« first day (1709 days earlier)      last day (3508 days later) » 

13:01
@RegDwigнt I'm here to contest the closure of my question. I bring (boring) facts to do so
Oh, it's closed.
I didn't know that.
@RegDwigнt it's a source for wikitionary, it's not a random google result
@Spork You buried the lede.
A lead, or lede, paragraph in literature is the opening paragraph of an article, essay, news story or book chapter. Often called the lead, it usually occurs together with the headline or title. It precedes the main body of the article, and it gives the reader the main idea of the story. In both spellings, the word rhymes with the word need. == Spelling == In the journalism industry's news style, particularly in the United States, the term is often spelled "lede", to differentiate it from the metal lead (pronounced led), which was used in hot metal typesetting. This spelling may be found in online...
I don't know what that means, so I may end up learning something today
@Spork in my capacity as a former Wiktionary bureaucrat, I have to point out that "source for wiktionary" and "random google result" are on pretty much every synonym list ever. And certainly on Lee's Complete List.
So anyways. Is there a meta question about this yet?
13:03
@Spork In journalese it means you introduced the real subject of your story far along in the telling of it.
@RegDwigнt that makes full sense ;) but the 'authority' of wiki* was brought forth by @Robusto, not me.
@Robusto I learned something today. So you're saying the title is a little too late to introduce the main topic, then?
@Spork What does the title have to do with it? I'm talking about the lede. I'm talking about you coming into this chat with your agenda. Apparently you assume everything you've ever said is germane to this chat discussion.
I think it's mostly that the former title was too difficult. I reworded it. The upvoted wrong answer is still wrong, so no big deal for the answerers.
Depends on the title, really. And the context. Just like with everything else in language.
See, that is one title that was five centuries too early to introduce its topic.
1. You enter chat
2. You rail about lists of oxymorons
3. Back and forth
4. You say what you're really here to talk about is the closing of your question

That is burying the lede.
13:06
@Robusto well, as I introduced the topic in the title, the lede seems to have gotten a shallow grave
ohhh, I thought you meant in the question itself
@Spork There is no "title" in this chatroom for what you are talking about.
To his defense, absolutely any agenda or lack thereof is germane to this room because see room description.
ooh nice extension of metaphor.
my agenda is that there is no agenda
But I do endorse moving this to a meta question, because there it can have a happier home.
Or not.
13:08
I mean I honestly don't care if the question is open or not, the reason I'm here is because there was discussion about my question that could not be done through question comments. This is a result of it being closed, but I'm not here to open it necessarily.
[can't type today]
Also that you must not force an agenda
@Robusto That's the beauty of meta. Momma always said, it is like a box of chocolates.
@Spork And all I did was post my opinion about the qualification of "pretty ugly" as an oxymoron, and include a little history of how your term was used humorously. Then suddenly you start casting me as a poster boy for prescriptivism.
also that 'because most/all lists include an item makes it so' is not descriptivism, it's everybody being wrong. lists are not languages
13:09
@Robusto you're confusing people
not all low-rep users are the same
@RegDwigнt fattening
I demand all poster boys be replaced with pinup girls.
@Spork That makes two of us.
And I demand it now.
Who are "people" and what is "confusing"?
@Spork Now I really have no idea what your point is.
13:10
Welcome to the Incomprehensible Room.
I'll meet you half way and replace poster boys with pinup kittens
people -> me and ben hocking, confusing -> mixing them up
I really think we should put the sign back up.
@RegDwigнt and favorite son with black sheep
@MattE.Эллен How about kitten videos? Would that help?
@Spork nah don't pay attention to me, I'm writing my usual Ulysses.
Also, you sure that Merriam-Webster are aware of your definition of "people"?
room topic changed to English Language & Usage: The Incomprehensible Room [everyone-talks-at-once]
@Robusto I never accused you of anything but petty/nonconstructive comments
@MattE.Эллен Ha!! You like puppies instead of kittens! Admit it! I've caught you in your nefarious lie of a world view!!
