« first day (1398 days earlier)      last day (3821 days later) » 

00:00
See what I mean now?
I didn’t understand what was controversial about the thumbnail that I thought was all that was there.
00:17
Have they never watched the discovery channel?
00:45
@tchrist seriously? Someone complained? Not only is it not shocking in the first place, when you actually do manage to see the thing it is the only part of the animal that is actually red!
@terdon Yes, someone complained. I thought they were being childish. But I never saw what they apparently saw, either.
@IceBoy The dingo stole my pickie!
Yeah, I found the meta Q. I'm sorry but I find the whole thing hilarious. People really will take offense at anything.
At least the OP was both polite and restrained. I love your disclaimer about sheltered children though. Made me chuckle.
Lol @tchrist :D
Chuckling is good.
The best medicine.
00:55
Maybe it was a dik-dik not a dingo.
Perhaps.
@terdon Shock and awe.
Indeed. Shame there were no sheep there, you could have gotten in a pun about shock and ewe.
I think the Brits don’t get ewwwwwwwwww.
21
Q: Eww! Has it crossed the pond yet?

Mari-Lou AI hear eww (sometimes spelt as ew) fairly regularly on American sitcoms, usually uttered by a scatterbrained beautiful blonde girl when she sees or hears something disgusting. I don't recall it ever being said when I was a child living in London, in the 70s it was common to utter yuck or ugh, the...

 
1 hour later…
02:03
I'm afraid this doesn't answer my question, which originally was: "Is it grammatical in certain regions of the UK to use "too" instead of "either"? — Luis 2 hours ago
Then why did you add the part about "Imagine"? You should have left that out if it had no bearing on your question, or else tied up the relationship better. — Robusto 2 mins ago
We forget that people who ask dumb questions about English may not necessarily express themselves all that well.
02:20
> Imagine that there’s no countries, and imagine that there’s nothing to kill or die for, and also imagine that there’s no religion too.
No negative-polarity there. Imagine X and Y and also Z too.
Not sure why he ever thought it was wrong.
The negative polarity would trigger an either only if it began Don’t imagine . . .
user116848
@tchrist Oh, JOHN LENNON's song. Although a very old song for me but I liked it when I heard it :-)
user116848
I don't get your "Don't imagine" part though :)
02:35
VERB X and Y and Z, too.
do not VERB X or Y or Z, either.
It is a very old song for EVERYONE.
 
2 hours later…
04:08
Well, I think a certain experiment has run its course long enough to present results.
I wanted to find out to what degree “naughty” words in titles attracted views.
I intentionally masked shag in an ambiguous fashion so that its sexual connotation would not be immediately apparent compared with its scatological one.
And look at the views results: the titles with the sex-related naughty word in the actual title all drew many more views than it has.
@KitFox This is interesting.
This suggests, to me at least, that the title can prove a view-attractor if it contains a “wicked” word in a way that if it is masked off, it does not.
Hm, I seem to have discovered an unrevealed UI change. Checking through meta now.
Darn, not testable.
04:41
> 2014-09-08: "Too minor" was removed of the suggested edits reject reasons list.
2014-09-05: Suggested edit review offers a new button “Reject and Edit”.
Well, that wasn’t what I was looking for, but interesting nevertheless.
04:51
Completely different question: What is the bookmark facility in chat good for?
05:14
Hi guys
good morning
"Her spouse is a Software Engineer and they have 3 year old twin boys"
^ Is this sentence correct?
05:41
@Mr_Green Not especially.
> Her spouse is a software engineer, and they have three-year-old twin boys.
06:02
@tchrist ok thanks..
@tchrist It is good for bookmarking a conversation you find important.
 
3 hours later…
hey
hey
09:23
hey, hello everyone.
hey hey hey
09:35
@AndrewLeach I'm having a crisis of analysis: It what the subject or object in "What is a car?"
does that have an inversion of subject and object?
Or @Cerberus or @tchrist if you're awake...
I would parse that as [pronoun=subject-complement] [copula] [subject].
But I'd happily be corrected.
ah, ok. interesting
so, is is a modal, or auxiliary verb in that sentence?
09:59
It's a copula, a linking verb.
Keep it SFW guys
You don't use copulas with your car, @Johan?
dunno, kinda hope I don't
10:02
I see it's a higher car
Ah. The cracked sump.
nice handiwork
That looks a good job.
@Robusto ^^
Note the back wheel, we had to replace it due to a flat tire 100 km before.
10:14
Have you tried that stuff you spray into a flat that plugs holes? Does that work for cars?
Now I've had three car problems in two weeks. Looking forward to driving ten years without pause now.
@MattЭллен Yep, had to test it last week on my friends car, it did not work.
:(
@JohanLarsson fingers crossed! :D
It probably works well if it is a nail in the tread. We had a cut in the side of the tire.
nasty
I've not tried it. I wonder if it works for bicycles
The insurance company said they only covered towing to nearest workshop, 200 km away. We managed to negotiate so the towing guy came with a spare tire so we could continue.
But this weekend we had a proper extra tire, it was even filled with air :)
10:21
woo!
harsh, but fair
@Johan: I'm impressed.
So one of our pineapple QA people writes: "the cercle is supose to be spiner but isno't spining." How do I even respond to that? "Hey, this isn't YouTube, it's a place of business"?
Or maybe: "He this isno't youtub its plaice of bisnas"?
"kerankle the cercle with a barkwadness until it spines"
Makes me wanna smack somebody.
their English teacher, presumably :D
11:01
At least.
@MattЭллен Car is the subject. It's a question inversion. QED
@WillHunting that looks like it would be cold in winter
@Robusto thanks! I have updated my answer to say much the same, hopefully it's not too mangled.
2
Q: What's the matter?

