« first day (2283 days earlier)      last day (2638 days later) » 

12:04 AM
heya @rob
 
@vzn yes. You can only measure point on sphere using repeated measurement on identically prepared copies of system.
But that's all assuming we're talking about projective measurement.
 
obe
12:25 AM
@BernardoMeurer is rufus legit?
 
Anyone care to help me diagnose a MathJax issue in our other chat room?
All I need is for someone else to post a message with some MathJax in it in the other room
 
@obe Yes
it's the usual tool
 
rob
@DavidZ Done
 
@dbassett hi. This weekend might be best.
But you can just ask here and I'll answer asynchronously.
 
Random question: Why a black body must radiate EM waves corresponding to its temperature, why we cannot have a black body that only absorbs but not radiating. Is it because a nonradiating black body will violate the second law of thermodyanmics since there are a lot more microstates in the EM field thus energy tend to be redistributed there?
 
rob
12:44 AM
@Secret Those are two good reasons.
Another good reason is that electromagnetism, which governs EM waves, is time-symmetric and doesn't distinguish between absorption and emission.
 
I see
 
rob
@Secret What a low-information press article. But the meeting presentation it describes seems to be available online.
[Obligatory eye-rolling about the APS "April" Meeting occurring in January goes here]
 
vzn
@DanielSank ok, but is there any other kind of measurement? anyway the newer "quantum surrealism" experiments seem to claim to measure pts on the bloch sphere...
 
We've got a cross-stack dupe: EE.SE version, Physics.SE version. Which stack shall we merge them on?
 
rob
1:56 AM
@NickAlexeev Looks like it's been on Physics for a couple of days without much interest, but the EE version has a couple of useful-looking comments already. Should I migrate it to you or is there another way to merge?
 
@rob I am not very sure how to read the data. Which slide suggests the $\nu_{\mu}$ disappearance it is a mix of two other flavors?
 
rob
@Secret Slide 9 is an exclusion plot. Presenter's analysis suggests that $|\Delta m_{32}^2|$ and $\sin^2\theta_{23}$ lie in the black oval. "Best" point is the black cross but it's probably wiser to treat the entire oval as more or less equally likely. Other ovals are constraints from other experiments.
The mixing angle between the second and third flavor states is $\theta_{23}$, so $\sin^2\theta_{23}=1/2$ corresponds to equal mixing.
 
Hmm interesting, Slide 12 also has the data fitted to an inverted hirarchy, so either $\nu_{\tau}$ or $\nu_{e^-}$ are equal mix of $\nu_{\mu}$ and the other flavor
 
rob
Looks like one result (Noνa 2016, normal hierarchy) favors $\sin^2\theta_{23}!=1/2$, but mostly my interpretation of that plot is "we still don't have good constraints on $\sin^2\theta_{23}$"
@Secret The IceCube constraints for normal hierarchy (slide 9) and inverted hierarchy (slide 12) look basically the same, which says to me that they're not terribly sensitive to the hierarchy.
 
@rob The other way is for me to migrate it to you. Ether way.
 
rob
2:12 AM
 
@NickAlexeev An electronical engineer here!
 
@BernardoMeurer Well... What can I say... EEE can happen to anyone.
 
@NickAlexeev I'm still in uni for it :P
Well, I'm a Computer Engineer
 
@vzn yes, weak measurements.
 
vzn
@DanielSank ok. was guessing that. hasnt anyone proposed that weak measurements obtain the legendary "hidden variables" long sought/ questioned in QM? ie real, imaginary part of psi? if not, why not? my understanding is that, based on what someone told me (years ago), Majorana may have proposed something like this ages ago...
 
0
Q: What would happen to a single light wave if mechanically cut in half?

Coyote62901Imagine a single light wave with a 1 meter length. This light wave goes through a hole in a wall. Before the entire light wave passes through the hole, the hole is closed so that only half of the light wave actually gets through. What happens to the part of the light wave that gets through? S...

It will just... continue...?
 
@vzn No. Nobody has proposed that weak measurements obtain hidden variables because it doesn't make any sense.
On the other hand, there have been demonstrations of violating Bell-type inequalities in experiments using weak measurements.
 
