« first day (2069 days earlier)      last day (2856 days later) » 
00:00 - 07:0007:00 - 00:00

7:05 AM
I'm going with feint.
 
@Mazura There was a name for this strategy but I just forgot.
It meant something like "distraction".
 
7:24 AM
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword with email in body, messaging number in body: why will so many people buy fake diploma and transcript online by sunshare on english.stackexchange.com
 
^ Flag please.
 
Not sure if that's the term, but it works I guess.
 
Hunters use decoys also.
 
2
Q: What did Batman do to the first tumbler, and why didn't he do it to the other one?

Wad CheberFrom the climactic scene in The Dark Knight Rises: The cops are approaching two tumblers. The batcopter swoops in, does something to the tumbler on the left, then leaves. What did he do to the tumbler on the left, and why didn't he do it to the tumbler on th...

Feint is a French term that entered English via the discipline of swordsmanship and fencing. Feints are maneuvers designed to distract or mislead, done by giving the impression that a certain maneuver will take place, while in fact another, or even none, will. In military tactics and many types of combat, there are two types of feints: feint attacks and feint retreats. == Attacks == A feint attack is designed to draw defensive action towards the point under assault. It is usually used as a diversion to force the enemy to concentrate more manpower in a given area, to weaken the opposing force in...
I'd say a feint is what a decoy does.
If I wanted to get all wordy, I'd deff use decoy ;)
 
7:35 AM
diversion is good too
 
@Sᴋᴜʟʟᴘᴇᴛʀᴏʟ +25
 
Still not ringing a bell.
 
I wasn't far off with "bait and switch" ;p
 
Military deception refers to attempts to mislead enemy forces during warfare. This is usually achieved by creating or amplifying an artificial fog of war via psychological operations, information warfare, visual deception and other methods. As a form of strategic use of information (disinformation), it overlaps with psychological warfare. To the degree that any enemy that falls for the deception will lose confidence when it is revealed, he may hesitate when confronted with the truth. Deception in warfare dates back to early history. The Art of War, an ancient Chinese military treatise, puts great...
 
Whoa. "fog of war" is a real term?
 
7:40 AM
All is fair in love and war :-)
 
Naw, you got it with diversion. This is deception:
 
I would call that^ cold blooded.
 
They don't look like reptiles.
 
 
1 hour later…
9:11 AM
@Færd sorry but I can't tell. I typically read all books in their original language. There are only a handful for which I've also read a translation, and none for which I've read all translations to compare against one another.
However, with regards to the Brothers Karamazov, I can say this much: if you have several translations to pick from, read a couple pages from each, and then go with whichever one reads the worst. That'll be the one truest to the original, because Dostoyevski couldn't write for shit. His forte lied entirely elsewhere. He is an excellent, outstanding psychologist. But he is a horrible, the crappiest writer.
So if you can read a paragraph without your body beginning to visibly twist in excruciating pain, then the translator is not translating but making his own stuff up.
 
9:40 AM
Thanks for the time @RegDwigнt. That was definitely good advice; if I decided to learn Russian someday, I won't go to Dostoyevsky's works for practice, despite the fact that I admired their translations.
 
 
1 hour later…
user208178
10:50 AM
@Cerberus Thank you.
 
12:59 PM
@RegDwigнt I really like D's style!
Yes, it is odd, but I consider that a plus.
 
 
2 hours later…
3:16 PM
Nine years tobacco-free today.
 
woo!
15 years married last week
 
Nice job!
Our tenth is coming up.
We were going to have a party, but I'm thinking maybe we should have a weekend getaway instead.
Did you do anything fun?
 
3:36 PM
Nothing major. We took Friday off, wandered around the city, and went out for dinner Saturday.
 
Sounds lovely.
Are your kids away with their grandparents?
 
no my parents came here for the weekend
 
Long time no see guys
 
Hi @Phonics.
 
3:45 PM
@KitZ.Fox Hi!
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Legoman!
How's life over there
 
 
2 hours later…
5:48 PM
@KitZ.Fox Nice.
 
6:45 PM
Is there something I'm missing here?
-3
Q: I am [who/whom] G-d made me

SAHPlease fill in the blank with the correct word and explain your choice. I am __ G-d made me. A. who B. whom ~~~ Some people have suggested I elaborate on this question so here goes. The above was not copied from any test. It is a question about basically two things: (1) whether an objective...

How is this not a duplicate?
 
Maybe something like:
God made me me --> I am who/m God made me
(with who taking the place of the second complement)
Or better:
God made me who I am --> I am who God made me
Anyway, it may well deserve the downvotes.
 
@KitZ.Fox Are there reopen votes on it?
 
I hear people are using (fake versions of?) the new Pokemon game of augmented reality to lure people to places where they are robbed.
 
@TIPS There was a flag on it, requesting review. I advised them to take it to Meta.
There is a company, CartelPress, that is posting hundreds of fake viral stories about Pokemon Go.
 
@KitZ.Fox Good for you. Me, about nine months.
 
7:01 PM
@Færd Way to go!
Well done.
 
:D
 
@KitZ.Fox huh, interesting.
 