Listenever A (1). What’s wrong?     A (2). What’s the matter? B. The internet doesn’t work. In A (1), ‘what’ is beyond doubt a subject. But in A (2), Which is the subject: ‘what’ or ‘the matter’? Can it be clearly designated? Or ambivalent?

It only works with copulas, however. You can't invert "I eat porridge" into "Porridge eats who?"
yeah. no inversion necessary, but you do need an auxiliary: "do I eat porridge?"
eat I the porridge?
Eatest thou the porridge?
Nay! Mine porridge is too hot.
11:13
Thy porridge is at best a five, not so hot as a ten.
Nay, not so much.
@RegDwigнt What makes you think @Cerberus is high? Excessive use of AHK is not indicative of drug use. Quite the opposite, one would think.
@MattЭллен Good question. In a sentence with noun - copula - noun, we normally say the first word counts as the subject, even though there could be inversion and you can't really tell. However, with what, I would be inclined to say the subject is a car, because the verb becomes plural if you change it to cars: what are cars?, not what is cars? (unless the asker doesn't know cars is a plural word).
@Cerberus oh! good point. thank you
Even so, the plural verb is not conclusive evidence, because it could also be caused by attraction from the complement.
bees are milk
that coin is milk
hmmm
@Cerberus what is attraction, here?
11:29
@Cerberus I hate it when you're right.
(BBL, lunch)
@MattЭллен It is when a word takes on features of a (nearby) word even though, syntactically/functionally, it shouldn't. That happens sometimes in language.
@Robusto bows
But I'm not sure there is right and wrong here.
continues hating that
Chew on a lollipop.
I'm eating seaweed instead.
11:33
Japanese?
In this case, Korean: "Seasoned Seaweed Snack with Olive Oil."
Is it true that a certain Japanese seaweed can give you pimples?
Ah.
Is it good?
@Cerberus No idea.
@Cerberus Quite.
I have no pimples, so . . .
11:34
Dutch has a special word for seaweed: wier.
Good to know.
Maybe wier is related to weed, but the verb weeding is wieden.
I have some Japanese おかずのり in my desk. They're crisper than the Korean treats, but you don't get as much.
Crisp is good.
But the Premium Roasted Seaweed (Green Laver), also in my desk, is the best. I'm saving those. I can't tell you the actual name, cuz it's in Korean.
And it even sounds wholesome, except the deep-frying (or isn't it deep-fried?).
> oeng. wār ‘wier’
I doubt it.
11:39
So Old English had a word wār meaning "seaweed".
I think baked, but I am innocent of any knowledge concerning seaweed-treat production.
Unhindered by knowledge, I see.
@Cerberus Quite possible.
I don't recall that one offhand.
There weren't a lot of seaweed treats in Beowulf.
> oeng. wīr
"wire"
Could be related, they say.
I'll take their word for it.
11:40
We don't have a word like wire in Dutch, that I know. I would translate wire as "draad", =~ thread.
So perhaps wier is our cognate to wire.
@Cerberus So there are no wiry athletes in the Netherlands?
Nope!
Just plump cheeseheads.
> ne. ware
A "New English" word ware?
Meaning "seaweed, beach"?
Dunno.
Hmm there is a lot of uncertainty about this word. But they think it may be related to English wire through Frisian.
I presume wire was once pronounced /wir/ in English, before the Great Vowel Shift.
Might have been two syllables.
11:47
Yeah?
Hmm.
The Proto-Germanic form had two syllables too.
Something like *waira, I think.
But that would be all right.
Wouldn't mess up the theory.
Beorht seomað wír ymb ðone wælgim.
The wire in that case is kind of an ornamental winding.
Obviously not something to connect circuitry.
Hmm what does that mean?
@Cerberus Something like "Bright hanging wire around the sword sheath"
Ahh.
Seomað is hanging? ðone is the?
Wælgim is an epithet for sword-sheath. "Gem of the dead" or something like that.
11:55
Ahh.
@Cerberus ðone is one that resists me. Bosworth-Toller turns up nothing on it, so I just interpolated an article there.
It could be an inflected article?
Or a demonstrative?
That was my thinking.
I thought it didn't affect the meaning we were interested in too much.
Right.
Could also be a possessive. It's part of a riddle, so you never know.
11:58
Ahh that is not an easy genre.
I should probably learn some Old English.
Exactly.
We "learned" the rudiments of Old English over the course of a single semester, and then were plunged directly into translating Beowulf in the second. I'm surprised I lived through that.