I want to accuse @Rob of petty comments, too.
yesterday, by Robusto
Petty cash is the money that Tom Petty makes for performing. Duh.
Accusation complete.
13:12
@Spork Hahaha, and that is your defense? That you belittled me? My, you do know how to win people to a point of view, don't you?
I belittled you?
@Mitch I don't know what you're talking about
Okay now can everyone just calm down and talk about Merkel again. Please.
She was cruel to a refugee girl.
31
Q: How to prevent quick outdation of questions?

Aditya SomaniIf we were to make a SE on Hardware Recommendations, most of the questions which would end up here will get outdated very quickly. It's possible to also encounter questions such as: Gaming Computer Configuration under $1000? MacBook Pro graphics card suggestion? I think we should find a way t...

I never want to win people to a point of view, I want to learn from theirs. I had expected to learn something from those who see 'pretty ugly' as definitely not-an-oxymoron, not convince the interwebs.
13:14
@MattE.Эллен don't twist my words. You claimed that... searches for evidence
I'm fairly sure outdation isn't a word (and, of course, it is an Indian writing).
also authorities dispatched prophylactically
What would be a suitable replacement? Outdating?
@Mitch (quickly edits away the evidence)
Merkin always heightens the tone of the conversation.
13:14
Don't give the stormtroopers a hard time, they're just doing their job.
@Spork I'm sure there are many lists of definitions for that word that you could find on the web.
@FaheemMitha Is the alternative going to the prom with your sister or cousin?
@FaheemMitha And?
So anyway. In the spirit of actually providing an on-topic comment for once: I am one of those who see 'pretty ugly' as definitely not-an-oxymoron. That said, I can't promise you can expect to learn anything from me. Other than that 'pretty ugly' as definitely not-an-oxymoron, that is.
@tchrist So, what is a suitable replacement?
Outdating?
13:16
TIL that Reg thinks that... of forget it.
@Mitch That is allowed only with your cousin-sister alone, not also with her sister-cousin.
I expected english.SE to be more enlightening than 'the web', as the other *.SE sites are. But hey, maybe your insinuation that the rest of the web contains more useful information is true.
@FaheemMitha expiration?
@Spork Again, you're shifting your focus. Which is it? You want to learn, you want to argue for a point of view, you want to find balm for the wounds we inflicted on you, you want to show that pretty ugly is found in some lists? What?
de-in-halation?
13:16
/me wonders if there is an English Language and Usage where people actually discuss English Language and Usage...
@FaheemMitha ”How to prevent questions from quickly becoming outdated?”
@tchrist Sounds good. Thank you.
@FaheemMitha ha ha, for once, we actually are.
Do you want me to credit you? I'll add a comment.
@Spork nah, you've only talked to like ten people here by now. And like a hundred on the Internet. That's not a representative enough sample to jump to conclusions.
13:17
@Robusto why would you argue for a point if not to learn?
To win!
@Spork Sheer bloody mindedness.
@Spork Wut?
@Spork have you ever seen a politician?
Their whole job description is "argue for points to not learn".
It's a very vast group of people, too!
@RegDwigнt it actually is :) I just may be incorrect in my conclusion, but luckily that conclusion is crowd-sourced, and there will be enough other users for english.SE to reach a fair conclusion in that respect
13:19
You overestimate the abilities of crowd-sourcing.
@RegDwigнt hahah, touché
In "pretty ugly", pretty is used as a modifier. Meaning "very", approximately.
thank you @FaheemMitha
@Spork Oft evil will shall evil mar.
that was funny
13:19
Having said that, it's a combination I would hesitate to use.
@FaheemMitha Technically, it’s an intensifier.
@tchrist I stand corrected. Thank you.
@Spork I'm just saying, when I first came here, it took me three days to see that ELU was superior to things I had seen before, but it's been taking me five years to try and understand how or why, and I'm still stuck at the "try" part.
