as widely as the other senses?
 
I don't think so: how could you misinterpret any of the quotations above?
3a sounds natural to me, so it must be alive and well.
Also because it follows naturally from incident (for me).
 
1:49 AM
@Cerberus No, they're clear.
 
OK.
 
@Cerberus Maybe that's why it's natural. It's what you (and me) expect it to mean.
 
It's natural = it would be easily understood by people?
 
Yes.
 
So now you assume that you would not be misunderstood if you used 3a? I agree, but you seem to be answering your own question now!
 
1:52 AM
@Cerberus Yes, natural to native speakers.
They don't compare incident and incidental logically. They just learn them separately.
 
It would give many some pause. I cannot say whether all would unravel it.
 
Some of them. I know I do that in my mother tongue.
@tchrist The 3a sense Cerb quoted from OED, right?
 
@tchrist Which sense of incidental, exactly?
 
@Cerberus Academic use is one thing; pedestrian use may be another.
 
That's not a sense.
 
1:55 AM
I wonder whether some might not think you meant "accidental".
11 mins ago, by Cerberus
> A store of magical articulation with which he+promised himself to frighten any incidental Christian of his own years.
 
Sometimes that amounts to the same thing, but it depends on which sense of incidental.
Ah OK.
Faerd asked about "normal people". I am of course assuming educated people, for otherwise they wouldn't know the word at all.
 
Why not?
 
I don't know, it's just not a very common word.
 
Incidentally, heard any good incidental music lately?
 
I guess the addverb, incidentally, is common enough.
 
2:02 AM
beat ya
 
Yes, that is more common.
Thought I'm still not sure a peasant would use it.
 
But a pedestrian? :)
 
Depends on where he's walking.
 
Peón toma caballero; jaque.
 
2:57 AM
@Færd That's the problem with dictionary definitions. They don't always capture how the words are primarily used.
@Cerberus peonastic?
@Cerberus argh... turkish names and no pictures in the wiki list did not help me.
But Central African Republic and Papua New Guinea? Not expected.
 
That's the poorest country in the world
 
Wait, doesn't Queen Hatsepshut in the Middle Kingdom and Cleopatra in Egypt count? Also Empress Wu in China? How about Gang of Four/Mao's wife
@skillpatrol which one?
 
Papua
 
CAR probably ain't so great either.
But PNG was the hidden kingdom until WWII, and they had multiple variations in there civilizations, from hunter gatherer to city-state, all at the same time. I bet money is not the top of their priorities.
 
5 hours ago, by skullpatrol
this is interesting
 
3:09 AM
@Mitch I think they only counted elected or appointed leaders, somehow.
 
@Cerberus Oh. That makes sense.
 
Well, I'm not sure it makes sense.
It is a choice.
It depends on the purpose of the map.
 
3:30 AM
What doesn't depend on purpose?
:P
 
Very little.
 
As long as it doesn't depend on porpoises. They're so unreliable.
 
Ya, those porpoises are so unreliable.
Never depend on a porpoise.
 
Tortoises, on the other hand, are quite dependable.
 
Slow and steady wins the race.
 
3:39 AM
 
@skillpatrol I always hated that moral. "slow" doesn't win races. Steady doesn't win races. Higher average speed wins races.
 
Depends on the givens.
 
It's more about determination @Mr.ShinyandNew安宇
 
@skillpatrol determination doesn't win races either.
you need to cover the total distance in less time than the opponents.
 
The will to win.
 
3:42 AM
You do need determination too.
Several necessary conditions.
 
you may.
I don't need determination to win a race with my kids. I have much longer legs. I can go much faster.
 
Given that some people tend to peak too much in marathons, perhaps "slower but steadier" is good advice in some situations.
Slowlier.
Steadilier.
 
Don't burnout
Pace yourself
 
Yeah it depends.
 
Okay, sure, we can contrive any number or race-like situations where some variation of "slow and steady" might be good advice.
But in the fable, the hare loses the race because he's a douche
 
3:45 AM
Look at the forest, not just the trees.
 
