« first day (4239 days earlier)      last day (73 days later) » 

00:21
REFRESH! There are 5285 unanswered questions (93.1786 answered)
00:32
@Mast Sounds like an excellent idea
 
4 hours later…
04:16
Not sure I agree with @RemyLebeau. I always want to go with the most readable form first (which I think std::function provides). I will go with function pointers only if there is an absolute need for more performance (space/time). But this is just a personal preference. If I got a version with function pointers in a code review I would not complain. — Loki Astari 29 secs ago
 
2 hours later…
06:07
possible answer invalidation by greybeard on question by wepajakeg: codereview.stackexchange.com/posts/294658/revisions
possible answer invalidation by greybeard on question by wepajakeg: codereview.stackexchange.com/posts/294658/revisions
possible answer invalidation by greybeard on question by wepajakeg: codereview.stackexchange.com/posts/294658/revisions
@Duga it appears only psuedocode was modified - e.g. typo in comment
I'm not sure why one function name in this line was formatted as an inline code span but not the second... 🤔
> for version2() and version3(), it generates this code
possible answer invalidation by greybeard on question by wepajakeg: codereview.stackexchange.com/posts/294658/revisions
possible answer invalidation by greybeard on question by wepajakeg: codereview.stackexchange.com/posts/294658/revisions
 
6 hours later…
12:17
possible answer invalidation by toolic on question by yulivee: codereview.stackexchange.com/posts/203462/revisions
@Duga: No. The top line of code was not included in the code block.
possible answer invalidation by toolic on question by yulivee: codereview.stackexchange.com/posts/203462/revisions
possible answer invalidation by toolic on question by yulivee: codereview.stackexchange.com/posts/203462/revisions
possible answer invalidation by toolic on question by yulivee: codereview.stackexchange.com/posts/203462/revisions
possible answer invalidation by toolic on question by yulivee: codereview.stackexchange.com/posts/203462/revisions
 
2 hours later…
14:14
Caught out by this. Yes, in "Code Review" Xcode represents the xcodeproj file as text. — Max MacLeod 43 secs ago
1
Q: Faster VB6 / VBA class deallocation

Cristian BuseVB6 / VBA is slow to deallocate class instances VB* class instance deallocation becomes exponentially slower the more instances of that particular class there are. Quick test. You will need: Guido's excellent AccurateTimer library a class module Class1 with no code the following code in a standa...

 
2 hours later…
16:34
10
Q: What’s on your mind?

SlateYou. Yes, you: What’s on your mind? When you think about the future of the network - years from now - what worries you? What makes you anxious? What do you look forward to? What might make you hopeful? I’ve spent the last few months thinking about the state of the Stack Exchange network and wher...

(Might as well ninja Slate)
17:21
Monking
I think Code Review is a better fit for this question because opinion-based questions are off-topic on Stack Overflow. — tyg 6 secs ago
17:40
Monking
 
2 hours later…
19:11
0
Q: Timezone-based VPN-detection

john_mI use the following snippet at my browser homepage to detect whether or not I have VPN turned on. If the IP timezone is different from the browser timezone, then it is most probably VPN is turned on. Yes, this is a very unreliable way, but asking to improve the code "conceptually" would be too mu...

 
3 hours later…
21:49
22:33
0
Q: UUID v7 Implementation

Jesse C. SlicerI wanted to backport the Guid.CreateVersion7() functionality in the newer versions of .NET back into .NET Framework. This is that effort. I have tested the UUIDs generated at online validators here and here with success, so I am now looking for a review in terms of approach, clarity, performance,...


« first day (4239 days earlier)      last day (73 days later) »