« first day (2068 days earlier)      last day (2870 days later) » 

12:28 AM
@tchrist I think I started with "modern Iran".
Then proceeded to mutilate the sentence.
 
heh
I’m subthused by journalists’ tendency to forgo national adjectives.
 
Especially UK journalists.
While simultaneously committing the sin of unnecessary abbreviations in a running text.
If by subthused you mean experiencing a lack of enthusiasm, perhaps hypothused or even ecthused would be better.
 
I deliberated that.
 
I truly wonder why newspapers do that.
And the website of the BBC.
 
They do it in blind obedience to wit’s soul, brevity.
 
user208178
12:40 AM
@Mitch your comments are star magnet.
 
user208178
hello @tchrist @Cerberus. how are you guys?
 
1:06 AM
Hello!
The BBC again.
 
user208178
oh good. I thought I was getting the silent treatment ;)
 
user208178
1:20 AM
do you watch news in the middle of the night?
 
11:55 AM
Is there an homograph word in English where the only difference is the stress?
 
crl
12:15 PM
woa, estoy completamente lleno (como diciera 'full?)
gotta go, a hunter is targetting at me :)
 
user208178
hello @skillpatrol
 
Hi! @Arrowfar
 
user208178
@crl in real life? :)
 
12:54 PM
@Arrowfar if you star this you will have bad luck. Also, good luck. Really, it's your choice.
 
 
1 hour later…
2:07 PM
Less boring and more chancy and clever than 2048: Threes.
 
Which one is correct?
- here is current result
- here is the current result
 
The.
 
ok thx
and what about these?
- How to set a default value when record is null?
- How to set a default value when the record is null?
 
The.
A is also possible, but it depends on context.
 
ah ok, thx
 
2:10 PM
@Cerberus Also in the first one, I assume?
 
Less likely, but not impossible.
I'm actually not sure what he means by current.
Perhaps it can be omitted.
 
Mhm.
Can I ask you where you live?
 
2:22 PM
@MartinAJ Neither. Never use how to X when asking a question. Always say How can I X instead. The How to X construct is for providing an answer, it could be the title of an article explaining how to do X, but not a question asking how X can be done.
3
 
@terdon ah .. good to know ..
I want to say I didn't do X so far at all. Which one is correct?
- I never have I ever didn't X
- I never ever have didn't X
 
:-/
why not say "I've never done X before"
 
@skullpatrol Yes this seems correct. But what I said is kinda a game :-) I seen that in the movies.
 
Both of those are nonsensical, I'm afraid.
Perhaps never have I ever done X
 
@terdon yup that's the one
 
2:31 PM
But dont say that. Not in normal conversation anyway.
 
"Never Have I Ever", also known as "I've Never…" or "Ten Fingers", is a drinking game. == Rules == The verbal game is started with the players getting into a circle. Then, the first player says a simple statement starting with "Never have I ever". Anyone who at some point in their lives have done the action that the first player says, must drink. Play then continues around the circle, and the next person makes a statement. An additional rule – uncommon, but beneficial to the game – is that if there is no one taking a drink, then the one who said the particular "Never have I ever…" must take a drink...
 
ok .. you know, that's a game. I don't know you're familiar with it or not. But I say "never have I ever done X", if anybody in there done that, he should be punish.
@skullpatrol tnx
 
Sure, in that context it's fine. Just don't use it in normal conversation.
 
ah ok
How can I make it a "imperative sentence"? Like "You should never ever do X". it that right?
 
2:38 PM
sounds ok
 
good
@skullpatrol or ... ever never ... ? Is the order important?
 
@terdon Wow, I wouldn't know that!
 
@Færd Yes, it's a very common mistake. Something like 30% of all questions on SE, for example.
 
@MartinAJ yes, order is important
 
But not something a native speaker would say.
 
2:39 PM
@skullpatrol So either "ever never" or "never ever" ?
 
Or, certainly not this native speaker anyway :)
 
Certainly good to know.
 
@MartinAJ "never ever" is ok
 
ah ok
@Færd You should say "I didn't know that". I guess "wouldn't" is wrong.
 
I meant I wouldn't know that if it weren't for you.
 
2:43 PM
@Færd bebin mishe farsiye ino begi? :-)
 
نمیتونستم اینو بدونم اگه به خاطر تو نبود.
 
@terdon could you pin it please? :)
 
@Færd ah :-) thx
 
np.
 