Do violating bell inequlities always imply entanglement, or there are non entanglement type configurations that also violate bell inequality?
 
rob
@Secret I'm genuinely confused by a lot of the Bell-inequality literature. What Bell proved had two parts: (a) a particular model for locally real observables gives weaker correlations than quantum entanglement, and (b) any other hypothetical locally real model gives weaker entanglement than QM, but without a constraint on how much weaker.
But most of the literature seems to analyze data using the CHSH (Clauser et al) version of Bell's inequality, which assumes the particular model (a). It seems like there's some unexplored parameter space.
 
3:10 AM
There's also something called quantum discord, which encompass all types of quantum correlations besides entanglment. I have not read that in detail though
 
@rob Let's put it like this: the only really interesting thing that can happen is someone does an experiment which is inconsistent with the theory we already have.
That has not happened.
Bell's inequality says "if you measure XYZ and get more than 2, then that's compatible with quantum mechanics and not with hidden variables in the particular way that I have described them".
Now, that "particular" was is actually rather general, so in fact violating Bell's inequality excludes quite a bit of "design space" (very appropriate phrase).
 
yes, people have been discussing this for years.
In the US, the elementary schools start later than high schools, which is ridiculous.
I mean, I think I know why we do that:
It's ok for teenagers to get home early, before mom/dad are out of work, because they can take care of themselves (or go to a job).
Younger kids need after school care or parents.
That's my guess.
 
rob
3:35 AM
@DanielSank That's a good explanation. But the experimental descriptions bug me. The entanglement data typically lie somewhere between the CHSH limit and the QM prediction. The analyses typically say "the classical behavior is excluded, and we're probably inconsistent with QM because of experimental imperfections." But I usually don't see the disagreement with QM quantified in terms of measurable parameters. The possibility that neither prediction is quite correct doesn't get considered.
... At least, that was my impression when I spent some time thinking about this semi-seriously, ten years ago. It's a big literature and I don't know much of it.
 
In the future, try driving them at relativistic speeds and see if we can make a spacetime crystal
Why are holograms from a holographic universe, unlike the holograms we made, are real instead of incorporeal?
 
vzn
4:15 AM
@rob agreed! great way to put it, & a way few others would phrase it. have been looking into the "unexplored parameter space" for many yrs, think have found a solution there. =D but, difficult to formulate exactly.
@DanielSank EPR1936 argues QM is incomplete. think that a physical demonstration that QM is incomplete would be far more than "really interesting". think weak measurements are increasingly essentially/ exactly that...
@rob think you have zeroed into the heart of the matter like few others. there are recent experiments/ claims/ writeups of "loophole free bell tests" but think theres more to the story...
 
rob
@vzn One problem is that the EPR paper attracts so many know-nothing cranks that the bar for expressing confusion about it is quite high.
 
vzn
bottom line: after very long study think its possible to create a purely classical experiment that violates the bell inequality. some scattered researchers are now coming to the same conclusion. but its now regarded as a minority-to-fringe pov. think that will slowly be overturned in years ahead. think it will eventually resolve the "hidden variables" concept in favor.
@rob by some measures, the most cited physics paper of all time. x% will be cranks.
 
4:45 AM
@rob Until pretty recently, there weren't systems with very highly controlled control and very high accuracy state measurement. Because of the quantum computing field, there are now systems with both.
Nowadays, we can make entangled states and understand the deviations from idea pretty damn well.
It's just that, honestly, most of us aren't particularly interested in publishing Bell state stuff because it feels old hat (and because to be interesting you have to close the spacelike separation loophole which is hard in a dilution refrigerator).
 
rob
4:59 AM
Yes, the weak measurement techniques were just starting show up when I was last looking seriously. Like I said, there's a lot of literature that I haven't thought carefully about.
Zeilinger is very interested in the spacelike separation side of things. Here's a new trick. I've only looked at the news story, not the PRL.
2
 
 
3 hours later…
8:07 AM
@vzn I'm not particularly interested in explaining why an eighty year old paper is no longer considered authoritative.
I'm even less interested until there is something falsifiable to respond to, or at least a real question. They usual "Gee I wonder if XYZ means quantum mechanics is wrong. It could be the biggest discovery of our life times!" is admirable for the fervor but tiring in its lack of substance.
@rob Yes it does.
Again, in order to be interesting, someone has to do one of the following:
1. Do an experiment for which QM doesn't predict the results. Nobody has ever done this.