The point is, however many lists include "pretty ugly" as an oxymoron, pretty does not mean beautiful in the expression, and so it is merely a modifier that has no antithetical relation to ugly.
the etymology for pretty is actually [ugh] interesting
13:20
@Robusto Yes, those lists are wrong.
@Spork Do tell.
@RegDwigнt Because the and bothers you? :)
@tchrist Careful, @Spork is going to accuse you of being a prescriptivist.
I use "pretty" in that sense a fair amount, but it is a somewhat weird usage, admittedly.
@Robusto and no definition of oxymoron actually requires for the meaning of the lemmas within the sentence to be the ones actually opposite
13:21
@Robusto Congrats (early) on getting a silver for the dog-love question. Which @MattE.Эллен is now a known member
Though probably no weirder than much of English.
Apr 16 '11 at 22:10, by RegDwight
That's a reference only @Vitaly will fully appreciate. There's a Russian children's verse that goes, "A and B sat on the chimney top. A fell down, B disappeared, who's left?"
@Mitch Cómo?
I've also never in my life accused anyone of being prescriptivist.
@Mitch it's not that I don't love dogs. I like kittens more than puppies
13:22
22
A: Is 'I f*cked the dog' an actual idiom and are there alternatives

Robusto"Fuck the dog" (or its milder variant, "screw the pooch") comes from an old joke. There are various versions, but a drunk man ends up shooting the wife and screwing the pooch (instead of the other way around). Reddit It is certainly not about idleness, but epic failure to get a sequence r...

kittens are demonstrably cuter
@Spork How dare you!
@MattE.Эллен Oh
@Mitch Silver? How so?
@Robusto it's the same people that call eye rhymes rhymes. Parental advisory.
@MattE.Эллен Then, with all due respect, why did you choose pinup puppies rather than pinup kittens as is traditional? Are you some kind of dog-lover?
13:23
@Spork okay, serious question now. How is such a definition of an oxymoron useful at all?
@Mitch alliteration
@MattE.Эллен Well played
@Spork Yes. And so if you remove the qualification for an oxymoron to have antithetical terms, then all two-word terms are potential oxymora.
@RegDwigнt it is useful as it seems to be the definition actually employed by people
@RegDwigнt They used to be rhymes. In another age and universe.
13:25
@Spork I don't know that they are employing it. If the words involved don't have to be opposites, then that definition matches all combinations of all words in all languages.
My point exactly.
@Spork the definition is to use the two words canonical meanings in isolation?
@RegDwigнt I agree it isn't logically sound or amazing, but language is used by people, and the experience of contradiction in our brain is what makes it an oxymoron, which is what all the lists reflect.
When everything is an oxymoron, nothing is. Just like when everyone is beautiful, no one is.
@Spork Ok, now you're just dieseling.
13:26
@Spork yes I know, there are similar definitions of things like "word" or "sentence" that I find equally useless because, well, they are.
@RegDwigнt Those would be the folks who couldn’t pull out the rime of a word if an albatross hung around their neck.
And for the record, I initially felt like 'pretty ugly' is NOT an oxymoron, hence I was taken aback by @BenHocking 's comment to the 'certainly possible' question. I decided I wanted to find out if it is an oxymoron, so I made a question on english.SE. Seemed appropriate.
@Robusto also, i expect that you'l get a silver for your answer because it's multicollider fodder
Been that for days, so far no silver.
I've still not checked the question. But I doubt it's anywhere as sparkling as this discussion.
13:27
Oxysoft: What happens when sophomores and oxymorons collide, dully.
Sep 12 '12 at 14:01, by ЯegDwight
When higs collide, like you and I, no shadows block the Sun.
@RegDwigнt it isn't, anymore.. I had to dumb it down.
Evolution at work.
the fitness function of this sub-site is definitely an intersting one. Post an answer with a singular source that contradicts your answer -> get upvoted.
@RegDwigнt You’ll’ve not learned your lesson from Through a Glass Darkly then.