@skullpatrol What the common mistake thing? I'd rather not abuse the mod pin thing, why don't you star it?
Oh. You have :)
 
2:44 PM
30% justifies my request
 
naw
 
Was that a yawn? :) Or no + wow?
 
an informal "no"
 
I guessed so. I wondered what it was that he disagreed with.
 
2:49 PM
Reminds me of dawg.
 
It's an old American form of address called Redneck Cryptic.
 
@Færd that would be a ghetto slang :)
 
My mind keeps reminding me of irrelevant things.
 
If 30% of the questions ask about that mistake shouldn't there be some kind of "canonical answer" to direct them to? @terdon
 
Ah, they don't ask about it, they just commit it.
 
2:55 PM
All the more reason.
 
Did you create a new user again?
 
yep
^ opposite of "naw" @Færd
:)
or "yup"
 
:)
@skullpatrol Did you just confess it to a mod?
 
3:00 PM
yup
 
naw!
 
@Færd Having a sock isn't a problem per se.
Doing something one person can't, with the help of socks, however.
 
it always depends on "intention"
 
Yeah.
 
3:02 PM
Plus, we're used to skully doing this.
 
that^ too
 
Why are you doing it anyway @Skull?
What's the point?
Don't tell you do it because "you can".
Oh, is it kinda a "reset game" thing?
 
dunno
I waste too much time on the internet
 
Why not waste it with one account?
 
I'm trying to stop
 
3:23 PM
Triple-digit weather and three active fires in the county. Total fire ban because all local resources for responding to fires are already in use. One of the homes destroyed was that of one of the firefighters.
 
Literally breaking news
 
how ironic
 
The fire is retaliating.
 
fighting fire with fire
 
@tchrist Use the Celsius scale then.
 
3:30 PM
@Færd But I’m not measuring body temperature!
 
(/¯◡ ‿ ◡)/¯ ~ ┻━┻
Don't make us wish that was three digits in Celsius.
 
@TIPS I don’t read Farsi, sorry.
 
@TIPS take that table back to the chem room
 
@tchrist It would, nevertheless, reduce the temperature.
 
@Færd No, merely the figure. :)
 
3:33 PM
The bigger figure has a negative mental impact.
 
@tchrist And the figure affects how you perceive the temperature.
@tchrist Now I wish I was a wiener.
 
@TIPS Does it now?
 
It does.
 
Oh yes. For the trees too.
 
I mean look at you. Your hair is on fire.
 
3:35 PM
Max temperature today is. . . .
Let’s go with degrees Newton, shall we?
 
BTW, we're still so weak against the mildest of natural disasters.
 
Thirteen seems a lot nicer than triple digits.
And forty centigrade always confuses me because I worry that there’s been a sign-bit error and so it should actually be negative instead, and therefore Fahrenheit.
@TIPS Because you so like Viennese pastries?
 
I'm more comfortable with the metric scale (Kelvin) than Fahrenheit.
 
@Færd That’s understandable given that everything and everyone around you is uniquely expressed in centigrade degrees, right?
Although Kelvin is rather absolutist of you. :)
 
Or physicist. :)
@tchrist Right.
 
3:48 PM
It’s awfully convenient to use units whose usefully memorable range corresponds to the majority of actual use and experience.
So for example, what's wrong with that thermometer?
 
That it can't show negative temperatures? Or something subtle?
 
Both.
That it does not correspond to the outside temperatures most often encountered on Earth.
 
Outside temperatures?
 
You will often get temperatures below freezing, and you will virtually never get anything even half as high as the maximum.
 
let's not get into a "heated" discussion about scales now :)
 
3:51 PM
Ah.
 
As in, "What's the temperature outside today/tonight?"
 
user208178
@tchrist that thermometer could be okay for a warm place where we don't get lower temperatures.
 
Perhaps so. You should probably start at forty below otherwise.
 
I see. That is a rather self-centered view. (Is it too negative a word?)
 
user208178
@skullpatrol so how many accounts do you have? just curious :-)
 
3:53 PM
@Færd But is it justifiably self-oriented? :)
 
over 9,000
 
user208178
nice.
 
That one is more useful, albeit still leaving a few things to be desired.
 
as justifiable as my request based on 30%
 
@tchrist I didn't want to use a strong word. sorry. If you want to carry a thermometer in your pocket, then yes, those aren't optimum.
 
3:55 PM
@Færd It was for an oil gauge, which is why it had those termini.
 
@tchrist It can't tell if you have a slight fever.
 
Call me old fashioned or arithmetically challenged, but I’d rather numbered demarcations on every even ten degrees than every twenty.
 
