« first day (2038 days earlier)      last day (3182 days later) » 

00:24
@Shafizadeh @Mitch "not at all" doesn't always mean "it is not at all possible"; it could mean "it is not at all true." Example: Q: Are you hungry? A: Not at all.
Indeed, a better expansion of that answer is "I am not at all hungry."
00:51
@phoog Yes.I agree
 
1 hour later…
01:56
Is there any word sharing roots with brilliant that also has to do with shining in meaning?
Or doesn't have to do with shining in meaning. That might work too.
02:18
@ SE - There's a user here that needs some... <cough> direction.
02:46
@Færd You mean aside from brilliance, brilliancy, brilliantly? I didn't know this word before looking it up, but apparently brilliantine is a type of oil you put on hair to make it shiny.
Noun: brilliantine ‎(countable and uncountable, plural brilliantines)
  1. A hair pomade, making the hair shine brilliantly.
  2. 1921 "I wouldn't regret it," said Linda, "if I took Eileen by the shoulders and shook her till I shook the rouge off her cheek, and the brilliantine off her hair, and a million mean little subterfuges out of her soul. Gene Stratton-Porter, Her father`s daughter Chapter 4.
  3. A smooth shiny, luxurious fabric, often of alpaca or vicuña.
  4. Sunday June 11, 1916 No. 112. Bathing Suit of Brilliantine in Navy Blue and Black, trimmed with white mohair braid and buttons (no bloomers). Special 3.95 — The New York Times, *.pdf
Verb: brilliantine ‎(third-person singular simple present brilliantines, present participle brilliantining, simple past and past participle brilliantined)
  1. To apply brilliantine to the hair....
Brille?
@Cerberus: is the following Wiktionary entry right? I am very doubtful that the "ei" in cuneiformis was pronounced as a diphthong in Latin:
Adjective: cuneiformis m, f ‎(neuter cuneiforme); third declension
  1. cuneiform
@sumelic Thanks. I just don't know why when I thought about brilliant I just knew it was originally related to light and shining. I thought maybe it was because of its relatives, but apparently it has no famous relatives.
Probably because it's similar to bright.
03:10
@sumelic The Romans did not treat it as a diphthong.
Are you saying there should be a dot there in the IPA?
As to how they pronounced it exactly, I don't know...
I just know it counts as two syllables in poetry.
Which is why I think they never translitterated Greek ei as ei.
03:44
@Færd Like those gl- words perhaps, e.g., glow, gleam, glisten, glimmer, glitter, glory, glamour. (Hey, glamour is related to grammar!)
 
4 hours later…
07:29
@DamkerngT. Quite possible. Thanks.
Or maybe grammar is related to glamour? ;)
(No, it's the reverse.)
08:26
@sumelic the word appears to have been coined in the early modern period so it was probably pronounced variously according to the native language of the speaker.
@Cerberus the word was unknown to the Romans; see my previous message.
@phoog: I see. In that case, it's pretty ridiculous that Wiktionary lists a "classical" pronunciation in the first place!
 
1 hour later…
09:43
@Færd Things like related to have no real direction, I suppose. :D
 