13:29
@Robusto two days, and two away
I think that if you say that "pretty ugly" is an oxymoron then you have to say "open container" is, too.
and things just start to get silly
Yeah I think by now there are like 20k people with the privilege to vote. But the only people who can tell English from english are in this room not voting.
Also, did your question get on the MultiCollider by any chance?
@MattE.Эллен I'm not laughing.
That would explain any amount of silliness you can imagine, and beyond.
Is multicollider the term you use for the abomination that is the "Hot questions" section?
13:31
@Mitch not even a forced, hollow laugh of desolation?
Jaw pinned shut from surgery after disturbing deli equipment accident. laughing with eyes
0
A: Colloquial meaning of 'exponential decrease'

user162097The fall in the number of fish in the lake has been snowballing.

Wut? How is that an answer to anything?
> Roll roll roll a troll,
gently down the the hill:
Merrily merrily merrily merrily,
Here comes another shill.
@tchrist I keep hearing about that glass darkly thing. I've still not checked out what it even is.
The closest I ever came to checking out Glass Darkly was this:
Which is to say, not too very close at all.
@Spork Yes. or at least I learned that descriptively following other people usage. I like 'hot question list' better now that I've heard it for the first time.
@Robusto snowballs are obviously exponential. duh
13:33
@Robusto it is an answer to the question "Has the fall in the number of fish in the lake been snowballing?" Also, to "Who is Putin?"
Seeing life through a glass darkly is more tenebrous than la vie en rose.
Unless you have a lot of roses.
Mar 13 '13 at 1:03, by RegDwighт
Sub umbra alarum tuarum Iehova.
semper ubi sub ubi
Mixed metaphors are the Swiss Army Knife of ELU answers, snowballing like dragonfire in the bowling alley of Life.
13:34
What's Kirstie Alley to do with this?
Thats not a metaphor, that's a metabarf
So. Thor, Vör, and Metaphor walk into a bar.
> Bright autumn fish
Build mighty snow castles
Of captured snowballs.
in ELL's Cabin, 7 mins ago, by Pandya
Free vs Open : exact meaning
in ELL's Cabin, 2 mins ago, by Pandya
Freedom vs Openness
@RegDwigнt I hate it when he spakes that way.
@Pandya Cheap shots are always easily had at an open bar.
Comparing apples and avarice.
13:39
James Cameron's Avarice was epic.
Everyone needs a Varys on his side.
Getting dotty.
Thanks for all the fisheses.
@RegDwigнt btw, English directory suggestion for that? (EN->EN)
ok
13:46
ok?
How can you be so sure? puppy lover.
if you say so, kitten objectifier
14:04
It's not right. But it's ok.
the theme tune to all SWRs
To all of them, you say?
ALL OF THEM
Well rats. There goes my hope of distinguishing them by name or tune.
And just so you know, I'm not paid enough to distinguish them by smell.
perhaps if you were paid less...
14:13
... we'd enter the realm of imaginary numbers.
Alas, my boss is determined to not let you enter it.
I imagine all sorts of numbers
His name is Gandalf. He is determined a lot.
Bob Gandalf
> Statisticians have computed that the MH17 crash claimed a bigger share of the Dutch population than 9/11 did in the US.
Well no shit Sherlock. You needed "statisticians" to "compute" that for you?
And then it goes on for four friggin paragraphs explaining the math.
Jesus Christ.
This humanity is lost. Propose another.
I propose a humanity where old people stop liking photos of cats
and this makes them more creative
14:23
I dunno. Liking photos of cats does seem to be more creative than old people's pastimes from yesteryear. Like, for example, being dead all of the time.
don't get me wrong, I don't think old people need to stop liking photos of cats, as humanity is now. Right now photos of cats are the life blood of our culture
but a new humanity, where cat photos were only appealing to younger folk, that's the way of the future
ankh more cat
Civilizations using cats for life blood have gone extinct before. When will we learn? WHEN?
