« first day (4034 days earlier)      last day (278 days later) » 

Duga
Duga
00:15
REFRESH! There are 6163 unanswered questions (92.0621 answered)
 
6 hours later…
Captain Obvious
Captain Obvious
06:03
0
Q: Two body collision written in sfml

ResfeThis program shows two object that can be controlled with arrow keys, Its 569 lines. I have a 8 core cpu and this simple program takes around ~30 of my CPU, i don't understand if SFML is causing this or if something is wrong in my code. Code can it be that i am declaring same variables in a while...

c++ c++11 pointers graphics sfml
 
2 hours later…
Duga
Duga
08:09
I think: codereview.stackexchange.com ?? — Luuk 26 secs ago
Kaz
Kaz
@Mast Yeah. I guess I'm one of those. Congrats @pacmaninbw
Anyone know if Lamplighter is still alive and kicking?
How's the site doing these days?
 
1 hour later…
Captain Obvious
Captain Obvious
09:23
0
Q: Code Feedback Request: SwiftUI Image Search App Using Pixabay API

user3580937Body: Hi Stack Overflow Community, I recently completed a home assignment for an iOS development position, but unfortunately, I did not pass. I'm confident that my implementation meets the given specifications, and I would appreciate your feedback on my code to understand where I might have gone ...

swift mvvm swiftui
Mast
Mast
@Kaz Welcome back.
I don't recall anyone by the name of Lamplighter.
We have a lampshade, Lampard, thelamp, LampPost, Shadylamp and Mecury Lamp though.
Perhaps you mean glampert?
Haven't seen them this year.
@Harith highlight.js does, apparently. I've tried it on your post and the result is far from spectacular.
Harith
Harith
10:00
@Mast Okay, that looks horrible. I've opened an issue about digit separators on their github repository albeit. I also see "map" being highlighted as a keyword or type in my post, and that also looks to be a bug to me.
Mast
Mast
@Harith I hope it's simply a bug in the repo that can be fixed. Once it has been fixed, please let me know and I'll bugger a dev about updates.
Duga
Duga
10:57
It very much depends on how you view Renderer. Is it a property of this object? Since you don't pass it in as a method parameter I would assume it is, in which case you do change the state of this object, meaning the function should not be const IMHO. However,t hat IMHO part is a problem. It's an opinion-based question. That's reason to close this question. It is better to put this on a different Stack Exchange site like Code Review or Software Engineering — Homer512 6 secs ago
Kaz
Kaz
11:45
@Mast Oh. You know what. Now that I think about it. I'm pretty sure I know them from The Workspace not Code Review ^^
Mast
Mast
12:11
160k 108 436 585
professionalism interviewing management communication software-industry colleagues united-states
That one?
pacmaninbw
pacmaninbw
@Mast Isn't glampert a moderator on another site?
Mast
Mast
@pacmaninbw No.
You may have them confused with Glorfindel.
Kaz
Kaz
@Mast yep
Mast
Mast
Who currently has 8 diamonds or so.
pacmaninbw
pacmaninbw
@Mast More confusion to me. :-)
Mast
Mast
12:17
9 even.
There are a couple of recurring guests who mod on other sites.
pacmaninbw
pacmaninbw
@Kaz Thanks. Nice to see you again.
Mast
Mast
mickmackusa used to mod Joomla. Maarten Bodewes is a mod on crypto. Donald.McLean mods Music Fans.
pacmaninbw
pacmaninbw
@Mast Glad to hear the Donald McLean is still around somewhere.
skiwi
skiwi
Monking
pacmaninbw
pacmaninbw
Monking
 
2 hours later…
Duga
Duga
14:13
After your refactoring you can post your code at the sister site Code Review to get some more input, if you want. — Leviathan 23 secs ago
Duga
Duga
14:45
If this is working code that you think could be improved (and you can provide some context as to what it's supposed to be doing), see Code Review. — jonrsharpe 55 secs ago
Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ
Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ
15:35
Monking
Duga
Duga
16:10
If your code is working as is and doesn't have an problems then your questions is off-topic. Consider asking on codereview.stackexchange.com — DarkBee 38 secs ago
Duga
Duga
17:07
fyi opinion-based / discussion-based questions are off-topic here, as are code reviews. For specific code feedback, you can post to Code Review — David Makogon 39 secs ago
Captain Obvious
Captain Obvious
17:46
0
Q: API Generator for Python

Hernandez Sinsel Jesus EmmanueI'm currently working on my titulation project in software engineering, and i want to get some feedback from real developers of how useful this project can be in the real life. the project is two modules, one is the http server which i created from zero using the sockets library and it has suppor...

python api rest websocket automation
Duga
Duga
18:19
I think you have the wrong stack exchange site. I believe you want code review. codereview.stackexchange.com — Bryan Dellinger 8 secs ago
If something with the posted code doesn't behave how you expect, please edit your post to say what that is. See How to Ask and making a minimal reproducible example. If you're looking for a code review, this isn't the place for it as it's too opinionated, see Bryan's link. — gunr2171 28 secs ago
 
2 hours later…
Duga
Duga
19:53
This type of question is more suited for codereview.stackexchange.com — aynber 11 secs ago
Thanks alot. I am gonna ask in codereview.stackexchange.com — Wissam Altanokhi 34 secs ago
Note that before asking on Code Review SE, you will also want to read the Code-Review help site, especially its How to Ask link. — Hovercraft Full Of Eels 51 secs ago
 
1 hour later…
RMunroe
RMunroe
21:04
I can't believe they wouldn't even let me hold a vote among the passengers about whether to try the loop.
Duga
Duga
21:15
If posting on Code Review site, delete this Question here. — Basil Bourque 40 secs ago
 
1 hour later…
Peilonrayz
Peilonrayz
22:40
@ScottMarcus SO doubted SO's understanding of CR's rules leading to a migration block by CR and a request for insta-deleting migration comments by SO. "The fact that a question is on topic on some site does not make it off topic on every other site." and questions can be on-topic on both sites. Additionally meta meta explains migrations. — Peilonrayz 11 mins ago
Note: (kinda want a record of the links for future)

« first day (4034 days earlier)      last day (278 days later) »