2 hours later…
@RegDwigнt ismart? Brilliant!
11:35
Which one?
- So no need to an UNION in the query.
- So no need an UNION in the query.
@DamkerngT. Technically, yes. But you're more apt to say I'm related to the King than The King is related to me.
@Shafizadeh no need to do something or no need for something
@Færd That's another kind of relationship, I think.
Generalization can be dangerous.
(Probably not dangerous-dangerous.)
12:02
@terdon well done. Now solve this one:
@RegDwigнt I found my dream room!
@DamkerngT. I'm just conjecturing that when people say A is related to B, the possibility of A being stemmed from B (however tiny it might be, say 0.001) is higher than the reverse.
I had the opposite feeling, but maybe it was just because I'm more familiar with abstract relations in math and programming.
(Note that by the opposite I didn't mean the opposite of your proposition. I meant that I don't think your conjecture is universal.)
Well, you may be right.
I didn't and don't claim that I was right or am right or anything. Using relations like this is probably just my idiosyncrasy.
But OO is quite common nowadays. I don't know. Maybe there are more people who think this way than before.
12:18
When A is related to B, it's as if someone has related A to B, which makes me think that maybe B was the main object or concept.
In OOP, the direction of a relationship can be specified or unspecified.
What are OO and OOP?
Object-Oriented Programming
A has B (as one of its members) is about the same as B is in A, for example.
Technical senses hardly reflect ordinary aspects.
12:25
@RegDwigнt masochistic piercing.
12:42
I think I'm in the wrong room. Sorry.
Please close the door on your way out.
@terdon I can't find the door. I think it's a form of cognitive blindness.
Bash your head against the wall a few times. That usually works.
Both for the cognitive issues and for opening doors.
"let you know" is a correct sentence? Or can I just use "me" in that sentence?
@Shafizadeh Context? It isn't correct by itself. "I will let you know" is fine, for example.
12:51
ah ok. your example is what I was looking for
@Shafizadeh This should be "So no need for a UNION in the query
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 got it ... thx
an onion but a union
@RegDwigнt Very nice. Apple's true nature shines through...
I'm assuming the i-think is Apple.
And the white plastic.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 are you sure? because U is a letter which we have to use "an" behind it
12:56
@phoog @sumelic It makes sense to add a classical pronunciation, because a classical pronunciation is what many people who speak Latin now are after, and they may also use newer words in their conversation.
@Shafizadeh It depends on the sound, not on the letter. Does it sound like a vowel?
The word union sounds like yooonyen.
So y as a consonant sound.
So a union.
But onion sounds like onyen, a vowel sound.
An onion.
@Cerberus yes .. vowel characters are these: a, i, o, u, e
Yes, but sometimes vowel letters don't sound like vowels, but like consonants.
Ah I see what's your point
And it is the sound that counts, if you're choosing between a and an.
I really didn't know that
12:58
Now you do!
So you say an unknown cat, but a unique cat.
yes :-) tnx
@Shafizadeh Don't worry, many native speakers make that mistake.
@terdon :)
13:11
Which weather is more uncomfortable, muggy or humid? Which is hotter?
@Shafizadeh It's one of the most commonly asked questions around here, when to use "an" or "a". It never depends on spelling, always on pronunciation. And the other thing they don't teach in most schools: letter are not sounds, they are just used to indicate sounds. So "vowel letter" is an incorrect concept. There are only vowel sounds represented by letters.
@Færd muggy means "unpleasantly warm and humid".
It's possible to be cold and humid.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 I would not say incorrect.
@Cerberus well, incomplete at least. There are letters that are used to represent both vowels and non-vowels.
Yes.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 I see
13:14
The term is best considered a rule of thumb.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Thanks. Doesn't humid (for weather) suggest high temperature and unpleasantness?
@Færd To me it just means high moisture.
Logical.
high humidity is often found with warm temperature though, and as it reduces your ability to cool off by sweating, it makes you feel hotter. So often the temperature is known, or expected, and can be elided.
Mhm. I saw somewhere that the two were synonymous. Seemed to me that they're not, as you explained.
13:18
Hi there
Can I ask a question?
Guys couple of days ago I created a question you can see here:
http://ell.stackexchange.com/questions/93146/can-can-be-used-to-imply-become-being-able-to
And me and @Tromano discussed about it.
Now, I asked him can "can" be used with subjunctive connotation?
I will be happy to know your comments
13:33
@Færd What Mr Shiny seems to be saying is that humid often connotes high temperature in practice, so it may amount to that in most contexts, but that temperature is strictly not part of its meaning.
@Cerberus Well, not exactly. What I mean is that the temperature is often known because it doesn't vary much on a day-to-day basis. But the humidity can. So in July I can say "It's really humid today" and I don't need to tell you about "hot" because you would have known that. I don't think "humid" connotes "hot" per se.
Now that you mention it, I don't think I'd call a cold, wet day "humid". I'd probably go for "damp" instead. Humid does seem to suggest heat somehow.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 How about what Terdon says?
I wouldn't call a cold day humid either, even when it is.
@terdon I'd probably go for damp first, but not necessarily.
Not necessarily, no. Perhaps if I were living in a cold climate where all days were cold, I would use humid for the wet ones. However, in the absence of context, it was a humid day suggests heat to me, while it was a damp day suggests cold.
13:49
There are lots of ghits for "cold and humid". I guess in the total absence of context I might think a "humid" day was warm (a damp day would never be warm unless otherwise specified). But also I think damp is wetter than humid.
The subjunctive in English is used to form sentences that do not describe known objective facts. These include statements about one's state of mind, such as opinion, belief, purpose, intention, or desire. It contrasts with the indicative mood, which is used for statements of fact, such as He speaks English. In Modern English, the subjunctive form of a verb often looks identical to the indicative form, and thus subjunctives are not a very visible grammatical feature of English. For most verbs, the only distinct subjunctive form is found in the third person singular of the present tense, where the...
> The English modal verbs do not have present subjunctive forms, except for synonyms such as be able to as a subjunctive corresponding to the indicative modal can. However would, should, could and might can in some contexts be regarded as past subjunctives of will, shall, can and may respectively. (They may also be described simply as the past forms of the latter modals, or as modals or auxiliaries in their own right.)
@Cardinal I'm not an expert on the subjunctive but maybe this answers your question?
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword with email in answer, email in answer: One word for witches and wizards by dgbcxdhhnnc on english.stackexchange.com
14:21
Helpful discussion. Thanks all.
 