I just don't know. I'm a software developer, Jim, not a futurist, damnit
14:28
Futur ist, Futur war, Futur wird immer gewesen sein.
Haute Future
@MattE.Эллен whereas puppies are for old people, to pull them out of burning buildings.
right at the moment of tenderness and flavor.
@Mitch I cannot speculate on the future of puppies. Who knows if they have a place in the cat world order
@MattE.Эллен Futurkampf
@MattE.Эллен as playthings, to prevent from going through doorways. or snacks
14:43
Doorway is such a retarded word.
So is it a way or is there a door? Make your mind up, English.
I think doorway should be put on the list of all oxymorons.
I think night owl should. Time and animals are opposites
Meanwhile Germany sets another world record. Just like that:
> 218000 — never before had more German catholics left the church in a single year.
is this because the pope believes in climate change?
No, it's because the German states believes in church tax.
Seriously.
why would that encourage people to leave?
they're taxing the church not the goers?
or is it the other way around?
14:52
@MattE.Эллен I have no idea. I do not know that there's a reason. Could be a simple axiom of life.
If the pope (or Mohammed) says, "fuck with condom bad, fuck three year old without condom good", people are like "oh yeah, right on, you're the man". If the pope (or Mohammed) says "keep money bad, give money good", people are like "fuck you pope (or Mohammed)".
It is a mystery of life that can only succumb to Sir Richard Attenborough.
Alas, he takes his time uploading the research to YouTube.
yeah. I guess if the church wasn't really doing anything for them, why pay for it?
Franz-Peter Tebartz-van Elst (born 20 November 1959) is a German prelate of the Catholic Church and theologian. He was a vicar and an auxiliary bishop in Münster before becoming the Bishop of Limburg in January 2008. On 23 October 2013, he was suspended by the Vatican from the exercise of his episcopal office. The reasons have not been specified, but are believed related to the controversies on his expenses which earned him the nicknames "gold-plated bishop" and "bishop of bling" in the world press, and also to his having settled a perjury case for €20,000. On 26 March 2014, Pope Francis accepted...
Well they've been doing something for someone. You must give them that.
> In October 2013 the German press called for Tebartz-van Elst to resign after the building costs of the Limburg bishop's residence topped €31 million. The bishop's private apartment included a "$20,000 bathtub, $500,000 of built-in closets, and a $35,000 conference table."
> When the building complex opened on 29 June 2013, the diocese announced that the final "all-in"-costs would be €9,850,000. It changed that number just one day later, after an internal audit committee complained that the number was totally unrealistic.
@RegDwigнt yeah. that's a nice deal if you can get it
15:00
> With liability for damage to neighboring buildings included, the estimated cost was eventually updated to €40 million.
only €40 million? have two!
Hi all :-)
@MattE.Эллен right on, and now imagine getting two for each of the 218000 would-be catholics. I say, good thing they left!
Now a true Christian can expect to get 2.1, or even 2.3!
@BenHocking Good about about pretty ugly.
15:11
And thus it happened that Cerberus conversed in indecipherable fragments.
@RegDwigнt Curious. Was the building constructed around the cable, or was the cable drilled through the building?
That is the best thing about Russia: you will never know. There are no witnesses. And your best working theory is that both the building and the powerline, start to finish, were put in place simultaneously.
Or maybe they used the powerline to transport the building there. Drill a hole in it, hang it on the wire, and with a gentle push it will travel the 1352 verst to its designated destination.
The Germans and the Chinese do that with trains, so why not with buildings.
16:04
@Cerberus Wut?
@RegDwigнt I spell werst.
@Robusto Ugh, my typical typo.
I don't remember which noun should replace the first about.
Just pick any noun. It's like "mad libs"
Who is that?
I've just flashed a new ROM onto my G2.
It seems to be smoother than stock.
I am jealous.
