« first day (1944 days earlier)      last day (2976 days later) » 
00:00 - 20:0020:00 - 00:00

8:00 PM
@IͶΔ That's part of the reason I'm rooting for a more transparant migration system - no one will have to feel like their toes were stepped on and the question will still have a good chance of being answered without too much hassle for the user (and for the backend, the hassle will be there regardless)
 
@Terah Transparent as in?
And well, you're going off-road.
Migration is rare.
It's not on my checklist.
 
The problem with a downvote is that in itself, it's not constructive.
 
-18
Q: Change in the rating system of Stack Exchange

mpla_mplaWhen someone does make a question it is possible for someone to downgrade his question without further details. One important change here would be to make the downvote named (the person who performs it would be able to be seen by the according question). Also, before being able to apply the down...

^^^ An example of someone getting hurt because of spiky down arrows.
 
Anonymous
Downvotes have a bunch of uses.
 
Anonymous
For example, you might want to get a good answer listed above a bad answer.
 
8:01 PM
@Terah But making comments mandatory would not work.
 
Anonymous
Upvote good, downvote bad.
 
Exactly.
Downvote is for the content, not the person.
They just don't get that.
 
user116848
Good night guys.
 
Night
 
Good noght.
 
Anonymous
8:02 PM
I have a lot more upvotes on EL&U than downvotes. I do have a fair amount of downvotes, though. Let's see:
 
Anonymous
1,365 up, 282 down.
 
@IͶΔ Transparant as explained before - rather than downvoting a question, getting it closed, generating comments by those that have different opinions, the original question page should just mention something like 'This post was migrated <here> for ..... purposes, based on .... guidelines'. This wouldn't necessarily have to stop with ELU/ELL, but could work for any SE site.
Of course downvotes would still have their uses, but I'm now specifically discussing getting ELL more involved (raising awareness with the general public) while keeping ELU as user friendly as possible.
Night, Arrow
 
Anonymous
What are you proposing re: getting ELL more involved?
 
@IͶΔ Oh, I'm just brainstorming / thinking out loud - If comments were mandatory, the number of votes would decrease imo
 
When you're typing a question on Math SE,
sometimes the system says: your question maybe off-topic/etc.
and is likely to be closed. I don't know how exactly they do it.
 
8:07 PM
@snailboat Well, as far as I've been able to tell (this is the basis for everything that follows, so bare with me), there are a lot more question asked on ELU that really should have been asked on ELL than is the case the other way around. From what I understood, a question is first put on hold, then votes are gathered to migrate a question
 
But if it were possible on ELU, it would be nice.
 
, or the question is closed and the OP has to go to ELL and ask his question again (not necessarily being any wiser about why exactly he got down/close votes, etc)
 
@Terah Yeah, I agree the migration thingy is crappy.
 
I was thinking along the lines of moving some of that activity to the background, like the close votes, the off topic/out of scope comments that original question pages now show.
 
But migration is pretty rare.
There are a load of other things that need improvement.
There's even an eminent bug so that the OP links in comments are not linked after migration, and it's not fixed IIRC.
 
8:11 PM
Just for more mental image then (I've seen mostly 'This belongs at ELL' or 'this is off-topic' comments so far), what is the main issue when it comes to ELU questions? Like, duplicates, off topic, out of scope, etc?
 
Anonymous
@Terah The first part of that is an observation which I think is true, and by a fairly large margin. Some questions are asked on ELL that should have been asked on EL&U, but the number is much smaller than the other way around.
 
Anonymous
The second part looks to be a slight misunderstanding of how the migration system works.
 
Anonymous
Just to clarify one thing: 'on hold' is some special text that is shown for the first few days a question is in the 'closed' state. It's actually pretty much the same thing as a question being closed.
 
@snailboat I started thinking that too.. I'll go see what I can find about the process as it's implemented now.
 
Anonymous
And a question is migrated when the question is closed, if the prerequisites are met (people chose the "This question belongs on another site" close reason).
 