1 hour later…
15:24
@terdon That didn't work. And I'm awake again and I have a bad headache.
15:53
Which one:
- go sit of there
- go sit of the there
- go sit on the there
@Shafizadeh none of them
you're looking for the word over
But I heard that in the movies ..
"go sit over there"
oh .. you are right .. thx
16:05
@Shafizadeh Note that over there is informal. The standard expression is just there without a preposition.
@Cerberus Like this? - go sit of there
No: go (and) sit there.
Sit of there is always wrong.
Of is a preposition.
17:10
@Cerberus Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the preposition “of”.
@MετάEd Umm you're ending a sentence with a preposition.
That's wrong.
That's a pronoun.
@Cerberus So did you.
user208178
hello
@VitaminC Hello. Linus Pauling says hello too.
17:20
@terdon Did not!
Did too!
I ended with a preposition, not with a preposition.
Did three!
You ended a sentence with "a preposition.".
D'oh.
17:21
Sneaky, huh?
Surely you see the difference between a preposition and a preposition.
Besides, it ended with a full stop.
Surely you see the difference between a preposition at the end of a sentence and a preposition at the end of a sentence at the end of a sentence.
Exactly.
It's pretty clear.
user208178
@MετάEd lol. Hi!
Wouldn't the sentence 'I want to put a hyphen between the words Fish and And and And and Chips in my Fish-And-Chips sign' have been clearer if quotation marks had been placed before Fish, and between Fish and and, and and and And, and And and and, and and and And, and And and and, and and and Chips, as well as after Chips?
17:25
@Cerberus Damn! True, I missed that.
Foiled again.
@MετάEd That hurts.
user208178
@MετάEd So it is just a name off the top of my head. I'm not pro or against vitamin C.
@terdon I've fixed your line.
Now I am again open to your accusation.
Ha!
@terdon Then I'll hurt you more.
Whenever you're accused of something, it's always best to ameliorate the evidence.
17:36
5
Q: Is this compound sentence grammatically correct?

Šime VidasSo, I’ve stumbled upon this really long sentence, and now I’m wondering if it is grammatically correct. So they figured since I’m a real person and I’m in the movie and I’m actually me and they wanted to use me as me in the actual movie and I didn’t even know yet that I was me in the movie a...