Yeah, I guess it helps generate ad revenue? According to GQ anyway.
 
user208178
@KitZ.Fox Heh, nice link. This one is funny:
 
user208178
> “ISIS Is Taking Responsibility For Pokemon Go’s Login Problems; Server Issues”
 
user208178
7:04 PM
I mean who would fall for that!
 
user208178
Lol!
 
It looks like you could use a pokestop to lure people, but seriously, if you think it's legit to climb in the back of someone's windowless van, it's not the app that's the issue.
Pokestop = basket of kittens.
 
Do you have an idiom or proverb that would say something like I was so happy I tossed my hat upwards/to the sky/etc?
 
So happy I could cry?
 
Nothing about throwing hats?
 
7:10 PM
Not that I can think of. There's an expression about eating hats, but that's incredulity not happiness.
 
Something like this, but for regular people throwing regular hats!
@KitZ.Fox Oh, thanks!
 
Well, we do toss our hats in celebration. I just can't think of an expression that mentions that.
 
So the practice is not limited to graduation parties?
 
I don't think so. I think that's where "hat trick" came from.
I mean, it's not as common as shaking hands, but people would probably understand that you were happy/excited.
 
Hmm. Thanks.
We have it too, and it dates back to more than seven centuries ago. Was curious where it came from.
 
7:19 PM
Interesting.
 
7:31 PM
@Cerberus Youths!
 
7:47 PM
Is this correct? "what characters are the result of hash() function?" OR "the result of hash() function is containing what characters?"
 
@PhonicsTheHedgehog Could be anyone!
@Shafizadeh The first one is OK, except that I would say the function hash().
 
@Cerberus ah ok .. just I don't need to use the word of "made of" in that?
 
The second one should be: the result of the function hash() contains which characters?
 
@Cerberus good .. but just rephrase it by using the word of "made of" into it?
 
@Shafizadeh Made of is used for materials.
A house is made of brick(s).
 
7:54 PM
oh really? alright then
 
And I don't think characters are the material of a result.
 
yeah they aren't :-)
 
Made of can have an extended meaning, but I don't think that would work in this case.
You could say comprises or consists of.
 
Well I published that question .. nothing doesn't matter anymore :-)
"nothing doesn't matter anymore" means "nothing isn't important anymore" ?
 
You have a double negation there: noting...n't.
You probably mean nothing matters any more.
 
7:58 PM
is that bad?
 
Yes.
 
ah ok
 
Because normally -- becomes +.
On second thought, what you mean is probably it doesn't matter any more?
Because nothing suggests that there are several things that no longer matter.
 
tiny point :-)
 
Nothing [out of x,y,z].
 
8:01 PM
Which one is correct?
- I've tested it several times and results tell me there is no signs.
- I've tested it several times and the results tell me there is no signs.
 
The.
And are no signs.
Because signs is plural.
 
Ah :-) correct.
@Cerberus why "the"? I learned when there is a plural thing, "the" hides .. Also as you see, "results" us plural.
 
Ah, but that rule is wrong.
Plural can be used with the or without the.
 
In this case, you should use the definite article the because you are referring to specific results: the reader will have the results of the test in mind before you mention the results.
In general, use the when you are referring to something that the reader has already thought about, or could have thought about.
(There are of course many exceptions, special uses of the...)
 
8:13 PM
I see ...
 
nods
 
8:28 PM
@Cerberus I suspect most programmers would say the hash() function
 
Another possibility.
But noun adjectives are generally considered less elegant. Most people are no better than average writers.
The river Thames and the function hash().
 
@Cerberus Well, computer function names and the elegance you're describing are probably mutually exclusive in just about every text.
 
So I generally advise against noun adjectives where possible.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Umm I think we're talking about different things.
 
@Cerberus In this case I feel 70% strongly that "The function hash()" would sound odd in any document where you are talking about hash functions
odd = inelegant
 
Most technical prose is inelegant.
I am convinced of the opposite.
 
8:34 PM
well. using some flowery writing style in a document that doesn't call for it will distract your reader.
 
It's not flowery.
And noun adjectives are generally less easy to parse.
To quote Tolkien:
> Why deliberately ignore, refuse to use the wealth of English which leaves us a choice of styles – without any possibility of unintelligibility.
This is not some exotic or complicated construction.
 
Why user a style of prose that is never used for that purpose in any similar materials?
 
If such materials are generally inelegant and hard to read?
 
whoa, hard to read? They're certainly not hard to read because they say "the hash() function" instead of "the function hash()"
They may be hard to read for a variety of other reasons.
 
Did I say that?
 
8:38 PM
Well, let's contemplate two otherwise identical documents
one uses "The hash() function" and the other uses "the function hash()".
Surely you're not going to argue that there is much difference.
 
I really have no desire to contemplate technical documents at this time.
 
Except that nobody says the latter, and thus that document will read oddly to readers familiar with other similar documents
 
I think you're misinterpreting some line of mine, although I don't know which.
Next think you will argue against capitalising I in text messages.
 
