« first day (498 days earlier)      last day (4417 days later) » 

user19161
11:01 PM
There seems to be a lot of questions on whether to write it as X Y, XY or X-Y.
 
user19161
Answer: consult your local dictionary.
 
user19161
Eg ice cream, icecream, ice-cream
 
That's it. We need to make up a word. For "father's father's home-wrecking second wife".
 
Flaschenhals.
 
I wonder how short the Chinese one is.
Bottleneck?
 
11:04 PM
No. Flaschenhals.
 
user19161
@DavidWallace I have no idea what it is.
 
You misspelled every letter!
 
user19161
You call anyone who wrecks a home an asshole.
 
@WillHunting not if she's the wife of your father's father!
 
There's a Slavic word for mother-in-law that literally means "everything wrong", or "all at fault".
 
11:05 PM
Never heard of that one.
 
user19161
@RegDwightѬſ道 Yes if the act is evil I say. I am impartial.
 
You might if she causes your grandmother not to be the wife of your father's father.
 
user19161
I treat a 5-year old the same way I treat a 50-year old.
 
@Will I take it you don't have kids.
 
user19161
@DavidWallace No. I am single and unavailable at the moment.
 
11:07 PM
@DavidWallace you do like to ask people that, dontcha.
Mar 11 at 12:11, by David Wallace
@RegDwight - I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess that you don't have children.
 
@RegDwightѬſ道 Whoops, I got that wrong. It doesn't mean "everything wrong" or "all at fault". It means "everything bent", but only sort of. It's one of those coincidental cognates I guess, because the cases are wrong.
@WillHunting Don't worry, Will, it wasn't a come-on.
@RegDwightѬſ道 So was I wrong? Was I? Was I?
 
user19161
I have many answers for which I feel the asker should accept, sigh.
 
user19161
Why do they deprive themselves of 2 points?
 
Maybe the answer is more valuable to them than the 2 points!
 
user19161
@DavidWallace Nice consolation!
 
11:12 PM
Tell me which ones, and I'll go on an upvoting rampage. Maybe.
 
user19161
Nah, it was just a general remark. I think it applies to everyone.
 
user19161
I try to accept an answer to all my questions even if it does not really answer the question.
 
user19161
So I have 100 per cent accept rate across SE.
 
user19161
I also try to upvote all answers to my own questions as long as it is not utter rubbish.
 
@WillHunting I'm not sure that you should do that. It might discourage someone who HAS the right answer from posting it.
 
user19161
11:21 PM
@DavidWallace Well, I don't think not accepting any answer will encourage someone to post the answer. At least I am not encouraged myself that way.
 
Robots are ace
 
@WillHunting If I'm looking for questions to answer, I'm likely to ignore ones that have an accepted answer.
 
@DavidWallace I think the same
 
@WillHunting You should certainly NOT reward people for failing to answer the question.
 
Do any of you know stuff about internet protocols and DPI?
Do you think it will be possible to disguise an encrypted VPN connection as something else, like perhaps a video stream?
 
11:27 PM
Dots Per Inch?
 
Deep-Packet Inspection.
 
@Cerberus sure
Oh I see
 
Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) (also called complete packet inspection and Information eXtraction - IX -) is a form of computer network packet filtering that examines the data part (and possibly also the header) of a packet as it passes an inspection point, searching for protocol non-compliance, viruses, spam, intrusions, or defined criteria to decide whether the packet may pass or if it needs to be routed to a different destination, or, for the purpose of collecting statistical information. There are multiple headers for IP packets; network equipment only needs to use the first of these (the...
@MattЭллен Oh! Really? And is that technology already in use?
 
@Cerberus Well, that was before you mentioned DPI
 
@Cerberus Of course. This is the fundamental idea of steganography.
 
11:28 PM
@MattЭллен Oh hehe.
 
that's true
you can embed the message inside a video or image or sound file
 
@DavidWallace So no technical difficulties? It's easy to fool scanners?
 
user19161
@DavidWallace I did not know there is such a word.
 
@MattЭллен Yeah but I was rather thinking of regular internet usage, anything you do every day, but through an encrypted VPN, and disguised as a video stream.
I know hiding a file inside a video file is possible, but it is primitive and easy to detect if you know where to look.
 
depends on how you hide it
 
user19161
11:31 PM
@Cerberus Well, I know how to place a file in a folder, hehe.
 
@Cerberus regular internet use would be difficult to disguise as a video stream because the regular servers are not expecting video content
if it is encrypted through a VPN, how would DPI work? I'm not sure it would
 
user19161
But I can't place a folder in a file!
 
maybe a statistical analysis might figure out what type of traffic it is
 
@Cerberus I'm not an expert in this field. Why don't you read the wikipedia article on steganography - it explains things better than I ever could.
@MattЭллен Not if your steganography tools are good enough.
 
user19161
@reg Viscacha!
 