8:12 PM
@Mitch No, no, not Sligo. You're thinking of that cheap soft drink that's a favorite of rappers and trolls.
 
Anonymous
So it's not a two-step process.
 
Anonymous
Even moderators migrate questions as part of the closing process. If a question is 'on hold', and they want to migrate it, they have to re-open it and then close it, picking the "This question belongs on another site" close reason.
 
@snailboat I see, but it does still leave a 'closed because out of scope' like message on ELU, then, with the question more or less being duplicated on ELL?
 
Anonymous
If you look at the question we were just discussing, it looks like it was closed as off-topic because the migration was rejected on ELL.
 
K time for me to change into my horizontal state. Night all \o
 
Anonymous
8:15 PM
But if you look at a successful migration (or one that, at least, hasn't been rejected yet), you'll see a message saying the question was migrated. Also, I think regular users are automatically redirected to the new site.
 
Night INA, and thanks for your input!
 
I'm going too. 'Night.
 
Night, Fard
 
Anonymous
Well, have a good night, all you soon-to-be-sleeping people :-)
 
@snailboat I'm sure I'm just trying to reinvent the wheel - I was just thinking that the whole... presentation of the migration could be streamlined to make people more aware of why a question was migrated by removing everything that isn't relevant for the user (like the question itself excluding the title, the 'dry' close reason, comments, etc) and replacing it with a friendly message that explain the 'why' is a more constructive way
 
Anonymous
8:18 PM
@Terah I'm not a big fan of the current migration system.
 
while linking to the new page, rather than auto-direct, so that folks that end up on ELU know/learn why the question is now on another SE before consciously choosing to visit that particular site.
 
Anonymous
If you want to come up with a suggestion for how to re-design the migration system, I suggest taking some time to really look at the details of how it works. There are some rather confusing and counterintuitive details to it.
 
Anonymous
I can't give a full explanation off the top of my head.
 
@snailboat No worries - I'm too unfamiliar with it to have anything useful to say, except the feedback here from my 'user point of view' (as a new user myself)
 
Anonymous
Well, new users' input is valuable too :-)
 
8:20 PM
but I'll try to find out more about its inner workings
 
Anonymous
You can always start a discussion meta.stackexchange.com, the general meta for all SE sites.
 
Anonymous
Or, if you feel the discussion is more specific to ELL and EL&U, on one of the per-site metas.
 
That might be a discussion best saved for when I know what exactly I'm talking about ;)
 
Anonymous
Sure. But that's one of the nice things about chat. You can figure out what your ideas are while you talk :-)
 
well, true...
I did chuckle at 'gracefully' though :P
 
Anonymous
8:22 PM
It is a rather clunky process, isn't it? It works, though, at least some of the time.
 
Well, its initial description makes sense, though it appears to be a little laborious
 
Anonymous
There are various problems.
 
Anonymous
I'll give one example.
 
Anonymous
6
Q: Can "childs" ever be the plural of "child"?

FasihaIs the word childs ever used instead of children for the plural of child? And was it ever a part of standard English vocabulary but later neglected?

 
Anonymous
This question was migrated to ELL.
 
Anonymous
8:26 PM
One of the answerers, deadrat, asked for the migration to be reversed. Some other users agreed, so I helped close vote it on ELL (which rejected the migration) and then reopen it on EL&U.
 
Anonymous
But Sven Yargs' answer didn't get moved back over: ell.stackexchange.com/a/82371/230
 
Anonymous
And that's unfortunate.
 
I was just going to comment on my initial feeling toward the statement "Only questions which are less than 60 days old can be migrated; this rule applies also to moderators. Developers are able to bypass this restriction, but they only do so in very, very rare cases."
It doesn't really relate to your example, but it does boil down to having different, and over time, changing ideas of what belongs where.
 
