« first day (1610 days earlier)      last day (3607 days later) » 

18:00
Look how nicely the senate is divided.
The Brits and their stupid bipartisan system don't get how good this is.
Less cronyism, more actual debate and more serious options to vote for, more different perspectives.
18:37
> rakehelly
18:51
> gesundheit
19:12
@Rob if you have time flame with anger. Be nitty, I expect everything to be shit.
19:33
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Did you know that word?
@Cerberus which, gesundheit? It's what you say when people sneeze
Rakehelly.
I know German.
@Cerberus nope, never encountered it
@Cerberus It's an English word.
19:34
Then I am not crazy.
@Cerberus now now, let's not say things we can't take back.
You know it is German word, right?
@Cerberus there IS a German word that is a homonym but it's not really the same word.
And you know I know German, right?
And English?
So what are the chances that I would not know it?
Never said you wouldn't know it
19:36
And what are the chances of your not knowing a word that you have used yourself?
@Cerberus Well, as to that, lots of people use words they don't understand
I would not presume to accuse you of that.
Not now anyway.
I am careful, in this room especially, not to use a word unless I'm 99.999% certain of its meaning.
Good.
I've written stuff, then looked up definitions, then clicked "send"
19:38
Haha we all do that.
but sometimes I will use words I don't know the meaning of if it's not important.
People who never do that are...
but I went almost my whole life using the word gesundheit without knowing its German meaning.
Odd.
I'm sure if you asked 100 English speakers most of them wouldn't know.
it's just a thing you say.
19:40
Probably related to sane.
It sounds rather German.
But now I must forage.
Oh, they'd know it was German. But not what it means in German.
That makes more sense.
Later!
s/was/was from/
You lose.
Bye!
20:00
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 You admitted it is a German word.
20:16
@Cerberus I admitted it was a German word :p
Much like the German word Handy is not the same as the English word handy
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Hah, no, that was merely the past tense of subordination.
20:52
@Cerberus I look up the word, say 'oh shit', then cancel. Just think of all the things I haven't sent
@Mitch Same here!
I was going to say pachycephalosaurus, but then...
@Cerberus I've never heard that word before. But looking it up, it's the same as rake (the bro, not the lawn implement)
@Cerberus I've meant that word everytime I've used it. and correctly too
@Cerberus wait, I thought they were multiparty too, what with their liberal democrats and um some other two parties like maybe ... BNP? or is that India?
@Mitch Yeah, but I wouldn't have guessed that it was the same word, even though Dutch has rekel.
@Mitch You big lizard.
@Cerberus well, when running from one.
@Mitch Yes, they are, but in practice they have two huge parties and a few tiny ones. Before the current government, they never had coalition governments: they always had absolute majorities.
@Mitch Mm I don't think a pachycephalosaurus would attack you. They eat plants.
20:58
@Cerberus words can be almost identical sounding and they still aren't perceived as even similar.
Yes!
like... thinking of examples
Especially if you perceive different morphemes.
slag and slug
Mm in Dutch, both are slak (ish), so...
21:00
you mean the snail without a shell and the leftovers from iron smelting?
Or, wait.
Yes, I did.
Metalworking residue is slakken, and snails+slugs are slakken.
ok lay and lie are totally confused so that's an example of the opposite.
but back to the matter at hand...
It always surprises me how educated speakers confuse those in English.
In Dutch, they are just as confusing (liggen v. leggen), but it is typically lower class to confuse them.
Leg, legde, gelegd; lig, lag, gelegen.
German the same (confusion). All we need now is a Scandinavian
Right.
Probably similar...
The only thing is that Dutch has no two forms that are the same from both paradigms, unlike English lay/lay.
21:03
but here is my point about even subtle differences make things hard to know they are the same...
(assume copious examples already discussed)
OK OK.
I agree.
even when the sound is identical, it can be hard to tell that two words are the same.
that is even when there is polysemy (lots of dictionary entries for the same 'word'), if they two 'words' (spelled and sounded the same) appear in two different contexts, then it's hard to tell that they are different.
rake and rake is an example (not the best one). at first hearing you want to make a pun. but after you get used to it, they are two totally different words (being cognate is not necessary for this situation)
Do you know what I mean? Or does that just sound too weird?
looking at the word/spelling, it is easy to see that they are identical, but when used in context, there is no question - the two different meanings would never be confused.
so they really are two different things altogether.
I need more slightly differently spelled words... to make the case
21:31
@Mitch Yes, I get it.
And I recognise it, although it depends on context.
Because I believe there is also always a contrary stream in your subconscious that makes it think of vaguely similar sounding words when we hear or utter a certain word.
Which is why you will often hear people use a similar word in a totally unrelated conversation when they are standing next to your conversation at a party or something.
You know what I mean?
They will also use it in a totally different sentence with a different meaning, even.
Related to the general phenomenon of priming, no doubt.
 
2 hours later…
23:09
Rob, you up for a noob question?
23:53
solved it
@JohanLarsson What was it?

« first day (1610 days earlier)      last day (3607 days later) »