11:34 PM
@DavidWallace right, but I was thinking of regular traffic, just encrypted.
if you send google a search request inside a photo, I don't think it would know what to do
 
Well, I guess it would have to be a binary. But you could hide anything you like in unused parts of an .EXE, and it would be basically invisible.
 
user19161
Everyone refresh your browser to see viscacha!
 
s'ok @Will I can see it already
@DavidWallace how would Google process it though?
 
Do you want google to process it?
Google would generally ignore executables.
 
well, Cerb is talking about regular internet traffic
 
11:36 PM
Hi.
 
so, a thing I regularly do is search on google
hi @KitFox :)
 
user19161
@KitFox Woof!
 
@MattЭллен What does Google have to do with regular internet traffic?
 
I'm not a dog!
 
Hello, vixenly one.
 
11:37 PM
42 secs ago, by Matt Эллен
so, a thing I regularly do is search on google
 
All morning, I've had the Spiderman theme song running round my head; and it's your fault!
 
user19161
@DavidWallace With great power comes great responsibility.
 
@MattЭллен Hmm I'm not sure I understand what you mean.
 
@Cerberus well, how are you characterising regular use?
 
So I could email you an EXE that's got a hidden video. But that works as an EXE too.
 
11:39 PM
@MattЭллен No, you can't see what's inside the encrypted content, but will you be able to see that it contains encrypted content? The goal is to have any inspecting software think it is just some video stream or. Or another stream of your choice.
@DavidWallace Hmm maybe later.
 
@Cerberus right, but what is the content?
 
@Cerberus No, not without decompiling it.
 
@MattЭллен Oh, no: the VPN server would decrypt the stream and send regular requests to the respective sites.
 
@Cerberus Oh! I see
 
@MattЭллен Everything you have done today.
 
11:41 PM
So it would be the EXE equivalent of
10 print "hello"
20 goto 100
30 show Jennifer Lopez naked
100 print "goodbye"
110 end
 
@Cerberus Well, if the VPN is expecting it, then there would be no problem
 
@DavidWallace And it would be possible for the VPN server to find the encrypted content inside the video stream and unpack it, provided that the server had advanced software to do this? Or does such software not exist (yet)?
 
If it's sufficiently encrypted, it won't be able to.
It will just look like inefficiently written code.
 
@MattЭллен No? OK, good. With present technology? And an ISP would be unable to find out that it wasn't a regular video stream?
@DavidWallace What if the ISP decompiled bits of the stream to sample it?
 
If the payload is encrypted, that won't help them.
 
11:44 PM
@Cerberus if you make it encrypted video, then that should be indistinguishable
 
The goal is for the ISP to never even notice that there is an encrypted stream going on.
 
Are you planning terrorist activities?
 
@MattЭллен Hmmm...are there sites that actually use encrypted video streams?
@DavidWallace I am contemplating the future of file sharing.
 
Or just video piracy?
 
but if they do DPI on every packet, and the stream doesn't look like encrypted video then I suppose the game will be up
 
11:45 PM
@DavidWallace Not video: basically all internet usage.
@MattЭллен Hmm yes...and this cannot be hidden with padding or something?
There will be an awful lot of overhead, of course.
 
@Cerberus there must be. I bet skype video calls are encrypted. I should say, I hope they're encrypted
 
@MattЭллен Hmm yes, good point.
Conclusion: if a company that offers anonymous VPN disguises its connection as an encrypted video stream, nobody will be able to find out that it is in fact a VPN connection that's going on?
 
@Cerberus Sorry, no idea. stenography is not something I know
 
Bloody hell, there are a lot of Star Wars books.
 
@MattЭллен OK thanks for thinking along, hehe.
 
11:49 PM
my pleasure
 
According to that page you linked to, the DPI system that Iran has "enables authorities to not only block communication but to monitor it to gather information about individuals, as well as alter it for disinformation purposes."
 
@KitFox you having a Star Wars books marathon?
 
@DavidWallace Yup. Sold by some large American company.
 
I'm trying to find the name of the book I read.
 
Wouldn't that be a bummer; you send someone a naked picture of Jennifer Lopez and it comes out as Jennifer Aniston.
 
11:50 PM
Yup!
Very dangerous.
 
@KitFox alas I've read none
 
I've read three.
And I can only remember the names of two.
I think the third was a collection of short stories, but I'm not sure.
It featured Boba Fett and Han Solo.
So that's going to narrow it down.
rolls eyes
 
The original odd couple!
 
Ask on Scifi?
Or was that not allowed?
 
I think it used to be
 
11:53 PM
Oh!
Oh! Oh!
Tales of the Bounty Hunters! That might be it!
 
job done
 
I'm confused about the publication date though.
I could've sworn I read it before 1996.
It might explain why I seemed to know so much about Darth Vader's history before the second trilogy came out though.
 

« first day (498 days earlier)      last day (4417 days later) »