2. Propose a new theory, consistent with all the data we have, and which is either 1a) simpler than QM, or 1b) makes falsifiable predictions that differ from QM's predictions.
Nobody has done that either.
 
8:35 AM
-1
Q: Agenda for Tuesday's chat session

John RennieWe have a chat session coming up next Tuesday at 16:00 UTC in the Physics chat room. Recent chats have been a bit amorphous, so if there are any issues you want to raise now is a good time to crystallise your thoughts. This is of course just an excuse for me to highlight the single most importan...

 
@JohnRennie "amorphous" "crystallise" for real?
 
I couldn't resist it :-)
 
9:06 AM
In 1 day 10 hours, 0celo7 will return. Then something BIG will happen
 
9:38 AM
$\Huge{0celo7}$
 
$\Huge {\text{...Something BIG will happen}}$
 
$\Huge {\text{0celo7 will return}}$
 
Lol
i think he is secretly reading chat
(2 people checked his profile :P )
 
@obe: Those scary looking errors PXE-e61 media test failure, check cable are quite harmless. If the PC can't boot off the hard disk (because you haven't installed Windows yet) it will try to boot from the network using a protocol called PXE.
The errors are just the PC saying it couldn't boot off the network either, which isn't surprising since you need a PXE server to allow network booting.
Once you get Windows installed on the hard disk those PXE messages will disappear.
 
10:15 AM
Recently, it has been really annoyed me that some people are selectively ignoring my chat questions in another chat room.

These people have the tendency to only @ or respond to me whenever I said something wrong but when I ask them for more details, they go silent
 
10:31 AM
@Secret Did you ponder over why you are at the receiving end of such behavior? If so, what are the reasons you thought of ? :)
 
well, one possiblity is perceived dwelling on a question, because of really trying to understand it despite reading many sources and still not haveing the stuff fit togethr. Another possibility might be people are annoyed of me keep making mistakes in my logic when discussing about a certain concept and end up not responding.

I am not known to be demanding in the question asking, especially how I only reserve pings for very big questions or for replies. I also don't really ask homework questions, thus help vampire behaviour cannot be the reason for that
The annoying thing about ignore is that the act carries so little information thus there is no way you can adapt to it to prevent future instance of it happening
Put it simply, most ignore reasons are unknwon and uncertain
 
@Secret I would like to add a few reasons: 1) Half of the times you write stuff directed at nobody, just general facts or like jotting down your thought process. Most people aren't interested in reading such long paragraphs. 2) Often it cannot be understood whom you are asking your question to! Rather, are you actually asking a question or is it a rhetoric ? That becomes difficult to understand. 3) Think of the chat system as something like Whatsapp or Hangouts rather than a personal blog.
Most people aren't interested in knowing about your dream diary or long paragraphs on unrelated facts or division by 0! (Please pardon me if that sounds a bit rude. I tried to point out the facts which upon modifying might improve your chat experience) :)
And it will be better if you ask questions directly to someone with a ping @ rather than leaving an open question!
 
10:52 AM
1,3) I have my own room now thus this is a lot less in all SE chat rooms
2) When I said "being selectively ignored" usually it means the question is actually directed at someone with the reply function.
The good news about division by zero is that it is temporally shelved. It now also has a separate room in other chat rooms, thus that is dealt with. If people are not interested in my dream diary, I will share less

> And it will be better if you ask questions directly to someone with a ping @ rather than leaving an open question!
(NB: I felt being selectively ignored in another chat room, not this one, and as far I know this one is where most of my crazy messages you pointed out are (which are nowadays heavily reduced to basically just the sciencedaily sharings)
 
11:09 AM
hi dudes
 
11:19 AM
@Hey-men-whatsup whatsup? :D
 
hi I'm fine..
you?
 
same as you :)
 
where are people this friday?
 
sleeping maybe ;}
this time is usually low in activity
 
yes, closer to weekend anyway
 
11:22 AM
@Hey-men-whatsup where are you from ?
country?
 
Hmm.. for some reasons I can't answer it.
sorry
 
okay..atleast can you say...you are a student or professional?
 
I'm a student at university
I learn everythings
 
i see... what subject ?
 