You are recommending to use "The function hash()" instead of "The hash() function"
on the basis of "elegance"
I'm trying to point out that that particular style would be most likely inappropriate for the types of documents that sentence fragment would appear in.
It wouldn't make the document more elegant.
 
I disagree in all respects.
A thing does not become good because there are many of it.
Bad habits should be ignored or broken.
 
8:43 PM
A thing does not become good simply because people did it a lot in the past, either.
 
Am I arguing that?
At some point, beauty is hard to support with arguments.
 
Well, you're appealing to "elegance", but it's totally arbitrary and based on aesthetic norms of writers from before. There is no objective reason to use one format or another in general writing.
 
You're trying to prove beauty by objectivity...
Isn't that a bit crazy?
 
I'm not at all trying to prove beauty. I'm pointing out that there is no objective reason to use one or the other.
You say one way is more beautiful.
I say that's just because you associate that completely arbitrary way with "good writing"
 
What you're saying seems self-contradictory.
 
8:46 PM
There's probably an alternate parallel universe where everything is identical to this one, except that "good writers" use "The Thames River" and we're arguing the opposite points.
 
Why would I need objectivity to decide on beauty?
It's completely irrelevant.
 
No, it's totally relevant.
Some people like coffee with milk. Others like it black.
There is no objectively better way.
 
It doesn't make sense to argue that there is no objective reason to like milk, and that people should therefore not advocate the use of milk.
 
It's purely a matter of taste, which is completely arbitrary. It's an accident of history.
 
Beauty is always a matter of taste.
 
8:48 PM
@Cerberus You're not getting my analogy.
 
I don't think we're getting anywhere.
You may write as it pleases you.
 
Shafizadeh says "blah blah black coffee blah blah". You say "You should say "blah blah coffee with milk blah".
 
I advise against using unnecessary noun adjectives in general.
 
I say "In his context, nobody uses milk, ever."
 
Irrelevant.
Circles.
 
8:49 PM
Then you try to appeal to the elegance of using milk.
 
Advising people as to beauty or taste is good and useful.
 
makes popcorn
 
@MετάEd Popcorn with black coffee with milk.
 
@Cerberus Context matters though. A tuxedo is the right thing to wear if you're in the wedding party, it's the wrong thing to wear to the beach.
anyway @Shafizadeh use "the hash() function" if you're communicating with programmers. Use "the function hash()" if you're writing a deliberately florid document.
/my two cents
 
crl
A sales passed an interview, the interviewer showed his laptop and said 'sell me this', the sales took the laptop and left. Few hours later, the interviewer called him, 'can you give me back my laptop?', '$200, and it's yours' he replied
 
user208178
oh I love the banter between Cerberus and Mr Shiny.
 
I'd love to stay and bantertain you guys further but I need to go pick up my kids at daycare. cya.
 
user208178
See ya!
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 What's the meaning of "deliberately florid document"
 
user208178
@KitZ.Fox Nice! me, I don't even know what a cigarette tastes like.
 
9:06 PM
@Shafizadeh If you intend the document to be florid.
@Arrowfar It tastes "good". Like a cigarette should.
 
user208178
Howdy @MετάEd :)
 
@MετάEd ah
 
@Arrowfar Howdy.
 
@MετάEd I heard that they taste like gasoline.
Would you say that's true?
 
@PhonicsTheHedgehog I thought that was Comet.
 
9:11 PM
Interesting
 
10:05 PM
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 I can't stand those people. That's a fact
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 There are some limits to what can go together. probably
@Cerberus Why don't people ever say that about religion? It's pretty much the same thing. or same result. "That girl is ugly". "She's my girl, god damn you!"
 
@Mitch We could say that?
 
Step 1. Register Patent
Step 2. Call movie theaters
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 You're obviously in the most absolutist of wrongingness:
 
@Mitch Can non-citizens register patents, by any chance?
 
@Cerberus If by 'we' you mean 'us', then yes, 'us' could say that. BUt I never hear people say it. And I'm saying they should say it. or 'us' should.
 
Who are us and why are they not we?
 
10:14 PM
@PhonicsTheHedgehog hm... I obey the law of gravity without ever having studied law.
So I'm pretty sure anybody can be prosecuted for patent infringement. But can the execution of the fine be enforced if the non-citizen has no assets (or their person) in the country in question?
@Cerberus 'We' is everybody, including ourselves.
'They' is everybody, except for ourselves.
Why don't we (or they) ever say religion is as supportable by argument as taste.
 
10:30 PM
Hi guys
Which one below is grammatically correct?
What are the music you listened to yesterday? Or What is the music you listened to yesterday?
 
@Mitch I'm sure I'm the first every person to pair popcorn with black coffee with milk.
 
@Mitch I think you've answered your own question.
@CoKoder Is. Music is always singular.
@Mitch Oh, well, who says we don't?
 
11:12 PM
@CoKoder "What is the music you listened to yesterday" is grammatically correct, as Cerberus already said. If this music has not been mentioned yet as a topic, then I think it would be even better to use something like "What music did you listen to yesterday?"
 
11:30 PM
agrees
wags tail
 
00:00 - 07:0007:00 - 00:00

« first day (2069 days earlier)      last day (2856 days later) »