@MετάEd God.
Holy crap
I see I had already voted for your answer.
:O
19 simple sentences
Jihadi terrorist attacks in Europe.
17:42
It would be interesting to see a graphic of violence against "foreigners" to compare that to.
Green means foiled, grey failed, red carried out successfully, half-red partly succeeded.
Particularly Muslims.
Today is Muhammad Ali's funeral :'(
and they still haven't finished the autopsy on Prince.
Let me have men about me that are fat;
Sleek-headed men and such as sleep o' nights:
Yond Cassius has a lean and hungry look;
He thinks too much: such men are dangerous.
user208178
Hello @KitZ.Fox!
17:48
@VitaminC Hello.
nice @MετάEd
I'm surprised about Egypt.
Don't know how reliable this poll was, though.
Same for this one.
user208178
@Cerberus I agree with Kit. Also Jihad isn't terrorism, it's a very broad word. I mean many muslims get offended when they see "Jihad" and "terrorism" being used side by side.
user208178
Just saying.
@VitaminC The map does not equate Jihad to terrorism.
user208178
17:57
No you wrote "Jihadi terrorist attacks in Europe."
In the same way as a Christian would get offended if you used the word crusade?
Another map could have said, left-wing terrorism in Europe.
Using one word to specify another doesn't mean you equate one to the other.
user208178
@Cerberus I don't know about Christians. I am a muslim and it is kind of hurtful to see people equate Jihad to terrorism.
How about "left-wing terrorism"?
user208178
Yeah ok maybe.
18:00
crl
crl
probably already spammed it, but made this small web editor
Nobody thinks all left-wingers are terrorists. That's simply not what that means.
Some left-wingers are terrorists, just as some Jihadis are.
Some Christians as well.
And Jews.
Atheists too.
Politicians too :P
Luckily, very few people are terrorists among any of those groups, so we're pretty safe.
(Unless terrorists get large numbers of nukes.)
@skillpatrol Probably...
user208178
@Cerberus Well I wouldn't call them Jihadists if they kill innocents. "Terrorists" plain and simple. Jihad is a sacred thingy for many muslims.
18:04
The equivalent of a sacrament, iirc.
And I don't think this is an appropriate place to discuss terrorism. You can go chat about it in the Latin room if you want.
@VitaminC Them how would you specify them?
People often conduct terrorism in the name of x.
Those people say they do so in the name of their Jihad.
In the name of god.
I think Vitamin C's stance is clear, as is yours, @Cerberus. There's no need to labour the point.
One of the most horrific acts of terrorism of this century was committed by a blond European, just saying.
18:07
I think you spell labor without the u :P
Luckily, the threat is minuscule in stable countries for now.
But it's still interesting.
I'm trying to finish off the first Percy Jackson series, but there's this other interesting series called "the Blackwell Pages", which is basically Percy Jackson except Norse myths instead of Greek ones, which keep sinterrupting me.
I didn't think I'd much like Percy Jackson, but it's not bad as far as middle grade fiction goes.
@VitaminC By the way, of course I wasn't trying to say Muslims are bad or anything. Almost all of them are peaceful; I wasn't trying to insinuate anything. I know and like many Muslims myself in real life.
I think I just prefer Norse mythology to Greek mythology is what it boils down to.
I meant no offense @VitaminC with my Christian analogies :-)
18:10
The problem being that I'm way more familiar with Greek myths than with Norse ones, so I'm sure I'm missing half the fun.
Norse myths are a lot colder
Analogical reasoning can get so...messy.
I like the Germanic myths, too
I'm not at all familiar with those, aside from a few random things I picked up from Neil Gaiman.
like the ring of the nibelung
no, I don't know a lot, but what I know I like
18:13
Kobolds are from Germanic culture, aren't they?
Come to think of it, we spend a lot of time on Greek mythology in school and pretty much no time on other mythologies. I wonder why that is.
@Kit were you sneaking around my neighbourhood yesterday?
@KitZ.Fox because "the classics" are Latin and ancient Greek