So the moral should be "don't take a nap until you win", or "don't be overconfident", or "don't be a douche"
Not "Slow and steady wins the race". That is only true in the specific case of gross incompetence on the part of the hare.
 
Try not using "don't" :-)
 
"do not take a nap until you win"
 
The tortoise wins.
Not the porpoise
:-)
 
The tortoise won the race because the hare was an overconfident jerk with poor time management skills and bad planning.
 
3:49 AM
But, what did the tortoise do that was right?
That^ is the moral.
 
The tortoise was lucky.
slow and steady and an incompetent douchebag opponent wins the race!
 
Luck never made a man wise.
 
neither did this fable. It's plainly ridiculous.
 
Not to me.
 
Well, let me rephrase. It's not so much the fable as the idiom.
"Slow and steady wins the race" is totally BS.
 
3:53 AM
Again, a matter of POV.
 
A better moral would be "There is always someone being slow and steady; if you are overconfident you will lose to them".
Slow and steady basically wins no races anywhere.
It's definitely the combination of steadiness plus opponent mistakes that wins.
if the opponent is fast and steady, they will definitely win. Slow and steady won't stand a chance.
 
The nature of the animals in a race are a given.
16 mins ago, by Cerberus
Depends on the givens.
 
Perhaps the character traits "slow and steady" rarely go with "overconfident".
 
@Cerberus my problem is mainly with the assertion that "slow" wins races.
 
3:58 AM
I understand your point.
 
But sure, you could totally be overconfident that you're going to win, if your whole life people have said to you "slow and steady wins the race", and you believe them. Then you'll be shocked to discover that you're shit at racing.
 
But there is a requirement of "steady" @Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 which tells kids to keep trying your best.
 
"Go on, keep doing that thing you're doing mediocrely. As long as you're steady about it"
 
It's like saying "wasting energy is good for the longevity of your species" based on the fact that peacocks who waste some energy on growing and maintaining their tails are more successful than those without proper tails.
 
Slow and steady
 
3:59 AM
@skillpatrol steady is not sufficient to win races.
Neither is slow.
 
Put them together
 
Neither is the combination.
seriously try racing slowly against anyone.
 
Proper time and energy management is beneficial in many races.
 
Keep trying your best
 
@skillpatrol It doesn't say "keep trying your best" though, does it? It says to go slow.
 
4:00 AM
And it forces you to plan and not be overconfident, to some degree.
 
Slow and steady doesn't win marathons either.
 
Depends on how slow "slow" is.
 
You still need to be faster than the others.
 
If it means "don't run as fast as you can", it may be good advice.
 
slow and steady will let you finish marathons.
@Cerberus But that advice isn't supported by the story and isn't how the idiom is used.
 
4:01 AM
If you peak a lot, your average may suffer.
I was talking about marathons this time.
 
The story is about a hare that takes a nap during a race because he's overconfident. Then a thing which would normally be impossible happened because he was asleep.
 
In the story, I can only defend it by assuming that overconfidence is the primary danger, and that a slow and stead attitude towards racing prevents overconfidence.
 
Sure, in that case "slow and steady won the race", but post hoc ergo propter hoc?
@Cerberus But the hare shouldn't race slowly and steadily. He should race quickly and steadily. His problem was major unsteadiness.
not speed.
He didn't take the challenge seriously
 
But is "quickly and steadily" an option?
 
yes.
why not?
It's not a marathon.
 
4:04 AM
Perhaps the choice is between "slow and steady" and "fast but overconfident".
 
The hare didn't lose because the tortoise outlasted him.
@Cerberus Yes but "X and overconfident to the point of total incompetence" will lose to a great many competitors.
 
Certainly.
 
What if it were two hares, but one was slightly faster, and he was overconfident and ate too much before the race? The other hare then won because he wasn't bogged down by piles of french fries. Fast and steady and better preparation wins the race.
 
But what if the moral of the story is, even if you're slow, you can still win by determination in certain circumstances, so you should never give up beforehand?
 
