A basic query to filter out a lot of crap:
is:q closed:no votes:2.. locked:no
2.4M results.
Adding some negative keywords, the best query I could come up with is this:
is:q closed:no votes:2.. -thanks -thx -please -pls -suggest -edit -u -urgent -"a doubt" -informations -spit -cuz -coz ...
I have a form:
<form method="post" action="do.php">
...
</form>
In do.php I require an another php file:
require_once "another.php";
The another.php is appears good, but in the address bar there is mysite.com/do.php
I wold like to see mysite.com/another.php in the address bar.
How can I r...
The point of Lightness's question is that there's a lot of crap in the pile. bjb's answer doesn't add anything to that point. All his answer does is show he's clueless.
Yay, SO reached 10m questions because it's being flooded with crap every day! And everybody knows that quantity is the most important metric anyways, nobody cares that milions of those questions are low quality duplicates, typos, people too lazy to read the docs, and so on. So let's all celebrate by tweeting #SOreadytohelp. Because we're a help site! /Facepalm... — l4mpiAug 20 at 17:52
I have a list of objects. This list is traversed using an iterator (pointer) and for every object that is retrieved I assign it a random "rank" such that, each rank-object forms a std::pair. I pass this pair to a multimap which stores and sorts the objects according to their respective ranks. So,...
No.
It's not.
So if you want to moderate a user effectively, you have to moderate in a means for which you can get feedback from the user you're communicating with. Commanding messages at a user who can't even talk is not effective.
Update: Thanks for all the additional feedback below. We incorporated a lot of your suggestions, and this is going live (as http://meta.stackexchange.com/help/be-nice).
We're also looking at ways to get this in front of more new users when they sign up, to help them start off on the right foot...
Because if I crossed a line by referring to a post as idiocy, but calling a troll doesn't cross a line, then I need help understanding what the rules are exactly.
guys.
The code below is spring security web adapter. I do not like configure(HttpSecurity) method that generates security confirmation policy.
Any ideas to do it more readable and clear?
/**
* Spring security configuration
*
* @author Eugene Ustimenko
* @date Nov 5, 2014
*/
@Configuration
@Enabl...
Again, if the message I posted was across the line (I wasn't aware when I posted my message), then the messages I flagged were across the line. I didn't think at the time that either was unacceptable. But again, once mine was deemed unacceptable, logic can only dictate that if comments directed at posts are unacceptable, then the same sort of comments directed at user's must certainly be deemed unacceptable.
@Zak If I am being unfairly treated it is by members of this chat who opted to flag my message and not other messages, not by the moderators who only judged the flagged message.
When your message was flagged, it was actioned by a moderator and you received a small chat ban.
On your return, you flagged several messages you felt were similarly offensive, not because they were offensive to you, but because you felt there was a double-standard at play.
So... entirely out of context, my flags shouldn't have been considered revenge flagging. They were legitimate flags on messages that ultimately, you agreed did not hold up to that common standard.
It's only revenge flagging if you look at it with one, extraordinarily specific context
That in which you see that I flagged them after a suspension and ignore what I actually flagged (just look at that I flagged anything as a result of suspension)
@nhgrif - Precisely. Returning to flag answers because you feel you've been treated badly is considered to be revenge-flagging. You're not offended by the posts, you're offended by what you feel are a lack of common standards.
It's the job of moderators to bring a human viewpoint to the situation. Ultimately I was voted by my users to see what's happening and to assess what can be done to make the situation right
Analyzing this from a rules or fairness perspective is pointless, because what's offensive is entirely subjective. For whatever reason, someone said something that someone else didn't like. Be a bit more cautious in the future. that's all.
This room was placed in timeout for 10 minutes; the topic of this room is "General discussion about Code Review codereview.stackexchange.com - Site Business always comes first" - conversation should be limited to that topic.
Oh, here's another reason not to abbreviate variable and method names... if English isn't your first language, your abbreviation will be far less then helpful.
The following code transforms multi-line input into the the Brainfuck equivalent. One line turns into one program. The resulting programs are split by newlines for readability.
Brainf.cpp
#include "Brainf.hpp"
int main()
{
std::vector<std::string> userInput;
std::string currentLine = "...
Hey, @Mast, I might argue that the brainfuck tag there isn't appropriate. Your question isn't about that language. It's only tangentially related to the language.
Inspired a bit by a previous Brainfuck question and the recent fizzbuzz invasion, I decided to make FizzBuzz in Brainfuck.
The code is entirely my own, except for the inclusion of the Printing a number algorithm that I found on StackOverflow.
My code is divided into several parts.
Setup Const...
@nhgrif There are two things you should tag your question with: What language you wrote it in and what the code is about. Sometimes, code can be about a language - such as brainfuck - in which case tagging it so is perfectly alright.
Effective Tags - Bring more attention to your question
Each tag should stand on its own: if a tag only makes sense when used in a group with other tags, something is wrong. For example, tagging a question as [visual] [studio] (two tags) is wrong.
Pick tags that show higher counts in the look-a...