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Oh! Haha. That's my cousin! So that's what she was trying to tell me. I couldn't tell over all the giggling.
Just mind your rubbish, is all I'm going to say about it.
@MattE.Эллен Yeah, but why? I mean, most of the people I know are Germanic or Scandinavian.
Or Gaulish.
18:17
@KitZ.Fox snobbishness?
shrugs
It reminds me though that I was going to write Hades/Persephone as a love story, after that "Heart of Pluto" writing exercise.
Nobody broods better than Hades.
And we all know how sexy that is.
Even if it's his niece...hmm. I may have to re-think that.
Is that your pickup truck? @Mr.ShinyandNew安宇
@skillpatrol no. it's from a house a few doors down on another street. But it's very close by... there were two foxes there that time, but the one with a squirrel in its mouth ran off while the other posed for pictures
18:27
I see. You never struck me as a pickup truck driver :D
heh. What do you think I drive?
Prius or a Honda.
Maybe a Toyota Corolla.
I'd say Honda accord.
not serial-killer-enough.
some kind of volvo
18:28
Ford Escape. Just like Dexter.
Huh.
I thought you'd drive something more fuel efficient.
Why a Ford Escape, you ask? Because I care nothing about cars, and my parents had one, and I drove theirs, and it was okay, so I just copied them.
"like my father before me"
@KitZ.Fox yeah... I like having cargo space.
Makes sense. We have a minivan. It's awesome.
18:31
I hope my next car will be an electric car, but we'll see.
Hey, can anyone explain to me why it's apparently some kind of sick burn that Hillary tweeted "Delete your account" at Trump?
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Me too! We're looking at a union-built Volt.
I figure there must be some kind of cultural reference there that I'm totally oblivious to.
18:52
@KitZ.Fox Was it in reply to something? I heard about it too, but didn't think anything of it
19:09
"Delete your account" wow, so witty, so insulting.
yeah. what's next? "I'm rubber, you're glue, what bounces of me sticks to you"?
That "dated" one was in response to GOP tweets that used the Doge meme in 2014. At least that comeback is funny.
it is better than "delete your account", I'll give it that. shame they've regressed in two years
19:20
Is there anything missing from the expression to have time alone? As in:
> I'm going to go to my room and have time alone with myself.
There are a dozen hits in COCA for it. I guess it's kind of an idiom.
Or maybe nothing's wrong or unusual about this use of time at all.
it seems normal to me. anything you can have, you can have alone (until someone shows me a counter example)
Except a tango. It takes two to tango.
curse you, @Mr.ShinyandNew安宇!!!!!!
Yeah, I don't know why I'm not comfortable with it.
I think the "with myself" is a bit redundant
19:29
yeah, I agree
Me too. :) Unless:
Me and myself, the two of us
Perhaps it's used for emphasis, like "last and final call"
Only with myself do I have time alone.
It was with my thoughts in the sentence that I'd heard. I misquoted.
That makes more sense :-)
I need to have time alone with my thoughts
Now I need to have time alone with my dreams.
I'm sleepier than this jaguar:
19:38
Sweet dreams :-)
See you later :)
19:55
Is there a word like "holding" which describes "a big shopping center" or "a high-class business company" ?
A holding company is a company that owns other companies' outstanding stock. The term usually refers to a company that does not produce goods or services itself; rather, its purpose is to own shares of other companies to form a corporate group. Holding companies allow the reduction of risk for the owners and can allow the ownership and control of a number of different companies. In the United States, 80% or more of stock, in voting and value, must be owned before tax consolidation benefits such as tax-free dividends can be claimed. That is, if Company A owns 80% or more of the stock of Company...
it doesn't really mean either of those two things, though
Oh I see ..
20:15
You could say that a company that is a large holding is a high class business worth a lot.
20:59
@KitZ.Fox Sinterrupting. My new word of the day.
 
2 hours later…

« first day (2038 days earlier)      last day (3182 days later) »