You can draw any conclusion you like from a sample size of one, even fallacious ones.
 
4:06 AM
36 mins ago, by skill patrol
What doesn't depend on purpose?
 
I thought it was a scientific test.
 
@Cerberus Then it should be "Slow and steady and excellent fortune wins the race"
 
But fortune is not in your hands.
 
@skillpatrol arguments in this room don't depend on purpose. They are completely purposeless.
@Cerberus neither was the hare's incompetence in the tortoise's hands
 
But not tortoiseless.
 
4:07 AM
Sorry, I forgot:(
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Indeed not. So it may be about generating the best chances for yourself.
 
It was pure chance, as far as the tortoise was concerned. He was powerless to win the race except by finishing. For some bizarre reason, the hare basically didn't even run the race, so the tortoise wins by default
@Cerberus Even then, I still object to the "slow" part.
Steady and good fortune win the race.
 
Perhaps the fable assumes that overconfidence is very common in society. And that many tortoises would give up.
 
Perhaps there should have been a drug test?
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Perhaps slow and steady means "slow but steady" here?
 
4:09 AM
@Cerberus The fable isn't entirely bogus. But the idiom "Slow and steady wins the race" which is drawn from it is.
@Cerberus That doesn't help much.
 
Slow but steady = Even if you're slow, you may still win if you're steady. So be steady always!
 
It should be "Slow and steady MAY win the race"
and it's not a hopeful message for tortoises, it's a warning to all dumb-ass hares
 
So try to win.
 
Perhaps it is a typically American thing.
 
What is, the proverb?
 
4:12 AM
God exists. And God is just. So he won't let good people lose, unless it's their own fault. Given that there are slow people, there must be a way for them to win, or God would be unjust towards them. This way is willpower: anyone can have willpower, so it's not unjust if God lets people lose who lack willpower. So willpower will let you win anything.
In summary: if you lose, it must be your own fault, because God would never let virtuous people lose anything.
 
A core cultural concept.
 
@Cerberus yeah the basis for Trial by Combat
 
How does that work?
It's the basis for "no public healthcare".
 
4:14 AM
A person who is accused of a crime fights against the champion of the state. If they are innocent of the charges, the Gods will give might to their arm and they will defeat their opponent.
 
Yes.
 
Because God would never let an innocent person go to jail
Funny how that reasoning is never extended to just about any action. "If I try to murder this man, and succeed, it must be because God wanted it to happen!"
 
Haha yup.
 
God will never let a tortoise be a loser.
 
"God wanted me to drink this beer, or He wouldn't have allowed Me to buy it!"
 
4:16 AM
Never expect consistency in religion.
Every Hollywood film is about people who win not because they're skilled or lucky, but just because of their determination.
As long as you're determined, you can do anything.
 
I think the hare was a satanists
 
Haha.
Plausible.
 
@Cerberus They discussed that in a Cracked video. How in the Fast and the Furious series, the protagonists and villains walk away from horrific car crashes as a matter of willpower.
 
I think that is a core concept of American culture.
It's not absent from other cultures, but it is particularly pronounced there.
 
@skillpatrol Most satanists are misunderstood. Also it was unfair of the tortoise to insist on racing the day that the hare had to take his religiously-mandated nap.
 
4:19 AM
Lol
 
The American dream: you can become president as long as you work hard enough.
 
@Cerberus lol. Nobody would go THAT far.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Perhaps the tortoise was a racist.
 
@Cerberus He did insist on a race
 
4:20 AM
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 It is their secret hope.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Exactly.
A Freudian slip.
 
The hare was like "#speedmatters" and the tortoise was like "#allspeedsmatter"
 
Now you're getting too modern.
 
Never try to race with a racist.
 
If you go slow, you can win.
Whatever the racist does, go slower.
Why does someone always bring up race in this room??
I said purpose, and then we got this.
 
If the tortoise tried to sprint he would be lowering himself to the level of the racist hare.
 
4:23 AM
Ah, yes.
But the tortoise is virtuous.
So God rewarded it.
 