You're not old fashioned. You just happen to have ten fingers on your hands.
 
t "arithmetically challenged" christ
 
@Færd Thanks be.
 
3:58 PM
Incorporate your toes and the problem is solved.
 
Four score and seven toes ago, our fathers learned how to count.
 
Alas, they didn't use their toes. Would have been fun if they had.
o/
 
I wonder what digit-forms a duodecimal, hexadecimal, or vigesimal counting system would have devised.
So for like vigesimal you can't just go 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F G H I J.
Because the 1 and the I look too close.
Oh, Wikipedia has a suggestion to tr[IJ][JK] for legibility.
 
Why would a culture using a vigesimal counting system use the latin alphabet?
On a slightly relevant note, when Greeks count in letters, it's Α, Β, Γ, Δ, Ε, ΣΤ(!)
 
how needs to count when you have geometry?
 
4:07 PM
Why sigma-tau instead of zeta now?
That's Inuit. Still combining with an underlying mark and score system, looks like.
That's Mayan.
stroke stroke stroke stroke slash.
But with dots instead.
 
and they have zero
 
Five-count tallies are less compact but might be easier to read and endure.
@skullpatrol Clever of them.
 
indeed
 
@tchrist No idea. That's just how it is. As a kid I was in grades A through E and then, suddenly in ΣΤ
 
no negative numerals though
 
@skullpatrol Ah, but apparently, 0 was their bread and butter.
 
@skullpatrol We don’t have negative numerals either.
 
Bread, anyway.
 
@tchrist we?
 
@skullpatrol Nope.
Our digits are unsigned.
 
4:14 PM
ok, negative numbers
 
That's something completely different.
Did you know that when you write -10 the compiler sees that as the constant 10 with a prefix unary negation operator applied to it?
 
yes
 
user208178
speaking of numbers how come we don't have an "accountancy SE" site?
 
there is a Quant.SE
 
4:17 PM
EUREKA
> The Dozenal Society of Great Britain propose a rotated digit two 2 (↊, U+218A) for ten and a reversed or rotated digit three 3 (↋, U+218B) for eleven.
 
@Arrowfar There's Economics and Personal Finance & Money.
 
user208178
@terdon hello terdon. yes they are quite close. I was thinking a site for CPA's, ICAEW's etc. Chartered Accountants I mean. It's still in Area 51 it seems and not very popular unfortunately.
 
user208178
4:21 PM
@skullpatrol yes thanks, but I was thinking something else.
 
I’m thinking those might be easily misread, but maybe that’s like saying that all (insert racial stereotype) look alike to me.
> It is possible for people to count on their fingers to 12 using one hand only, with the thumb pointing to each finger bone on the four fingers in turn.
 
if the mayan's had zero, i wonder why they didn't have the negative numbers?
 
> In Hellenistic Greek astronomical texts, such as the writings of Ptolemy, sexagesimal numbers were written using the Greek alphabetic numerals, with each sexagesimal digit being treated as a distinct number. The Greeks limited their use of sexagesimal numbers to the fractional part of a number and employed a variety of markers to indicate a zero.
 
crl
looks like a base-3 system
 
@skullpatrol Who said they did not?
 
4:26 PM
you
 
I said they no more had digits that represented a negative than have we.
 
crl
they didn't think of the symmetry with negative numbers
 
Not clear. Their zero was extremely important to them.
 
perhaps, they didn't use it to count
 
4:30 PM
> Mayans used only positive numbers; there is no theory and description about negative numbers of Mayans mathematics.
 
especially counting backwards
 
crl
Greek system was base10?
well not really
they have shortcuts for hundreds
it makes more sense than Roman system that came after :)
 
sighs
 
how far from you?
 
Too far for danger. Not far enough to breath clean.
 
user208178
4:33 PM
@tchrist is that Colorado? sorry too slow to reverse search.
 
crl
fires are natural actually, I mean they benefit to the forest in mid-term
 
@crl So's rattlesnake poison.
 
user208178
@tchrist oh. sorry to hear that.
 
crl
π was 80 in Greece
 
4:48 PM
@crl ?
Ah, yes, I see. So it was.
 
What's that tool that lets you compare frequencies of phrases is worldwide English?
Should be on our resource list, darn it.
Got it.
 
5:36 PM
@terdon One for you.
0
Q: Is an English word coined with Greek morphemes considered a loanword by native speakers of Greek?

ltuxEuropeans and Americans often use Greek roots to coin new words for new concepts. For example, the telephone was invented in the United States of America, and the word telephone is itself derived from Greek roots tele (τῆλε) and phone (φωνή). Later the term telephone was adopted into the vocabula...