That is a good way to learn it, I suppose.
Basically, you always have a dictionary on hand.
Naturally.
Was it fun or torture?
We had some thoroughly nerdy Old English parties where we could only speak in OE. That was kind of fun.
Someone would make a statement, and then the rest of the party would whip out their Bosworth-Toller editions and formulate replies.
12:01
Yay!
We got to drink mead, however. That was fun.
Actually, I thought the whole thing was a lot of fun.
We never were nerdy enough to have parties. But we did and do speak Latin or Greek sometimes.
Learning other languages is fun for me. I seem to do it with a fair degree of ease. If only I could keep them active in my life so I don't lose the proficiency, all would be well.
What would be easiest way to keep them all active?
To live in a place where they're spoken all the time.
12:05
Which is?
Ye Olde Englande.
Yeah, for OE it would be hard.
I was pretty fluent in German after only six months there. It helped that I'd had high-school and college-level German instruction, but the rapid assimilation of full immersion is what I credit for my spike in competence.
But knackered only works in BrE. In AmE we'd probably say used up or spent, but more likely outdated or obsolete. Still more likely: "I junked my shitty old phone and got a new one." — Robusto 1 min ago
Yay Android.
more of your shilling, I see!
Do you guys like Samsung?
12:13
@MattЭллен Hey, the android put it in my contract, so I have to obey it.
Yesterday you make video promoting android, today you're randomly proclaiming their name aloud!
@IceBoy It's okay. Like many other brands.
@Cerberus I can't argue with that, I suppose ;)
@MattЭллен It's the chip, I can't help it!
Planted in one of my brains.
12:14
But I have to go.
@MattЭллен Just don't mention The Phone That Dare Not Speak Its Name in chat. (Hint: the company's corporate headquarters are in Cupertino, CA.)
Adios kiddos!
@Robusto Shhh!
poof
Later pal.
12:15
Jun 16 at 12:15, by Robusto
@Cerberus This is much adieu about nothing!
@Robusto Do you mean 'iPhone'?
36 secs ago, by Cerberus
@Robusto Shhh!
The iPhone is made for baby fingers.
s/for/from/
evil!
12:28
@MattЭллен s/ev/ve/
Cover yourself!
12:41
@Mitch s/ve/unve/
discover yourself!
@MattЭллен s/ver// Disco yourself!
Today I found another nice shopping centre to walk in. It has 8 storeys.
\  0
 \_|_
   |_|
   |
  / \
 /   \
@Robusto s/(\w*) yourse(.)f/\2et's \1!/
@MattЭллен O you rascal you!
12:50
yourseet'sf s/ver// Disco!
Oh
let's s!
@MattЭллен Normally, what is the interrogative pronoun, the one which corresponds to the demonstrative pronoun that. Abnormally, What is the name of the second-base player in a baseball game. What was originally used only as a neuter impersonal singular, but was extended to plural use following the revelation that the shortstop didn’t give a damn.
What?
Yeah. That's weird. The name of the shortstop didn't come up.
@WillHunting does it have stairs/elevator or is it a continuous spiral?
@Mitch Who?
@tchrist In "None but the brave deserve the fair," how would you rephrase that as a question? "Who deserves the fair?" or "Who deserve the fair?"
They did a study and there is only (so far) one linguistic universal and that is 'huh?' Well, maybe they spell it funny elsewhere.
@Mitch Huh?
12:56
@Robusto I wouldn't even bother with the question. Too much pressure. What if they don't get what they deserve? Will the brave turn to violence?
Well, if you can't handle that pressure, how are you ever going to deal with pineapple English?
I have a question about how SE works: Can the OP of the question see the reason people gave for voting-to-close on his or her question?
With sufficient rep, they can before the fact. And anybody can afterwards.
I mean before the question becomes on hold.
@Robusto Really? How?
12:59
Oh, wait. Do you mean as individuals?
Only by voting to close yourself do you see other people's close votes.
Yes. As the original poster of the question.
You can see the reasons if you have a close-vote because the dialog shows how many votes there are against each reason.
You can't see who voted for which reason.
With sufficient rep they can see the number of votes for this or that close reason. But as Mitch says, you have to at least initiate the close-vote process (which doesn't mean you have to vote to close yourself).

« first day (1398 days earlier)      last day (3821 days later) »