Morning everyone- just a quick question before I go back to bed and sweat this flu out: An OP seems to have really done her best to edit and clarify her question. While it may technically still be out of scope for ELU (or not, since these questions are abundant here :P), I'm wondering how to best proceed to get a 'On Hold' lifted.
I flagged it for moderator intervention and provided details to support my request to lift the [On Hold], but someone, it doesn't seem that's what the Flagging process is for ^^
@Cerberus There's always the benefit of the doubt for older people who may have a set pattern and not realize or be familiar with the newer usage.
Someone who uses 'he' for an unknown person isn't necessarily sexist, it may be their language culture. Their use of 'he' I consider nowadays to be a bit sexist ('How could you assume the doctor is male?')'. But 'using' isn't 'is'. You can do something 'Xish' but that doesn't make you be Xish through and through. But doing it over and over in various similar corroborating ways may make it look a lot like you are Xish.
@JustynaNogala It seems like a figurative use of the word "authority". It might mean the person's words carry power because the audience knows the person is knowledgeable. Or it might mean the person's words carry power because the person has a powerful way of speaking that influences the audience emotionally. Either way it is about power.
@MετάEd Whoa whoa whoa. I think I can make it all simpler for you. Just make one big check instead of all those many small ones. Then send to me, I'll take care of the rest for you.