Anonymous
@Terah Yeah, we (Japanese.SE moderators) asked the SE staff once to migrate a couple old questions that we felt were clearly off-topic but were welcome on another site. They did it for us :-) But usually it doesn't happen.
 
changing, *
But yeah, your example there is one where, depending on the asked, can be considered for both ELL and ELU.. so where draw that line?
 
Anonymous
8:29 PM
Migration isn't always appropriate. Sometimes it's better to encourage users to re-ask their questions on the target site. One reason for that is that the question might be phrased in a way that doesn't really take into account the audience on the other site.
 
Anonymous
(This is not a response to your latest message, just another observation.)
 
Anonymous
@Terah EL&U and ELL have a lot of overlap. I don't think there'll ever be a clear line dividing the two.
 
I don't think it's unfair to adhere to a sort of minimum skill list... though I doubt that considering the actual question, that would do any good.. or bring any sort of clarification on where it'd belong.
 
Anonymous
I personally have a hard time guessing whether any particular question will remain open on EL&U.
 
Anonymous
I do close vote myself, sometimes, and I try to help migrate questions I think belong on ELL. (I've been more active on ELL overall than EL&U.)
 
Anonymous
8:31 PM
So I don't know exactly what criteria the EL&U community uses.
 
Anonymous
But I think some questions are, at least, clearly across the line, even if it's not always clear.
 
Perhaps some questions could be tagged in a way that makes 'm visible on both sites
that is, if it can, is, will be answered from both ELL and ELU perspective
 
Anonymous
@Terah There are probably feature-requests for cross-posting support on meta.SE.
 
Anonymous
Right now there isn't any such support in the software.
 
Anonymous
And manually cross-posting (posting the same question to both sites) is discouraged.
 
8:33 PM
Holy crap
270 new posts
 
yeah, seen something about it, though haven't dug into it.. I'm really just brainstorming at the moment, and worry about how, if at all, it can fit in at a later time, when I have more rep and have become more familiar with the 3k+ life
@DeltaEscher We wanted to give you something to read/ignore :P
 
Anonymous
Sure, which is great. Getting 3k reputation is fun. You can vote to close and reopen :-)
 
@Terah I guess 270 posts in 1.5 hours isn't too many
Did my avatar finally change?
 
Anonymous
If you do get ideas before then, though, you can certainly advocate for them on meta at any time. You don't need a high reputation number to make yourself heard.
 
It's a cached image icon for me
 
8:35 PM
@DeltaEscher I really have no frame of reference :)
 
Not Canada
Then good
 
@DeltaEscher What I'm seeing is like a rack the optician keeps glasses on display on
 
@Terah That's a will of BRICs
AKA Kazakhstan
 
@snailboat I will, thanks for all the background info and moral support :)
 
8:47 PM
@moderator I was just going to answer on this Q english.stackexchange.com/questions/312388/… when it was closed, can it be re-opened?
 
I think what would really get me summarily shot is suggesting the broadening of ELU's scope and incorporate ELL all back into it again :P
 
Anonymous
@Terah I think that many people here would be against it, but I imagine some other people think it would have been better if the sites had never been separated.
 
Anonymous
But at this point, I think it'd be all but impossible to come up with a merged site that would satisfy everyone.
 
Anonymous
The sites have evolved to have very different standards, for one thing. Just lumping all the questions together onto one site would make lots of people very unhappy.
 
Anonymous
@Christopher Hi, I'm not a moderator here, just a regular community member. But I think that question is clearly off-topic, and you're unlikely to gather much community support for reopening it.
 
Anonymous
8:55 PM
The purpose of closing a question like that, one that's not about the English language, is to prevent people from answering.
 