He carried the house of the lord with him.
 
That's true.
 
@skillpatrol A common misconception. That's just his shell.
 
We all have our shells to carry.
 
It's how I tell people off: "Go to shell!"
 
4:29 AM
I guess that's better than telling them to "Go to the Latin room!"
 
Or like my Mom always says, in her French-Canadian accent: Go to ELL
 
What would your dad reply?
 
Haha.
It's bed time.
Adieu!
 
Cya pal
The moral lesson of the story is that you can be more successful by doing things slowly and steadily than by acting quickly and carelessly.
 
4:54 AM
@skillpatrol lol, she only uses it on other drivers.
 
I see @Mr.ShinyandNew安宇
I found this: "What is harder than rock or softer than water? Yet soft water hollows out hard rock. Only persevere.”
This is a deep quote.
I think the intent of the proverb is to get students to study a little everyday, rather than try to cram at exam time.
 
 
7 hours later…
12:08 PM
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 It's like all sports commentary after a game "Why did you win the game?" "We got more points." "What was your strategy?" "We were in better shape, we tried harder and there was some luck"
 
"The other team were good, they played well. If it wasn't for the fact that we are better, we would have lost."
 
@Mitch thank you
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 fallacious and made up.
@theyCallMeBobu de nada. I'm sure there are lots more possibilities. "Bobu's timesheet app" "Timesheeting the Bobulicious way" "XKZ (fill out your timesheet painlessly)"
These suggestions are free. Unless you make a big profit.
 
12:42 PM
Easysheets also sounds like "Easy Street".
Which is rather clever.
 
12:53 PM
@Mitch Perhaps, but it sounds like a Texan laxative.
Well, not sure if Texan is the right accent actually, I'm just imagining "Easysheets" said by Clay Davis from the Wire.
 
Hmm, when you put it that way.
 
1:26 PM
@terdon "When you have to fill out a time sheet, but you feel like you need an enema to get it out, get a Texas strong, Texas big movement to get it out. Smooth move, Easysheets!"
 
@Mitch You've missed your calling.
 
Woohoo! Starting the week with poop jokes!
 
[ SmokeDetector ] Non-English link in answer: Antonym for "Dense" by Elishanto on english.stackexchange.com
 
@terdon Actually I'm heeding a calling...
wait for it...
 
Tsk. That one's beneath you.
 
1:28 PM
...and there.
@terdon It is now.
Timesheet jokes. I love it.
 
 
2 hours later…
3:34 PM
I find it rather strange that this gum is countable, but this gum is uncountable. I came to terms with the latter, but as for the former, what would a gum be?
 
lower gum or upper gum?
 
So the whole upper gum is a gum?
 
I think so
 
I see. Then we have two gums in our mouths?
 
sounds about right. I'm no dentist.
 
3:36 PM
Damn it, Færd, he's a programmer, not a dentist.
jinx
 
:D
 
Well, good to know. Thanks.
 
no probs :)
 
Does someone here knows german?
 
3:39 PM
What do you need? We might could find you someone.
 
I take it the German Language chat is dead?
 
I found this in a book: Father can't sleep and is working in the kitchen
which translates to:
Vater kann nicht schlafen und arbeitet in der Küche
 
Shouldn't that be Vater no Vatter?
But "kann nicht schlafen" sounds like a word-for-word translation.
 
I see the conjugation of arbeiten but why schlafen is in infinite?
yes is Vater, sorry
 
"Kann" is taking the conjugation as an auxilliary, I suppose.
It sounds like Google translate though. I don't really know German though.
 
3:46 PM
@MattE.Эллен I'll check it out, but it is kinda
 
fair enough
we are the best chatroom, afterall
 
I'm trying to think where there are other German speakers.
 
@WeaponX It's a decent translation. The "kann" is an auxiliary verb, and auxiliary verbs take the Infinitiv of the verb they're applied to in German.
 
00:00 - 16:0016:00 - 00:00

« first day (2076 days earlier)      last day (2847 days later) »