Mad Libs is a phrasal template word game where one player prompts others for a list of words to substitute for blanks in a story, before reading the – often comical or nonsensical – story aloud. The game is frequently played as a party game or as a pastime. The game was invented in the United States, and more than 110 million copies of Mad Libs books have been sold since the series was first published in 1958. == History == Mad Libs was invented in 1953 by Leonard Stern and Roger Price. Stern and Price co-created the game, but couldn't agree on a name for their invention. No name was chosen until...
16:08
The worst part of having a phone contract is not being able to root the phone.
@Robusto how does that stop you?
Well, laziness and not wanting the hassle are things that stop me.
Those don't seem related to the phone contract
In fact, wouldn't the contract simply prevent you from cancelling the service without paying a fee?
You could smash your phone, buy a different phone, and they wouldn't even notice or care.
Don't argue with me. I am too lazy to argue back.
16:10
Thing is, if I fuck up the rooting then I have no recourse.
Also it's an unholy pain to reinstall all my apps, etc., etc.
Well, you have the exact same recourse with/without a contract.
you may be able to root without wiping.
you can't install a ROM without wiping though.
16:24
@MattE.Эллен You pay extra tax to the government for that church if you elect to do so (or don't say no). Therefore people choose to say no. That's cash in your pocket that God won't be giving you (he's kinda cheap that way)
@Mitch I see. interesting
@RegDwigнt Oh. That's different. I'd totally pay for that guy to have a conference table instead of me.
@MattE.Эллен I know. messed up. it's like they're trying to drive people to godlessness. Also removal of TVs. There's a tax on TV sets. Those wacky Germans!
@Mitch yeah! what kind of nation would make you pay the government money to receive TV broadcasts...
(Hides TV license under doormat)
wait... in England too?
In the US they just broadcast blipverts which intoxicate you to buy stuff from people you don't know. Corporate welfare via public service annonucements!
@Mitch since forever!
I don't actually have a license, because I don't have a TV, but I still get mail from the TV licensing authority every month asking me to buy a license.
I could explain to them, but it's less effort to throw away a letter
16:35
You don't have a TV?
You've never had one?
@MattE.Эллен You could just let the letter sit there
But then staring at it would take energy
@skillpatrol since 2010
an established...establishment
@Mitch plus I could slip on it and break my back. health and safety first
Heroin free since ... checks watch
@MattE.Эллен IKR! especially the glossy pictures
and perfume
@MattE.Эллен do they have 'inspectors' that come around and check if you have a TV screen or not?
16:43
@MattE.Эллен But you have free healthcare!
@Mitch so, you can own a TV, so long as your aerial is not plugged in to it. however, since pretty much every house has an aerial, it's difficult to prove that you don't use your TV to receive broadcasts, unless you blank off your aerial sockets. And, yes, there are inspectors that come round, but you're not obliged to let them in
It's not the back breaking part that's so bad, it's the lines at 'broken back dance-offs' that are the worst
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 true! in fact, I'll go and break my back right now, to get my money's worth!
@MattE.Эллен Police state!
@MattE.Эллен That's funny (or not funny) because in fact, quitting smoker younger actually increases the amount of health care dollars spent on you (because you live longer, and therefore have even more expensive illnesses awaiting you that dying from smoking avoids.
Well, I've heard. I haven't experienced that yet myself.
maybe, but I'm not sure that works out, since the diseases that smoking causes are pretty expensive to treat (e.g. cancer) so if you live longer do you get cancer more often?
16:51
Woot, I smoked when I was young?
And drank and etc :P
@skillpatrol Oh no, that's the worst! The earlier you quit, the even longer that you'll live and incur even higher health care costs. But on the bright side, you'll have that much longer to annoy the younger generations with stories of yelling at them to get off your lawn.
@MattE.Эллен I on;y know the anecdote without any supporting references/links. So it could obviously be very misleading or remembered wrong. I think it's one of those freakonomics things that sounds cool because it is so mind bending but in the end doesn't make sense, because you're not going to take up smoking because of it.

« first day (1709 days earlier)      last day (3508 days later) »