Computer, math, electrical & electronics, languages and bibles
but my field is Computer science
you?
 
11:26 AM
im in grade 12
science stream
 
did someone kick me in the head..? really?
uh
 
check your ceiling XD
 
sorry I missed that 12 is actually 2-nd year high school
 
@Hey-men-whatsup ya
 
what field do you want to take when you enter university?
 
11:29 AM
@Hey-men-whatsup Any engineering other than computer/mining/chemical...
 
i would like mechanical or electronics
 
that's nice
it's a year far right?
 
i have my entrance exam after 2/3 months
i am preparing for it now
 
what university/college you want to enter btw?
 
11:32 AM
@Hey-men-whatsup I applied to some universities in the US and Canada. Also, I am looking forward to enter one the IITs in India as many of my family members stay in India. In the US or Canada I would be totally alone. The IIT entrance exams are coming up in 2/3 months.
 
11:49 AM
Hello everyone
Does anybody have an idea what a lennard Jones potential would look like
if you plot it in function of time in stead of the intermolecular distance?
 
well that depends on where you are at t0
and initial velocity
 
@Skyler let's imagine extremely close
and as time goes by you go further and further.
 
hmm... so your outside the well portion, meaning the harmonic approximation isnt valid anymore
 
@Skyler it got me stumped as well...
 
id use lagrangian mechanics and calculus of variations if i were you, probably while praying to mathematica
 
11:53 AM
@Skyler it was asked to us during an exam
And we were supposed to know it intuitively.
 
hmm, well at that point you "guess" the solution
 
So no overly complicated math was supposed to be involved.
 
which is really what we are doing with 90% of ODEs
 
@Skyler Yes we had to be able to give some sort of theoretical approximation.
@Skyler do you have any clue about how you could "guess" that?
 
create superposition of two competing forces, attraction vs repulsion
 
11:55 AM
yes
 
then maybe expand each a few terms, and toss out terms that couldnt fit behavior
 
what bothers me is that the formula for Ep doesn't even contain any element related to time...
 
oh wait
wait
 
$E_p = \frac{1}{2}kx$
@Skyler yes?
 
are you allowed to start from the lennard jones potential you have in x
 
11:57 AM
yes
 
that function
 
mhm
 
thats much easier then give me a minute to think about it
 
in Mathematics, 2 hours ago, by Alessandro Codenotti
Ok let me rephrase that correctly: suppose that you have a family of countable sets such that the intersection of any 2 sets in this family is finite, can such a family be uncountable?
@anonymous ^ any idea?
 
okay :)
 
11:58 AM
im not saying its easy,, just less off a handful
do you have the answer btw
 
@Skyler no sorry that is why I am asking it here.
 
do we use the actual lennard jones approx (order of 12 and order of 6 terms) or the buckingham potential improvement on it (order of 12 term instead exponential)
 
@DHMO The formal proof isn't very simple. See mathoverflow.net/questions/89306/…
6
Q: Uncountable family of infinite subsets with pairwise finite intersections

MTSI am searching for a constructive proof of the following fact: If $X$ is an infinite set, there exists an uncountable family $(X_\alpha)_{\alpha \in A}$ of infinite subsets of $X$ such that $X_\alpha \cap X_\beta$ is finite whenever $\alpha \neq \beta$. The way I know how to prove this statement...

 
@Skyler IDK this is what we use: imgur.com/a/Hz1hZ
 
@anonymous thanks
 
12:02 PM
@DHMO However, intuitively the fact is very easy to understand using Venn Diagrams
 
@trilolil basically the 6th order term in LJ is because its a good model of the dipole-dipole interactions. the 12th order term was just picked for convenience
 
ok
@Skyler an idea So far?
 
bug me again in the morning
its 4am here
=)
fell asleep a bit tbh, gl and bug me later
 
Ok thanks though.
 
12:53 PM
@anonymous, yeah, if there some families it would be nice
 
@Hey-men-whatsup Hey-man-whatsup ?
 
hi i'm fine as always you
?
 
Fine :)
 
obe
1:32 PM
@JohnRennie thanks, I was wondering what it was. all resolved now.
my computer is 10x faster.
 
2:01 PM
I short circuited my transformer(or I blew it up) but when I see diagram of it there seems no part of it to get damaged so will it still be okay to use it... I am afraid to use it again without confirmation?
 
