Guys, I'm planning to go through the following book: http://www.amazon.com/Word-Power-Made-Norman-Lewis/dp/067174190X
I'm going to take IELTS to score overall band-score 8, would you recommend the book to me?
I've already bought the book because it wasn't too expensive at the book-store. I was solving first few pages of questions in the book and found that they are little bit challenging for me.
@Robusto Lot's of triangle proofs (side-angle-side etc), but no sine cosine tangent stuff, no 'prove sine 2 theta = 2 sin theta cos theta' or cos 30 = sqrt(3)/2
I will be meeting my prof next week to tell him about my problems and my plans and see what he says. I met one of them last year, and cancelled another three because I was too unwell to go out.
@MattЭллен It's good to get downvotes. Once you get them, you no longer fear them.
@MattЭллен I don't know. From day one, I am already prepared for the worst. Like I said, I might never get well or go to grad school. But I will give myself another 6 more years to achieve that.
Anyway, I am particularly worried that I might not be able to resolve certain OCD themes. These involve other people and I don't know how they will react when I try to resolve them. They may act in ways which prevent me from resolving them.
@MattЭллен Yes, I try to have some hope in my heart.
If you drag yourself up three steps and fall down two, you are still one step ahead of where you started from. Plus you can learn what to do differently next time. @JasperLoy defeat is not falling down. Defeat is not trying to get back up.
You must use those numbers, and in that order, until you get the number you need. If you need any of the other numbers, so anything starting with 2/3/6/7/8, you use multiples of the highest number possible that starts with 1. So the basic building blocks are the numbers I gave above; you have to use addition or multiplication based on those: no subtraction.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 I am not even sure about that. If you can be stupid enough to take your ID to a shootout, then you can be stupid enough to not burn a piece of paper. Or to make over 9000 typos in a three-word message rendering it unreadable to anyone.
So while the UK's PM is trying to make a law requiring back doors in all encryption, that demonstrably does absolutely nothing to help prevent, say, criminals from communicating securely.
without even computers
@RegDwigнt Nah, typos are just typos.
each character is decrypted individually, so a typo doesn't make the rest of the message garbage.
So when lawmakers try to "improve security" by weakening encryption, all they really do is reduce security, because it's been trivial for decades for people to communicate securely.
@RegDwigнt yeah "I don't know how to edit a video, so I'm going to make copies of my OTP which is actually a terrible thing to do"
Lawmakers won't give a shit. For people who know about encryption, it will be pointless blather. For people who know nothing about encryption, it will be well over their head.
@RegDwigнt All it takes is for the message to get out "What you're asking for is stupid AND impossible", and then if enough people repeat it, he might understand that what he's asking for is not only stupid, but impossible.
You know, when Mr Shiny said "a really simple video explaining why laws can't prevent people from communicating privately", I was expecting to see two people just talking in person with no frigging app in-between.
@MattЭллен Nice. That'll work. I'll need a reference from him though for the next landlord. Next problem for the theory of everything...finding current disgruntled landlords phone number.
I don't think you can hold the PM to intelligence about technical things.
"even a child could do it" - You know why only children can fix the time on the video player? because they have all t time in the world to mess around with the machine.
@MattЭллен He has 'social' intelligence and luck in getting people to vote for him.
There was some Kurt Vonnegut story about how the president was a rotating 2 year random assignment of the population so that it wouldn't be getting people who actually wanted it.
@MattЭллен So basically asking what would be plausible given some bizarrely implausible premise like 'magic exists' or 'pi = 3' or 'If only that chick really liked me'
I think it's al about confidence...make up your rules and stick with them. Or change them if it doesn't suit the story. but be confident. "Faster-than-light speed is totally impossible. So effing what! Go with it!"
Yeah I've posted a few times. It's largely speculative. Things like, "In a world where people can switch freely between physical gender, what would happen to sexuality, gender identity, etc?" I assume it's about some story the OP is writing, looking for different possible plot points and trying to remain "believable".
I've talked to people for a job offer (secludit), the job will deal with Python code, and I'm not an expert in Python, although I find it's a nice language
The part of job I'll start with is a sort of dropbox/google drive, in Python, to sync files in a cloud storage
So I'm a bit troubled, waiting for their reply also, if they say yes, should I accept or not
Mainly I like Python, but there are few things I dislike, like the "**" operator for powers, the j variable for the complex number instead of i, etc...
@Barmar: I would if they involved an analysis based on Latin grammar. Also, the ones you mention are way more frequently encountered than datum non concessum. — Robusto51 secs ago