 
Woah.
Not really on topic though.
 
True.
Having exhausted the measly little 24-vote supply of close votes allotted to me daily, I am forced to edit bad questions and give comments instead.
 
in Language Overflow, 8 hours ago, by Færd
Etymology quiz #2: Which pair are related?
1. rise, rouse
2. meager, mere
3. rotisserie, rotary
4. studio, stadium
 
The pair that Latin won’t help you for.
 
You sure? :)
 
5:46 PM
No, that's a hunch.
But I know roti from French roast, and doubt that has anything to do with circles.
And studium and stadium are different.
Latin merus isn’t where we get meagre from.
 
@tchrist Oh that was the tricky one in this quiz!
I should've remembered you know French..
 
It’s more likely to stump me with purely Germanic words, and much easier with Celtic ones.
 
in Language Overflow, May 19 at 10:19, by Færd
Etymology quiz: Which pair are related?
A. relevant, relative
B. save, savor
C. play, display
D. ally, coalition
E. fortitude, fortnight
 
haha
I don't know how people who don't know Latin solve these.
 
The interesting option in this (for me) was D.
And B.
 
5:51 PM
I rather imagine that ally and coalition are related, but further back then basic Latin alone. An ally is someone you are tied to, and a coalition brings things together.
Tied to as in a papal legate.
Ligatures.
 
As far as etymnoline goes, they're not.
I've forgotten though. Let me check.
 
As I said, further back than simple Latin alone.
< alescere
Perhaps not. I cannot break that one down further.
 
> Ally ... from Latin alligare
 
Ok, there's a lost stative aleo.
@Færd Yes, that's the tied thing.
> From a lost stative *aleō ‎(“be growing up”) +‎ -scō ‎(inceptive suffix).
 
They are similar, alescere and alligare.
 
5:55 PM
Which is why I wasn’t sure there wasn’t something behind them, but there does not appear to be.
 
Phew! And my quiz stays a(n answerless) riddle.
 
B is wrong because salvare and sapere are different.
Play is Germanic but display from Latin.
@terdon Your theta that came after your chi lost itself a naitch.
 
@tchrist Lost you there.
 
autochthonous
I can only see other people’s typos, not my own.
 
Ah, indeed. Thanks.
 
crl
6:07 PM
Latinus studio (studere at first person?)
 
7:03 PM
Should I be doing:
<b>This sentence is bolded.</b>
or
<b>This sentence is bolded</b>.
 
I would do the first way, normally, but it doesn't really matter at all.
 
thank you
 
8:04 PM
I'm looking for a name for my function. That function converts 1000 to 1k or 13200 to 13k. Here is my current name: getShorthandNumb();. Is there any better suggestion?
 
My fingers are Numb.
I'd recommend WrongNotation();
 
why "wrong"?
 
'cause it's wrong.
 
:-)
Are you talking about the word of "numb"?
 
It's something programmers came up with.
@MartinAJ No, about changing 13,000 to 13k.
Never can you see such abominations in real scholarly articles.
 
8:10 PM
@TIPS That number is user's reputation
I'm trying to do what SE does.
 
Well, it doesn't become right when SE does it.
 
:-)
All I asked was a function name
 
But look at all the smiles you made
Now you'll live longer.
 
:-)
 
Well, jokes aside, I'd write Num instead.
 
8:13 PM
So is this fine? getShorthandNum();
 
Since, 1. that's the semi-official short for "Number". And 2. Oh you already accepted my proposal
@MartinAJ You can remove hand if you don't have any feelings about it.
 
yes exactly what I was looking for .. I liked to remove "hand", But I scared the meaning changes. ok thx
 
@TIPS That message is . . . slightly odd out of context.
 
Just "short" or "shorter" ? I mean getShortNum(); or getShorterNum();
 
Doesn't matter.
Wait, who said the function names should make perfect sense? Call it IceCream();
Or even better, WrongNotation();
 
8:19 PM
:-)
 
 
2 hours later…
9:50 PM
You really should "never" use abbreviations in identifiers: try shortened_number_with_letter_suffixed(13000).
Or maybe just letter_suffixed_number.
Trust me, it will pay off in the long run.
Wait, am I in the right chat room?
 
10:47 PM
Isn't there an existing library function?
 

« first day (2068 days earlier)      last day (2870 days later) »