@ACuriousMind Does the Wigner classification make sense for classical fields
 
@Slereah No, why would it? It's about unitary representations of the Poincaré group, why would you classically search for unitary reps?
 
I guess it would just be classifying the momentum and spin
 
Classically, you just have the finite-dimensional non-unitary reps the field itself transforms it - there are no associated "particle states" living in a Hilbert space, and therefore no unitary representations which you could classify a la Wigner
 
Oh and also
I guess there's no discrete spin
Only continuous spin densities
So that part wouldn't make sense either
 
2:10 PM
what?
A classical field has a clear and obvious spin - it transforms in a finite-dimensional rep labeled by $(s_1,s_2)$ and the spin is $s_1+s_2$.
 
Hm
True I suppose
Is there a Casimir invariant associated to it?
 
Sure, the Casimirs work the same as always. They are still central, and Schur's lemma doesn't need unitarity
 
alright
I had fears that it may differ since I know the value of the spin isn't discrete, classically
I recall that the Casimir operator for spin is a bit weirder, though
I forget what it is though
 
0
Q: How broad can a resource-recommendation question be?

Quantum spaghettificationI am looking for text books of the same style as 'Nuclear and Particle Physics' by W.S.C.Williams (that is with clearly labeled definitions and sections of concise explanation). However, I am looking for such textbooks in a range of subjects, GR, atomic physics etc. How is such a question best as...

 
Wigner's original paper sounds pretty modern for a 1939 paper
you don't often see "manifold" in 30's QM papers
 
2:18 PM
@Slereah I don't know what you mean by that. Fields come in discrete spins: Scalar, vector, 2-tensor, etc.
Spin, in so far as it exists classically, is still discrete
 
@ACuriousMind I'm refering to the Noether invariant under rotation
 
rob
@DanielSank Good.
 
Which doesn't depend on the momentum
 
@Slereah That's angular momentum, not spin :P
 
Well
It is called "spin density" usually
Usually 0 but not for EM fields
 
2:21 PM
Ah, yes. You shouldn't call that spin in the context of talking about Wigner's classification because that "classical spin" is not the same as the invariant that labels the representations.
 
You can tell it's an old paper because it spells coordinate "coördinate"
Wigner says that the coordinate transform can be expressed by a linear unitary operation
All lies
It can also be antiunitary
Also if he uses the words "up to a constant factor" one more time I'm gonna scream
 
@DanielSank I feel this misses at least one important point, which is that weird-QM-nonclassical-entanglement-correlations are strictly weaker than they could be while keeping relativity + causality intact. That is, there are PR boxes which are nonsignalling but which exhibit stronger correlations than you can produce with QM.
Thus there's plenty of interesting layers between "bigger than allowed by HLV models" and "(in)consistent with causal relativity", and if as suggested by @rob there's some fundamental thing stopping us from getting to the full QM correlations, then that's also very interesting.
4
 
Is there a wider Wigner classification for supersymmetric QM?
Apparently there's a paper called "Introduction to Supersymmetry and Supergravity, or Supersymmetry in 12954 minutes"
I'm not sure I have enough time
 
How do I say "For a more complete review, see ..." in a way that's not horribly clunky?
 
2:50 PM
@Slereah Yes, you have to redo the classification for the super-Poincaré group, of course. It should be e.g. in the papers by Nahm where he showed that d=11 is the highest dimension with multiplets with spin $\leq 2$.
 
@obe Cool :-) SSDs make an enormous difference to the speed!
 
user228700
Hey, everyone :-)
 
Hi :-)
 
user228700
What is uuup? How are the new laptops?
 
Fine :-) I've done a test install of Windows on them and both work fine.
 
user228700
3:02 PM
Great :-)
 
And I have my real new laptop arriving in an hour or two.
 
user228700
Real laptop?
 
i.e. the latop I'm actually going to use myself.
 
user228700
The one that ur friend is giving you?
 