Anonymous
Let me quote the moderator:
 
Anonymous
It's not an ELU question and it's not really productive to answer it. — Andrew Leach ♦ 6 hours ago
 
@snailboat There's a grain of truth in every joke, though this one was more to throw some oil on an unlit fire than anything else.. thing is.. together, the scope would be too broad, separate, the overlap is potentially so large, even when each site would be used for in scope question only, it'd still be impractical
 
Anonymous
I have a good reason. It's not a question about the English language, it's a question about a theoretical being based on a drawing by a mediaeval Italian. — Andrew Leach ♦ 6 hours ago
 
and to add yet another stack just for all those questions that don't belong in either, but still can find people willing to answer..
 
8:56 PM
@snailboat ok...just asking, but thanks anyway
 
well, before long, there'd be just that 'catch all' 3rd stack, I guess.
 
Anonymous
@Terah The split has some rather unfortunate side effects, though. Imagine, if you will, a question that has been answered well on EL&U. Now, a year later, ELL opens and someone asks the same question. What happens? Well, unfortunately there's no such thing as a cross-site duplicate, so the question gets answered anew, even if there's nothing new to add from a learner's perspective.
 
Anonymous
Will the question be answered just as well? Maybe. Maybe it'll be answered by someone finding and quoting an answer from EL&U.
 
Anonymous
But sometimes, you end up with a substantial duplicate on ELL with lower quality answers.
 
Anonymous
And now people have a chance of finding that lower quality post on ELL rather than the EL&U post when they search. That's a bad thing.
 
8:58 PM
Agree.. well.. all things considering, this is not an easy nut to crack, if it's crackable at all ^^
 
Anonymous
Now, it's not necessarily the case that a question and answer on ELL are always going to be lower quality than on EL&U. Sometimes it's the opposite. But in a way, that's the same problem. We have cross-site duplicates and no way to close them as duplicates.
 
Anonymous
Sometimes it's a good thing. Sometimes you can write an explanation that's more appropriate on one site than the other. But in my opinion there are definite downsides to splitting the two.
 
Anonymous
@Terah Yeah, I'm afraid I don't have any good solution to propose.
 
Well yeah, regardless of which site it's on, ideally a question would be asked only once
@snailboat No easy solutions to be sure...
 
Anonymous
@Terah At least one user has suggested making a third English site, but there was very little support for the idea: meta.ell.stackexchange.com/q/2746/230
 
9:03 PM
A solution will present itself, though (possibly years and years from now, born from copious amounts of mutual frustration :P)
 
Anonymous
So hopefully it won't happen.
 
@snailboat I can imagine - it's easy to imagine that 3rd site, especially if used as a catch-all for everything that doesn't stick with ELL or ELU will not do quality any favors
 
Anonymous
There's already the problem of low quality contributions that are rejected on one site ending up on the other, often to be rejected again.
 
I see it turning into what everyone seems to agree about is a bad idea - becoming Yahoo Answers.
 
Anonymous
You know, I've never looked at anything about natural language or linguistics on Yahoo! Answers.
 
Anonymous
9:06 PM
I just hear how everyone on Stack Exchange talks about the site :-)
 
I think they mean the general idea of 'just ask away, regardless of it being a valid question, or having been asked a dozen times before, or having correct answers'
 
Anonymous
Ahh.
 
Which is not to say you can't find some 'Ahaaaa' answers there.. it's just a lot of opinion, personal experience, and not much in terms of linking to proper sources.
Then there's its scope of 'everything from A to Z' :P
I'm off as well for the night - try and get the rest of this flu and cold out of my system.
Have a good evening all, and thanks again Snailboat.
 
Anonymous
Have a good night, @Terah! :-)
 
Anonymous
Feel better.
 
9:13 PM
Tnx, later!
 
 
3 hours later…
11:57 PM
@MετάEd no no not ... Diet Faygo? Orange.Crush? A&W Cream Soda? Butterbeer from Hogsmeade Inn (which tastes uncannily like cream soda)?
 
@Mitch You might have gotten it. Hard to tell with all those names there.
 
Hedging my bets
If you can say that.
Wait...trolls can drink soda?
 
00:00 - 20:0020:00 - 00:00

« first day (1944 days earlier)      last day (2976 days later) »