@maaartinus nah, you're missing context - that block is inside anIdentifierReferenceResolver class, letting it bubble up further than FindLocalScopeDeclaration would cause more harm than silencing it, because then the entire module onward stops resolving. That said I'm only trapping it that way so I can fix the actual issue ;-)
the actual issue is that Property Let and Property Get members both have the same Scope string, and in the case that's blowing up I'm resolving an index parameter that's in both.
I wrote a map reduce program which uses multi threads, bounded buffers, condition variables. It works perfectly for some types of inputs.
In the program there are N mappers, R reducers, 1 merger. mappers get data from input files, put each string in files to corresponding buffer-X-Y. reducers r...
If someone is good with Rails, this could use a good answer. The current one is just a code dump and has a downvote, so the system treats it as a zombie.
Whatever. :-P
Fixed
And when it gets a good answer, the current one can be removed. That user was seen two days ago, and the post notice went up last year.
Thou shalt not exceed the number one hundred
And for the number three times fives modulus zero
Thou Sayeth "FizzBuzz"
And for the number three modulus zero
Thou Sayeth "Fizz"
And for the number five modulus zero
Thou Sayeth "Buzz"
Else
Thou Sayeth the number
I am trying to calculate the sum of the smallest prime factors of n, where 2 < n < 10**12, and get the remainder of this sum when divided by 10**9:
require 'prime'
puts "Started at #{Time.now}."
num = 10**12
sum = 0
(2..num).each { |n| sum += n.prime_division[0][0]; p sum }
sum = sum % 10**9
put...
function ackermann(m, n) begin
if (m == 0) begin
return n + 1;
end
elif (m > 0 and n == 0) begin
return ackermann(m - 1, 1)
end
elif (m > 0 and n > 0) begin
return ackermann(m - 1, ackermann(m, n - 1))
end
end
Welcome to Code Review! While this somewhat answers OP's question "why could the solution have been disliked by the recruiters", the implicit question in any and all on-topic question on this site is "please review my code" - as it stands, this answer is more of a comment than a review of OP's code. Feel free to edit your post to add content that addresses any facet of OP's code, not just an opinion on what may or may not have happened in OP's specific situation. Cheers! — Mat's Mug17 secs ago
Sorry, too long for a comment (this isn't a real review, but it isn't a CR what you need).
This is Project Euler 521 and providing a full answer here would spoil the fun. If you really want to cheat, google it out.
Is there any way to shorten the runtime of this program?
There are many way...
I am here for reviewing my code with programming techies. Please give me some feedback on how I could make it better or simpler.
public class BinarySearchTree {
private static TreeNode root;
public static void main(String args[]) {
BinarySearchTree bst = new BinarySearchTree();
root = ...
so if you have an ISomething interface with an int DoSomething(string), you're saying that any class Something : ISomething is required to have a method called DoSomething that takes a string and returns an int
the implementation is irrelevant, so long as the DoSomething method takes a string and returns an int, so by depending on ISomethingabstraction instead of Something concrete class, .... oh well, good night!
I wrote up a script a while back to let me play around with fractals. The idea was to have direct access to the script that creates the fractal. None of that close, edit, then run hassle; just edit then run.
renderscript.py contains the gui:
import tkinter as tk
from tkinter.filedialog import a...
I am new to programming. I saw this Java code with a lot of if-else statements that is copied below. People say that such a code is called 'smelly code'. So I wrote my own version of the code below. Can anyone guide me with any improvements to the program (related to style, programming, formattin...
Suppose, I submit a code for review, and, some reviewers suggest some corrections.
Suppose, then, I want to update my code and show it to the same reviewers.
How should I do it?
Should I edit my previous question, or, should I ask a new question?
When you've asked a question, had feedback, made changes, and are ready for another review,
You should post a new question with the updated code, but, link the original review, just for clarity.
For example, user @QPaysTaxes, has a trilogy of questions relating to a BF to Ruby converter,
And f...
I tried to use loop in this program to reduce it. But error: "byref argument type mismatch" is occur. How can we rectify it?
My converts converts all csv files in the subfolders of folders 1,2,3. As of now I am converting using codes for each folders. I tried to club those into one using for loo...
Your code looks really nice, and as I am unfamiliar with the framework you are coding for, my review is somewhat limited, nonetheless, I'll try my best.
When you are going over items in a dictionary or array, you should put the comma on the next line, so that: it's easier to comment out, easie...
http://codeforces.com/problemset/problem/556/B
This is the problem I am working on! *NOTE - THIS IS NOT A COMPETITION IT IS JUST A PROBLEM SET.
So this is my code. The compiler i am using is GNU C++11 This code runs fine with all the test cases provided. I dont know what to do. Any help would b...