Yes, that one.
First brand new laptop I'll have owned in twenty years :-)
 
user228700
3:04 PM
What are u gonna do with the other one, then? Fix and give to someone? :-)
 
I will almost certainly end up giving one or both of the other laptops away.
 
user228700
Cool :-)
 
Or I might keep them as ornaments ...
 
cool
give it to me
 
user228700
I used my mouth to create words to speak to almost strange American and Australian nerdfighters today, BTW :-D
 
3:08 PM
Skype?
 
user228700
Discord--it's a chat app for gamers. We used the voice channel over there.
 
user228700
It was originally created for the treasure hunt about which I told u last week, dyou happen to remember?
 
I don't ...
 
user228700
Padre Pio, the newly sainted figure of YouTube...
 
Ah yes, the secret chat room.
 
user228700
3:11 PM
Precisely :-) Although "secret chat room" borders on creepy :-P
 
Have things started happening there yet?
 
user228700
Have they?! I'm usually not around for most of the fun but today, my friend, today was my day. One of the vlogbrothers, John Green, who is the one setting up this hunt (who is also the author of TFiOS, Looking For Alaska, etc.) joined us over there and gave us new hints! It's separate from the main forum, but he found out and came over.
 
user228700
One of my favourite authors(/creators) was aware of my existence for 15 minutes. Best. Day. Ever.
 
:-)
 
@Kaumudi.H You met John? Now I'm jealous!
 
user228700
3:14 PM
@JaimeGallego :-) How dyou know John?
 
user228700
(Also, I didn't technically meet him in that no words were exchanged but pretty darn close, yes!)
 
@Kaumudi.H He is the Crash Course guy, isn't he?
 
user228700
Yep--CC World History, Big History, Literature, etc.
 
Along with Hank
 
user228700
Yep!
 
3:17 PM
So what is the next stage of the hunt?
 
@EmilioPisanty Yes, but are they really interesting?
A new theory is interesting if it is either simpler than the old one or makes different predictions than the old one.
 
user228700
@JohnRennie Well, this week, he created another board at the forum, which was protected with a different password from last week.
 
There's so much experimental support of QM that new proposed theories have to jump through a lot of hoops to even reproduce the old data.
 
user228700
In the description box of Wednesday's video, he left a series of random words and numbers.
 
Certainly there are such theories, but to my own knowledge, they all fall into the "exactly same results as QM but different story" category, usually trading away randomness for nonlocality.
Is that interesting/useful? Maybe.
 
user228700
3:19 PM
We combined the first letters/numbers of those words and came up with a strange string.
 
and ... ?
 
user228700
...I had help from the other members at the discord and it was one of them who figured out that it is a URL to a YouTube video about Tuataras. I didn't realise that and simply googled the string--that also worked and I was lead to the video.
 
user228700
We speculated about the relation between the words in the description and the video but we had forgotten, of course, to read the comments on that video.
 
user228700
John had commented with a riddle:
 
user228700
> in YD's cap
when seeking warmth in a hurry, or randomly
when you want a smile, or the impression of one
it's what i'm making now.
 
user228700
3:23 PM
Hmm, @JohnR: U give it a try.
 
I have no idea!
 
user228700
If u want a hint, I will tell u what "YD" means.
 
user228700
(This, BTW, was in no way solvable by non-Americans. If not for the discussion at discord, I would never have figured it out)
 
Ah, OK, not being American I may struggle
 
user228700
YD=Yankee Doodle.
 
3:26 PM
As in Yankee Doodle went to town ... ?
 
user228700
Yep!
 
A feather then?
 
user228700
> it's what i'm making now.
 
Macaroni!
 
user228700
BINGO! :-)
 
3:28 PM
What has that to do with smiling?
 
user228700
I'm not so sure--maybe it indicates that Macaroni is delicious and brings a smile to one's face.
 
or seeking warmth in a hurry?
@Kaumudi.H tenuous, very tenuous
 
user228700
Like I said, it's not a particularly good riddle. The rest of it only makes sense when you've figured out what YD stands for.
 
user228700
If not for the people at discord, I wouldn't have gotten in. Anyway, inside the new board, there is a piece of writing.
 
OK...
 
user228700
3:31 PM
We all suspect that it's something written by the protagonist of John's new book.
 
user228700
A bunch of people spent a crapload of time trying to anagram the heading of the writing but got nowhere. It was at that point that John decided to grace us and told us all to chill about the anagrams--well, those of us who were in the anagram frenzy.
 
user228700
Since that first time, he's popped on many times to give us other clues.
 
user228700
eg: p.steiner 5-7
 
Ah, I hadn't made the connection with the John Green who wrote The Fault in Our Stars.
 
user228700
And after some sleuthing, we found this:
 
user228700
3:34 PM
 
@DanielSank I honestly don't know of any theory within that space that is particularly appealing besides QM. But I think the fact that QM inhabits a specific niche within that space, away from both the 'classical bottom' as well as the 'signalling top' is plenty intriguing to begin with.
 
user228700
(And that comic makes sense because his new book, we all suspect, is about identity)
 
user228700
@JohnRennie Ah, yes, that's the John I'm talking of :-)
 
It had not occurred to me it was the same John Green
 
user228700
U can understand why I freaked out :-)
 
3:38 PM
Yes, it makes him more interesting than just another vlogger
 
@JohnRennie if you're looking to fritter some time away on the internet, his Crash Course World History series is a plenty good place to do it.
 
So you think he's dropping hints about his new book?
 
user228700
Oh, certainly. After all, he was described by Markus Zusak, bestselling author of "The Book Thief" as "Damn near Genius" and as being "100 most influential people in the world in 2015" by TIME magazine.
 
user228700
@JohnRennie YES, YES, YES!!
 
user228700
We've received many many hints about what the new book is going to be about. In fact, he dropped a hint about the tuatara over a year ago and we only just understood.
 
user228700
3:43 PM
Very exciting times but sadly, it doesn't look like I'll be able to continue with this hunt for much longer.
 
It's about a lonely physics nerd who uses an Internet persona to masquarade as a normal human being! :-)
 
user228700
@JohnRennie Possibly! :-) U'd know that that is actually a possibility if u've read any of his books.
 
Cool, when they're casting the film I'm a shoe in for the starring role!
Hollywood here I come!
 
user228700
Hmm, can u act like a teenager? Most of his protagonists are teenagers, y'know.
 
Ah, that could be tricky ... I could ask my niece for tips!
Just being sulky all the time seems to be the main qualification :-)
 
user228700
3:47 PM
Did u know that J.D Salinger, the author of the book "The Catcher In The Rye" refused to sign a contract to let "them" adapt it into a movie? He said that he'd agree if he were cast as Holden(the protagonist), who is 16 in the book, but Saligner was middle-aged at the time.
 
No, Stack Exchange, I am not a robot. I am simply posting fifteen answers in a row because reasons.
8
there's now a 60-second wait between succesive answers, which I think is fairly new. Made copying over the old community ads a fair bit more of a drag than before ¬¬.
but anyways
2
Q: Community Promotion Ads - 2017

Grace NoteIt is a bit late into this new year, being that we're already in the second month, but we are now cycling the Community Promotion Ads for 2017! What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show up on the main site, in the right sidebar....

vote away
particularly for this one
 
@Kaumudi.H Me, I'd have taken the money :-)
 
user228700
@JohnRennie Most of his protagonists are made of awesome...well, sort of. They're nerdfighters and nerdfighters aren't sulky :-)
 
@Kaumudi.H Well, I guess these are fictional teenagers :-)
 
user228700
Oi! Teenagers made of awesome do exist!
 
user228700
3:52 PM
Case in point: Me :-P
 
I'm exaggerating of course, teenagers are not sulky all the time.
 
rob
@EmilioPisanty I think that's not new --- it's just hard to trigger if you're writing and then posting.
 
Sometimes they're sleeping :-)
 
user228700
Yeah, we sleep. A lot :-P
 
@rob I did a mass copy-over two years ago. Maybe it did the same and I didn't notice / don't remember.
I think it was present last year, though?
I ported the physics ads to other SE sites as well
 
3:54 PM
Actually, apart from my niece, you and Heather and the only teenagers I interact with, and neither of you are sulky :-)
So I guess there is hope for the future of the human race!
 
user228700
@JohnRennie Indeed there is! :-)
 
Dammit, where is my new laptop? It should have been here by now!!
My friend is bringing it over when he closes up the office for the weekend.
 
in 1 day 3 hours
 
user228700
@JohnRennie Patience, grasshopper :-P
 
In the past week I and the maths guys have been exploring the tower of infinity
 

« first day (2283 days earlier)      last day (2638 days later) »